February 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
My partner held ♠ 9-8-7-5, ♥ A-Q-10-8-7, ♦ K-Q, ♣ Q-7, and opened one heart. In response, holding 12 points with three hearts and four very small clubs, I had available one no-trump as semi-forcing, with new suits at the two-level being game-forcing. What is the right way to show my hand, and how should our bidding go?
Enough Said, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
If you decide you don’t have a game force, you might respond one no-trump, which your partner may decide to pass. That means you might stay out of game, but facing something like ace-third of spades, king-third of hearts, and ace-jack third of diamonds with the aforementioned four-small clubs, you do have four top losers in four hearts, even if three no-trump is quite playable. Driving your hand to game with a call of two clubs is certainly reasonable if playing sound openers — few do, though.
Please explain the difference between the minimum number of cards promised by opener rebidding his suit (be it a major or minor) over a one- or two-level response by responder, and the number of cards promised by responder for rebidding his suit?
Pistol Pete, Kenosha, Wis.
Responder’s rebid of his own suit shows six, except that occasionally he will rebid a very chunky five-card suit — typically over a one-no-trump response from his partner. Similarly, opener’s suit rebid facing a one-level response promises six — though occasionally the rebid of a minor facing a one-spade response may be forced with five when unsuitable for a reverse or one-no-trump response. By contrast, opener’s rebid facing a two-level response is often a decent five-carder.
When you open one club, then hear one heart to your left and two diamonds from partner, what should you do with ♠ Q-9-6-4, ♥ 3, ♦ 6-4, ♣ A-K-Q-10-9-8? Would a call of two spades promise extras? Should I therefore rebid three clubs?
Poor Richard, Charlottesville, Va.
If your partner had been able to respond one heart, your one-spade rebid would just show four spades and not promise extras. Similarly, a bid of two spades is natural here — it may contain extras but does not promise them. That said, the absence of a negative double from your partner means you probably don’t have a spade fit, so emphasizing your excellent clubs has a lot going for it.
|
As a relatively disciplined player, I’m curious about how the experts pre-empt in second seat these days. Does this action require a decent suit, or will the vulnerability override position?
Restraint of Trade, Jackson, Tenn.
In second seat at favorable vulnerability, I’d expect many players to take liberties. (Whether they should is another matter.) Conversely, in second seat when vulnerable, players of my vintage tend to want to have very close to the perfect hand for a pre-empt. By the way, suit quality is paramount; four small cards in a major will not influence me that much.
I play standard methods of carding, but I would welcome input on when giving suit preference should overlap with count and attitude.
A Little Learning, Honolulu, Hawaii
Your first signal on partner’s lead is attitude (unless your attitude should be clear to partner by bridge logic — and both players know that). On declarer’s lead, signal count when necessary, or else nothing at all. When the second round of a suit is led, your choice of cards may carry a suit-preference signal. This often applies when you have a sequence or a choice of irrelevant small cards to play. For example, from 7-3-2, you play the two first to discourage, but the order of the remaining cards will carry a suit-preference message. I’ll leave the discussion of how to signal when dummy has a singleton for another day.
|
February 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.
Magna Carta
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ J 8 5 4
♥ 2
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ A K 8 4 |
West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 9 2
♥ J 6
♦ Q 10 6 3
♣ 10 6 |
♠ K 3
♥ A 10 7 3
♦ J 4
♣ Q J 9 5 3 |
South |
♠ 7 6
♥ K Q 9 8 5 4
♦ K 7 2
♣ 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
Sometimes a cigar is only a cigar, and a bid in the fourth suit is occasionally natural, not artificial. Here, a call of two clubs shows clubs and is limited by the failure to jump to three clubs (which you would do if the spade four were the king). You would certainly guess that clubs would play better than no-trump here, and since you can offer the suit to play, that seems a sensible option.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 5 4
♥ 2
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ A K 9 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
February 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Respect was mingled with surprise.
