February 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
I know that my one-level overcalls should be on five-card suits or longer, but I have seen you recommend the action of overcalling with only four on occasion. And what about two-level overcalls — would you say five-card suits, as opposed to six-, are the exception, not the rule?
Short Shrift, New Haven, Conn.
Four-card suit overcalls at the one-level are rare. Bidding a strong four-carder with opening values may occur when you can’t double because of a shortage in an unbid major and the hand isn’t suitable for a one-no-trump call. Don’t overcall on a bad suit at the two-level, but sometimes your values require you to bid with only five and a reasonable suit in a strong hand when nothing else will do.
Holding ♠ A-J-2, ♥ K-9-6, ♦ Q-10-7-4, ♣ 10-6-3, I decided to raise my partner’s one-spade opener to two (suggesting 7-10 in our style, as we play forcing no-trump). Do you agree? After my partner tries for game with a call of three clubs, what do you recommend?
King Creole, Selma, Ala.
I like the simple raise. Now you can assume your partner has made a game-try suggesting three or four clubs in a suit where he needs help. Your club suit is as bad as it could be, but you have a maximum hand in high cards and decent spot cards. Maybe you could try three no-trump to suggest these values and let partner decide what to do next.
If you open a minor suit and your partner responds with one no-trump, are you allowed to invite to two no-trump with a good 16-count, or do you have to pass? What is the minimum you need to bid two no-trump, or even three no-trump?
Simple Simon, Vero Beach, Fla.
A jump to three no-trump suggests either a 19-count or a running minor and no shortage (since a jump to three in a new suit would be a self-agreeing splinter here). With an unbalanced 16-17 or a balanced 18, you can raise to two no-trump instead. You may be single-suited or have a 5-4 shape with a second suit you no longer feel like you need to introduce.
|
I was in third seat with ♠ 9-2, ♥ K-Q-6-4-3, ♦ A-7-4, ♣ 10-3-2, playing teams, and I heard my partner open three diamonds at favorable vulnerability. What is the right tactical approach in situations like this, playing with a relatively aggressive pre-empter?
Movers and Shakers, Riverside, Calif.
To give your opponents the hardest problem, you can jump to five diamonds, fortified by the knowledge that partner could have pre-empted to two diamonds but chose to do more. After a club pre-empt, you would not have quite as much confidence. Make them guess!
I dealt myself ♠ A-J-10-2, ♥ A-K-7, ♦ 4, ♣ Q-10-6-3-2, and opened one club. When I heard one diamond from my partner, I bid one spade, of course, and was given preference to two clubs. How much more would I need to bid on, and if I do act, how should I proceed?
Spare Change, Pueblo, Colo.
You have a nice hand, but your second action (one spade instead of one no-trump) suggests an unbalanced or semi-balanced hand, and your partner could have invited to three clubs easily enough. So I would surely pass, but I would not need much more in the club suit (say K-J-10-6-3) to consider bidding on with a call of two hearts, which might suggest a pattern very similar to this one.
|
February 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The public … demands certainties … but there are no certainties.
H.L. Mencken
S |
North |
Both |
♠ K 9 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A Q 3
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 8
♥ 8 5 4
♦ 9 5
♣ Q J 9 4 3 |
♠ Q 7 6 5 2
♥ 9 3 2
♦ J 10 8 7 4
♣ — |
South |
♠ A 3
♥ K Q 7 6
♦ K 6 2
♣ A K 7 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Forcing
♠J
This feels like a good hand for hearts, but the issue is whether partner is showing a good hand or merely an invitational one. If you were sure that your partner had a good hand, you could bid three hearts and intend it to be forcing. To me, though, the three-club call sounds non-forcing, so you should just bid four hearts now and avoid accidents.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4
♥ A J 10
♦ A Q 3
♣ 10 8 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
February 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The rich have become richer and the poor have become poorer; and the vessel of the state is driven between the Scylla and Charybdis of anarchy and despotism.
Percy Shelley
E |
North |
None |
♠ 8 5 3
♥ Q 9 6
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ K 8 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 2
♥ K 2
♦ 10 6 4 3 2
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
♠ A 6 4
♥ A J 10 3
♦ K J 9
♣ J 9 6 |
South |
♠ K Q J 10 7
♥ 8 7 5 4
♦ 8
♣ A 10 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
2 ♦** |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
**Asking for the longer major
♣4
Your cue-bid shows a limit raise or better in diamonds. That said, you have nothing in reserve, but just enough in hearts to bid two no-trump now. This suggests a hand in the invitational range and is not forcing, which perfectly describes your assets. Let partner make the next decision, if any, as to strain and level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 3
♥ Q 9 6
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ K 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 31st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Curfew must not ring tonight.
