December 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
In second seat, I held ♠ K-9-7-2, ♥ Q-9-3, ♦ A-Q-10-5, ♣ J-4, and my right-hand opponent opened one heart in second seat. Would you double, and what your plan would be if your partner bid two clubs? Should you try and improve the situation for yourself or leave well enough alone?
Rainy Day, Jackson, Miss.
I’m not totally opposed to doubling on flawed shapes with a minimum hand, but facing a passed partner with a highly unsuitable heart holding, I’d pass initially. Make my heart queen the king, and I might double. I’d happily double a minor with an uninspiring holding in the other minor, though. Partners tend to bid a major in response if they can.
I have heard some of the players at my club speaking about game-try doubles. What are they? When do they apply?
Back to School, Fredericksburg, Texas
Game-try (also called maximal) doubles traditionally apply at the three-level when you have a major-suit fit and the opponents’ competition has taken all the space and prevented you from making a game-try. Since competing to three of your own suit would be to play, double replaces a game-try. So, after one heart – two diamonds – two hearts – three diamonds, double is a balanced game try.
Say you hold ♠ A-7-6-4-3, ♥ 8, ♦ 3, ♣ K-J-8-7-6-2. You choose to pass as dealer and partner opens a strong no-trump. You transfer to spades (would you?) and partner jumps to three spades, a superaccept showing a good hand with four spades. Would you try for slam?
Fits Like a Glove, Harrisburg, Pa.
I like the transfer to spades (transferring to clubs then bidding spades should show shortness), and I’d now think about slam. If partner has a control-rich hand with a club filler, we might make lots of tricks. I’d cue-bid four clubs, then try four hearts over a four-diamond call. If partner signs off at any point, I will let it go. If not, we’re off to the races! Partner knows I am limited in high cards by my initial pass.
|
Do you always raise partner’s one of a major opening to two with three-card support? I play a forcing no-trump response and was wondering if I could put a raise through that. If so, which hands are suitable?
Forcing My Hand, Dayton Ohio
With two ways to support, I prefer the direct raise to show a fair hand, something in the region of 7-10 points. Responding one no-trump, then giving preference to partner’s major, is consistent with either a doubleton or a bad hand (perhaps 4-7 points) with three-card support.
Say you open one club and your left-hand opponent overcalls one spade. What does partner’s negative double promise in terms of the unbid suits? Would a two-diamond rebid by you show extras?
Be Prepared, Memphis, Tenn.
Your partner’s double simply promises four or more hearts — and occasionally may not deliver even that! The notion that a negative double shows both other suits would restrict your use of that call too much. However, in response to a negative double, I’d jump to three diamonds with a true reverse. So two diamonds just shows extra shape and both minors.
|
December 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end: then stop.
Lewis Carroll
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K 8 5 2
♦ J 10 8 4
♣ A K |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9
♥ 6 3
♦ A Q 9 6 5 2
♣ Q 6 2 |
♠ Q J 10 5 4
♥ A J
♦ 7
♣ 9 8 7 5 3 |
| South |
♠ A 8 3
♥ Q 10 9 7 4
♦ K 3
♣ J 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣2
Bid one spade. You do not have enough for a Michaels cue-bid of two hearts, which should show more in the way of general high cards, and more of a concentration in your long suits. One spade is enough. If partner raises, your hand will become much more powerful, but until then go low, not high.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 5 4
♥ A J
♦ 7
♣ 9 8 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 13th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, November 29th, 2019
I have lived some thirty years on this planet, and I have yet to hear the first syllable of valuable or even earnest advice from my seniors.
Henry David Thoreau
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 5 4 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 4
♣ A 7 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 6 3
♥ 10 4
♦ K J 6
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ 9 8 6 2
♦ Q 9 2
♣ J 8 4 |
| South |
♠ K J
♥ K J 7 5
♦ A 8 7 5 3
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Four spades, forcing
♣2
You should pass now. You have no fit for partner, no source of tricks and no intermediates, all of which are warning signs. Picture partner holding a minimum opener with long but broken diamonds. Would you want to invite game opposite that and jeopardize your plus score?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 5 4 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 4
♣ A 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Most of us seldom take the trouble to think. It is a troublesome and fatiguing process and often leads to uncomfortable conclusions. But crises and deadlocks when they occur have at least this advantage, that they force us to think.
