March 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I have tried hard to explain to my bridge class how the Monty Hall problem works and how it applies to bridge in the form of the principle of restricted choice. I’m not sure I’ve convinced them yet. Do you have a patented method?
Razor’s Edge, Tupelo, Miss.
Imagine you are missing the queen, jack, five and four of trumps. You lead to the ace, and your left-hand opponent produces one of the honors. Should you finesse next or play for the drop? Well, a singleton honor is almost twice as likely as the queen-jack doubleton, even though any specific singleton is slightly less likely than a specific doubleton. With queen-jack doubleton, the player has a choice of cards to play; with a singleton honor, he has no choice.
In second seat vulnerable, you hold ♠ 2, ♥ K-9-4, ♦ A-K-10-4-3, ♣ K-J-5-4. After a four-spade bid on your right, I assume you would double to show a good hand. Partner now bids four no-trump. What does that call mean, and what should I do next?
Mumbles, Wausau, Wis.
Partner’s call suggests a two-suiter, to which you respond by bidding your better minor at the five-level — unless your hand is so strong that you want to drive to slam. Be aware, though, that your partner might have hearts and clubs, planning to correct five diamonds to five hearts. The wisest bid here is five clubs, to ensure finding a good fit, if not the best.
After opponents have opened one no-trump, does the meaning of their double of a transfer bid depend on the range of the no-trump, and on whether yours is a passed or unpassed hand? Should it promise a good suit, a good hand or both?
Coming Up for Air, Newport News, Va.
Yes, the range of the no-trump and whether yours is a passed hand are both critical here. Double by an unpassed hand after the opponents have opened anything but a strong no-trump shows a good hand but not necessarily a great holding in the suit doubled. Any other double should be lead-directing, showing a good suit but not necessarily guaranteeing a good hand.
|
Please recommend some books that might help me master the percentages in order to gain a basic knowledge of the essentials in bridge?
Captain Crunch, Albany, N.Y.
Kelsey and Glauert wrote informatively on this subject, but for the truly devoted expert, there are highly complex books by Borel and Roudinesco. The normal player, however, can get by with only a few basic rules. Learn the normal splits missing three, four, five or six cards, and you really don’t need much else. The ACBL’s most recent version of the Encyclopedia of Bridge certainly covers those basics.
Recently, I held ♠ Q-J-4-2, ♥ 10-7, ♦ 10-9-8-6, ♣ J-8-3, and my opponents bid unopposed one club – one no-trump – two no-trump three no-trump. What would you have led here? (The winning lead was a heart, since partner had five decent hearts and an entry.)
Right Said Fred, Harrisburg, Pa.
Dummy probably has a balanced 18 with some club length, while declarer has no major and is therefore 4-4 or so in the minors. Partner needs to have 10-11 points to give you a chance, but he didn’t bid. I would guess partner’s shape to be 3-4-3-3 (again, give or take a card), and I’d lead a diamond, hoping dummy has a doubleton queen or jack. I’d never expect my partner to refrain from bidding with values and five hearts.
|
March 16th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ K 8 6 3
♥ 3
♦ A K J
♣ Q J 5 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ A 10 8 7 4 2
♦ 9 3
♣ 10 9 6 4 |
♠ A J 10 7 2
♥ J 6
♦ 8 7 5
♣ A 8 7 |
South |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K Q 9 5
♦ Q 10 6 4 2
♣ K |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 ♦ * |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Weak two in either major
♥7
You could settle for a penalty here: If your partner has a singleton diamond and the other three aces, you might expect to take about seven tricks on defense. Or you could look for game in either hearts or no-trump. Since a 4-3 heart fit might be awkward to play, I would start by cue-bidding, then convert a three-spade response to three no-trump, hoping partner could bid on with real extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K Q 9 5
♦ Q 10 6 4 2
♣ K |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
If you carry this resolution … you will send a British Foreign Secretary, whoever he may be, naked into the conference chamber.
Aneurin Bevan
S |
North |
Both |
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ A 10 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ 10 5 |
West |
East |
♠ A 8
♥ J 7 6 4
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 8 4 2 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 8 5
♦ 10 9 8 5
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 |
South |
♠ J 9 5 4 2
♥ K 9 3
♦ A J 6
♣ A J |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game forcing with spade support
♠A
Hands like this emphasize the necessity for Checkback Stayman, using the other minor as a forcing relay to learn whether your side has a 5-3 spade fit. If it does, you surely want to play in four spades; if not, three no-trump. So, bid two clubs and act accordingly over the response.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ A 10 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ 10 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Chance is the pseudonym of God when he did not want to sign his name.