Rose Hartwick Thorpe
S |
North |
Both |
♠ 8
♥ 8 6
♦ A 10 7 2
♣ A K Q 7 5 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 5
♥ A K Q 7 4 2
♦ J 8
♣ J 6 4 |
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ 9 5
♦ K Q 9 6 3
♣ 9 2 |
South |
♠ A K Q J 6 2
♥ J 10 3
♦ 5 4
♣ 10 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Yes, your partner may have been dealt two trump tricks and not much else. But it is far more practical to play this double as a decent hand, asking you to decide whether you want to play offense or defense. If so, you must bid on now. A call of four no-trump to suggest the minors and a hand like this will let partner determine the best trump suit and what to bid over further competition.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ 8 6
♦ A 10 7 2
♣ A K Q 7 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 30th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
A mind quite vacant is a mind distressed.
William Cowper
S |
North |
None |
♠ Q J 6 2
♥ 5 2
♦ A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ Q 10 6 4 3
♦ 5 2
♣ K 10 7 4 3 |
♠ 10 5 3
♥ J 9
♦ K J 9 6 3
♣ Q 8 2 |
South |
♠ A K 8 7 4
♥ A K 8 7
♦ —
♣ A J 9 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
In second seat, your pre-emptive opening bids should be relatively disciplined. Even when at favorable vulnerability, I would not want to open two diamonds with such a potentially powerful major suit on the side. To change this to a hand that I might pre-empt with, move the spade queen into either side suit, or make the spade queen the three.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 2
♥ 5 2
♦ A Q 10 8 7 4
♣ 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 29th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Every Communist must grasp the truth: Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.
Mao Zedong
S |
North |
Both |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 8 6 3
♦ K 10 6 3
♣ K J 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ A 9 5 4 2
♦ 9 8
♣ A 7 5 |
♠ Q J 5 4 3
♥ Q J 10
♦ 5 4 2
♣ 9 8 |
South |
♠ A 2
♥ K 7
♦ A Q J 7
♣ Q 10 4 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♥4
Whether playing inverted raises or not (where a simple raise promises a limit raise or better), this hand is on the cusp between a diamond raise and a one-no-trump response. In a strong no-trump base, I lean slightly toward bidding one no-trump, since it isn’t entirely clear I will be wrong-siding no-trump. As a passed hand, I might raise diamonds, since partner is slightly more likely to have real diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ 8 6 3
♦ K 10 6 3
♣ K J 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 28th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
He who receives a benefit with gratitude repays the first installment on his debt.
Seneca
N |
North |
N-S |
♠ A 2
♥ A K
♦ A 8 5
♣ A K 8 6 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 5
♥ 9 7 4 2
♦ K J 10
♣ J 10 |
♠ Q 6 4 3
♥ 8 6 3
♦ 9 6 4
♣ Q 9 5 |
South |
♠ K J 7
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ Q 7 3 2
♣ 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠10
The spades may not be splitting for declarer, but it still seems right to go active by leading a top diamond rather than a relatively passive heart. Anytime your partner has diamond length or one of the top three diamonds, this is a sensible lead. Moreover, if the diamond ace-king are to your right, the lead doesn’t cost a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7 6
♥ 9 8 6 2
♦ Q J 2
♣ J 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
January 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
How would you handle a hand like ♠ J-4, ♥ K-6-5-4, ♦ K-Q-4-2, ♣ 8-7-2, facing a strong no-trump? Would vulnerability or the form of scoring affect your decision?
Gun for Hire, Orlando, Fla.
It seems clearly right to start with a Stayman two-club call, with the intention of merely inviting game even if you find a heart fit. The honors in the long suits somewhat compensate for your lack of intermediates. With some heart intermediates, you might persuade me to do more. If vulnerable at teams, I might bid to four hearts if we found a fit.
If the opponents intervene over our no-trump, what would you recommend I play to describe my hand? Is Stolen Bid an approved gadget?
Barabbas, Madison, Wis.
Both opener and his partner must be able to bid all the suits efficiently. (The transfer element is less vital.) Each player should be able to double with shortage since that is the hand you are most likely to want to compete on. Responder can play transfers and Stayman over an artificial double or a call of two clubs — with double acting as Stayman. After higher intervention, new suits should be natural at the two-level and forcing at the three-level. The meaning of a two-no-trump call as Lebensohl is discussed at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lebensohl.
