June 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Is not life a hundred times too short for us — to bore ourselves?
Friedrich Nietzsche
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 3
♥ Q 10 5 2
♦ A K J 2
♣ 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 9 7 4 3
♦ 10 9 8 7 5
♣ Q 9 6 4 |
♠ K 9 7 4
♥ K J 8 6
♦ Q 6 3
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 8 6 5 2
♥ A
♦ 4
♣ A K J 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Drury, a maximum pass with spade support
♦10
Your partner must be weak and unbalanced, since he surely has six clubs but chose not to repeat the suit at his second turn, and then he ran from one no-trump. I’d guess he has one spade and is maybe 4-6 in the minors with 11-12 points. You have no fit, no sure defensive tricks and no reason to think you can beat two spades. Go quietly and pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 7 4
♥ K J 8 6
♦ Q 6 3
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Here error is all in the not done, All in the diffidence that faltered.
Ezra Pound
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ Q 4
♦ K 7 6
♣ 9 7 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 2
♥ J 7 6 2
♦ 10 8 3 2
♣ Q 4 |
♠ 4 3
♥ K 9 8 5
♦ Q J 9
♣ K 10 8 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 8 7
♥ A 10 3
♦ A 5 4
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
Leading against no-trump when no suits have been bid is often daunting. Without a long suit of five or more cards or a suit of three or four cards headed by a sequence, my advice is to consider going passive. Avoid giving up a trick if you can, or take your best shot at it if you cannot. With today’s hand, I’d lead a low heart rather than a club, since the club king is so likely to be to my right.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 3 2
♥ J 8 5
♦ K 10 8
♣ A Q 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
|
How do you feel about opening one no-trump with ♠ 4-3, ♥ A-J-9-7-2, ♦ K-Q-6, ♣ A-K-4? If you open one heart, you will hear partner respond one no-trump. What next?
Space Cadet, Casper, Wyo.
This hand is inappropriate to open one no-trump, in that you are too strong, with a five-card major, and you also have a weak doubleton. Having opened one heart, I can see it might be right to rebid two clubs, but I think I’d prefer a simple raise to two no-trump and let partner decide what to do next.
I play (low-level) bridge with other members of a retirement community averaging about 85 years of age. Vision problems there are fairly common. These are mostly mistakes in suit-symbol recognition. Do you have any suggestions to ameliorate these difficulties?
Rocking Robin, Tempe, Ariz.
There are playing cards with four different-colored suits. Before I get into your concern, have you looked at them as a possible solution? Using black and red for the majors, with either orange/yellow or blue/green for the minors seems best to me. I looked online and saw many references: Search for “Copag four-color double deck.”
Recently I held: ♠ A-Q-9-3-2, ♥ Q-9-3, ♦ A-K-3-2, ♣ 4. My partner responded one no-trump to my one spade, and the next hand butted in with two clubs. What should my double be here? Is this extra values, takeout or penalty? Or would you just bid two diamonds?
John the Divine, Bellingham, Wash.
While there is no firm agreement on what a double means here, I like it to be take-out, and this hand would be ideal. With both majors, you might simply bid hearts instead of doubling. But the double keeps hearts in play, as well as the pass for penalties.
|
Playing duplicate, declarer came down to four cards in dummy: two good spades and two honors, one of which was high and one that wasn’t. When he claimed the rest, depending on the order he played the cards, I could get one or two of those tricks. What should the director rule here?
Richie Rich, Los Altos, Calif.
This is a tricky problem because declarer is put on notice of his error by your disputing the claim. Typically, a disputed trick is awarded to the nonclaiming side if the losing play was inferior but not irrational. Here, declarer seems to have thought all of dummy’s cards were good. It would be inferior but not irrational to play the cards in the wrong order and give you two tricks rather than one. So two tricks it is.
When you open one no-trump and hear your partner transfer to a major then bid a new suit to show a two-suiter with game-forcing values, how should you rebid at your third turn?
Down Under Dave, Greenville, S.C.
Opener raises the major when he can, and by agreement I suggest you use four of the other minor specifically as a fit for both suits, suitable for slam. With no support for either suit, bid no-trump if you can, but bid a new suit at the three-level to look for no-trump with concern about the fourth suit. In that instance, you may also be planning to bid on over three no-trump, which would convert your previous bid to a cue-bid.
|
June 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
That best portion of a good man’s life, His little, nameless, unremembered acts Of kindness and love.
