Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 28th, 2019

Is not life a hundred times too short for us — to bore ourselves?

Friedrich Nietzsche


N North
E-W ♠ J 10 3
 Q 10 5 2
 A K J 2
♣ 10 3
West East
♠ —
 9 7 4 3
 10 9 8 7 5
♣ Q 9 6 4
♠ K 9 7 4
 K J 8 6
 Q 6 3
♣ 5 2
South
♠ A Q 8 6 5 2
 A
 4
♣ A K J 8 7
South West North East
    Pass Pass
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♣ * Pass
4 NT Pass 5 Pass
6 ♠ All pass    

*Drury, a maximum pass with
  spade support

10

After North’s Drury two club response to show a maximum pass with fit, South checked for key cards, then bid the spade slam.

West’s lead of the diamond 10 went to dummy’s ace. Declarer needed to hold his losers in the black suits to one, but had to decide which black suit to play first. In these positions, it is sometimes right to go after the side suit first, but here South advanced the trump jack and let it run when East played low. West’s discard of a low heart gave declarer pause. Can you see a good plan for him now?

Declarer’s solution was to throw a club on the diamond ace, then to lead out dummy’s trump 10, covered by the king and ace. Next, he put the club jack on the table — a move that would guarantee the contract as long as East had at least two clubs.

As the cards lay, the defense had no answer to this line of play. If West took the trick with the club queen, declarer would use dummy’s club 10 as an entry to pick up East’s remaining trumps. He would end up with six trumps, a heart, two diamonds and three clubs.

At the table, West allowed the club jack to hold the trick. Declarer continued by cashing the club ace, then ruffing the club eight in dummy. East overruffed this with the seven, but that was the only trick the defense made. Declarer ruffed the return of the diamond queen and drew East’s remaining trump with the ace, after which his hand was high.



Your partner must be weak and unbalanced, since he surely has six clubs but chose not to repeat the suit at his second turn, and then he ran from one no-trump. I’d guess he has one spade and is maybe 4-6 in the minors with 11-12 points. You have no fit, no sure defensive tricks and no reason to think you can beat two spades. Go quietly and pass.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 9 7 4
 K J 8 6
 Q 6 3
♣ 5 2
South West North East
    1 ♣ Pass
1 1 ♠ Pass Pass
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ 2 ♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 27th, 2019

Here error is all in the not done,
All in the diffidence that faltered.

Ezra Pound


S North
Both ♠ Q 9 6
 Q 4
 K 7 6
♣ 9 7 6 3 2
West East
♠ K 5 2
 J 7 6 2
 10 8 3 2
♣ Q 4
♠ 4 3
 K 9 8 5
 Q J 9
♣ K 10 8 5
South
♠ A J 10 8 7
 A 10 3
 A 5 4
♣ A J
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

2

When an opponent is faced with a blind opening lead, do you think it more likely that he has underled a king or a jack? Sometimes the fate of a contract will hinge on such a guess, but often declarer can survive guessing wrong — if he is careful.

Take today’s deal, where you drive to four spades on an uninformative sequence and receive the lead of a low heart. Your immediate reaction might be that if West has underled the king, you must fly up with the queen; while if he has underled the jack, you should play low. Is that addressing the problem correctly?

No, it is not, and the reason is that declarer’s heart 10 plays a huge role in the deal. Without that card, you would indeed put up dummy’s queen, but not today. Imagine that you play low from dummy and guess the position incorrectly. East’s jack forces your ace, but all is not lost if you win the lead and return the suit. West will win with his king and can shift to diamonds, but you have time to put up the king and lose the spade finesse to West. You will win the diamond return, shake a losing diamond from dummy on the heart 10, then ruff a diamond in dummy and draw trumps for your 10 tricks.

If the opposing heart honors were switched and you put up the queen, you would lose the chance to build a home for your slow diamond loser on the hearts.

Incidentally, if the first trump finesse succeeds, make sure not to repeat it until you have taken your diamond ruff in dummy.



Leading against no-trump when no suits have been bid is often daunting. Without a long suit of five or more cards or a suit of three or four cards headed by a sequence, my advice is to consider going passive. Avoid giving up a trick if you can, or take your best shot at it if you cannot. With today’s hand, I’d lead a low heart rather than a club, since the club king is so likely to be to my right.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 3 2
 J 8 5
 K 10 8
♣ A Q 4 2
South West North East
      1 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 26th, 2019

How do you feel about opening one no-trump with ♠ 4-3,  A-J-9-7-2,  K-Q-6, ♣ A-K-4? If you open one heart, you will hear partner respond one no-trump. What next?

