November 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
A man may be in as just possession of truth as of a city, and yet be forced to surrender.
Sir Thomas Browne
W |
North |
None |
♠ A J 7
♥ 10 5 2
♦ A Q 10 6 3
♣ K 7 |
West |
East |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ K 8 4
♦ 8 4
♣ 10 9 6 4 2 |
♠ 6 3
♥ Q 9 7 6 3
♦ K 7 2
♣ A Q J |
South |
♠ K Q 10 9 5
♥ A J
♦ J 9 5
♣ 8 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥4
There is no clear reason to get aggressive with a heart lead — nothing about this auction suggests we cannot beat three spades on normal defense. So it feels right to lead a diamond, but which? I tend to lead top of three small in a bid-and-raised suit. From a four-card suit, I would therefore lead the eight; the six might be hard to read if declarer has a singleton honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 2
♥ J 8
♦ 8 6 3 2
♣ A Q 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
November 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Recently while declaring four hearts, I reached trick 13 and discovered my left-hand opponent, who was on lead, had no cards left. The missing diamond jack from his hand had been played simultaneously with another card (a club), but no one had noticed. What is supposed to happen now?
Lost in the Shuffle, Worcester, Mass.
Call the director first. I’d expect the diamond jack to be restored to your opponent’s hand and led to the last trick. If the player has revoked in the meantime, the penalty is whatever the revoke laws demand, but if he has managed to follow suit throughout thus far, he can count his lucky stars — there is no penalty.
I’m trying to learn the basics of declarer play. Should declarer count winners or losers when planning the play?
Victor the Viper, Augusta, Ga.
You ask a tough question, akin to asking the length of a piece of string. Do you count losers or winners? I just don’t know how to answer, because sometimes it is one, sometimes the other. Often it is losers, not winners, that are critical at suits, especially when we have tricks to spare. I think I look for winners first, and if I meet the target, then I make sure to control losers. Each hand brings its own rules.
I know fourth-suit forcing sets up a game-forcing auction. But how does opener deal with a fourth-suit forcing call, holding ♠ A-Q-J-4, ♥ J-10-4-2, ♦ 5, ♣ K-Q-10-8? If you open one club and partner responds one diamond, do you bid your better major? If you bid hearts and your partner bids one spade, do you raise or bid no-trump?
Subway Rider, Pierre, S.D.
There are different approaches to fourth-suit at the one-level, but whether this truly sets up a game force or not, it is simplest to play continuations by opener as entirely natural. Here, a call of two spades suggests this pattern and 12-14 points, while a jump to three spades is the same shape but 15-17. Raising the fourth suit shows four (assuming you haven’t bypassed the suit, in which case it suggests honor-third).
|
What is your opinion on opening a pre-empt on one fewer card than might be expected in third seat, non-vulnerable, or indeed at any other position or vulnerability? If you are not entirely opposed, what are the conditions you would require for such an action?
Silver Bells, Dayton, Ohio
I’m opposed to random frivolity, though with a good suit and low defense — say, king-queen-fifth — I can understand feeling the need to act facing a passed partner. I don’t mind bidding one of a major with a five-card suit and limited values in third seat. But an outright psych tends to destroy partnership trust for the next time you pre-empt, so I like to keep my hand roughly in line with what my partner might hope for.
I opened one diamond with ♠ K-Q-10-4, ♥ A-J-10-5, ♦ A-K-Q-7-2, ♣ —-, and heard my partner invite game with a jump to three clubs. I wasn’t sure whether to bid three no-trump or explore for a different strain. We eventually played in three no-trump, scrambling to reach nine tricks when my partner had seven solid clubs and I had no entry to the board — but six clubs would have been ice cold. What are your thoughts?
Missed the Boat, Bristol, Va.
With your partner’s hand, I might have responded two clubs, but I’m not sure that would help us get to six clubs. Hands like these are going to cause even the experts a problem. Mind you, had your partner been the opener and been able to bid three no-trump to show a solid minor, life would have been considerably easier.
|
November 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I don’t think necessity is the mother of invention – invention, in my opinion, arises directly from idleness, possibly also from laziness. To save oneself trouble.
Agatha Christie
E |
North |
None |
♠ A K J 6 2
♥ K Q 7
♦ 10
♣ A 7 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ 10
♦ 8 6 5 4 2
♣ Q 9 4 2 |
♠ Q 4
♥ 9 6 4 2
♦ K Q J 9 7
♣ K 10 |
South |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ A J 8 5 3
♦ A 3
♣ J 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
4 ♦ |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All Pass |
♣4
I cannot tell you that Stayman here is a bad bid, or that it will not work. It is indeed the normal (if unthinking) thing to do. But consider that if you play a 4-4 heart fit, it might be the only game you cannot make if partner has bad hearts or if the suit does not break. With honors in your short suits and a side source of tricks, I suggest jumping to three no-trump, which gives away far less about declarer’s shape.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ 9 6 4 2
♦ K Q J 9 7
♣ K 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To try to understand the real significance of what the great artists, the serious masters, tell us in their masterpieces, that leads to God.
