September 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A community is like a ship; everyone ought to be prepared to take the helm.
Henrik Ibsen
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 5
♥ 7 5
♦ J 9 7 5 4
♣ K 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 2
♦ A K Q 6 2
♣ 9 6 3 2 |
♠ 8 7 6 2
♥ K J 6 3
♦ 10
♣ A J 10 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 9 4
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ 8 3
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl.* |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three hearts
♦K
I would pass here. A two-level overcall usually promises a six-card suit and for good reason. Even though I have excellent diamonds and want them led, I have no desire to win the contract, and my heart holding is very bad for declaring. The real danger may be that partner leads a club, not a diamond, against a spade game; I’ll pay off to that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 2
♦ A K Q 6 2
♣ 9 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 16th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Truth sits upon the lips of dying men.
Matthew Arnold
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 9 6 4
♥ K 8 5 4
♦ A 9
♣ A 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ K J 10 8 5 3 2
♣ — |
♠ Q J 8 7 5
♥ —
♦ 6 4
♣ J 10 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A Q J 10 7
♦ Q 7
♣ K Q 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Asking for the trump queen
♥2
I would lead the diamond two. My best shot appears to be to give partner a diamond ruff when I get in with the heart ace. It is unlikely that a club trick will stand up, but if it does, we can probably try it later on. Note that a spade lead is unlikely to do much good. If partner has the spade king over dummy’s ace, he will probably score it sooner or later.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 2
♥ A 5
♦ 10 8 6 2
♣ K 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
| 5 ♣ |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
September 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 1st, 2019
|
Does a successful doubled contract produce a game even if game has not been bid, or do the extra scores go above the line? Both interpretations make sense to me, but which is correct?
Bonus Baby, Tucson, Ariz.
When you make a doubled part-score, the score for the contract goes below the line. Thus, three diamonds doubled scores as twice 60 or 120. Since that number exceeds 100, it qualifies for the game bonus. The insult, game bonus, and overtricks go above the line — as usual. Two clubs doubled scores as 80 — thus no game bonus; two diamonds redoubled is 160 and thus generates the game bonus.
I heard my partner open with an artificial two-club bid with ♠ A Q-9-4-2, ♥ —-, ♦ A-Q-10, ♣ A-J-10-9-5. I responded two diamonds, then raised a two-spade call to game with ♠ K-J-8-6-3, ♥ J-9-4, ♦ 8-3-2, ♣ 8-4, and we played there. How might we have bid our cards to slam — or should we have been content with game?
Orpheus, Hartford, Conn.
A two-club opening on an unbalanced hand is game-forcing unless responder bids two diamonds, then issues a double negative at his second turn. Your partner should have opened one spade; after you jumped to four spades, he could have shot to slam — which is an excellent spot. Of course, had you raised two spades to three (showing a better hand than a jump to game), you still might have recovered.
Holding ♠ Q-10-5-4, ♥ A, ♦ A-10-8-2, ♣ A-Q-J-4, it felt right to open one diamond and jump to three spades over the one-spade response. My partner felt I could have driven to game or even bid four hearts as a splinter raise. Where do you stand on this issue?
Billy Goat, Augusta, Ga.
Your values are on the cusp between a drive to game and an invitation — the singleton ace doesn’t really pull its full weight. I wouldn’t jump to four hearts with a 4-1-4-4 shape unless I had full value in high cards. This hand is not worth that action, so your choice was a little pessimistic but entirely reasonable.
|
How important do you think it is to learn the precise percentages at bridge? How much of correct declarer play and defense is about table feel and table presence?
10 Gallon Matt, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
You do not have to learn all the percentages; a few simple ones are enough. (Kelsey and Glauert’s book on practical odds should suffice.) Table presence outranks percentages all the time! But you must learn to hone your card-reading skills, to try to learn when you can trust your instincts and when you cannot.
Holding ♠ A-J-9, ♥ K-Q-J-9-3-2, ♦ 10-2, ♣ A-J, my partner opened three diamonds in first chair. Would your decision to bid on or pass be influenced by vulnerability more than by your choice of partner? Would it matter if the pre-empt was in second seat?
Steven’s Son, Detroit, Mich.
I know that four hearts might make when facing heart length, but if I bid three hearts, will partner be able to bid three no-trump if he has no fit in hearts? Probably not. It is much more likely that I can make three no-trump my way up, so I might gamble it out. Facing a pre-empt in first seat at favorable vulnerability, I would pass.
|
September 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Do not commence your exercises in philosophy in those regions where an error can deliver you over to the executioner.
