Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 9th, 2019

A sharp tongue is the only edged tool that grows keener with constant use.

Washington Irving


W North
None ♠ A K 10
 A J
 A K J 10 6 5
♣ A 8
West East
♠ Q 9 6 4
 10 4
 Q 8 3 2
♣ 9 5 4
♠ J 8 7 2
 9 8 5 2
 7
♣ J 6 3 2
South
♠ 5 3
 K Q 7 6 3
 9 4
♣ K Q 10 7
South West North East
  Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 NT Pass
3 * Pass 3 Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 6 Pass
7 ♣ Pass 7 All pass
       

*Hearts

♣4

All of our deals have a common theme this week: how to play suit combinations that include the ace, king and jack.

This deal occurred in the final of a major national tournament, on Vugraph no less, so that declarer’s eventual embarrassment was evident to all when he missed the best play. Out of deference to the player (and perhaps partly out of concern about what might happen to my grandchildren if I mention his name) I shall preserve his anonymity.

North treated his hand as very strong and balanced, then tried to get out in diamonds, but South wasn’t in on the joke and eventually, much to his disgust, ended in a grand slam with only two trumps in hand.

Perhaps the auction influenced his line of play: He won the club lead in dummy, cashed the diamond ace, then came to hand in clubs to finesse the diamonds. The finesse won, but the 4-1 trump break was too much for him to cope with.

Of course, the percentage play with this trump suit is to take two finesses. Win the club lead and pass the diamond nine at once. When it holds, repeat the finesse and draw trumps, after which you have 13 tricks.

The reason this play is right is that if trumps are 4-1, with West having the length, it is four times as likely that the singleton is a small one rather than the queen. With any other lie of the diamonds, the question of whether you take the first- or second-round finesse is irrelevant.



Clearly, you have a hand worth raising spades — but to what level? A jump to four spades shows three or four trumps, tending to deny a high-card control such as an ace or king. With three third-round controls, you might choose to raise to three spades rather than four, but this seems just a little too much to me. With as little as an additional jack in diamonds or spades, I might feel differently.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 9 6 4
 10 4
 Q 8 3 2
♣ 9 5 4
South West North East
    2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 2 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 8th, 2019

Our ship of state, which recent storms have threatened to destroy, has come safely to harbor at last.

Sophocles


N North
E-W ♠ A Q J 8 3
 Q 2
 A 2
♣ A 9 6 3
West East
♠ 9 6 2
 J 8 6
 10 9 7
♣ Q 10 7 5
♠ 10 7 5
 K 9 7 5
 Q 8 6 4 3
♣ 8
South
♠ K 4
 A 10 4 3
 K J 5
♣ K J 4 2
South West North East
    1 ♠ Pass
2 ♣ Pass 3 ♣ Pass
3 NT Pass 4 ♣ Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 * Pass 6 ♣ All pass
       

*Two key-cards, no trump queen

10

All the deals this week have something in common. Each includes the theme that declarer has to tackle a suit in which he has the ace, king and jack. With holdings of this sort, there are multiple issues that might arise. You may need to keep one defender off lead (a concept generally summed up as “avoidance”). Alternatively, you may simply need to maximize your trick potential. Finally, as in today’s deal, you may be looking at a safety play, where you are prepared to invest a trick in order to ensure that you do not lose two.

When the opponents lead the diamond 10 against your club slam, you count three tricks in diamonds, bringing your total outside the trump suit to nine tricks. So you need only three club tricks to make your slam — in other words, the focus should be on avoiding two trump losers. (It’s true that if both clubs and spades fail to break, you might not have 12 top tricks, but a 4-1 trump break is far more likely than a combination of foul splits.)

The simplest route to making your slam is to win the diamond lead cheaply in hand and avoid the knee-jerk reaction of leading a club to the ace and a club back toward the king-jack. Instead, cash the club king and play toward the ace-nine, planning to put in the nine if West follows with a small card. If West plays the 10 or queen, you take the trick; but if he shows out, you win the ace and lead toward your jack. After that, it is smooth sailing.