Vincent van Gogh
N |
North |
None |
♠ 10 4
♥ A 10 3
♦ A K 9 3
♣ J 5 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 6
♥ Q 8 7 4
♦ J 8 6 4
♣ A 8 7 |
♠ K Q 9 8 3
♥ J 6 5
♦ 10
♣ K 9 6 3 |
South |
♠ A J 5 2
♥ K 9 2
♦ Q 7 5 2
♣ Q 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 NT * |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Forcing for this pair
♠7
Bid two no-trump here. I believe this to be a forcing auction, though not forcing to game. With one heart stopper and no reason to assume either opponent has five hearts, you should bid what is in front of you. While you might just about have a 4-4 spade fit, your partner can explore (with a cue-bid of three hearts) if his hand is unsuitable to play no-trump, but he wants to drive to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 5 2
♥ K 9 2
♦ Q 7 5 2
♣ Q 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.
Victor Hugo
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ K 8 4
♥ 6 5
♦ A 7 4 3
♣ K J 9 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 2
♥ K Q J 9 4
♦ Q 10 9 5
♣ 7 3 |
♠ J 9 6
♥ 10 7
♦ K 8 6
♣ A 8 6 5 2 |
South |
♠ A Q 7 5 3
♥ A 8 3 2
♦ J 2
♣ Q 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Not all hands fit into the convenient algorithm of adding up the high cards and spitting out an answer. If your diamond nine were in clubs, I would probably pass two hearts, but your extra shape means you have enough to invite game. A case could be made for reraising to three hearts to suggest six; but maybe a rebid of two no-trump more accurately expresses your values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 2
♥ K Q J 9 4
♦ Q 10 9 5
♣ 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Driftwood: I’m practically a hermit. Henderson: Oh, a hermit. I notice the table’s set for four. Driftwood: That’s nothing; my alarm clock is set for eight. That doesn’t prove a thing.
“A Night at the Opera”
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ K 10
♥ A J 8 6
♦ A Q J 9 8
♣ J 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ K 10 4 3
♦ 6 5 4 3
♣ A K 5 4 |
♠ A 7 6
♥ Q 9 7 5
♦ 10
♣ Q 10 9 7 2 |
South |
♠ Q J 8 5 4 3 2
♥ 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
Sometimes we have to choose between the practical and the elegant. This may not be a balanced hand, but 16-counts with five of a minor and four hearts present a real problem if you do not open a strong no-trump. Upgrade a 17-count to a reverse, and downgrade a 15-count to a one no-trump rebid if practical; but with a 16-count and some honors in your short suit, maybe a one-no-trump call is the least lie.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10
♥ A J 8 6
♦ A Q J 9 8
♣ J 6 |
November 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Things fall apart; the center cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.
W.B. Yeats
S |
North |
Both |
♠ K 10 9 8 4 2
♥ Q 10 2
♦ K 6
♣ J 8 |
West |
East |
♠ Q J 3
♥ 9 7 3
♦ Q J 7 3
♣ 9 7 3 |
♠ A 7 5
♥ 6 5
♦ 10 8 4 2
♣ K Q 10 6 |
South |
♠ 6
♥ A K J 8 4
♦ A 9 5
♣ A 5 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♥3
You should double here. Your partner may not have much of anything, but he could just as easily have something like four spades to the king-jack and be unable to take action. After all, your hand does not always deliver quite so many quick tricks on defense. As it is, though, you can surely expect your partner to find a sensible resting place in hearts or clubs if he does not have the requisite trump holding.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ A K J 8 4
♦ A 9 5
♣ A 5 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
People who know little are usually great talkers, while men who know much say little.
Jean Jacques Rousseau
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ A K 4
♥ 6 5
♦ 10 7 6 2
♣ 9 7 5 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 7 5 2
♥ K J 9 4
♦ J 8 3
♣ Q 6 |
♠ 6
♥ 10 8 3
♦ K Q 9 4
♣ J 10 8 4 2 |
South |
♠ J 10 9 8 3
♥ A Q 7 2
♦ A 5
♣ A K |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
This is an ugly hand from which to lead spades. If I did lead a spade, I might select the king rather than a low one, maybe to retain the lead or to make partner’s play in the suit easier at trick one. The club sequence is a reasonably attractive alternative. The club 10 may give the game away in that suit, but nothing else really looks appealing, does it?
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 3
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ J 3
♣ 10 9 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
|
November 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, November 4th, 2018
I know you aren’t the biggest fan of Key-card Blackwood, but if you ask for key-cards, then for the trump queen, what responses should you use to that second ask?
