September 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
A smattering of everything and a knowledge of nothing.
Charles Dickens
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ 6 4
♦ A 7 2
♣ 10 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ K J 10 8
♦ K Q J 9
♣ 8 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 7 5 3
♦ 8 5 3
♣ K 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ A 2
♦ 10 6 4
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
The only way to show a good hand here is to start with a double. Your plan will be to rebid in no-trump at your next turn, and the question is whether a simple bid (showing more than a strong no-trump) will suffice. Given that your club honors should be pulling extra weight, you might consider jumping to two no-trump over a red-suit call from your partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 9
♥ A 2
♦ 10 6 4
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Reason still keeps its throne, but it nods a little, that’s all.
George Farquhar
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ K 10 6 4
♣ A 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5
♥ A K Q 9 8 4
♦ 8 3
♣ K 9 8 |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ J 10
♦ J 9 5 2
♣ J 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 4 3
♥ 7
♦ A Q 7
♣ Q 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
This auction calls for a heart lead. It is akin to a Lightner double, in which the double of a high-level contract calls for dummy’s first-bid suit. There is no reason not to lead the top of your doubleton. You could make a case for leading high from a three-card suit as well, but that is a bit of a digression.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 4 2
♥ J 3
♦ 10 8 3
♣ J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
September 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Holding ♠ J-9, ♥ A-Q-J, ♦ A-10-4-3, ♣ A-7-6-4, I believe I have a straightforward opening of one no-trump. After my left-hand opponent overcalls two spades, how should my partnership play a double over and under the trumps — and what should I do if the auction comes back to me?
Crowded House, Pasadena, Calif.
It is sensible to play all doubles of a natural call (or of a two-suited call that names one of the two suits naturally) as take-out, if and only if it is the first call your partnership has made after the no-trump opener. So both sides play take-out doubles of two spades here. I’d make that call in this case; this shape is perfect for it, and my partner can bid his suit. If he has two places to play, he can bid two no-trump.
I understood that following an overcall after your partner opens, as responder you can always start with a take-out double, no matter what was bid to your right. In what cases would double be for penalty?
Red Flag, Cartersville, Ga.
If you play negative doubles in response to an opening bid, it means that all initial doubles of overcalls of four spades or lower are emphasized toward take-out. Doubles of three spades and higher may tend toward optional, though. Doubles of no-trump bids and of artificial calls that show two-suited hands, however, suggest a desire to defend. (When the opponents find a fit, all doubles by either player at their second turn tend to be take-out).
Should you wait until you have all suits properly controlled before launching into Blackwood? Or should you cue-bid instead?
Mumbo-Jumbo, Muncie, Ind.
Don’t use Blackwood if you are sure you won’t know what to do over the response. In other words, if your hand consists of the first-round controls but not second- and third-round controls, let your partner ask; cue-bid instead to let him do so. When your side has more than enough high-card points for slam, it is not terrible to use Blackwood with one suit that may be unguarded if no sensible alternative exists.
|
Please tell me how I can discreetly ask my opponents not to look at my partner’s cards — or find a way to help my partner hold his cards back!
Hiding in Plain Sight, Dodge City, Kan.
One thought is that you might ask an opponent to hold his cards back, and then extend the warning to your partner. Incidentally, one thing that always gets my goat is people who count their suits so their partner (but only their partner) might see, if they are looking. That should be firmly if politely discouraged, too.
What scheme of responses do you recommend to a two-club opener? Do you prefer complex over simple schemes, and what is your opinion of control-showing responses?
Tripe and Onions, Troy, N.Y.
I recommend a simple scheme of responses. I’m happy to bid two hearts with positive values and a reasonable suit, whereas a two-spade call needs two top honors in five or more cards, or a six-card suit and one top honor. I can see the logic of using all other calls as natural, but if you prefer something artificial, use two no-trump as clubs with limited values. Bids at the three-level would then be natural with very good suits (or transfers if you want to live a little).
|
August 31st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 17th, 2019
Art is a human activity having for its purpose the transmission to others of the highest and best feelings to which men have risen.