When declarer is likely to have four cards in the suit you lead, as would be the case for an attack on clubs here, a low card is better than leading from a sequence. Imagine partner with the doubleton ace of clubs and declarer with the guarded king, for example.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ J 8 7 2
 10 4
 K 7 5
♣ Q J 3 2
South West North East
  1 Pass 1
Pass 1 ♠ Pass 1 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, April 7th, 2019

I’m thinking of acceding to my partner’s request that we take up third-and-lowest leads since he tells me they are more helpful in counting the hand than fourth-highest. But how do we know if the lead is from a bad suit — can we play second—highest as well?

Spuds McKenzie, Atlanta, Ga.

It is absolutely impossible to use third-and-lowest leads together with second from three or four small cards. Imagine the five missing cards are Q-8-7-4-3; if you combine the two methods, the seven and four are unreadable. You can, however, lead top from three or four small in a suit you have supported, where a doubleton is not a possible holding.

I have been taught that, facing an opening bid of one no-trump, Stayman always promises invitational or better values. My new partner likes to play Stayman followed by a minimum call in any suit as weak. Which is the better way?

Follow the Money, Raleigh, N.C.

It is relatively common (and sensible) to use the sequence of Stayman followed by a rebid of two hearts over two diamonds as weak with both majors, not invitational. All other sequences after Stayman do indeed tend to promise at least invitational values. A call of two spades can be played in many different ways, though it is often as an invitational hand of sorts. Calls in the minors are typically natural and game-forcing with a four-card major on the side.

Say you were third to speak, holding ♠ Q-7-4-3,  K-8-4,  A-3, ♣ J-7-4-2. Do you have a strong opinion about whether to open this hand, and does the vulnerability matter?

Testing the Water, Salt Lake City, Utah

I would not open this hand at any vulnerability, since I really do not know that I want a club lead (or a spade lead if I open that suit). It wouldn’t take much to change my mind. Non-vulnerable, switch the diamond ace and club two, and now opening ace-jack-fourth doesn’t strike me as unreasonable. I recognize that my answer may be showing my age a little.

When my partner opened one heart, I heard a double to my right. With ♠ 10-6-2,  Q-4,  K-Q-J-5, ♣ Q-10-8-4, I thought it looked natural to bid one no-trump. Then came two hearts from my partner and two spades to my right. What should I do now?

Law-Abiding Citizen, San Francisco, Calif.

You have some extras and nothing wasted in spades, plus good trumps in context. I’d bid three hearts, expecting to make it. I don’t think game is favored our way, but you can imagine that if partner has short spades, we might come close to 10 tricks. So maybe three diamonds should be a heart raise with diamond cards, since I have already implicitly denied long diamonds at my first turn.

I note that you often attribute deals from actual play. Of the remaining deals, which are from your own imagination (or others’)?

Yellow Pager, Mexico City, Mexico

In all cases where a player or location has been specified, I’ll try to leave the spot-cards unchanged, except to eliminate unnecessary complications or duplicate solutions (sometimes called “cooks”). For others, I tend to use real deals, sometimes modified, sometimes concealing the protagonists if they have erred. The rest are creations or variations on a genuine theme. The advent of the Common Game is a boon because I get to use deals the readers may already have played, but put my own spin on them.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, April 6th, 2019

Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. I find out what the world needs. Then, I go ahead and invent it.

Thomas Edison


S North
E-W ♠ Q 6 3 2
 10 9 6 4
 Q J 4 3
♣ A
West East
♠ 9 4
 K Q J 8 5 3 2
 9
♣ 8 6 5
♠ A J 10 8
 7
 K 10 8 6
♣ 10 9 3 2
South
♠ K 7 5
 A
 A 7 5 2
♣ K Q J 7 4
South West North East
1 1 1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 2 Pass
3 ♠ Pass 5 Dbl.
All pass      

K

Today’s deal is a real-life hand from 45 years ago, reported in the Australian press.

It represents a missed opportunity for declarer, who had been given a roadmap by East’s double (maybe Dick Cummings was assuming his partner, Tim Seres, had a hand with some defense, given his overcall rather than a preempt.)

