May 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
When a deal is passed out on the first round of a duplicate, are we allowed to re-deal the hand without asking the director for permission?
Thrown for a Loop, Naples, Fla.
While the paying customer has one fewer deal to play because of the throw-in, that would be missing the point. Say I or my partner had passed a hand others might open. Should we not get the good or bad result from that decision? Also, you can be confident that on most pass-outs, someone, somewhere, will find a reason to bid, no matter how flimsy the pretext.
If a defender shows his card, when may he be excused from playing that card, assuming it has not actually been put on the table? I thought I was allowed to change my mind here.
Faulty Towers, Wilmington, N.C.
There are different rules for declarer and the defenders. For declarer, a card has to be played — or the equivalent of played — rather than accidentally dropped. (Declarer doesn’t have a partner who might benefit from unauthorized information.) For the defenders, a card is played if it is actually or potentially in view. Thus, a partly or wholly visible card is normally treated as played.
I picked up ♠ 9-4, ♥ 7-4-2, ♦ A-Q-7-5-3, ♣ K-3-2 and heard one club from my partner, then one spade on my right. Is this hand suitable for a negative double? I thought not, so I passed, and now a raise to two spades was passed back to me. What would be appropriate now?
Lurking Warbeck, Dodge City, Kan.
You were right not to double or bid two diamonds, though you might take the latter action as a passed hand. Here, I’d bid two no-trump at my second turn if I trusted my partner to be fully present. A call of two no-trump is logically take-out for the minors, not natural. It denies four clubs, since I would already have raised if I had that hand. Something like this hand would therefore be perfect for the call.
|
Is there a simple way to learn the rules for the percentages as they apply to calculating how the opponents’ missing cards might divide?
Life’s a Bore(l), Honolulu, Hawaii
In broad terms, two missing cards will probably split, but in all other cases, an even number of missing cards will probably not divide evenly. The odds of them splitting exactly are slightly more than 1 in 3 in most cases, while a one-from-even split is a 50-50 shot. An odd number of cards split as close to evenly as possible, with odds about 2 in 3 for that. Start from those numbers; for other cases, the more normal the split, the more likely it is.
I was second to speak, with ♠ A-8, ♥ A-Q-7-3-2, ♦ J-4-3-2, ♣ A-4, and I opened one heart. The next hand doubled, and my partner jumped to three hearts. I passed, and we missed a game. Afterward, he said there was no way to show less than a limit raise but more than a pre-empt. He mentioned the concept of a mixed raise. Have you heard of this call?
Mixed Nuts, Detroit, Mich.
A mixed raise is a jump cue-bid in competition, facing an overcall, to show a four-card raise with 6-9 points or so. It is mixed, as it has the shape for a pre-emptive raise and the values for a single raise. Since this call has no other useful meaning, it makes good sense to play this convention — as long as your partnership has agreed. One could also use the jump in the unbid major after a major suit is doubled to show precisely this hand; so here, a call of two spades would show this.
|
May 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is: infinite.
William Blake
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ K 9 6 3
♣ A 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6
♥ 7 6
♦ J 10 5
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
♠ 10 7 5 4
♥ 4 3
♦ A Q 8 4
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 2
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
It is worth emphasizing why your response maybe be different after a balancing double than after a direct-seat double. A direct double shows opening values or more; a balancing double may be as much as a king less than that. So, responder to the balancing double bids as if he has transferred a king to his partner. Here, responder jumps to two hearts; he would not do so facing a balancing double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 2
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Everything happens to everybody sooner or later if there is time enough.
George Bernard Shaw
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 9 7 6 4
♥ Q 3
♦ J 7 5
♣ A 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8 5
♥ K 8 7 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ J 4 2 |
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ J 9
♦ 10 9 4 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A 10 6 5 2
♦ A Q 8
♣ K 10 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
Even though the opponents seem prepared to go quietly, it is worthwhile to invest a small amount to make their lives more difficult in case West plans to re-open the bidding. You should raise to three spades to force his next action to come at a more uncomfortable level. This may turn a plus score into a minus, but overall, the investment looks sound to me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 5
♥ K 8 7 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
But I, being poor, have only my dreams, I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
W.B. Yeats
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 2
♥ K J 10 5
♦ A Q 9
♣ A 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ 9 8 7 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ Q 10 9 6 |
♠ Q J 10 8 5 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ K 6 3
♣ J |
| South |
♠ A K 6
♥ Q 4
♦ J 10 8 4
♣ K 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠7
It isn’t clear whether you belong in diamonds or three no-trump, but you don’t really have any slam ambitions yet. Bid three clubs to show where you live and let partner help you decide what strain to end up in. When in doubt, it is always better to let partner tell you what he has, rather than deciding for him.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 2
♥ K J 10 5
♦ A Q 9
♣ A 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them.