Space Cadet, Casper, Wyo.

This hand is inappropriate to open one no-trump, in that you are too strong, with a five-card major, and you also have a weak doubleton. Having opened one heart, I can see it might be right to rebid two clubs, but I think I’d prefer a simple raise to two no-trump and let partner decide what to do next.

I play (low-level) bridge with other members of a retirement community averaging about 85 years of age. Vision problems there are fairly common. These are mostly mistakes in suit-symbol recognition. Do you have any suggestions to ameliorate these difficulties?

Rocking Robin, Tempe, Ariz.

There are playing cards with four different-colored suits. Before I get into your concern, have you looked at them as a possible solution? Using black and red for the majors, with either orange/yellow or blue/green for the minors seems best to me. I looked online and saw many references: Search for “Copag four-color double deck.”

Recently I held: ♠ A-Q-9-3-2,  Q-9-3,  A-K-3-2, ♣ 4. My partner responded one no-trump to my one spade, and the next hand butted in with two clubs. What should my double be here? Is this extra values, takeout or penalty? Or would you just bid two diamonds?

John the Divine, Bellingham, Wash.

While there is no firm agreement on what a double means here, I like it to be take-out, and this hand would be ideal. With both majors, you might simply bid hearts instead of doubling. But the double keeps hearts in play, as well as the pass for penalties.

Playing duplicate, declarer came down to four cards in dummy: two good spades and two honors, one of which was high and one that wasn’t. When he claimed the rest, depending on the order he played the cards, I could get one or two of those tricks. What should the director rule here?

Richie Rich, Los Altos, Calif.

This is a tricky problem because declarer is put on notice of his error by your disputing the claim. Typically, a disputed trick is awarded to the nonclaiming side if the losing play was inferior but not irrational. Here, declarer seems to have thought all of dummy’s cards were good. It would be inferior but not irrational to play the cards in the wrong order and give you two tricks rather than one. So two tricks it is.

When you open one no-trump and hear your partner transfer to a major then bid a new suit to show a two-suiter with game-forcing values, how should you rebid at your third turn?

Down Under Dave, Greenville, S.C.

Opener raises the major when he can, and by agreement I suggest you use four of the other minor specifically as a fit for both suits, suitable for slam. With no support for either suit, bid no-trump if you can, but bid a new suit at the three-level to look for no-trump with concern about the fourth suit. In that instance, you may also be planning to bid on over three no-trump, which would convert your previous bid to a cue-bid.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 25th, 2019

That best portion of a good man’s life,
His little, nameless, unremembered acts
Of kindness and love.

William Wordsworth


N North
None ♠ K 10 5 4
 K 10 6 3
 K J 7 4
♣ 9
West East
♠ A J 6
 J 7
 Q 10 3 2
♣ Q 10 5 3
♠ Q 9
 Q 8 5
 8 6 5
♣ A J 7 4 2
South
♠ 8 7 3 2
 A 9 4 2
 A 9
♣ K 8 6
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 Pass 2 Pass
2 ♠ Pass 4 All pass
       

2

Our final example in the theme of negotiating a suit missing the queen and jack will happen to you only once in a lifetime; be ready for it, please!

In the finals of the World Championships in Beijing in 1995, neither the men nor women managed to stop low — indeed, three pairs bid the hands to game, and no one made much of an attempt to make it. Strangely enough, when South declares the hand on a diamond lead, the contract is unbreakable. Of course, South can play for a mundane doubleton queen-jack of trumps, but that will never get you in the papers, will it?

In four hearts, there is no need to rush things; the timing is a little awkward, but it is simplest to finesse the diamond jack at trick one, then play a club. East must take his ace, and a diamond return is as good as any. South wins the ace, plays a spade to the king, then leads the diamond king for a spade discard; now the carding makes it safe to ruff a diamond. Next cash the club king, pitching a spade, ruff a club and exit with a spade from dummy. In the five-card ending, either defender can take this trick, but it is best for West to overtake East’s queen with the ace and cash his side’s second spade trick.

However, declarer is now left with A-9-4 in trumps facing K-10-6, and the defense’s trump trick is about to vanish. When West leads a club, you ruff low in dummy, and whether East ruffs in with the eight or queen, you are home free. A perfect Devil’s coup.



There is as yet no official Wolff’s Law. I have laid down the law in so many areas it would be hard to define just one. Among the conclusions I have come to in a long life at the table is that 4-4-4-1 hands play disappointingly on offense, but always play nicely on defense. Stretching to open three-suited hands is a fine way to turn a plus score into a minus; this hand is a solid pass, not a light opening bid.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10 5 4
 K 10 6 3
 K J 7 4
♣ 9
South West North East
?      
       

