January 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.
Robert Heinlein
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ A Q J 9 7 4
♥ 10 8 5
♦ 4
♣ Q 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 10
♥ J 3
♦ A J 10 3 2
♣ K J 9 3 |
♠ 5 2
♥ 7 6 2
♦ K 9 8 7 5
♣ A 8 7 |
South |
♠ 8 6 3
♥ A K Q 9 4
♦ Q 6
♣ 10 6 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♦A
Your partner has shown a pre-emptive raise, so your values on defense are strictly limited. My best guess to beat this would be to lead the spade ace and give partner a spade ruff or two. Starting with a top diamond may extract our own entry prematurely, so you must hit the ground running with the spade ace.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 3 2
♥ 6 4
♦ A K 7 5 3
♣ 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
4 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
January 13th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
With this hand: ♠ 3, ♥ K-10-5-4-2, ♦ A-J-7-2, ♣ K-Q-3, I opened one heart and heard two spades to my left, followed by a double from my partner; I then bid three diamonds. Now my partner bid three spades. What does that show, and what should I do?
Bumblepuppy, Ketchikan, Alaska
The three-spade call asks you to bid three no-trump, or it may be the first move in a slam try for diamonds. You can’t bid three no-trump, of course, but you can bid four clubs to suggest this shape (or even raise to four spades to emphasize the spade control).
Say you deal yourself ♠ A-7-3, ♥ A-J-9-2, ♦ A-J-7-6-2, ♣ 10. If you open one diamond and hear a response of one spade, what options would you consider sensible?
Brunhilda, Union City, Tenn.
You have a good but not great hand, with the right shape but not quite enough for a reverse to two hearts. Give yourself the diamond queen instead of those red jacks, and the aces might persuade me to do just that. Since you cannot repeat diamonds or bid no-trump, of course, you’re left with a slightly inelegant raise to two spades. The hand is a little strong for that, but you have only three trumps, so it feels about right.
Please explain to me what a safety play in bridge consists of. I seem to see quite a few different plays described by that term.
Taxi Driver, Pittsburgh, Pa.
There are two completely different plays lumped under the heading of “safety play.” The first (the one I normally mean) involves protecting yourself against an unkind distribution by a correct move. For example, with K-Q-9-2 facing A-8-7-4, you might start with the king to pick up a bare jack or 10 in either opponent’s hand. The second usage is like a gambit at chess: sacrificing a trick you may not have had to lose to ensure you don’t lose two tricks. With K-J-8-7-2 facing A-9-4, cashing the king and leading to the nine would be an example.
|
You recently discussed this hand, where you heard partner double one diamond and a one heart call to your right. With ♠ J-9-6, ♥ —, ♦ Q-9-6-5-2, ♣ A-10-8-5-2, you bid two clubs and heard partner bid two hearts. Why did you next bid two no-trump instead of three clubs?
Gorgonzola, Sioux City, Iowa
I’d expect to be facing a 3-5-2-3 18-count or so. I don’t have any reason to repeat my clubs; partner knows I have them. Three no-trump could easily be making, but if my partner passes two no-trump, would three clubs be better? I doubt it.
I’ve received contradictory advice about how the defenders should signal at trick one when dummy has a singleton, after the lead of a high honor. When, if ever, is suit preference right? Are there other cases where it applies?
Chump Change, Great Falls, Mont.
Briefly, when continuation of the suit led makes no sense, suit preference may apply. When continuation may be right, third hand should be able to signal for a continuation as well as giving suit preference. Also remember that if third hand knows declarer has a singleton or void in the led suit (and opening leader knows he knows), he may also be able to pass on a suit-preference message.
|
January 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Get up, stand up: Stand up for your rights! Get up, stand up: Don’t give up the fight!
Bob Marley and Peter Tosh
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ 6 3
♥ 8 6
♦ A 7 5 3
♣ A 9 8 5 4 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 5 2
♥ 5
♦ Q J 9 6
♣ J 6 3 2 |
♠ Q 9 8
♥ K Q J 10 9 2
♦ 8 2
♣ 10 7 |
South |
♠ A K 7 4
♥ A 7 4 3
♦ K 10 4
♣ K Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
This is easier if you play one no-trump to be non-forcing, so that the two-club call virtually guarantees four or more clubs. Regardless, I’d bid two spades to show a good raise to three clubs. The aces and fifth trump make this hand worth an aggressive action. For the record, if partner had instead responded two diamonds, I would either raise or give false preference to two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ 8 6
♦ A 7 5 3
♣ A 9 8 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
I hit a grand slam off Ron Herbel, and when his manager, Herman Franks, came out to get him, he was bringing Herbel’s suitcase.