Laurence Peter
| East |
North |
| None |
♠ K Q 4 2
♥ A 9 8
♦ Q 9 6 2
♣ A K |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7 3
♥ K 10 6 5 2
♦ 7 5
♣ 8 3 |
♠ 8
♥ J 7
♦ J 8 3
♣ Q J 10 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 6 5
♥ Q 4 3
♦ A K 10 4
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All Pass |
♣8
Creeping or Crawling Stayman allows you to bid two clubs here and correct a response of two diamond to two hearts to offer a choice of the majors. Opener tends to pass unless he has three spades and two hearts, so this way you can remove yourself from one no-trump and find a reasonable partscore whatever your partner has.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 7 3
♥ K 10 6 5 2
♦ 7 5
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
In science, the credit goes to the man who convinces the world, not to the man to whom the idea first occurs.
Sir Francis Darwin
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 9 8
♥ K 7
♦ A 6 3
♣ K Q 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3 2
♥ 9 8 6 2
♦ J 7 2
♣ 10 8 |
♠ Q 6
♥ Q J 5 4 3
♦ Q 10 8 5
♣ 6 5 |
| South |
♠ J 5 4
♥ A 10
♦ K 9 4
♣ A J 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥9
A double here is cardshowing (typically a strong no-trump equivalent or better, with no clear alternative action). It is not for penalty, but closer to take-out than optional. You should simply bid three diamonds and let your partner take a further call if appropriate.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6
♥ Q J 5 4 3
♦ Q 10 8 5
♣ 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Life always gets harder toward the summit — the cold increases, responsibility increases.
Friedrich Nietzsche
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 4
♥ A J 7 6 3
♦ 2
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 6 5
♥ 9
♦ J 9 8 4
♣ K J 8 |
♠ K J 7 3
♥ 5
♦ K 10 7 6 5
♣ 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ K Q 10 8 4 2
♦ A Q 3
♣ A Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Short diamonds, agreeing hearts
♠10
I’m unimaginative here; I lead my long suit and hope we can somehow develop it. With honor-third in diamonds, I might try that suit, but three small requires my partner to have way too much in the suit for it to be a success. Either red suit might work, or even a passive lead, but I prefer to lead what is in front of my face.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 5 3
♥ Q 2
♦ 8 3 2
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
May 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
My partner heard me open one diamond and held ♠ K-J-4, ♥ 2, ♦ A-J-8-2, ♣ K-Q-7-6-5. He responded two clubs and heard me rebid my diamonds, which we play simply as showing five or more in an unbalanced hand. How should he develop his hand now, given that a raise to three diamonds would be forcing in our style?
Stocking Stuffer, Tuscaloosa, Ala.
A raise to three diamonds is one possible start, while a call of two spades may be best to get you to three no-trump. A third option is to jump to three hearts instead. Since two hearts would be natural and forcing, this shows a singleton heart with diamond support and likely slam interest; you hope partner will find a cue-bid of a minor-suit king. If he signs off in three no-trump, you should probably respect his judgment.
My partner unleashed a sequence on me for which I was not prepared. He opened one club, and I responded one spade. The next hand bid two diamonds, and partner jumped to four clubs, holding six clubs and four spades. Is this a convention — and is it in standard use?
Point Counterpoint, Little Rock, Ark.
It is not unusual to agree that in a non-competitive sequence, a double jump to four clubs shows at least six decent clubs and four spades, with the values to drive to game. This helps partner see a source of tricks for his side in a spade slam. But in competition, should four clubs be natural or fit? I guess fit is logical enough, but it is an unusual enough auction that I wouldn’t want to spring it on my partner unawares.