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, May 24th, 2019

Clowns to the left of me,
Jokers to the right.
Here I am,
Stuck in the middle with you.

Gerry Rafferty


S North
None ♠ K 8 4
 A Q J 3
 J 6 3 2
♣ J 10
West East
♠ J 5
 6 4
 A Q 9
♣ A Q 9 6 4 2
♠ Q 10 7 3
 9 8 7 5
 10 8 7 4
♣ 3
South
♠ A 9 6 2
 K 10 2
 K 5
♣ K 8 7 5
South West North East
1 ♣ * 2 ♣ Dbl. Pass
2 ♠ Pass 3 ♣ Pass
3 NT All pass    

*Two or more clubs

♣6

The maneuver shown in today’s deal, known as an intrafinesse, does not come up all that often. It is an episode in this week’s theme of how to develop an extra trick in a suit missing the queen and jack.

Here, South declared three no-trump after opening a short club. West overcalled a natural two clubs over this, and when North produced a negative double, South introduced his four-card major, then owned up to a club stopper when North asked him for one.

After West kicked off with a low club, declarer won with dummy’s 10. He could see his way to something like two clubs, two spades and four heart tricks, but where was the ninth going to come from?

If he tried to set up a diamond, the defenders would surely win the race to establish clubs first. So the extra trick had to come from spades. In order to achieve his target, South crossed to his heart 10 and led a spade to the eight and 10. East shifted to diamonds, and West could see that declarer would likely establish his ninth winner in that suit if left to his own devices. So he played the ace of clubs, then the queen, as East pitched hearts. That let South score his king, but it set up West’s clubs in the process.

However, now declarer cashed the hearts, then took the spade king to drop West’s jack and led dummy’s last spade to his nine. The finesse wasn’t guaranteed to succeed, but declarer was confident that West would have split his honors at trick three if he had begun with Q-J-x of spades.



There are three equally good answers here, and it may be that your personal style will dictate what you do. Raising hearts may lose the spade fit, but bidding spades may lose the heart fit (or force you to overbid to find it). Rebidding one no-trump might lose either fit, but it does define the hand type nicely. I think I’d raise hearts, as long as my partnership style allowed me to.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 9 6 2
 K 10 2
 K 5
♣ K 8 7 5
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, May 23rd, 2019

I never resist temptation because I have found that things that are bad for me do not tempt me.

George Bernard Shaw


W North
None ♠ A 9 4
 9 5 4
 K 6 2
♣ A 9 3 2
West East
♠ K Q 10 8 7 3
 Q
 J 9 4
♣ Q 10 8
♠ 6 2
 J 10 8 6
 Q 10 8 7 5
♣ 6 5
South
♠ J 5
 A K 7 3 2
 A 3
♣ K J 7 4
South West North East
  2 ♠ Pass Pass
Dbl. Pass 3 ♣ * Pass
3 Pass 4 All pass
       

*Natural, promising values

♠K

This deal is part of our weekly overview of a general theme: handling a suit where we are missing the queen and jack. When the auction has marked one defender as more likely than his partner to hold length in a suit, we have safety plays to guard against the bad split. Today’s deal is a horse of a slightly different color.

When West pre-empted to two spades, South doubled, to which his partner responded three clubs to show constructive values. With less, he would have used the Lebensohl convention, bidding two no-trump as an artificial negative.

In four hearts, South ducked the spade lead, won the second round and noted that the only real danger was a hostile trump break. He could not guard against most breaks where West was short, but he had a play that was technically sound and also gave the defenders a chance to err. After taking the spade ace, he led the heart nine from dummy, a play that would pin a bare eight in West and would also allow East to fall from grace with a knee-jerk cover. East did precisely that by putting in the 10, and South won, collecting West’s queen in the process.

Declarer now led a diamond to the king and played a second trump, ducking East’s eight. East returned a diamond; declarer won his ace, crossed to the club ace and took the trump finesse, then drew the last trump. Then he played the club king and another club, conceding a club trick, after which his hand was high.



I would be unhappy about bidding either two or three clubs here. First, I might not have as much of a fit as I expected. Second, one call is an underbid, and the other overstates my offensive possibilities. I’d settle for a slightly flawed two-no-trump response, despite having only one diamond stopper. I’m the diamond jack short of my action — sue me!

