November 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
People are always blaming their circumstances for what they are. I don’t believe in circumstances.
George Bernard Shaw
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 5
♥ 9 8 5
♦ A K J 5
♣ J 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 8 2
♥ K 4 3
♦ Q 10 4 2
♣ 8 3 |
♠ Q 6 4 3
♥ J 10 7 6 2
♦ 8 7
♣ A 4 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ A Q
♦ 9 6 3
♣ K Q 9 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
In the absence of a checkback mechanism, you need to explore for a 4-4 spade fit or 5-3 heart fit by the seat of your pants. Since a bid of three spades would (according to some) promise only four hearts, you might miss a 5-3 heart fit. I suppose you could simply bid three hearts. If partner has three-card support, he will raise. If he has four spades, you hope he will bid three spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 4 3
♥ J 10 7 6 2
♦ 8 7
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I may as well say at once that I do not distinguish between inference and deduction. What is called induction appears to me to be either disguised deduction or a mere method of making plausible guesses.
Bertrand Russell
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 5
♥ K
♦ A K 7 5 2
♣ Q 10 7 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3
♥ Q J 10 7 2
♦ J 10 6 3
♣ A 4 |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ 9 6 5 3
♦ Q
♣ K J 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 6 2
♥ A 8 4
♦ 9 8 4
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
East has promised at least five cards in each major, so partner must have short spades. Rather than try a speculative minorsuit lead, you should pave the way for the spade ruff that you hope to give when you gain the lead with the heart king. The spade two is the best lead, making it look like you have the singleton. If the heart ace is on your left, declarer might reject the finesse and suffer an embarrassing ruff.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 5 3 2
♥ K 8
♦ 8 7 4
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
| Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
November 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
What do you think is the best way to learn how to play bridge? Did you start by playing pairs or team games, or did you learn rubber bridge first? Which would you recommend?
Tyro Tyrone, Worcester, Mass.
Rubber bridge used to be far more common than it is nowadays. I think your chances of learning quickly would be improved by playing in a duplicate club, where you can take classes as well as playing in events. Teams is easier to learn than pairs, I would say. If you can’t find a local club, the American Contract Bridge League will help. Try them at 1-800-264-2743.
The following hand kept me up at night. My partner opened one spade, and I responded with one no-trump, holding ♠ J, ♥ K-10-6-5-4, ♦ K-Q-10-3, ♣ J-3-2. Now my partner bid two clubs, and I could think of nothing intelligent to say. What would you have done?
Curious George, Battle Creek, Mich.
There is no good answer here. Passing may be disastrous facing a good hand with only four (or even three!) clubs, while bidding two no-trump may send you overboard. Correcting to two spades also looks very dangerous, so I’d try two hearts, hoping to end up in a contract where I have more trumps than the opponents.
Please explain what happens when a player makes a slow bid, and his partner seems to take advantage of that unauthorized information? What are the criteria for awarding an adjusted score?
Blinky Bill, Charlottesville, Va.
Say a player’s tempo for a call suggests a particular action, and his partner subsequently takes the action that might have been suggested by that tempo. If so, the director may adjust the result, depending on whether there were logical alternatives to the action chosen. In other words, you can bid as fast or as slow as you like, but your partner must not be influenced by your tempo.
|
How would you respond to a three-spade pre-empt at unfavorable vulnerability, holding ♠ J-9, ♥ K-10-5-2, ♦ A-J, ♣ A-Q-7-3-2? I elected to raise to game, and though I wasn’t expecting to be facing solid spades, I did expect more than queenseventh of spades and queenfourth of diamonds.
Unimpressed, Seneca S.C.
Pre-empts vary enormously according to position and vulnerability. Your partner appears to have bid considerably below what I might expect for a second-seat pre-empt at unfavorable vulnerability. In first or third chair non-vulnerable, I might even open his hand at the three-level.
I assume you would open one diamond with ♠ A-7-3, ♥ K-J-4-2, ♦ Q-10-5-2, ♣ Q-10. You then hear a two-club overcall, and your partner bids three clubs to show a limit raise or better in diamonds. You sign off in three diamonds, but partner presses on with three hearts. What would you do now?
Marquis of Mirth, Torrance, Calif.