Theophile Gautier
S |
North |
Both |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K 8 7 4
♦ K 5 3
♣ A J 5 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 5 3
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ —
♣ 10 7 |
♠ 9 4 2
♥ 6
♦ Q J 8
♣ Q 9 8 6 4 2 |
South |
♠ A
♥ A J 3
♦ A 10 9 7 6 4 2
♣ K 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
2 ♦ * |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*5-5 or more in the majors
♠K
Redoubling used to be mandatory, since all bids denied invitational values or better. Nowadays, new suits at the one-level by unpassed hands are played as forcing. Redouble is still acceptable here — though if the opponents bid spades or clubs, we may not be able to define our heart length precisely. Thus, the choice is a close one; I’d certainly redouble if my spades and diamonds were switched.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K 9 7 4
♦ K 5 3
♣ A J 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
March 13th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Most editors are failed writers — but so are most writers.
T.S. Eliot
S |
North |
Both |
♠ Q J 8 2
♥ A 10 9
♦ 10 8 7
♣ A 9 8 |
West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ K 7 6 5 4
♦ A K 5 4
♣ K 5 |
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 3
♦ Q J 9 3
♣ Q 10 7 6 3 |
South |
♠ A K 10 6 3
♥ J 8 2
♦ 6 2
♣ J 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT * |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Forcing
♦K
Your partner’s double is take-out, suggesting opening values or so. It seems obvious to bid three diamonds, since you prefer that suit over hearts, but your partner might easily be three-suited with more clubs than diamonds. It would therefore be more prudent to bid two no-trump as take-out for the minors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 3
♦ Q J 9 3
♣ Q 10 7 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
It doesn’t much signify whom one marries, for one is sure to find next morning that it was someone else.
Samuel Rogers
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ J 7
♥ A Q 8 7 3
♦ A K J 9
♣ J 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 2
♥ 9 6 4 2
♦ 10 8 6 3
♣ 3 |
♠ Q 6 5 4 3
♥ K J
♦ Q
♣ 10 8 7 6 5 |
South |
♠ A 10
♥ 10 5
♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ A K Q 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
I’m prepared to jump to four heats, gambling on finding a top card in a black suit opposite, since West is very likely to be short in diamonds and to lead that suit. If he does, I’d be optimistic about having nine top tricks in the red suits and finding another trick somewhere else.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7
♥ A Q 8 7 3
♦ A K J 9
♣ J 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting — died!
George W. Cecil
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 10
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ A Q 8 5 2
♣ K J 7 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 8 3
♥ 10 7 6
♦ 10 3
♣ 6 5 4 |
♠ 6 5 4 2
♥ A Q J 2
♦ K J 9
♣ 8 3 |
South |
♠ A K 7
♥ K 8
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A Q 10 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠Q
This is a tough one! Should you double hearts, then bid spades? I think so, since even if your right-hand opponent has length in hearts, that might be your best suit. Double hearts for penalty and then bid spades if the opponents find a fit in a minor suit. Whether you should bid spades or jump in that suit may depend on just how the bidding develops.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 4 2
♥ A Q J 2
♦ K J 9
♣ 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
? |
|
|
|
March 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
My partner opened a strong two clubs, and I gave the neutral response of two diamonds. After a rebid of two no-trump, can I use Stayman and Jacoby Transfers, just as if my partner had opened the bidding with a no-trump call? What is the best use for a bid of three spades here?
Movers and Shakers, Albuquerque, N.M.
You play exactly the same as over a two no-trump opening bid. (The same applies when you overcall a weak two-bid with a natural two no-trump call.) Use the three-spade call in one of two ways: either as Minor Suit Stayman or as a puppet to three no-trump. After that, responder can show one or both minors in various ways. Some possibilities are listed at bit.ly/AoB2NTresponses.
When declaring, I can generally keep track of the trumps. But following the spots in more than two suits is a challenge. What would you recommend as a way forward?
Losing the Thread, Detroit, Mich.
I do not recommend trying to count all the suits. Focus on the ones that seem most likely to matter to you after dummy comes down. Try to focus only on trump (just count the missing ones in the opponents’ hands) and one other suit. As you get more skilled at the task, maybe you can expand your repertoire.