In second seat, I had ♠ A-Q-7-2, ♥ K-4, ♦ K-Q-J-9-5, ♣ Q-4, and opened one diamond. The next hand overcalled two hearts, my partner doubled, and the next player jumped to four hearts pre-emptive. I had planned to jump to four spades and wasn’t sure if that call would suffice here — or what slam try to make.
Missing Out, Mexico City, Mexico
If your right-hand opponent had let you jump to four spades, you would probably have made that call. As it is, you certainly want to make a slam try; but does a jump to five spades ask for a heart control? Does four no-trump suggest the minors here rather than being key-card? I’ll settle for bidding four spades and hope partner can do more with real extras.
|
My partner and I have been arguing about whether there is any sort of hand that would pass in first or second chair and then back into the opponent’s auction with a pre-empt. Is such a thing possible?
Better Late Than Never, Springfield, Mass.
There must be hands with the shape for a pre-empt but not the right honor location, where you might pass initially but decide to pre-empt later. Similarly, you may have a hand with too much defense or with a sidesuit. When vulnerable, you might also not have a good enough suit to act on initially. Whenever your partner bids, though, jumps by a passed hand in a new suit will not be a single-suited pre-empt but should show fit for your partner.
Holding ♠ Q-7-3-2, ♥ K-Q, ♦ A-J-4-3, ♣ A-Q-3, please discuss what you might open and why.
No Way Jose, Bellingham, Wash.
Not all 18-counts are created equal. This hand, with its doubleton heart honors not pulling their full weight and no intermediates, looks like a strong no-trump to me. You could persuade me that if your no-trump range includes good 14-counts, then you should go high and not low; I’ll take that under advisement. At pairs, though, I’d reluctantly open one diamond so as to go with the field.
|
January 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There’s not a joy the world can give like that it takes away.
Lord Byron
N |
North |
None |
♠ Q 6 5 3
♥ Q J 5
♦ A 7 6 4
♣ K 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ 10 8 6 3
♦ Q 5 2
♣ J 10 8 |
♠ K 4
♥ 9 7 4
♦ K J 10
♣ A 9 7 6 3 |
South |
♠ A J 8 2
♥ A K 2
♦ 9 8 3
♣ Q 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
♣J
When your partner introduces a major after the double of a minor, it tends not to be a call made with four small cards or dead minimum values. So, I would raise to two hearts now, aware that we might just miss a spade fit, but expecting even a 4-3 heart fit to play reasonably well.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 5 3
♥ Q J 5
♦ A 7 6 4
♣ K 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Taste does not come by chance: It is a long and laborious task to acquire it.
Sir Joshua Reynolds
N |
North |
Both |
♠ J 10 2
♥ Q J 6 3
♦ K 5
♣ A K 8 5 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 6 4
♥ 4
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ J 10 7 4 |
♠ 8 7 5
♥ K 9 7 2
♦ A 9 6 2
♣ Q 6 |
South |
♠ A Q 3
♥ A 10 8 5
♦ Q J 4
♣ 9 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
|
♣J
It would be nice if a double here were for penalties, but it isn’t. A double here would be for take-out. (Switch the diamonds and spades to produce a minimum example.) Generally, low-level doubles — especially those early in the auction and under the trumps — are more for take-out than penalty. I guess I’d pass; defending against two diamonds undoubled looks like our best possible result.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 5
♥ K 9 7 2
♦ A 9 6 2
♣ Q 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
Different partnerships play inverted raises (a system in which the direct raise of a minor in an uncompetitive auction is strong, while a jump raise is weak) in different ways.
South had agreed that the simple raise was forcing as far as three of a minor. Thus, his two-no-trump call was forcing, suggesting 12-14 or 18-plus. When he bid on over three no-trump, he showed the extra values, and North had such weak trumps that he had no reason to choose to play in the suit contract, especially because South could have moved on with a call of four clubs over three no-trump if he had wanted to set clubs as trump. That was a good idea today!
West put the spade jack on the table, and declarer won in hand and led a heart to dummy to advance a low club from that side. When East showed out, declarer saw that his only chance now would be to strip West of all his plain cards and force him to lead clubs at trick 12.
So he cashed his three remaining heart winners, West pitching his fifth club, after which three rounds of diamonds forced a spade out of West. South had a complete count of the West hand now, but when he took his last spade winner, he was locked in dummy, forced to lead a club and concede two of the last three tricks.
Too late, South realized that to make his slam he had needed to win trick one in dummy. Then, in the same three-card ending, he would have been able to lead a low club from hand, and West would have been forced to concede the last two tricks.