Jawaharlal Nehru
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 6
♥ 7
♦ K J 3
♣ A K 10 9 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ K Q 10 8 5 2
♦ 8 7 2
♣ 7 6 5 |
♠ K Q 7 5
♥ A 9 3
♦ A Q 10 9 6
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 8 4 3
♥ J 6 4
♦ 5 4
♣ Q J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥K
Whenever your side is doubled for penalty, a redouble is for rescue. You must run, and your options are three clubs, three diamonds and two no-trump to suggest no preference. I prefer the last of these, although I can also imagine bidding two spades and redoubling to get partner to pick a minor.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ K Q 10 8 5 2
♦ 8 7 2
♣ 7 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
A knockdown argument: ’Tis but a word and a blow.
John Dryden
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q J 3 2
♥ 9 8
♦ 10 9 2
♣ 9 8 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 8 5
♥ 7 4 3
♦ 4 3
♣ J 6 4 |
♠ 10 7 6
♥ A K J 6
♦ K J 8 7 5
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ 4
♥ Q 10 5 2
♦ A Q 6
♣ A K Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠A
Two clubs. For most partnerships, a one-no-trump advance to a take-out double promises some values. Here, you must bid two clubs and hope you are not doubled or called on to take another action. In my opinion, the range for the one no-trump call is 5-9 or so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 3 2
♥ 9 8
♦ 10 9 2
♣ 9 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The object of punishment is prevention from evil; it never can be made impulsive to good.
Horace Mann
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 7 3
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ J 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ K Q 10
♦ 4 3
♣ Q 9 8 7 4 |
♠ 4
♥ A J 8 5 4
♦ A Q J 8
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 8 6 5
♥ 7
♦ 10 7 6 2
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦4
Pass. This is no time to introduce such a poor heart suit. There is no need to respond now, and you do not want to get partner excited. If partner voluntarily takes another bid, you can come alive later. Put one of the kings in the heart suit, and one heart would be fine. But as it is, you can be fairly confident you will get a second chance at a low level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 3
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ K 9 5
♣ J 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Enjoyment of the work consists in participation in the creative state of the artist.
Martin Heidegger
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9
♥ K Q 6 5
♦ K 7 4
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K
♥ 10 7 4
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q J 10 9 5 4 |
♠ Q 10 4 2
♥ 8 2
♦ A 6 5 3 2
♣ A K |
| South |
♠ A 8 7 6 5 3
♥ A J 9 3
♦ Q J
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
Lead the spade nine. Your goal is to get partner in to give you a diamond ruff, and the way to tip him off is to lead an unnatural card. In standard methods, the nine is typically led from shortness. As you have preempted in spades, partner should have little trouble reading this as a suit-preference signal for diamonds. If you had a void club, you would lead the spade two.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 10 9 7 5 2
♥ Q 8
♦ —
♣ Q J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 3 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
December 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
I’ve often seen writers discuss when to charge a one- or twotrick penalty after a revoke. I’ve seen it asserted that in rubber bridge, if you did not bid game, adding the extra penalty trick(s) would not entitle you to the game bonus. Is the situation different for duplicate bridge or if using Chicago scoring?
Dazed and Confused, Sioux Falls, S.D.
The revoke law never does anything except change the number of tricks actually won. The contract always remains unaltered. So, the penalty tricks from a revoke may produce overor undertricks (or change a making contract into one going down or vice versa), no matter what form of bridge you play. But they do not change the contract.
Some of our opponents at my local club compete aggressively (on occasion frivolously) over our strong no-trump. Would you recommend we play penalty doubles in an attempt to teach them a sharp lesson?
Fetch the Axe, Janesville, Wis.
Try to maximize the frequency of your double as opposed to trying to optimize the results from the call. Use double for take-out at your first turn to act, since you will have that hand more often than a penalty double. This applies both to responder’s and opener’s double — both under and over the trump. Double of a purely artificial call should be values by responder, showing that suit by opener.