William Wordsworth
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 5 4
♥ K 10 6 3
♦ K J 7 4
♣ 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 6
♥ J 7
♦ Q 10 3 2
♣ Q 10 5 3 |
♠ Q 9
♥ Q 8 5
♦ 8 6 5
♣ A J 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 8 7 3 2
♥ A 9 4 2
♦ A 9
♣ K 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦2
There is as yet no official Wolff’s Law. I have laid down the law in so many areas it would be hard to define just one. Among the conclusions I have come to in a long life at the table is that 4-4-4-1 hands play disappointingly on offense, but always play nicely on defense. Stretching to open three-suited hands is a fine way to turn a plus score into a minus; this hand is a solid pass, not a light opening bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 5 4
♥ K 10 6 3
♦ K J 7 4
♣ 9 |
June 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right. Here I am, Stuck in the middle with you.
Gerry Rafferty
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8 4
♥ A Q J 3
♦ J 6 3 2
♣ J 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5
♥ 6 4
♦ A Q 9
♣ A Q 9 6 4 2 |
♠ Q 10 7 3
♥ 9 8 7 5
♦ 10 8 7 4
♣ 3 |
| South |
♠ A 9 6 2
♥ K 10 2
♦ K 5
♣ K 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ * |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Two or more clubs
♣6
There are three equally good answers here, and it may be that your personal style will dictate what you do. Raising hearts may lose the spade fit, but bidding spades may lose the heart fit (or force you to overbid to find it). Rebidding one no-trump might lose either fit, but it does define the hand type nicely. I think I’d raise hearts, as long as my partnership style allowed me to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 6 2
♥ K 10 2
♦ K 5
♣ K 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I never resist temptation because I have found that things that are bad for me do not tempt me.
George Bernard Shaw
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A 9 4
♥ 9 5 4
♦ K 6 2
♣ A 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 8 7 3
♥ Q
♦ J 9 4
♣ Q 10 8 |
♠ 6 2
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ Q 10 8 7 5
♣ 6 5 |
| South |
♠ J 5
♥ A K 7 3 2
♦ A 3
♣ K J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Natural, promising values
♠K
I would be unhappy about bidding either two or three clubs here. First, I might not have as much of a fit as I expected. Second, one call is an underbid, and the other overstates my offensive possibilities. I’d settle for a slightly flawed two-no-trump response, despite having only one diamond stopper. I’m the diamond jack short of my action — sue me!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 4
♥ 9 5 4
♦ K 6 2
♣ A 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Lars Porsena of Clusium By the Nine Gods he swore That the great house of Tarquin Should suffer wrong no more.
Lord Macaulay
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 9 6 3 2
♥ K 9
♦ Q 5 4
♣ K 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 5 4
♥ Q 7
♦ A 9
♣ Q 10 9 7 6 |
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 6 4
♦ J 7 6 3 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ A 8
♥ A 10 5 3 2
♦ K 10 8
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Spades
♣10
Your partner is virtually certain to have four spades and longer clubs. (With a balanced hand, he would bid one no-trump; with three diamonds, he would surely double one heart for takeout.) So don’t panic: Revert to two clubs, giving partner preference back to his first suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ J 8 6 4
♦ J 7 6 3 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
I’m sure we all agree that we ought to love one another, and I know there are people in the world that do not love their fellow human beings, and I hate people like that.
Tom Lehrer
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 10 7
♥ 9 4 3
♦ 7 4 3 2
♣ 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 3 2
♥ Q J 10 8
♦ 8 6
♣ Q 10 9 7 |
♠ Q 6 5 4
♥ 7 5
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ J 8 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 8
♥ A K 6 2
♦ A K 5
♣ A K 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥Q
It is tempting to get your spades into play now, since this may be your last chance to bid the suit you want led at a convenient level. But I think I’d settle for raising diamonds, for two reasons. First, raising partner and limiting your hand as soon as possible helps him visualize your assets better. Second, if you bid spades, you may later have to raise diamonds to a higher level than you would like.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 10 7
♥ 9 4 3
♦ 7 4 3 2
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There is nothing stable in the world; uproar’s your only music.