Would you consider it appropriate to open with a pre-empt in third seat, holding ♠ 4-3, ♥ K-Q-8-7-3, ♦ A-7-3-2, ♣ 10-3? I assume you might pass at some vulnerabilities, but if you bid, do you prefer one or two hearts?
Risking it All, Panama City, Fla.
You are right that I would probably pass at unfavorable vulnerability, though the heart 10 might tempt me to act. Non-vulnerable, I might mix it up with a call of two hearts, but a simple opening of one heart with both sides vulnerable is perfectly reasonable and mixes aggression with some degree of safety.
|
Recently, I was declaring three spades, and when I led the trump king, one opponent revoked. I asked her if she had any spades, and she corrected the revoke by playing her trump ace at once. What is the consequence of this? If I make three spades with an overtrick thanks to the revoke, would that be game?
Portia’s Pa, Lake Oswego, Ore.
For a revoke to be established, the offending side must have played to the next trick, unless a claim has been made. So here, the revoke is not established and the player can correct the revoke, with the card played in error a penalty card. In this case, it must be led to the next trick — but penalty cards are not always so simple if someone else wins the key trick! In any event, revoke penalties serve as under- or overtricks and can never turn a part-score contract into a game.
Would you ever compare the safety play in bridge to a gambit in chess or a sacrifice in baseball? Are there other games, such as poker, that serve as more apt comparisons to bridge?
Boy Scout, Pleasanton, Calif.
Most safety plays in bridge definitely advance your side’s cause by guaranteeing your contract, while a sacrifice at baseball is a less-guaranteed return on investment. Maybe a better comparison would be to the suicide squeeze, safety squeeze or sacrifice fly, which all get a run in when executed well. Psyching in bridge is like bluffing in poker, while the cerebral approaches required for chess and bridge are very similar. I wish bridge players realized that they need to read in order to improve, just as chess players do!
|
March 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The people people have for friends your common sense appall But the people people marry are the queerest folk of all.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ 6
♥ 8
♦ A 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A K 10 9 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 8 7
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ Q 8 |
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 7 4
♦ J 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
South |
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ A J 10 9 5 2
♦ 10
♣ 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♦K
It seems obvious to bid or transfer into spades, doesn’t it? Indeed, the normal route with hands like this is to transfer into spades then offer no-trump. Here, however, I believe the quality of your spades should argue for playing four spades, even facing a small doubleton. I would transfer, then bid four spades — or use a Texas transfer to spades if that is in my repertoire.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 7 4
♦ J 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
An act of God was defined as something which no reasonable man could have expected.
A. P. Herbert
W |
North |
Both |
♠ 10 8
♥ A J 7 6 2
♦ 7
♣ K 6 5 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K J 9 5 4 2
♥ 4
♦ J 10 8 6 5
♣ Q |
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 8 5
♦ Q 4 3 2
♣ A J 10 7 |
South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ K Q 9 3
♦ A K 9
♣ 9 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
It feels right to re-raise to three diamonds. With so little defense to the majors but a good fit for your partner, you should be able to take nine tricks, or the opponents must be able to make a partscore. For the record, the bid of a major here would show a stopper and fit for diamonds, with a maximum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 8 5
♦ Q 4 3 2
♣ A J 10 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
At the 1996 World Championship quarterfinals in Rhodes, Greece, most North-Souths maneuvered themselves into three no-trump by South on a heart lead after West had shown a weak two in hearts.
In one match, South took the heart king and played the club king, and East erred by taking her club ace to play a second heart back. There was really no rush, since declarer was unlikely to have nine sure tricks. Declarer covered the heart six with the nine, and West naturally cashed her heart ace, after which declarer was home free.
At the other table in this match, East correctly ducked the club king. Now declarer crossed to the diamond king and played the club queen. All East had to do was win it and return a club, and the defense would have prevailed. But East played a second heart, and again the defensive communications had been cut.
In both the Open and Women’s series, almost every East besides Irina Levitina of the U.S. failed to duck the first club and continue the suit when declarer played it again. The defense was so blinded by the distraction in hearts that they could not see the simple way to defeat the contract.
Was there anything that declarer could have done about a correct defense? Yes, as Alfredo Versace for Italy demonstrated. Once the club king held the trick, declarer could cut the defensive communications by playing back a top heart himself! The defenders could take only four tricks now, no matter what they did next.