Leo Tolstoy
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7
♥ J 4
♦ A 10 7 5
♣ 10 7 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 10 9 6
♦ 9 6 2
♣ Q J 9 |
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 7
♦ J 4 3
♣ A K 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6
♥ A K 8 5 3 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Takeout
♣Q
Your partner’s double should be take-out showing values, presumably with no more than two spades and two or three diamonds. Since he did not overcall one heart, he must have at least four clubs, so it seems right to bid three clubs now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 7
♦ J 4 3
♣ A K 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 30th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
There is a loveliness exists, Preserves us, not for specialists.
W.D. Snodgrass
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ Q J 6 2
♦ Q 8 7 4 2
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J
♥ K
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ A 9 7 5 3 2 |
♠ A K 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 8
♦ 5 3
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 7 6
♥ A 9 7 5 4 3
♦ A J
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
My general rules about whether to bid and what to bid on marginal hands that include a six-card suit start from the assumption that you should always bid immediately with a good six-card suit. Whether you act at the one- or two-level will depend on the specific hand, of course, but this hand has a bad suit and isn’t worth a one-level opener in first seat, so I’d pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6
♥ A 9 7 5 4 3
♦ A J
♣ J 10 8 |
August 29th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
You don’t have to be intelligent, but I think you have to be open to possibilities and willing to explore. The only stupid people are those who are arrogant and closed off.
Edward de Bono
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10
♥ A Q 4
♦ A Q 10 9 3
♣ K 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ K 10 8 7
♦ 7 4
♣ J 10 3 2 |
♠ A 9 2
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ K J 8 6
♣ A 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 7 4 3
♥ J 9
♦ 5 2
♣ Q 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦7
There is no guarantee that it is safe to come back into this auction (your partner could have close to a Yarborough, after all), and I suspect I would pass if my right-hand opponent weren’t already a passed hand. But as it is, I think it is right to double, hoping partner will have a long suit of his own, have three cards in support of diamonds, or be able to bid two no-trump as a scramble to let you bid your second suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ A Q 4
♦ A Q 10 9 3
♣ K 8 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 28th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
When you study natural science and the miracles of creation, if you don’t turn into a mystic you are not a natural scientist.
Albert Hofmann
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 9 8
♥ 9
♦ A 5 3
♣ K Q 7 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 6 3 2
♥ J 8 3
♦ 9 2
♣ A 10 3 |
♠ 10 5 4
♥ A 10 7
♦ Q J 10 6
♣ 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ Q
♥ K Q 6 5 4 2
♦ K 8 7 4
♣ J 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦9
You have some nice shape (albeit no great fit for partner) and some real extra values. Do you have enough to raise to two no-trump? I’d say so, but if I had the club 10, I’d be more optimistic about my partner’s chance to set up the suit for one or two losers.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 9 8
♥ 9
♦ A 5 3
♣ K Q 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Books must follow sciences and not sciences books.
Francis Bacon
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 6 2
♥ A 8 5
♦ A 8 6
♣ 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8
♥ Q 6
♦ K Q J 10 9
♣ J 8 7 3 |
♠ K 9 7 5 3
♥ K 4 3
♦ 5 4 3
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
♠ J 4
♥ J 10 9 7 2
♦ 7 2
♣ A K Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Since you limited your hand at your first turn to be in the range 0-9 high-card points, your partner’s double suggests real extras. In that context, because of your first two calls, you have a pretty decent hand, and the best way to show it is to jump to three spades. Partner will infer that you have five spades and about 6 or 7 points.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 7 5 3
♥ K 4 3
♦ 5 4 3
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Thou art not for the fashion of these times, Where none will sweat but for promotion.
William Shakespeare
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ K 6 5
♦ K J 10 5 3
♣ J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 3
♥ A Q 9 7 3
♦ 8 2
♣ K 10 4 |
♠ 10 8 7
♥ J 10
♦ A Q 9
♣ 9 8 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 5
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦8
I’d lead the heart eight. It feels as if partner has at least four hearts, so leading our side’s long suit should give us a decent chance to set up an extra trump trick one way or another. A club lead might achieve the same result, but that is more likely to cost a trick if it is doesn’t hit an honor in partner’s hand.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ J 9 8
♦ 10 5
♣ K J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
August 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 11th, 2019
|
If you open one spade and the opponents intervene with two diamonds, what action would you take, holding ♠ K-Q-8-7-2, ♥ K-Q, ♦ Q-3, ♣ A-Q-J-4, when the auction comes back around to you? I assume the hand is too good for a pass, but what action covers the most bases?