Private Eye, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
Use a signoff in the trump suit as denying the trump queen. Other calls show it, and you cue-bid a side-suit king if you can, or jump in the trump suit (or bid five no-trump if the ask is above five of the trump suit) if you cannot. Additionally, one can agree that when you have the trump queen and two side kings, you cue-bid the king you don’t have.
I opened one diamond with this hand: ♠ A-Q-3, ♥ 10-5-3-2, ♦ A-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-3. I raised the one-spade response to two (do you agree?), and then heard my partner bid three clubs. What should I have done next?
Bell, Book and Candle, Sitka, Alaska
Yes, I would raise to two spades, though many would prefer a one-no-trump rebid. At your third turn, you do have a maximum, but it is not clear where you belong. A temporizing call of three hearts may get you to three no-trump if that is appropriate. If your partner bids three spades, you will have to decide whether to advance, and if so, how. I think a delayed three-no-trump call would be reasonable.
I picked up ♠ A-10-2, ♥ K-10-9-5, ♦ J-9-7-4-3, ♣ K and passed in first seat. When my partner opened one club and the next hand overcalled one spade, I could make a negative double. But what is the right way to continue over my partner’s rebid of two hearts?
Mashed Potatoes, Eau Claire, Wis.
This is an auction where your partner will almost always deliver four hearts but be in the 12-14 range. So you are likely to have an eight-card fit with no values to spare for game. Does that mean you should pass — given that you do have an absolute maximum in high cards? I’m not sure. With your partner in third seat, you are on the cusp for a three-heart call. I think I’d pass, but if that singleton king were in a long suit, I’d bid.
|
I held ♠ 10, ♥ A-K-8-6-5-3, ♦ K-10-9-2, ♣ J-7 and opened one heart. When the next hand over-called one spade and my partner doubled, was I supposed to rebid two diamonds or two hearts? I opted to show my diamonds, and we ended up in a 4-3 diamond fit, which played far less well than our 6-1 heart fit would have.
Strawberry Jammer, Grenada, Miss.
The better the hearts, or the worse the diamonds, the more attractive a two-heart bid becomes. Here, without the diamond spots, I can see the logic in repeating the hearts. But bidding two diamonds describes nine of your 13 cards, whereas repeating hearts shows only six of them. So I’d bid the diamonds, expecting my partner generally to know when to revert to hearts. A 4-4 diamond fit ought to play much better than hearts, on average.
Please explain what Checkback Stayman means after opener has rebid one no-trump. Do I understand correctly that the sequence one diamond – one heart – one no-trump – two clubs is not natural? Isn’t there also a method called Two-way Checkback?
Inquiring Minds, Pottsville, Pa.
When opener rebids one no-trump, his degree of support for his partner and length in an unbid major are often still undefined. So responder has a Stayman-like relay (New Minor) at the two-level. This promises values and is searching for three-card trump support or length in an unbid major. Two-way New-Minor uses two clubs as a puppet to two diamonds, to play there or invite game somewhere, while two diamonds is a game-forcing relay.
|
November 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
If your opponent imagines that because you are a woman you’re easy to bluff, that you’d never bluff yourself and that you can be pushed around, you can exploit those assumptions.
Victoria Coren
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ K Q 6
♥ K 7 2
♦ K 9 7 4
♣ Q 9 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8
♥ J 10 9 6
♦ J 6 3
♣ 10 8 6 2 |
♠ 9 7 5 4 3
♥ Q 8 5 4
♦ 2
♣ K J 7 |
South |
♠ A J 2
♥ A 3
♦ A Q 10 8 5
♣ A 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♥J
In auctions of this sort after the redouble, jumps should be played as pre-emptive or shapely, not real invitations. There aren’t enough points in the deck for your partner to have a high-card invitation. (With that hand, he might pass and jump at his next turn.) So while I can see the case for re-raising obstructively, I would pass now and let the opponents decide where they want to play the hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 6
♥ K 7 2
♦ K 9 7 4
♣ Q 9 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
In today’s deal from a team game, one pair came back to score up with what they considered a normal result in their game contract: North had opened a weak no-trump and played four spades on a heart lead. He could not find a way to succeed after that start, but was disappointed to lose a big swing when four spades came home from the South seat in the other room on the auction shown. And it all came down to the play to trick one.
When you have this combined heart holding, you are happy to have the suit led around to — rather than through — your tenace. You are gifted a second trick in the suit, but that will not do you any good today. One discard is completely irrelevant in comparison to the avoidance issues in the minor suits.
See what happens if South wins East’s heart queen with the ace. After drawing trumps, declarer will run the diamond nine. East can win with the king and return a heart to West’s king, then a club shift will beat the contract.
At the table, South appreciated the necessity of keeping the danger hand, West, off lead. By allowing East’s heart queen to hold, communications between the defensive hands were cut. East could not effectively attack clubs from his side of the table. South won the heart return, drew trumps, then ran the diamond nine. East could win in either case the first or second round, but the defenders were limited to one club trick in any case.