October 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Art hath an enemy called Ignorance.
Ben Jonson
N |
North |
None |
♠ Q 7 5 4 2
♥ K 9 4 3
♦ K
♣ A 5 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K 10
♥ 5
♦ 9 8 6 5 3
♣ Q J 10 8 6 |
♠ A 9 8 6
♥ 10 8 7
♦ Q 10 4 2
♣ K 9 |
South |
♠ J 3
♥ A Q J 6 2
♦ A J 7
♣ 7 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♣Q
Over one diamond, I would probably overcall one spade, but here it feels right to double two diamonds. Since this hand is likely worth no more than one call, I want to keep both majors in play. Doubling seems like the right way to do that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 4 2
♥ K 9 4 3
♦ K
♣ A 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 ♦ |
? |
|
|
|
October 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
When would you open a weak two in fourth seat? I can understand that you would pass most hands with 8 points. What would you open, if anything, in fourth seat with ♠ J-10-7-3, ♥ A-K-10-9-3-2, ♦ —, ♣ Q-10-3? My view is that it should be a better hand than one in which you would open one heart and rebid two hearts.
Sally Fourth, Elkhart, Ind.
My two-bids in fourth chair start at 9 points. A two-spade opening with ace-king-jack-sixth and an additional minor honor is probably a dead minimum. Your example looks like a two-heart opener. We might belong in spades, but I’d be willing to take my chances on that.
I know Lebensohl applies as a way to compete when the opponents overcall over a strong no-trump. Are there other applications of this convention that we should be playing?
Handy Man, Pottsville, Pa.
Yes, indeed! Once you have bought into the concept, use it after reverses or when responding to the takeout double of a weak two. It can also be employed when partner opens, then balances with a double of a two-level overcall or jump overcall. Finally, you can (with some caution) use it after partner doubles a one-level opener and the opponents raise that suit. For more information, see Extended Lebensohl and Blackout.
I am returning to bridge after an extended hiatus. I suspect my methods 30 years ago (16-18 no-trump and four-card majors) are now out of date. What approach is standard these days?
Long Gone, Memphis, Tenn.
I believe almost everywhere in the world new players are taught five-card majors, and to open 12-counts rather than waiting for 13-point hands. In turn, that fits best with 15-17 for the no-trump range. I’d recommend learning from the ACBL free teaching tool.
|
What happens when a tournament director gives a decision at the table that appears to you to be wrong or unfair? Is there a right of appeal, or is a director’s ruling final?
Last Call, Charlottesville, Tenn.
I believe there is always a right of appeal against a director ruling, except where that ruling is a matter of law rather than interpretation. For example, you cannot appeal a penalty for a revoke, no matter how unfair or inequitable you think it is. But you should chat to your club director (or an impartial expert) before doing anything dramatic.
How should our partnership play the range of a jump in partner’s opened minor? We play a strong no-trump, and specifically I wonder when, if at all, we should consider moving on to three no-trump facing the jump raise.
Razor’s Edge, Tupelo, Miss.
I’m going to hedge a bit. I suggest that if you have a normal balanced 18-19, you do not head for three no-trump facing a non-vulnerable pre-emptive raise. In other words, the raise typically shows values of 0-5 high-card points with five or six cards in the suit raised. But facing a vulnerable raise (which tends toward showing slightly more than a purely preemptive raise), I would at least try for three no-trump, expecting partner to have closer to 4-8 high-card points.
|
October 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
It was very prettily said that we may learn the little value of fortune by the persons on whom heaven is pleased to bestow it.
Sir Richard Steele
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ A Q 8 7 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A
♣ A K 10 8 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ K J 10 8 3
♦ K J 10 6 2
♣ 5 2 |
♠ 10 3
♥ 7 5 2
♦ 5 4
♣ Q J 9 7 6 4 |
South |
♠ K J 9 4 2
♥ A Q 9
♦ Q 9 8 7 3
♣ — |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ * |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Michaels, five hearts and five cards in a minor
♠6
It seems logical to raise to four hearts now. Anytime your partner has six hearts (or five good hearts), your hand will offer the opportunity to ruff some diamonds. If you bid three no-trump, you will probably find that to succeed you will need to set up the clubs, one way or another.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 8 7 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A
♣ A K 10 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Into a limbo large and broad, since called The Paradise of fools, to few unknown.
