January 14th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
All men are liable to error; and most men are, in many points, by passion or interest, under temptation to it.
John Locke
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ A 8 7
♥ A K 9 6
♦ K Q 10 8
♣ J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 3 2
♥ Q 10 7 4 3
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 2 |
♠ Q 5
♥ J 8 5 2
♦ 9 7 5 3
♣ K 9 4 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9 6 4
♥ —
♦ A J 2
♣ Q 8 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♠ * |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Spades and a minor
♥4
You should bid two spades and not consider doing more. It is perfectly acceptable to hold a maximum for your bidding now and again. The hand is potentially powerful in support of spades, but it does not have nearly enough to warrant a limit raise, either directly or through a forcing no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3 2
♥ Q 10 7 4 3
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 13th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Fame is no plant that grows on mortal soil.
John Milton
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 8 7 5
♥ J 10
♦ J 8
♣ A 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6 2
♥ 8
♦ K 10 4 3
♣ Q 9 8 2 |
♠ K Q 4
♥ A 9
♦ Q 9 7 6 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ K Q 7 6 5 4 3 2
♦ A
♣ K J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
| 4 ♥ |
5 ♦ |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦3
Partner might have redoubled to show something in hearts, such as king-doubleton. A heart lead might give declarer his ninth trick, so perhaps you should try to put your partner in to fire a heart through declarer’s king. For that purpose, a spade seems best. But a low heart lead is close behind, since that might work whenever partner has an entry and a doubleton heart.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ A Q 9 7 4 2
♦ 6 4
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
January 12th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Yesterday, my opponent held ♠ —, ♥ Q-10-7-6-4-2, ♦ 9-7-2, ♣ Q-10-8-3. At unfavorable vulnerability, he heard his right-hand opponent open one spade. He passed, and his left-hand opponent raised to two spades, back to him. Would you act? The player in question bid three hearts and was raised to four, making five!
Bowled Over, Spartanburg, S.C..
I would probably pass, albeit unhappily. At these colors when partner is known to hold spade length, the real risk is that your side will end up defending against a doubled (and making) spade contract. Certainly, bidding hearts is better than doubling two spades, because partner rates to pass a double, expecting much more defense from you.
How far forcing should one play the sequence of opening two clubs and bidding two spades over a waiting two-diamond response?
Bygone Age, Great Falls, Mont.
I play this as forcing for one round, but not to game. After a second negative response (a bid of three clubs over two spades), repeating opener’s suit is non-forcing. For the sake of completeness: After a strong and artificial two-club opening, opener’s rebid of two no-trump after a negative two-diamond call shows 23-24 balanced, non-forcing.
When you have a hand like ♠ K-4, ♥ J-9-2, ♦ A-7, ♣ Q-10-9-8-4-3 and hear a suit bid opened to your right, would you make a jump overcall, as opposed to a two-level overcall? Would the vulnerability matter?
In the Action, Flagstaff, Ariz.
When vulnerable, I prefer my jump overcalls to be closer to intermediate than weak (so I’d need the club king instead of the three in this example). Nonvulnerable, I’d be concerned this hand had too much defense for a pre-empt. I’d settle for a simple overcall at any vulnerability, except perhaps in third seat nonvulnerable.
|
I picked up ♠ K-10-8-2, ♥ 8-6-5, ♦ J-9, ♣ A-J-8-7 on my most recent jaunt to the local club. With no one vulnerable, my left-hand opponent opened one club, my partner overcalled one heart and my right-hand opponent bid two diamonds. I raised to two hearts, and my left-hand opponent competed to three diamonds, passed around to me. I bid again, but got doubled and went two down for a bottom. Was I wrong to act again?
I Fought the Law, Lakeland, Fla.
It is rarely right to over-compete with a balanced hand, especially with poor trumps and a doubleton in the opponents’ suit. I would definitely not bid three hearts here. Give yourself a singleton diamond (or a fourth trump), and now competing with three trump and a decent hand is certainly not unreasonable.
One of my opponents held ♠ Q-J-7-5, ♥ A-10-9-6-4, ♦ 9-4, ♣ Q-7. He heard his partner open one diamond, and he bid one heart, then passed the one-no-trump rebid. They missed their 4-4 spade fit when declarer was 4=2=4=3 and could not make one no-trump. What went wrong?
Came in Spades, Danville, Ill.