Bob Uecker
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ A 10 9 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 6 4
♣ A K 7 5 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 10 9 8 7 2
♦ K 9 7 3 2
♣ Q 4 3 |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ 4
♦ J 10 8 5
♣ 10 9 6 2 |
South |
♠ K Q J 5 2
♥ K Q J 3
♦ A Q
♣ J 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
I haven’t incorporated many modern treatments into my armory, but one I do like is to play three clubs as the second negative over opener’s rebid of two of a major. This ensures that three no-trump, if we reach it, will be played the right way up. Had partner responded two spades, I think I would jump to four spades rather than splinter to four hearts. (I’d need a king or two queens for that.)
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 6 4
♥ 4
♦ J 10 8 5
♣ 10 9 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
There is no real ending. It’s just the place where you stop the story.
Frank Herbert
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ K 8 6
♥ 9 4 2
♦ A 6 3
♣ A J 6 3 |
West |
East |
♠ A J 3
♥ Q 10 6 5 3
♦ K 10 9 7
♣ Q |
♠ 4 2
♥ K 8 7
♦ J 8 4
♣ 9 8 5 4 2 |
South |
♠ Q 10 9 7 5
♥ A J
♦ Q 5 2
♣ K 10 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
After a negative double, you will sometimes (maybe often) be forced into a slightly ugly call. Here you have two disgusting choices: rebid a four-card club suit or bid no-trump with three small in the danger suit. Instead, why not bid one spade facing your partner’s known four-card suit? I suspect that this call shows three more often than four nowadays.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 6
♥ 9 4 2
♦ A 6 3
♣ A J 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
When success is essential to keeping a family together, there is nothing a man won’t do. Nothing.
Jason Street, “Friday Night Lights”
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ J
♦ K 10
♣ K Q 9 8 5 4 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ Q 9 2
♦ Q J 9 4 3
♣ J 2 |
♠ K 7 2
♥ A 8 7 5 3
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ 10 |
South |
♠ J 10 8
♥ K 10 6 4
♦ A 6
♣ A 7 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All Pass |
*Showing three spades
♦Q
You may have a minimum hand, but I think it is just worth a try for game. Your best bet is to bid three clubs, suggesting this general shape. Your partner is almost guaranteed to have four-card trump support. What you need from him is aces or trump honors — and he will know those are good cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ J
♦ K 10
♣ K Q 9 8 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Great Britain is a republic with a hereditary president, while the United States is a monarchy with an elective king.
Knoxville Journal
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ A J 9 8 5
♥ K 4 2
♦ Q
♣ 8 7 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 8 7 4 3
♣ K J 10 9 |
♠ Q 10 6 2
♥ Q 7 5
♦ K J 5 2
♣ A 3 |
South |
♠ K 4
♥ A J 10 9 8
♦ A 9 6
♣ Q 6 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Does it seem outrageous to bid a second time with a 10-count, including a singleton queen? I don’t think so. Partner is marked with moderate values, and just because he doesn’t fit spades doesn’t mean you can’t make a part-score somewhere or push the opponents up a level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 8 5
♥ K 4 2
♦ Q
♣ 8 7 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
January 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There is never time in the future in which we will work out our salvation. The challenge is in the moment; the time is always now.
James Baldwin
E |
North |
None |
♠ K 8 7 4
♥ A 5 3
♦ A Q 9
♣ A 9 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6 2
♥ 2
♦ 8 7 5
♣ 8 6 5 4 2 |
♠ 9
♥ Q J 10 9 8 7
♦ 4 3 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
South |
♠ A J 5 3
♥ K 6 4
♦ K J 10 6
♣ K J |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 ♥ |
2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♥2
If your partner has a four-card major, you probably won’t beat one no-trump, since partner did not act over the double, and he would surely have bid a decent suit. I guess I’d lead my long suit, and there is no reason to lead any card but the fourth-highest spot card.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 2
♥ J 7 5
♦ K J 5 4 2
♣ A 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
January 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I have been taught never to lead or underlead an ace or king against a slam. But after reading yet again about a slam that would have been set if an ace had been led and the suit continued, I wonder how often it is fatally wrong to cash an ace against a slam, as opposed to that being the necessary defense.