John Milton
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ A K 2
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 2
♣ K 7 4 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 8 5
♥ 7
♦ Q 10 5
♣ A Q 10 8 6 2 |
♠ Q 10 7 6 3
♥ A 6 3
♦ J 9 6 4
♣ J |
South |
♠ J 4
♥ 10 9 8 5 4 2
♦ 8 7 3
♣ 9 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠9
Despite your singleton, you must rebid three no-trump here. To bid a second suit, you should have at least minimal slam interest; make one of your low diamonds the queen, and you would have enough for that action. Here, you should try to get partner to pick between spades and no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 6 3
♥ A 6 3
♦ J 9 6 4
♣ J |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Civilization advances by extending the number of important operations which we can perform without thinking about them.
Alfred North Whitehead
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 7 5
♥ —
♦ 9 8 5 4 3
♣ K Q 9 8 6 2 |
West |
East |
♠ A Q J 9 2
♥ K Q J 10 3
♦ J 6
♣ 3 |
♠ 10 6 4
♥ A 9 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 7
♣ 7 5 |
South |
♠ K 8 3
♥ 8 7 6
♦ A K 2
♣ A J 10 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
2 NT * * |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
**Lebensohl
♥K
Your side has at least an eight-card heart fit, and your opponents surely have some sort of eight-card or better fit in diamonds. You do not need to examine the situation more carefully than that: The Law of Total Tricks tells you to bid on to two hearts. Dare you argue with it now?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 6 4
♥ A 9 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 6
♣ 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
? |
|
|
|
October 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 19th, 2018
Only take this rule along, Always to advise her wrong; And reprove her when she’s right; She may then grow wise for spite.
Jonathan Swift
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ 10 8 7
♥ K J 10
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ 9 8 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ A Q 7 4 2
♦ 9 4 2
♣ K J 6 4 |
♠ K Q J 9 6 5 3 2
♥ 9 5
♦ 5
♣ 3 2 |
South |
♠ A
♥ 8 6 3
♦ A Q J 10 8
♣ A Q 10 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠4
In auctions of this sort, one normally raises partner’s major either directly or at the next turn. Typically, you raise directly unless the hand is too defensive in nature, or unless you have a doubleton honor in trump, when you might not want to get partner too excited about competing further. I’d raise directly here, but if my lefthand opponent had opened one diamond, I might pass first and raise later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 7
♥ K J 10
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ 9 8 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
October 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
As long as you know that most men are like children, you know everything.
Coco Chanel
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 6 4
♥ A K 7 6 4 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ J 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 7 2
♥ J 5
♦ 10 8 6 5
♣ K 9 7 6 |
♠ 5 3
♥ Q 10 9 8
♦ J 4 2
♣ 8 5 4 3 |
South |
♠ A K J 10 9 8
♥ 3
♦ K 9 7
♣ A Q 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
Despite your extra values you have no guarantee you can make game, or that hearts will play better than no-trump. I’d raise to two no-trump as the least committal way forward, with my second choice a jump to three hearts. If you play two clubs as artificial rather than natural, it would come into consideration too.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 4
♥ A K 7 6 4 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ J 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Not only is there an art in knowing a thing, but also a certain art in teaching it.
Cicero
N |
North |
N-S |
♠ 8 2
♥ A Q 9 5 3
♦ K 7 2
♣ A 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 4
♥ J 10 7
♦ J 6 3
♣ 9 7 4 |
♠ 7 6 5 3
♥ K 8 4
♦ Q 10 8 4
♣ 8 3 |
South |
♠ A K Q
♥ 6 2
♦ A 9 5
♣ K Q J 10 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
It seems possible to build up the full shapes of all the hands. Dummy surely has a strong holding, maybe a 3=2=5=3 shape. Declarer must be 4=4=1=4, so it feels right to lead a trump and cut down the ruffs, as is generally the case when one opponent has a three-suited hand.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6 2
♥ K J 9 3
♦ K 7 4 2
♣ 9 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
|
September 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
How many extras does an overcaller need to double for take-out, then double again? One of our opponents followed this sequence with perfect 4-4-4-1 shape, but just three aces and a queen. His partner passed with queen-jack-fourth of trump and a king, but couldn’t defeat our contract. Does the second double promise more cards than this, even if it is still for take-out?
Reopen for Business, Edmonton, Calgary
When a hand that has doubled for takeout bids again, it shows extras. The second double is still for takeout, though this one may come close to being played as optional, depending on the level of the action, say a double of a game contract. In such situations, sometimes responder passes from weakness if balanced, and hopes for the best.