John Keats
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 7 4
♥ Q 8 5
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ A 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ 10 9 7 6
♦ —
♣ K Q 10 8 7 5 |
♠ J 8 6 3
♥ J 3
♦ Q J 10 5
♣ J 9 4 |
| South |
♠ A 5 2
♥ A K 4 2
♦ A K 9 6 4
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
I wouldn’t say this hand is a no-brainer; one should never lead without thinking. But here you can reasonably assume that your left-hand opponent will put down a weak hand with three or four spades and relative shortness in diamonds. Declarer will be hoping to trump diamonds in dummy, so lead a low trump and be ready to continue the attack on that suit.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 4 2
♥ 9 2
♦ A J 6
♣ Q 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
June 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 19th, 2019
|
Thank you for your quote from James Baldwin in a recent column. Even though I don’t play, I like the quotations. Do you have a favorite?
Linda Lou, Lakeland, Fla.
I try to mix apposite quotes for the deal with lines that stand out either because they entertain me or because the quote sticks with me. My favorite is from Matthew Arnold: “We do not what we ought, / What we ought not, we do, / And lean upon the thought / That chance will bring us through.”
I recently thought I had a difficult decision as a defender and paused for some time in the play. My opponent called the Tournament Director, and though nothing came of it, I hope you can explain to me what behavior is permitted at the table in terms of mannerisms or tempo?
Solvitur Ambulando, Willoughby, Ohio
No variation in tempo is permitted if the sole purpose is to deceive. You can, of course, deceive the opponents by a false card, but not by the manner in which you play that card. When it comes to your tempo, you may not hesitate without a reason; but as long as you have a real problem to consider, you should feel that you can take as long as you like — within reason.
My wife and I have enjoyed your column for many years, and you have answered our questions from time to time. Now, we have a silly one. Is there a preferred response by the player when asked to explain his alert of his partner’s conventional call? Does he name the convention first or describe the convention first and then name it if asked? Or, does it matter?
Saints and Sinners, Memphis, Tenn.
I think I normally say the convention name first; if the listener knows the convention, he can fill in the blanks as I speak. If the listener doesn’t know it, he will ignore the name and focus on the explanation. But either is acceptable, I believe.
|
When your partner opens one diamond and the next hand overcalls three clubs, what should you do with ♠ J-3, ♥ K-Q-10-6-4, ♦ Q-7-6-5, ♣ 10-3? Is it best to pass, raise diamonds (and if so, how high?) or introduce the hearts?
Chuck and Duck, Dallas, Texas
I would bid three diamonds, feeling that this hand is well short of a three-heart call. I’d need a black king more than I have, and even then, game can hardly be underwritten. Can we find a way to four hearts if that is the best spot? I doubt it, unless my partner has four hearts — and maybe not even then.
When discarding at a trump suit, what are the implications of starting with the discard of a neutral suit (one you cannot want to encourage in)?
Sage and Onions, Kenosha, Wis.
Pitching a neutral suit first always dilutes the message that follows. If you felt strongly about one suit or another, you’d begin by sending that message, be it encouraging or discouraging. If you want to encourage, discouraging the other potential candidate allows you to retain all your winners in the key suit. And you can give suit preference by pitching high or low from your long suit when your holding is already defined.
|
|
After North’s Drury two club response to show a maximum pass with fit, South checked for key cards, then bid the spade slam.
West’s lead of the diamond 10 went to dummy’s ace. Declarer needed to hold his losers in the black suits to one, but had to decide which black suit to play first. In these positions, it is sometimes right to go after the side suit first, but here South advanced the trump jack and let it run when East played low. West’s discard of a low heart gave declarer pause. Can you see a good plan for him now?
Declarer’s solution was to throw a club on the diamond ace, then to lead out dummy’s trump 10, covered by the king and ace. Next, he put the club jack on the table — a move that would guarantee the contract as long as East had at least two clubs.
As the cards lay, the defense had no answer to this line of play. If West took the trick with the club queen, declarer would use dummy’s club 10 as an entry to pick up East’s remaining trumps. He would end up with six trumps, a heart, two diamonds and three clubs.
At the table, West allowed the club jack to hold the trick. Declarer continued by cashing the club ace, then ruffing the club eight in dummy. East overruffed this with the seven, but that was the only trick the defense made. Declarer ruffed the return of the diamond queen and drew East’s remaining trump with the ace, after which his hand was high.