Sir Walter Scott
N |
North |
Both |
♠ A J 10
♥ K J 7
♦ Q J 7 5 4 2
♣ 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ Q 10 8
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ Q 7 6 |
♠ Q 9 8 7
♥ 6 5 4 3
♦ K 10
♣ K 9 8 |
South |
♠ K 4 3
♥ A 9 2
♦ 3
♣ A J 10 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠6
A natural two no-trump now seems right. That leaves room for your partner to show delayed support for clubs; if he doesn’t, you will surely not wish to play in that suit. If your partner bids three diamonds, you might bid three hearts to offer some delayed support for that suit. Alternatively, a call of two spades may get you to no-trump from your partner’s hand. Your clubs don’t seem quite good enough to repeat.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ A 9 2
♦ 3
♣ A J 10 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
February 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
Winston Churchill
S |
North |
None |
♠ A J 10 4 2
♥ A J 5 2
♦ 6
♣ Q 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5
♥ 9 7
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ K 8 7 3 |
♠ K 9 6 3
♥ Q 10 8 6
♦ Q 3
♣ 10 9 4 |
South |
♠ 8
♥ K 4 3
♦ K J 9 8 7 4
♣ A J 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣3
This hand is not worth an invitation to game. It seems logical to bid two spades — this sounds a bit more like a real suit than a call of two hearts, and it allows me to introduce hearts at my next turn if the auction doesn’t die immediately.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 6 3
♥ Q 10 8 6
♦ Q 3
♣ 10 9 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
February 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Fools are my theme, let satire be my song.
Lord Byron
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ A 9 5 2
♥ 3
♦ 7 6 5 2
♣ A K Q 2 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 4
♥ Q 9
♦ K J 8 3
♣ 8 7 5 |
♠ K Q 8 3
♥ K 8 7 5
♦ Q 10 9
♣ 9 4 |
South |
♠ 6
♥ A J 10 6 4 2
♦ A 4
♣ J 10 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠J
Your hand is worth competing to three clubs. The question is whether you should simply raise to three clubs directly or wait to make the raise after the opponents settle in two hearts. These weak trumps and defensive values suggest delaying the raise — especially because you don’t really want a club lead unless your partner has a natural lead himself without your input.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7 4
♥ Q 9
♦ K J 8 3
♣ 8 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
February 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The sense of being well-dressed gives a feeling of tranquility which religion is powerless to bestow.
C.F. Forbes
S |
North |
None |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ 7
♦ A 8 4 3
♣ A K 10 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 5
♥ J 5
♦ K J 7 6 5
♣ 8 4 |
♠ K 10 8 6
♥ K 8 3 2
♦ Q 9
♣ Q 9 7 |
South |
♠ 3
♥ A Q 10 9 6 4
♦ 10 2
♣ J 6 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠Q
Your hand isn’t suitable for a pre-emptive raise in that you have too much defense, and you aren’t close to having the values for a limit raise. What does that leave? A simple raise, maybe planning to compete to three spades, is possible. Or a jump cue-bid of three diamonds to show four trumps and 7-9 high-card points or so, also called a mixed raise, might be possible.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 5
♥ J 5
♦ K J 7 6 5
♣ 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
February 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Creativity involves breaking out of established patterns in order to look at things in a different way.
Edward de Bono
S |
North |
Both |
♠ A 7 5 4
♥ 6
♦ J 6 5
♣ A 9 7 6 4 |
West |
East |
♠ J 8 2
♥ A 9 2
♦ Q 8 7 2
♣ J 5 3 |
♠ Q 10 9 3
♥ J 8 7
♦ K 10 4
♣ Q 10 8 |
South |
♠ K 6
♥ K Q 10 5 4 3
♦ A 9 3
♣ K 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠2
Your target here might be to limit the number of tricks you blow on opening lead to one! Though there is spade length to your left, it still feels right to lead that suit (though a deceptive spade four or two is possible). Your spots are so bad that if partner has shortness, this lead may not cost anything, except to clear up a guess for declarer that he likely would have gotten right anyway.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 4 3 2
♥ J 6 4
♦ K 10 5
♣ J 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
February 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I read a recent letter in your column talking about strong raises available to opener when he has four-card support for responder’s major. Other than the jump raises, what actions might you consider?
Waiting for Godot, Dodge City, Kan.
A jump raise to the three level suggests the equivalent of an unbalanced 15-17 high-card points; a jump to four suggests a balanced 18-19. With an unbalanced strong hand, a double jump in a new suit shows shortage in that suit and four-card support for partner. Occasionally, you can jump-shift, then jump in support of partner to show a really powerful three-suiter, but that would be rare indeed.
How often is it a critical mistake to cash an ace against a slam, as opposed to that being the necessary defense? And when, if ever, do you consider leading an unsupported ace in a suit that hasn’t been bid and supported, or bid by your partner?
Best Foot Forward, Midland, Mich.
I tend not to lead an ace against any contract unless the auction sounds so strong that I imagine my tricks may go away. The stronger my opponent’s sequence, the more likely it is that I will lead an ace (especially if they ask for aces and stop at the five-level). Trying to give partner a ruff in your long bid suit by leading the ace and another is often also a plausible defense.