Are there many partnerships that defend against preempts by using a double as anything but takeout? What if opener doubles the preemptive raise of an overcall at his second turn to speak after partner has bid a suit?
Combat Boots, White Plains, N.Y.
Playing takeout doubles of one- or two-suited preempts at your first turn to speak is sensible because that is the hand type that comes up most often. I’d assume most people use a second-round double as indicating extras, unsuitable for repeating one’s own suit, raising partner, bidding a second suit or bidding no-trump. So, balanced or semi-balanced with extras, maybe?
|
I have always been taught not to open all 12-counts reflexively, but to bid only with a hand good in shape or controls. Am I out of line with modern thinking? And how should I act with a shapely 11-count?
Egg-shells, Charlottesville, Va.
With 4333 pattern and with a suit I do not particularly want partner to lead I might pass. By contrast, on 11-counts with shape, especially those where a rebid is easy, I like to get the hand off my chest at my first turn. Hands with awkward shape, where the four-card suit ranks above the five-carder, might sensibly pass at the first turn rather than having to distort at the second turn.
What is the right way to ask for aces and then for kings using Gerber after my partner opens in a suit?
Florence of Arabia, Columbus, Ohio
Gerber applies only after an opening or rebid of one or two no-trump. The four-club call gets a response of four diamonds for zero or four aces, four hearts for one ace, and so on. Then five clubs (or step one if you play Sliding Gerber) over the response asks for kings with the same scheme of responses. By agreement, one can use Gerber after a one-no-trump opener if Stayman finds a fit. But the best way to play Gerber is by your left- and right-hand opponents, rather than by you.
|
May 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Weeded and worn the ancient thatch Upon the lonely moated grange.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K Q 7 5 2
♥ 10 4 2
♦ 9 6
♣ Q J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3
♥ K 9 6 5
♦ Q 10 3
♣ A 10 9 3 |
♠ 10 8 6 4
♥ Q
♦ K J 8 7 5 2
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A J 8 7 3
♦ A 4
♣ K 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
The fact that your right-hand opponent has shown four spades shouldn’t stop you from simply raising to two hearts, the value call on your hand. Although your trumps are weak, your defensive values aren’t that remarkable and your overall hand is just fine for the simple raise of hearts. Don’t pass and back in later; that lets the opponents establish their optimal fit and level too easily.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5 2
♥ 10 4 2
♦ 9 6
♣ Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
There was a time when meadow, grove, and stream, The earth and every common sight, To me did seem Appareled in a celestial light.
William Wordsworth
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A K J 5
♥ Q 9 7 6
♦ 10 5
♣ 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4 3
♥ 10 8 5
♦ A K Q J 6
♣ K J 6 |
♠ Q 10 8 7 6
♥ J
♦ 8 3 2
♣ 8 7 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 9 2
♥ A K 4 3 2
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
One of the critical debates in two-over-one bidding is whether opener’s rebid of his suit in a game-forcing auction should promise six. If you believe that, you are occasionally required either to rebid two no-trump with a flawed hand or to raise responder’s suit with three trumps and a balanced minimum. If you can rebid two hearts here without promising six, that is clearly the right course of action.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 2
♥ A K 4 3 2
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When South heard his partner balance over East’s one-diamond opening bid with a double, he did not have enough to jump to two hearts — see today’s Bid With the Aces problem. However, when his partner made a game try, showing real extras, South had enough to go directly to game.
West had a straightforward lead of the diamond jack, and declarer correctly ducked this in dummy. (If declarer covers, East will win and must then steel himself to play the diamond four to his partner’s 10. Now a club shift leaves declarer out of options.)
When the diamond jack held the first trick, West did very well by shifting to a club anyway, won by East’s queen. East exited passively with a spade to dummy’s king, but declarer now had a blueprint for the full hand. He unblocked the spade ace and led a heart to the nine. Then he took a spade ruff in dummy with a trump intermediate and cashed the heart queen.
If trumps had been 3-1, declarer could have run them all, reducing down to a three-card ending where dummy had the bare diamond king and the ace-10 of clubs, but he might have needed to read the ending carefully. East might make declarer’s life hard by baring his club king early, then pitching the diamond queen.
Instead, though, with trumps being 2-2, declarer simply drew all of them and led a diamond. He could cover West’s card, endplaying East to concede the game-going trick in one minor or the other.