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ K 5
♥ A Q 8 7 5
♦ A 6 5
♣ 8 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 4
♥ 10 9 4 2
♦ 8
♣ J 9 2 |
♠ Q 7 2
♥ K J
♦ K 10 9 2
♣ Q 10 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ 6 3
♦ Q J 7 4 3
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
This auction should be played as forcing. If your partner had a limit raise in diamonds, he would invite at his first turn or pass your non-forcing three-club call. If you believe you are being forced to act, bid three spades, showing values and implicitly denying even half a heart stop, in which case you would have bid three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 3
♥ 6 3
♦ Q J 7 4 3
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 13th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
How can a rational being be ennobled by anything that is not obtained by its own exertions?
Mary Wollstonecraft
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ A K 5
♦ 3 2
♣ K J 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3
♥ 10 6 3 2
♦ 10 9 8 5 4
♣ 10 7 |
♠ K Q J 5
♥ J 7
♦ Q
♣ A Q 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6 4
♥ Q 9 8 4
♦ A K J 7 6
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
You may have only a 14-count, but slam in diamonds is easy to imagine if partner has nothing wasted in clubs. The way to make a slam try and stay safely low if necessary is to bid four clubs, showing shortage in clubs and letting partner decide whether to go high or low. Hearts is likely to play better than diamonds — you should be able to pitch partner’s slow spade losers on your diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 4
♥ Q 9 8 4
♦ A K J 7 6
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Christopher Robin was sitting outside his door, putting on his Big Boots. As soon as he saw the Big Boots, Pooh knew that an Adventure was about to happen, and he brushed the honey off his nose with the back of his paw, and spruced himself up as well as he could, so as to look Ready for Anything.
A.A. Milne
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K Q 10 6
♥ K
♦ K Q 5 4
♣ A J 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ Q J 10 9 3
♦ 8 6
♣ Q 9 7 |
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ 7 6
♦ J 3 2
♣ K 8 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A 8 5 4 2
♦ A 10 9 7
♣ 10 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
7 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*12-14 balanced, or (as here) any 18 or more
♥Q
Most doubles facing a passing partner should be take-out, and this is no exception. There is no reason to bid no-trump with a feeble spade stopper and a perfectly good minor suit to bid. Just bid two clubs and see where things go from there.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 4
♥ 7 6
♦ J 3 2
♣ K 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
You can build a throne with bayonets, but it’s difficult to sit on it.
Boris Yeltsin
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 8
♥ 7 6
♦ K Q J 4
♣ A K 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 3
♥ Q 8 3
♦ 9 5 3 2
♣ J 10 9 3 |
♠ J 6
♥ K J 9 5 2
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 7 5 4 2
♥ A 10 4
♦ 6
♣ 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT * |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ * * |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*15-17 points
**Starting an invitational sequence
♣J
If playing negative doubles, opener must reopen with shortage when the auction gets back to him at a sensible level, whether he has a minimum or a maximum. You don’t have to double if you would pull a penalty double from your partner (for example, with king-queen-jack-fifth of diamonds and a singleton small club, when a two-diamond call is sensible). But here, double and let the chips fall where they may!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6
♥ K J 9 5 2
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ Q 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Our love of what is beautiful does not lead to extravagance; our love of the things of the mind does not make us soft.
Pericles
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 4
♥ Q J 10 9 2
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 5
♥ A 3
♦ 10 9 5 2
♣ 8 6 |
♠ K 7 6 3
♥ K 8 5 4
♦ J 8
♣ J 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 2
♥ 7 6
♦ A K 3
♣ A K Q 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♠Q
Whether you play transfers or not is, in a sense, irrelevant here. The key point is whether you want to show hearts and let partner play three no-trump with a doubleton, or whether you want to insist on hearts. I say insist on hearts. Unless partner has six solid clubs, no-trump rates to be best; if you can transfer there, so much the better.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4
♥ Q J 10 9 2
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
(The pragmatic method is) the attitude of looking away from first things, principles, ‘categories,’ supposed necessities; and of looking towards last things, fruits, consequences, facts.