Say you deal yourself ♠ K-9-3-2, ♥ A-Q-3, ♦ K-7-3-2, ♣ Q-10. If you open one diamond and hear a response of one heart, followed by an overcall to your right of one spade, what options would you consider sensible? If you pass and partner doubles, what do you do?
Ranking Member, Raleigh, N.C.
Some would double one spade to show precisely three-card support for partner’s major — a style I’m still not committed to, though I will play it if necessary. I have no problem with raising to two hearts, but if I pass and hear partner double — card-showing and more take-out than penalty — I would bid two hearts rather than one no-trump. Passing for penalty does not appeal to me.
|
I’m never sure when to pass out the double of a pre-empt. When you hear a double from your partner of an opening bid of three diamonds, and you are looking at ♠ K-J, ♥ 10-7-3-2, ♦ Q-J-3, ♣ Q-J-10-3, would you settle for the part-score or bid game in hearts, or would you defend?
Jugular Jim, Greenville, S.C.
You ask a good question, but strangely (and somewhat amusingly), you’ve proposed three answers to your own question, and my answer would be “none of the above.” I’d opt for a call of three no-trump, looking at all those soft values outside the heart suit, and hoping I did not buy a singleton diamond, with left-hand opponent able to underlead the ace-king and set his suit up. I would not pass out the double without a sure trick (or two) on the side.
As responder to an opening bid of one diamond, is my call of four clubs asking for aces? If not, what does it show?
Gerber Baby, Dallas, Texas
Four clubs should rarely be played as ace-asking, other than in response to a one- or two no-trump opening or rebid. But specifically in response to a preempt, you can play four clubs as some form of ace ask. And after Stayman finds a major-suit, you can optionally use four clubs as ace-asking rather than as a splinter bid showing shortness and setting the major. In almost every other instance, the jump shows shortness and agrees partner’s suit, as in your example.
|
February 16th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 2nd, 2019
When you come to a fork in the road, take it.
Yogi Berra
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ K 4 2
♥ A Q 10 6
♦ A K 8
♣ Q 10 9 |
West |
East |
♠ A J 7 6 3
♥ 9 5
♦ Q 10 7
♣ A K 2 |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ 8 3
♦ 9 6 5 4
♣ J 8 7 5 |
South |
♠ Q 5
♥ K J 7 4 2
♦ J 3 2
♣ 6 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Slam is still technically in the offing, even though you may seem to be a long way off. Don’t tell your partner what he has — explore with a call of three clubs, and see if he shows any signs of life. What would excite you is a three-diamond call. You can then bid four diamonds and let partner know you have slam interest but no heart control.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7 6 3
♥ 9 5
♦ Q 10 7
♣ A K 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
February 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I bend and I break not.
Jean de la Fontaine
W |
North |
Both |
♠ 6 3
♥ A K 5
♦ A Q 4
♣ A Q 8 7 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J 9 4
♥ 3
♦ 9 7 5
♣ J 10 6 5 |
♠ 10 5
♥ Q 10 8 4 2
♦ J 8 6 2
♣ K 9 |
South |
♠ A 8 7 2
♥ J 9 7 6
♦ K 10 3
♣ 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 ♠ * |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♥ * * |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Five spades, plus a minor
**Constructive
♠K
Your partner appears to have scattered values and at least five hearts. Is there any doubt as to what your final contract should be? I hope not! With your great trump support (in context) and source of tricks, game is highly unlikely to be worse than a finesse in one of the minors, which the auction tells you should work. So bid four hearts at once.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ A K 5
♦ A Q 4
♣ A Q 8 7 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal is the last of this week’s themed hands, in each of which declarer has to play a single suit to best advantage with length in one hand and a singleton in the other.
As I look through the hands, I am struck by the fact that such similar combinations have such disparate solutions. No wonder bridge players go gray so early!
In today’s deal, South opens and closes the auction with a call of two hearts. When West leads the club 10, he appears to be relatively short of clubs — the threat of trump promotions is a real one. Declarer must start to draw trumps at once, and he can afford to lose two trump tricks but not three.
He wins the club lead in dummy and leads a heart to the king. If this loses to the ace, he will regain the lead and play the queen of hearts, then the nine. But when the heart king holds, declarer must decide which trump to lead next.
If East has the bare heart ace left then, declarer must lead a low heart from hand; but there is a much better chance that one defender or the other is left with a bare jack or 10 of hearts. (Note that to give himself a chance to set the contract, West would have to duck the heart ace if he started with A-J-fourth or A-10-fourth of hearts.) By leading out his remaining top honor, he can pin the jack or 10 and remain in control, losing just two trumps and three plain-suit top cards.