Playing a knockout match, I was dealt ♠ A-Q-9-7-3, ♥ 8-7-2, ♦ A-J-6, ♣ Q-9. I heard my left-hand opponent pre-empt to three hearts, and then my partner bid four clubs. What should be forcing here — and what would a fourheart bid mean?
Well Placed, Kailua, Hawaii
Four spades and four diamonds sound natural and non-forcing to me. So, four hearts should be an all-purpose good hand with club support without reference to heart control. I’d make that call and accept a signoff in five clubs.
|
In a recent column, you posed a problem with ♠ A-J-9-2, ♥ J-5, ♦ 5-2, ♣ A-J-8-4-3, in which you heard your partner overcall two diamonds over one heart. How much weaker would you have to be to pass here? Since partner only overcalled, are you likely to make game when you don’t have a fit?
Skeptical Sam, Wausau, Wis.
My view of two-level overcalls is that a doubleton and a ruffing value constitute decent enough support. I try not to come in on bad suits here, and I expect the same of my partner! This hand is certainly strong enough to look for game with a two-heart advance. That shows values and asks partner to describe his hand further.
When you have a choice of eight-card fits, is it better to choose a 5-3 fit or a 4-4 fit?
Breaking Badly, Spokane, Wash.
With a 4-4 trump fit, it may be easier to generate discards and extra ruffing tricks with the 5-3 fit on the side. By contrast, if you play the 5-3 suit, it will not allow you to generate discards from the 4-4 side suit. It is hard to identify in advance where discards will not be relevant, so head for the 4-4 fit when you can.
|
December 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There is no great genius without some touch of madness.
Seneca
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 6
♥ 9 7 4
♦ 8 7 6
♣ K Q 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 7 3
♥ J 6
♦ A J 9 5
♣ 10 8 7 |
♠ 2
♥ K Q 10 8 5 2
♦ K 10 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 5 4
♥ A 3
♦ Q 3
♣ A J 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
Although you have only an 8-count, you should bid two hearts now. The reason is that you will never get your hand off your chest if you start with a negative double. The opponents will raise spades (often to an uncomfortable level), and you will wish you had made the slight overbid of getting your suit in at a more hospitable time.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ K Q 10 8 5 2
♦ K 10 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
I am the master of my fate; I am the captain of my soul.
William Ernest Henley
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 7
♥ 9 6
♦ 8 7 5 3
♣ 9 8 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ K 10 8 7 5 3
♦ 6 4
♣ J 7 |
♠ Q 6 5
♥ A J 4 2
♦ K J
♣ A Q 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9 3
♥ Q
♦ A Q 10 9 2
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥7
Bid two hearts. This type of hand, weak with a fair six-card suit, is perfect to act with. As you have shown, you cannot double to show values, which would start at around a 9-count, so this is non-forcing. You might prefer another high card or some more shape, but you cannot have everything.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4 2
♥ K 10 8 7 5 3
♦ 6 4
♣ J 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This deal, another from the 2018 National American Bridge Championships in Honolulu, presented an awkward declarer and defense problem.
Opposite a passed partner, West did not need to worry about missing a game with his heavy weak two. Because two diamonds escapes for down one, South was wise to balance; if his partner had passed, would East have balanced with two spades? I’m not sure, since I think that typically implies some diamond tolerance — but it would have been feeble for East to pass out two hearts. Be that as it may, North did not give East the chance to balance. Instead North’s optimistic raise to three hearts put his side into dangerous territory. West did not find the spade king lead, putting a low club on the table instead.
Declarer won in dummy to lead a low heart. East took the ace and knew his partner was likely to have a top spade and decent diamonds. The spade queen shift covered all bases. South had to duck, which he did, and now East shifted to diamonds, to the king, ace and four.
When West reverted to spades, declarer could win and draw trumps, then either set up a diamond to pitch his spade, or ruff a club and exit in spades, to throw East in and avoid losing a diamond.
Should West have found the winning defense? He must underlead in diamonds at trick five, thus retaining the diamond queen while scoring a second trick in the suit. East can ruff and exit in spades, and one way or another the defenders will score a fifth trick.