Some players avoid rebidding their spades with a balanced hand and 4-4 pattern. To me, though, this seems sufficiently shapely to rebid at a suit — unless all your values are in your short suits. Responder might have been reluctant to repeat his hearts, but his good heart spots might point toward the suit rebid.
|
January 11th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, December 28th, 2019
I have seldom known anyone who deserted truth in trifles that could be trusted in matters of importance.
William Paley
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 9 4 3 2
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ K 8 3
♣ Q |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 7 6 5
♥ Q
♦ 9 6 5
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
♠ J 8
♥ K 10 7 6 5 4
♦ Q 10
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A 2
♦ A J 7 4 2
♣ A K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
You should double here, which I recommend you play as take-out. You certainly have enough to compete the part-score, but I admit this could easily be the wrong thing to do. Still, partner will surely bid a major unless he has a defensive hand. And if partner passes, the club queen and diamond king should be pulling their weight in defense.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4 3 2
♥ J 9 8 3
♦ K 8 3
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
3 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
It is always a paltry, feeble, tiny mind that takes pleasure in revenge.
Juvenal
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 5
♥ A J 10 7 5
♦ A 6 3
♣ J 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q J 9 6 3
♥ K 4
♦ 8 4
♣ K 10 4 |
♠ 7 2
♥ 9 8 6 3 2
♦ J 5
♣ Q 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K 8 4
♥ Q
♦ K Q 10 9 7 2
♣ A 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
How bold do you feel? I advocate a call of three no-trump here. A call of four diamonds would preclude three no-trump. To bid the no-trump game directly is risky, especially since you may have to knock out the diamond ace, but you can hold up one round of spades, which is likely to cripple the defensive communications. This call has a big upside, plus you can run to four diamonds if doubled.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 4
♥ Q
♦ K Q 10 9 7 2
♣ A 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 9th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Life is a very sad piece of buffoonery, because we have … the need to fool ourselves continuously by the spontaneous creation of a reality … which, from time to time, reveals itself to be vain and illusory.
Luigi Pirandello
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ —
♥ A K Q 5
♦ A 6 5 4 3
♣ A Q J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 7 5 4
♥ 4
♦ J 10 7 2
♣ K 8 5 |
♠ 10 9 8 6 2
♥ J 9 3 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 3
♥ 10 8 7 6
♦ 9
♣ 10 9 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣5
Two hearts. You must force to game, and the most economical way to start getting your values across is with a twoheart reverse. To jump to three clubs would take up too much space and perhaps lose the heart suit. If partner bids three clubs over two hearts, you can raise to four clubs. This gets your shape across — though at the risk of going past three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ —
♥ A K Q 5
♦ A 6 5 4 3
♣ A Q J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If one learns from others but does not think, one is still at a loss. If, on the other hand, one thinks but does not learn from others, one is in peril.
Confucius
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 3
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ Q 8 6 4
♣ K 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 6 5 4 2
♥ J 4
♦ J 10
♣ J 8 6 |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ A 10 9
♦ 7 5 3 2
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ K 8 6 2
♦ A K 9
♣ Q 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
Bid four spades. You must raise to game, making it as hard as possible for the opponents to find their fit. Who knows — you might even make it! Anytime you have a problem like this, ask yourself what you would do if the opponents bid to their most likely game — here, four hearts. If you don’t know whether you want to save or not, give them the problem first by raising to four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 7
♥ A 10 9
♦ 7 5 3 2
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 7th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
I am driven Into a desperate strait and cannot steer A middle course.
Philip Massinger
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 4 3
♥ K J 9 8 3
♦ 7 4 3
♣ A 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ 10 2
♦ K J 10 6 5
♣ K Q 9 8 2 |
♠ 9 2
♥ Q 6 4
♦ Q 9 8
♣ J 7 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ Q J 10 8 7 6 5
♥ A 7 5
♦ A 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| 2 NT |
3 ♦ * |
5 ♣ |
5 ♦ |
| Pass |
5 ♠ |
All pass |
|
*Spade raise
♦J
Bid three clubs. Despite not really having extra values in terms of high cards, our shape is enough to justify taking a free bid. This describes our hand well, suggesting our nine or more cards in the minors. You hope it will help partner judge what to do if your left-hand opponent raises to four spades. If partner passes, you will too, of course.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ 10 2
♦ K J 10 6 5
♣ K Q 9 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 6th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
But war’s a game, which, were their subjects wise, Kings would not play at.