Look Back in Anger, Horne Lake, Miss
My policy is not to lead an ace unless the auction tells me there is a side-suit on which my tricks may go away. To be sure, passive leads against small slams are not always right. When I have a sequence, I normally lead that instead of an ace. Leading away from kings is active, but not necessarily wrong.
When my partner opened one heart, I held ♠ 9-8-7-5, ♥ Q-8-7, ♦ K-Q, ♣ A-Q-J-7. What is the right way to show my hand, and how should I plan the bidding?
Bumble-Bee, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Assuming you play a style where a two-club response is forcing to game, I would do that, planning subsequently to raise hearts and take it from there. I do not like a response of two no-trump here (whether you intend it as balanced or trump support). For me, bidding good suits and setting up a game force has a lot going for it. I don’t see how spades can ever be the right trump suit here unless partner bids it.
I found myself in third seat with an experienced and relatively aggressive partner, holding ♠ Q-8-4-3, ♥ A-8-6-3, ♦ Q-10-4, ♣ 10-3. The bidding started with a weak two spades from my partner and a double on my right. Would you pass or raise spades? If the latter, to what level should you bid?
Mischief Maker, Durango, Colo.
Raising to three spades looks right to me. I’d expect game my opponents’ way to be borderline to make. Taking away one level of bidding makes it much harder for them to get their act together, and the raise exposes our side to virtually no risk, given our good fit.
|
I’ve been confronted with the problem of choosing the right card to lead from the ace-king. I have received a lot of different answers from other players, and I’m still not sure what the rule is. Please shed some light on this for me.
Caramel Candy, Kansas City, Mo.
You ask a great question — one that is more dependent on partnership agreement than a right or wrong way to do things. My (rather old-fashioned) approach is to lead the king from ace-king throughout the hand. That is by agreement; others play ace from ace-king at trick one. Regardless, in the middle of the hand, lead king for count (high-low with an even number) and ace for attitude, typically about possession of the king. This helps to cash out suits accurately.
I recently heard my partner open the bidding and my right-hand opponent jump to two spades to show a weak hand and a long suit. I doubled and heard the next hand raise to three spades. With what kind of shape and values would it be right to double three spades here?
Lying Low, Wichita Falls, Texas
Your double here sounds like takeout to me. Most players believe you can’t double any contract for take-out at your first turn and then make a second double below game for penalties if the opponents have announced a fit. I’d say about a 10-count with short spades would qualify for take-out, so anything stronger is just fine.
|
January 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
But lest some unlucky event should happen unfavorable to my reputation, I beg it may be remembered by every gentleman in the room that I this day declare with the utmost sincerity, I do not think myself equal to the command I am honored with.
George Washington
W |
North |
Both |
♠ J 8 7 6
♥ A Q 9 6 5
♦ 10 6
♣ 10 4 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K 8 3 2
♦ 5 3
♣ K 8 5 3 |
♠ A K 9 4 3 2
♥ 10 7 4
♦ 4
♣ A 9 6 |
South |
♠ —
♥ J
♦ A K Q J 9 8 7 2
♣ Q J 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
This hand feels like it will play better in hearts than in no-trump. Your partner is relatively unlikely to have a singleton heart here — for the record, that inference would not be so clear if your initial response were one spade, since partner’s rebid would be more cramped. I would therefore rebid two hearts now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 6
♥ A Q 9 6 5
♦ 10 6
♣ 10 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
The USA under-21 team lost to Sweden in the finals of the 2014 World Youth Bridge Championships held in Istanbul. The gold medalists included three players who have already represented their country and won medals in the European championships open and women’s sections! Among the Swedish players were Ida Grönkvist and Mikael and Ola Rimstedt, all of whom won the junior title two years later, and who will be stars at world level sooner rather than later.
The USA silver medalists included Ben Kristensen, who played with Kevin Rosenberg. The latter is the son of Michael and Debbie Rosenberg, both world champions. Their teammates were Christopher Huber and Oren Kriegel.
Today’s deal came up in the final. In the first room, the Swedish East (probably rashly) sacrificed in five diamonds at his second turn to speak. This decision seems unsound because he was too balanced in the side suits, and he was not bereft of defense. This was passed around to the USA North, who doubled and collected 500.
In the second room, the auction was as shown: East (Huber for USA) bid just four diamonds. This passed to the Swedish North, who bid four hearts.
Kriegel, West, led the diamond ace, and on seeing dummy’s singleton, tabled the only card at trick two that could lead to the defeat of the contract — the club jack — a textbook surround play to ensure three club tricks for his side, whichever club declarer played from dummy.