Your partner is looking for a club stopper, and you do not have one. Since his call is forcing, your choice is to raise hearts and hope the 4-3 fit plays well. (Partner could still have four hearts, I suppose.) You could also temporize with three spades, but I’m not sure what that would achieve. So four hearts it is.
|
November 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Should I, after tea and cakes and ices, Have the strength to force the moment to its crisis?
T.S. Eliot
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 4
♥ K
♦ K J 10 9 7 4 2
♣ 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ 6 5 3
♣ J 10 6 |
♠ K Q 8 6 5
♥ 10 8 4
♦ A Q
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 7
♥ A J 9 6 2
♦ 8
♣ A K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Partner’s three diamond bid is artificial, a temporizing call. If he had primary heart support, six spades or a good diamond stopper, he would have bid naturally. You have strong three-card spade support and should show it by jumping to four spades. Even if it is a Moysian fit, it will probably be your best game. Meanwhile, this bid tells partner exactly what you have, in case he has a good hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 7
♥ A J 9 6 2
♦ 8
♣ A K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I see but one rule: to be clear. If I am not clear, all my world crumbles to nothing.
Stendhal
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 5
♥ A Q 10 6
♦ A 9 8 3 2
♣ Q 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 3 2
♥ 9 4 2
♦ Q 7 5
♣ J 8 3 |
♠ A J 4
♥ 7 5
♦ 10 6
♣ A K 9 6 5 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 9
♥ K J 8 3
♦ K J 4
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣3
Clearly, you must find a rebid, but none appeal. One no-trump is the best of a bad bunch, showing the strength of your hand but fibbing about the shape. With five poor diamonds and no shortness, two diamonds is not leading the polls. You might persuade me to make that call on a five-card suit if it were headed by two top honors, but not today.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5
♥ A Q 10 6
♦ A 9 8 3 2
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, October 24th, 2019
We’re all leading lives that are different and yet the same.
Anne Frank
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K
♥ J 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 9 5 3
♣ A 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 7
♥ K 3
♦ Q 8 6
♣ K 6 5 4 |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 9 8
♦ A K J 4 2
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
♠ A 10 8 5 2
♥ A Q 10 7
♦ 7
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦6
You had too little to bid two hearts on the previous round, and now with such a bad suit and little chance of a fit, you seem to have too much to pass but nowhere to go. Giving false preference to two spades on a singleton would be too rich for me, though admittedly it does give partner a chance to go on with the perfect hand. I’d pass two clubs and proffer my apologies along with the dummy.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ J 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 9 5 3
♣ A 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 23rd, 2019
Talent develops in quiet places, character in the full current of human life.
Johann von Goethe
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A J 9 8
♥ Q 8 7 5
♦ J 9
♣ K 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 5 3
♥ 9 4
♦ 8 7 5 4 3
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 4
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ K Q 10 6
♣ Q J 8 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 2
♥ 6 2
♦ A 2
♣ A 9 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥9
With marginal values, your singleton in partner’s suit should swing you away from inviting game at pairs. A two-no-trump advance would land you in the wrong spot too often. Playing teams, the lure of a vulnerable game might be too much to bear, though, in which case the two-no-trump call describes your general shape and values reasonably well.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 4
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ K Q 10 6
♣ Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The best liar is he who makes the smallest amount of lying go the longest way.
Samuel Butler
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 6 5 4
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ 9
♣ 10 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 3
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 7 6 5
♣ K Q J 7 2 |
♠ 8
♥ A K Q 10 8 7
♦ A Q 8 4 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 2
♥ —
♦ K J 10 3
♣ A 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
4 NT |
| 5 ♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣K
Your hand has improved considerably now that you know of a heart fit. Your singleton diamond will prove useful opposite partner’s likely 1=4=3=5 shape, as will the spade ace and the club intermediates. (Picture partner with king-jack-fifth, for example.) What is more, partner has shown extras with his reverse, so jump to four hearts to suggest no slam interest.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6 5 4
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ 9
♣ 10 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There is always a well-known solution to every human problem — neat, plausible, and wrong.