I enjoy your bridge column and tend to go along with most of your views on bridge. But recently, you featured an opening bid in third seat when holding ♠ Q-J-9-2, ♥ A-9-2, ♦ J-6-4, ♣ K-3-2. I do not enjoy opening one club with this hand; I’d rather open one spade and plan to pass any non-forcing response. Where do you stand here?
Trumpet Voluntary, Palm Springs, Calif.
I agree with you that a one-club opening bid does not accomplish much. Passing is perfectly reasonable, and when I do open a minor in third seat, I tend to have either a good suit or a reasonable hand. This hand does not qualify as either. A one-spade opener is more pre-emptive and lead-directing, so that would be my choice.
You recently discussed the Principle of Restricted Choice. Please explain how the concept works and when it applies.
Monkey Wrench, Newport News, Va.
Occam’s Razor basically says when you have to weigh up two outcomes, go for the simplest. So, when you have to compare the chance that a player has a doubleton consisting of two equal cards (generally the queen-jack) or that they started with a bare honor, the latter is more likely. The doubleton is more likely than each individual singleton, but the chance that the queen will appear from the doubleton holding is actually only half that, because half the time the player would contribute the jack from queen-jack. See details of “The Monty Hall problem” online.
|
What should persuade responder to upgrade a constructive raise of a major to a limit raise? For example, if you hold ♠ Q-9-2, ♥ K-7-3-2, ♦ J-6-4, ♣ A-3-2 and hear your partner open a major, would you make a simple raise or a limit raise of one heart or one spade?
Shark Tank, Key West, Fla.
You have a 10-count, but it is too balanced to make a limit raise of one spade. Make the club ace the diamond ace, and you might consider the limit raise; but since partner typically has a balanced 12-14, do you really need to be in game facing that? I’d simply raise to two spades. By contrast, the fourth trump would persuade me to make a reluctant limit raise of hearts, even if I’m not convinced the hand is really worth it.
You recently featured a deal where someone in second seat overcalled one heart over one diamond with a six-count, when holding ♠ 6-3, ♥ Q-J-10-8-4, ♦ Q-J-9-2, ♣ 6-3. I have seen this sort of action several times, both at the table and in your column, and I wonder where you stand on it.
Hot Drinks, Indio, Calif.
To clarify my position; I was just reporting the facts. This hand is not exactly worth an overcall. If I had to put a point-count limit on one-level overcalls, it would be a decent suit in a hand of 8-9 points. In the example hand, I would happily overcall if one of the queens were an ace.
|
September 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Three o’clock is always too late or too early for what you want to do.
Jean-Paul Sartre
E |
North |
N-S |
♠ A 9 8
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A 8 5 4
♣ K 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 5 3
♥ 9 2
♦ K 10 9 2
♣ Q 8 7 4 |
♠ 10 6
♥ A 10 7
♦ 7 6 3
♣ A J 9 6 5 |
South |
♠ K J 7 4 2
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ Q J
♣ 10 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Game-forcing, might be short
♦10
Your cue-bid sets up a force until a suit has been agreed. You could now invite game by bidding only three hearts, but isn’t this hand a force to game? Even though your diamond honors may be worthless, game is surely going to be no worse than the spade finesse. I would bid four hearts, but make the spade two a club, and I bid only three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 4 2
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ Q J
♣ 10 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
When North opens one spade and hears a two-heart response, he has three possible continuations. He could raise to three hearts or four hearts, or he could make a splinter raise to four diamonds. Does this last route show extras? The combination of North having a dead minimum and the “wrong” splinter — an ace or small card is much better than the king — persuades him to go low. South has no reason to continue over the four-heart call.
After West leads the club queen, it might seem that South has four quick black-suit losers. But declarer has a top diamond in hand to cope with the slow club losers. South wins the first trick with dummy’s club ace and unblocks dummy’s diamond king. He then gets back to his hand by way of the trump ace and cashes the diamond ace to discard one of dummy’s losing clubs.
The idea now is to make it possible for South to ruff his losing minor-suit cards in dummy. He trumps a diamond, then gives up a club, planning to ruff dummy’s remaining club with the heart king and draw trumps, conceding just two spade tricks.
If the defenders win the second club and play anything but a spade, that is precisely what declarer will do. If, instead, East wins the club king and plays a spade to his partner’s king, for a spade back to the ace and a third spade, declarer will ruff high, then draw trumps ending in dummy, with the spade queen as a home for his last club loser.