William Cowper
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 6 5 3
♥ Q 6 2
♦ A 3 2
♣ 8 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7
♥ K 10 8 7 5
♦ Q 6
♣ J 6 5 4 |
♠ K 4 2
♥ J 4
♦ 10 8 7 5 4
♣ K Q 9 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 9
♥ A 9 3
♦ K J 9
♣ A 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 1 NT * * |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Negative
**18-20
♠7
You have a control card in the trump suit and not much in terms of high-card strength, so you can expect partner to have an entry or two. This is the ideal time to lead your doubleton in search of a thirdround ruff. A seemingly passive spade will probably cost a trick as often as a diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ K 8 4
♦ 7 5
♣ K 10 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 5th, 2020 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Recently, I picked up ♠ A-Q-J-6-3, ♥ —, ♦ K-2, ♣ A-K-J-9-4-3. Would you have opened one club or forced to game with a call of two clubs? Then, assuming you went for the latter option, would you introduce the major first or bid clubs?
Full to the Brim, Greenville, S.C.
Both bids make sense, I suppose. However, even if the opponents stay silent over two clubs, you may still find it hard to describe what you have. And if they come in, you may not be able to describe your hand at all. If your diamonds were the doubleton ace, a two-club call might be right. But as it is, put me firmly in the one-club camp.
How hard do you find the seniors’ game compared to the open? I see you have played in seniors’ events in the past.
Aged Annie, Vancouver, Wash.
To do well as a U.S. team at the Senior World Championships, you need to beat plenty of former world champions to qualify in your zone. At the world events, you will find that more than half the squads consist of players who previously represented their countries at the open level. There are no free rides anymore,
Please help us with this bridge question: What is the name of this famous bridge hand: ♠ A-K-Q, ♥ A-K-Q-J, ♦ A-K, ♣ K-J-9-7?
Fell off My Chair, Holland, Mich.
This is the Duke of Cumberland’s hand from a famously rigged deal in the 18th century. With small variations, you can find details on the internet under that name. At whist, played for high stakes, with clubs as trump, the Duke (a son of George III) led a trump. The cards lay in such a way that he could not take a trick! Compare the Mississippi Heart hand for a similar rigged deal.
|
My left-hand opponent opened one diamond, and my partner doubled. My right-hand opponent raised to two diamonds. I passed again, and my partner backed in with another double. The question is, was this second double for take-out? I assumed this was optional rather than pure take-out. Was I wrong?
Curious George, Chester, Pa.
Once you start by showing one sort of hand, you can’t change it at your next turn. Such second-round actions are take-out, simply promising extras. Most low-level doubles facing a partner who has not acted are assumed to be for take-out. The only time you double with strength in the opponents’ suit, you will have 18-20 or more, and you will bid no-trump at your next turn.
Lately, a player at my local club has taken to criticizing his partner’s and his opponents’ play. Is he wrong to do this? Can we ask him to stop?
Kicking Up a Fuss, Waterbury, Conn.
You certainly can. It is important that everyone feel comfortable at bridge; if not, it is the surest route to losing players. Constructive criticism is a good way to learn, but only when it is done politely and away from the table. If it is unwanted or during play, it is not acceptable and contrary to normal ethical practice.
|
|
East found a simple yet effective defense on this deal from a knockout match. South’s twospade opening was two-suited, showing spades and a minor. North might have angled for the no-trump game, but he simply raised to the suit game instead.
The play began along normal lines. Declarer ruffed the heart lead in hand and ran the spade jack to East’s queen. Seeing little future for three tricks in the side-suits, East focused on promoting his partner’s spade king. The idea would be to force the dummy, and in so doing, preventing declarer from repeating the spade finesse.
There was only one suit in which this could be done: clubs. East needed his partner to have the club ace, and presumably the queen as well, or declarer could just win the third round in hand. However, East saw a way to give his side an extra chance by a timely deception.
By cashing the club king and leading the four to his partner’s ace, he would give declarer an extra losing option. When West continued clubs, South had to decide whether to discard, risking defeat on a ruff when West had started with a doubleton trump king, or to ruff with the spade eight, which loses the contract on this layout.
When declarer fell for the trap and ruffed in, East-West had managed to set an apparently unbeatable contract. Had South begun with 5=0=4=4 shape, he could have saved himself this guess by throwing two clubs on the heart ace-king. As it was, though, he had little room to maneuver.