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 9 4
 9 5 4
 K 6 2
♣ A 9 3 2
South West North East
  1 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, May 22nd, 2019

Lars Porsena of Clusium
By the Nine Gods he swore
That the great house of Tarquin
Should suffer wrong no more.

Lord Macaulay


S North
Both ♠ K 9 6 3 2
 K 9
 Q 5 4
♣ K 5 4
West East
♠ J 10 5 4
 Q 7
 A 9
♣ Q 10 9 7 6
♠ Q 7
 J 8 6 4
 J 7 6 3 2
♣ J 8
South
♠ A 8
 A 10 5 3 2
 K 10 8
♣ A 3 2
South West North East
1 NT Pass 2 * Pass
2 ♠ Pass 3 NT All pass
       

*Spades

♣10

Our themed deals this week all feature tackling suits where we are missing both the queen and the jack. Often the subsidiary cards influence our line of attack, and today’s deal is no exception.

Bringing home three no-trump after the lead of an interior club won’t be easy; we need to overcome not one but two hurdles. The first essential move is to duck the initial club lead. There is no shift we are particularly afraid of, but if clubs are 5-2 (as they are here), we may find we need to cut the defenders’ communications with a duck on the first round.

Winning the club continuation in hand, we then need to consider which major suit to go after, and the decision is pretty close. In favor of playing on hearts is the presence of better intermediates. But (and it is a big but) we need to exploit those intermediates to the fullest by leading to the heart nine. This succeeds not only against any 3-3 break, but also whenever West has both heart honors, and critically when he has a doubleton heart honor.

Today, east will win his heart honor, but has no third club to lead. The best he can do is shift to a high diamond spot, to the 10 and ace. In due course, we can unblock hearts, come back to hand in spades, and run the hearts. That brings us to four hearts, one diamond and two tricks in each of the black suits, nine in all.

Notice that playing the king of hearts, then the nine, will see us lose two heart tricks.



Your partner is virtually certain to have four spades and longer clubs. (With a balanced hand, he would bid one no-trump; with three diamonds, he would surely double one heart for takeout.) So don’t panic: Revert to two clubs, giving partner preference back to his first suit.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 7
 J 8 6 4
 J 7 6 3 2
♣ J 8
South West North East
    1 ♣ Dbl.
Pass 1 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, May 21st, 2019

I’m sure we all agree that we ought to love one another, and I know there are people in the world that do not love their fellow human beings, and I hate people like that.

Tom Lehrer


S North
None ♠ A K 10 7
 9 4 3
 7 4 3 2
♣ 5 3
West East
♠ J 3 2
 Q J 10 8
 8 6
♣ Q 10 9 7
♠ Q 6 5 4
 7 5
 Q J 10 9
♣ J 8 2
South
♠ 9 8
 A K 6 2
 A K 5
♣ A K 6 4
South West North East
2 NT Pass 3 ♣ Pass
3 Pass 3 NT All pass
       

Q

Today’s deal is part of a weekly series where we look at variations in the play and tackle suit combinations that exhibit a broadly similar theme.

This week, all the critical suits are missing the queen and jack. Here, a simple Stayman sequence saw South reach three no-trump after showing hearts, while dummy had implied spade length. West was happy enough with his heart sequence to lead it, and declarer won the first trick for fear of a club shift, then saw that he could probably make his contract if he could establish either an extra trick from spades or diamonds.

It seemed like the diamonds could wait; so declarer immediately went after spades, running the eight from hand around to East, who continued with hearts. Declarer ducked, won the next heart, then played the ace, king and a third diamond to East. That player could cash his last diamond winner and exit in clubs, but South took his last chance when he led a spade to the 10 and cashed out that suit for nine tricks.

Notice that declarer led the spade eight rather than the nine from hand because he did not want West to cover — as a general rule, leading the lower of touching cards toward dummy is more likely to get a defender to duck.

Also, it is worth noting that West did have a chance to set the game. If he had covered the first spade, declarer would have been held to two tricks in that suit, so long as the defenders played accurately thereafter.



It is tempting to get your spades into play now, since this may be your last chance to bid the suit you want led at a convenient level. But I think I’d settle for raising diamonds, for two reasons. First, raising partner and limiting your hand as soon as possible helps him visualize your assets better. Second, if you bid spades, you may later have to raise diamonds to a higher level than you would like.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A K 10 7
 9 4 3
 7 4 3 2
♣ 5 3
South West North East
  1 ♣ 1 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, May 20th, 2019

There is nothing stable in the world; uproar’s your only music.