William James
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A
♥ A Q 8 6 3 2
♦ K 10 8 7 5
♣ 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10
♥ J 10 9
♦ Q 6
♣ A 10 7 5 4 |
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 7
♦ A J 9 4 3
♣ K 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ J 9 8 6 3 2
♥ K 5 4
♦ 2
♣ Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
2 NT * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*At least 5-5 in the red suits
♠K
This hand seems too good to pass, and I don’t think double describes it well. (I’d assume it was a balanced 9-10 count with at least two hearts.) The best way to get diamonds into play is to bid two no-trump, emphasizing the minors and suggesting more diamonds than clubs (otherwise, you would reraise clubs). Since you didn’t bid one no-trump before, you surely don’t want to play no-trump now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 5 4
♥ 7
♦ A J 9 4 3
♣ K 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I assume you would pass in first seat with ♠ J-8-2, ♥ A-5-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-9-4. If your partner opens one diamond and the next hand overcalls one no-trump, do you double or assume your partner does not have a full opener?
Trusted Traveler, Lorain, Ohio
This is a very slippery slope. You don’t have to double when the auction tells you that your partner has embellished his initial call, because both opponents have bid strongly. But here, I think you do have to double and take your lumps if partner has psyched. If nothing else, it may discourage him from further flights of fancy.
Holding ♠ K-9, ♥ A-Q-7-2, ♦ Q, ♣ A-K-Q-9-6-3, would you open two clubs or one club, and why?
Hi-Lo Country, Bristol, Va.
Minor-suit oriented hands with average controls often handle well by starting low. Opening one club and jumping to two hearts over one diamond or reversing into hearts over a one-spade response tells partner much about your shape and high cards at the two-level. You will seldom be passed out in one club — and if you are, what chance did you have at game?
I have been struggling to learn New Minor after my partner rebids one no-trump, as a way to explore for game and slam. Is it worth the effort to play, and what would you recommend after a jump rebid by opener of two no-trump? Desperately Seeking Something, Tunica,
Miss.
Yes, New Minor (also called Checkback) is well worth the effort — in the same way that Stayman is an essential adjunct to modern bidding. This way you get to find fits in unbid majors, explore for 5-3 fits, and invite game efficiently. Over two no-trump, using the unbid minor as artificial is possible, but the Wolff Signoff (www.acblunit390.org/Simon/wolff.htm) works well, too.
|
When balancing over the opponents’ opening call, I’m aware that a hand like ♠ Q-6-2, ♥ Q-9-7-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ A-J-2 is more than sufficient to bid one heart over one diamond. But would you also balance at any vulnerability when playing pairs over a pre-emptive two diamonds, or even a three-diamond opener?
Lucky Luke, Monterey, Calif.
You are right that this is a simple hand with which to balance over one or two diamonds. But do you have enough to bid over a three-level preempt? I guess I might bid when non-vulnerable, but I wouldn’t be thrilled by the prospect.
Say you have ♠ 9-2, ♥ 5-4, ♦ A-Q-7-3, ♣ Q-J-4-3-2. After your left-hand opponent opens one no-trump and right-hand opponent transfers into hearts, then passes, do you pass, double or bid a suit?
Gerry the Gryphon, Bellingham, Wash.
At pairs non-vulnerable, I think this is just strong enough to act. The right way to get both minors into play is to bid two no-trump, suggesting both minors. Switch your spades with one of the minors, and you might double. Partner will bid spades or a five-card minor of his own, or scramble with two no-trump to get you to pick a minor.
|
|
This hand came along at the 2017 Vanderbilt Trophy in the North American Spring Nationals; at the wheel was Jan Jansma of the Netherlands.
West opened the bidding light, then compounded his felony with a support double to show three hearts. This didn’t keep North-South from reaching the spade game, though, after North made an unassuming cue-bid. South suggested no-trump initially, then despite his partner’s retreat to three spades, he awarded himself a fourth spade.
It is difficult to consider any lead other than a top diamond from West’s hand, and it was the king that was tabled. West switched to his singleton trump at trick two, but it came too late. Jansma won with dummy’s ace, finessed the heart queen successfully, cashed the heart ace and ruffed a third heart low in dummy.
Then, planning to ruff his last heart in dummy, declarer played a low club toward his queen. Divining declarer’s intentions, East rose with the ace and played another trump. This served to give declarer a 10th trick, but it was not immediately clear how South could make use of it, given the club blockage and the lack of a side-suit entry to dummy. However, South drew the rest of East’s trumps and cashed his own club queen. He then exited with his last heart. East won with the king, but with no diamonds remaining, he was forced to resurrect dummy’s club king for the game-going trick. East had been used as a stepping-stone to reach dummy’s stranded winner.