Great Auk, Galveston, Texas
You should not pass, though defending two diamonds may be the only way to go plus — or yield the smallest negative. If you do bid, a call of three clubs is on the table — the problem being that it is such a committal action. Doubling for take-out and converting a response of two hearts to three clubs suggests this hand type, but that route also lets partner bid two spades over the double, or even pass.
Say you have ♠ K-8-2, ♥ K-Q-7-6-5-4 ♦ Q-3, ♣ J-4. Do you pass, open at the one-level or open at the two-level, and what factors determine which way you should go?
Green Grouper, Eau Claire, Wis.
Non-vulnerable, this is just too strong to pass in any seat. Opening two hearts in third seat might see your side undercompete if the hand belonged to you. Vulnerable, I hate the weak spots and the side defense, so I’d open one heart, even if it might be a fraction too weak. Everything else, especially passing, seems worse.
I am interested in trying to acquire more master points. How do Swiss Teams work, and would they be a sensible way to go about achieving my goal?
Chasing the Dream, Ketchikan, Alaska
The urge to acquire points often exists in inverse proportion to the number you already have. But Swiss Teams are typically played over a single day, with multiple teams playing short matches. Your pairing is based on your day’s results, with matches scored not on a win-loss basis, but on a sliding scale where you can earn from 0-20 victory points. These points are accumulated over the whole event.
|
Holding ♠ Q-3-2, ♥ Q-9-7-4-2, ♦ 10-8, ♣ A-Q-J, I assume you would not open the bidding. If you passed and heard a one-diamond opening bid on your left, passed back to you, would you balance over it, and with what call?
Backup Planner, Pierre, S.D.
Vulnerability or position might influence you; I’d open in third seat but not in first or second. If I passed, I’d certainly balance over one diamond at any vulnerability. I’d plan to bid one heart and consider balancing a second time with a double of two diamonds, if necessary, to get both black suits into play. That fifth heart is too important to conceal, and if I double, we may lose it altogether.
My partner has asked me to play Lebensohl, but I’m not sure I understand the implications. Can you explain the call and discuss in which sequences it is commonly played?
Cold Comfort, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
After the opponents butt in over your partner’s one-no-trump opening or overcall, two-level calls by you are non-forcing. Three-level bids are strong, and two no-trumps puppets to three clubs — typically a weak hand with its own suit, but it may include some balanced or invitational hands. See https://www.bridgebum.com/lebensohl_after_1nt.php. These methods can be played after the double of a weak two-bid, but here, two-level bids can be a bust, while actions at the three-level are invitational, not forcing.
|
|
When you have a combined eight-card holding in a suit, the missing five cards will split 3-2 some two-thirds of the time. But they will split 4-1 a little over a quarter of the time. The second declarer in today’s deal allowed for this possibility, while the first did not — and the results were about what you would expect.
In each room, South ended in the routine spade game after opening two no-trump and going through Stayman. At both tables, South took the lead of the diamond king. After this, the play diverged.
The first declarer immediately did what I suspect at least half of my readers might do — if they hadn’t been warned that there was a trap! He drew all the opponents’ trumps, ending in North. Then he ran the club 10, and when that held, he continued by finessing the jack. But the 4-1 break meant there was no chance for a further finesse, because the second club had to be won in hand. So he had to lose a club trick eventually, and his chance to make the contract had vanished.
The second declarer saw that the club finesse was inevitable. He was aware of the possibility of a 4-1 club break and the club suit becoming blocked, so he carefully led dummy’s club five to the jack at trick two, which held the trick. Only then did he extract all of the defensive trumps, ending in dummy.
His next move was to play the club 10 from dummy and let it run. When this held, he could finesse the club queen and claim.