H.L. Mencken
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 4
♥ K 7 5 3
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6
♥ Q 9 4 2
♦ J 9 5 4 3
♣ 8 6 |
♠ K Q 5 3 2
♥ A J 10
♦ A Q 6
♣ J 7 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7
♥ 8 6
♦ 8 7
♣ K Q 9 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦4
It is rarely right to lead from ace-fourth against no-trump, since it often costs a trick and you will frequently have time to switch to that suit if you need to. Because a club lead from our doubleton would be against the odds, we must choose between the red suits. There is an argument for leading a major suit, as West did not use Stayman, but whether you lead a small heart or the diamond five is up to you.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 4 3
♥ J 8 2
♦ 7 5 4 3
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
November 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
What is the right way to signal from length when your partner leads a king (presumably from ace-king) and dummy has the guarded queen in that suit?
Rawhide Rick, Salina, Kan.
In a suit contract, if you might hold a doubleton, you echo with two; that way you never lose your ruff. I suggest play lowest from three, and second-lowest from four. This minimizes ambiguity, though nothing will cover every base. If you cannot have as few as two cards, give count, with a high card suggesting an even number, a low card suggesting an odd number. In no-trump, simply give count — your attitude is implicitly defined by the sight of dummy.
What would you do with ♠ K-10-5-2, ♥ A-Q-8-6-2, ♦ 10-4, ♣ Q-9 when your partner opens one club and rebids one no-trump over your one-heart response? Would you drive to game, settle for part-score or issue an invitation?
Straitjacket, Vancouver, British Columbia
Your hand does not look strong enough to drive to game, when you have at best an eight-card fit in either major and no more than 24 high-card points between you. I’d start with two diamonds, the new minor, looking for a heart fit, and be prepared to give up if I do not find one. If partner bids two spades, showing 4=3=3=3 precisely, I’ll raise to three.
Can you comment on the meaning of jump rebids by opener after a suit opening, when his partner makes a negative double of an overcall by the left-hand opponent? Are jumps forcing in the original suit or in a new suit — and if not, what about a double jump?
Head for Heights, Grenada, Miss.
Let’s consider a onespade overcall of a minor-suit opening, and a negative double from your partner. Now your two-heart call suggests four and a minimum balanced or semibalanced hand. A jump to three hearts suggests four trumps and 14-15 points, potentially unbalanced. A jump in any other new suit or your first-bid suit shows extras but is not forcing. Use the cue-bid to set up a game force.
|
In fourth seat, how should I have developed the following hand: ♠ A-Q-3, ♥ Q-7-6-4, ♦ K-9, ♣ K-9-4-2, when my left-hand opponent opened two spades and my partner doubled? This was a pairs event with both sides vulnerable.
Nosy Rosie, Orlando, Fla.
The choice is between bidding game in hearts or three no-trump, and passing for penalties. You rate to set two spades 500 or more — but declarer can surely take four spade tricks and may scramble a couple more out of dummy’s collection. With these spade honors taking tricks on offense, I would try three no-trump. Four hearts could easily run into ruffs or trump troubles.
Is there any real advantage to playing the version of Key-card Blackwood currently recommended by Eddie Kantar, where a five club response shows one or four key-cards (counting the trump king as a key-card) and five diamonds shows none or three? What do you usually play?
20th Century Blues, Selma, Ala.
Any system accident more than outweighs the benefits of playing the best possible methods. “The perfect is the enemy of the good,” they say. If I use Roman Key-card Blackwood, I play 30/41 responses, though I do see a shift toward the methods you outline. When in Rome …
|
|
North took the scientific route on today’s hand, responding one diamond and continuing with two spades over his partner’s twoclub rebid. North was showing a concentration in spades and some concern about hearts. In auctions like this one, the third suit shows values in the suit bid, while the fourth suit asks for a stopper.
Three no-trump was thus reached the right way up to protect the heart tenace, and West chose to lead dummy’s second suit, with the idea of leading to declarer’s weakness. This attack would be more attractive from a five-card or even a three-card holding (hoping to hit partner’s five-card suit). All too often, four-card suits set up winners, but not quickly enough to beat three no-trump. Then again, our recommended heart lead would give declarer no problems.
Today, though, the spade did pose a difficult challenge. Declarer could count eight tricks once the club ace was removed. The heart suit posed a threat, however. If West held the heart king and East gained the lead to shift through declarer’s heart tenace, the game would be defeated.
It followed that declarer had to keep East off lead at any cost. South therefore called for the spade king. This was safe even when West had led from the spade ace-queen. After all, the spade two lead was a strong indication that the suit was splitting evenly.
When the spade king held, all declarer had to do was knock out the club ace. The defense could score only three spades and a club trick.