John Keats


W North
N-S ♠ K 7 4
 Q 8 5
 8 7 3 2
♣ A 6 3
West East
♠ Q 10 9
 10 9 7 6
 —
♣ K Q 10 8 7 5
♠ J 8 6 3
 J 3
 Q J 10 5
♣ J 9 4
South
♠ A 5 2
 A K 4 2
 A K 9 6 4
♣ 2
South West North East
  3 ♣ Pass Pass
Dbl. Pass 3 NT Pass
4 Pass 5 All pass
       

♣K

I have been experimenting this year with a new category of themed deals. Every month I will run one week’s worth of deals with a common theme, generally during the play. This week’s deals all feature a problem for declarer or defense where the critical suit is missing both the queen and the jack.

Today’s deal is one fairly typical example of a sub-genre of the theme. Both North and South had a series of delicate decisions: South’s re-opening double looked clear, then North took an aggressive position, after which South was very close to driving to slam. Eventually he decided to respect his partner’s signoff. But make up your own mind how you would play five diamonds on a top club lead from West.

After that lead, South had a classic opportunity to take out insurance. In six diamonds, declarer would surely have played for either hearts or diamonds to break; but in five, he could virtually ensure his contract with a simple example of a safety play. By winning the club ace and leading a low diamond to East’s five and his own six, he could guarantee losing no more than one diamond and one spade. If West could win the first diamond, then declarer could guarantee being able to draw trumps and ruff the fourth heart safely in dummy, losing just one further trick in spades.

Admittedly, the lie of the cards was remarkably hostile, but not altogether unexpected given the initial pre-empt by West. And if you can guard against bad breaks, why not do so?



I wouldn’t say this hand is a no-brainer; one should never lead without thinking. But here you can reasonably assume that your left-hand opponent will put down a weak hand with three or four spades and relative shortness in diamonds. Declarer will be hoping to trump diamonds in dummy, so lead a low trump and be ready to continue the attack on that suit.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ A 6 4 2
 9 2
 A J 6
♣ Q 4 3 2
South West North East
      1
Pass 1 Pass 1 ♠
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, May 19th, 2019

Thank you for your quote from James Baldwin in a recent column. Even though I don’t play, I like the quotations. Do you have a favorite?

Linda Lou, Lakeland, Fla.

I try to mix apposite quotes for the deal with lines that stand out either because they entertain me or because the quote sticks with me. My favorite is from Matthew Arnold: “We do not what we ought, / What we ought not, we do, / And lean upon the thought / That chance will bring us through.”

I recently thought I had a difficult decision as a defender and paused for some time in the play. My opponent called the Tournament Director, and though nothing came of it, I hope you can explain to me what behavior is permitted at the table in terms of mannerisms or tempo?

Solvitur Ambulando, Willoughby, Ohio

No variation in tempo is permitted if the sole purpose is to deceive. You can, of course, deceive the opponents by a false card, but not by the manner in which you play that card. When it comes to your tempo, you may not hesitate without a reason; but as long as you have a real problem to consider, you should feel that you can take as long as you like — within reason.

My wife and I have enjoyed your column for many years, and you have answered our questions from time to time. Now, we have a silly one. Is there a preferred response by the player when asked to explain his alert of his partner’s conventional call? Does he name the convention first or describe the convention first and then name it if asked? Or, does it matter?

Saints and Sinners, Memphis, Tenn.

I think I normally say the convention name first; if the listener knows the convention, he can fill in the blanks as I speak. If the listener doesn’t know it, he will ignore the name and focus on the explanation. But either is acceptable, I believe.

When your partner opens one diamond and the next hand overcalls three clubs, what should you do with ♠ J-3,  K-Q-10-6-4,  Q-7-6-5, ♣ 10-3? Is it best to pass, raise diamonds (and if so, how high?) or introduce the hearts?

Chuck and Duck, Dallas, Texas

I would bid three diamonds, feeling that this hand is well short of a three-heart call. I’d need a black king more than I have, and even then, game can hardly be underwritten. Can we find a way to four hearts if that is the best spot? I doubt it, unless my partner has four hearts — and maybe not even then.

When discarding at a trump suit, what are the implications of starting with the discard of a neutral suit (one you cannot want to encourage in)?

Sage and Onions, Kenosha, Wis.

Pitching a neutral suit first always dilutes the message that follows. If you felt strongly about one suit or another, you’d begin by sending that message, be it encouraging or discouraging. If you want to encourage, discouraging the other potential candidate allows you to retain all your winners in the key suit. And you can give suit preference by pitching high or low from your long suit when your holding is already defined.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].