The defense began with a top heart lead to the ace. Perhaps assuming that hearts could not be 7-1, declarer unblocked clubs and led a heart from the board. Cummings discarded a club on this trick, and from here on in, the contract could no longer be made.

Declarer should surely have played for the diamonds not to break, and after winning the club ace, he should have led the diamond queen from dummy.

Say East covers, which looks right for preserving the tenace over dummy. Then four more rounds of clubs, discarding spades from dummy, forces East to ruff and return a high diamond. Now Declarer wins in dummy and cross-ruffs the majors. Though East can score his high trump sooner or later, that is all he gets.

The play is far more interesting on a spade lead, when East wins and returns a heart. After heart ace, then club ace, then the diamond queen to the king and ace, South cashes the club king and queen, throwing hearts from dummy. Then he takes the spade king, leads a spade to the queen, and ruffs a spade. In the four-card ending, South ruffs a spade and leads a heart from the board; now East can score only one more trump trick.



There is no reason to redouble, after which it may be difficult to get all your suits into play. Similarly, raising diamonds might lead to your losing a major suit fit. The simplest way forward is to bid hearts, hoping to hear partner raise or bid spades; but if not, you will raise diamonds at your next turn. When in doubt, bid suits rather than redoubling.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 6 3 2
 10 9 6 4
 Q J 4 3
♣ A
South West North East
  Pass 1 Dbl.
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, April 5th, 2019

The world, dear Agnes, is a strange affair.

Moliere


E North
N-S ♠ K Q J 9
 A K J 7
 —
♣ K Q 9 5 4
West East
♠ 7
 6 5 3 2
 A J 4 3
♣ A 7 6 3
♠ 8
 10 9 4
 Q 10 9 7 6 5
♣ J 10 8
South
♠ A 10 6 5 4 3 2
 Q 8
 K 8 2
♣ 2
South West North East
      3
Pass 5 5 NT * Pass
6 All pass    

*Takeout

A

Bridge history records all too many slam bids missing two aces, or two top tricks. Some of these contracts have come home, but surely one of the odder entries into the record books is today’s hand, from the 1997 Vanderbilt Trophy quarterfinals in Dallas.

West led the diamond ace in an attempt to force out declarer’s trumps, and declarer made the odd-looking play of discarding a spade from dummy. Meanwhile East played the diamond nine, a discouraging card that, according to the partnership methods, suggested to West that he should switch to a high suit rather than a low one. What was going on here? West could see no future in trying to cash the club ace, since it was surely never going to get away, so he led a spade, which seemed passive enough.

Declarer Paul Soloway won the king, drew four rounds of trumps and took the rest of the tricks with his seven-card spade suit and his diamond king, discarding all of dummy’s clubs in the process!

So what was going on? Soloway had thought his partner, Bobby Goldman, was showing the two lower unbid suits when he bid five no-trump. His hearts were better than his clubs, so he decided to bid hearts to protect his diamond king. Didn’t he play it well?

This turned out to be a flat board, since the opponents played in six spades in the other room, but Soloway’s squad was clearly the team of destiny, since they squeaked through in this match by 1 IMP and went on to win the trophy after that.



There is nothing wrong with a jump to four diamonds, a splinter-raise showing a hand of this general strength with heart support and diamond shortage. An alternative route is to jump to two spades, planning a call of four hearts next. That gets the three-suiter across very nicely and keeps all three in play as possible trump suits, since hearts may turn out not to be the best.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q J 9
 A K J 7
 —
♣ K Q 9 5 4
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, April 4th, 2019

Home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names, and impossible loyalties!

Matthew Arnold, on Oxford


N North
N-S ♠ K Q 10 8
 5
 J 10 9 6 2
♣ J 5 2
West East
♠ —
 9 7 3
 K 7 3
♣ A Q 9 8 7 6 3
♠ 9 7 6 2
 A Q 6 2
 A 8 5 4
♣ 10
South
♠ A J 5 4 3
 K J 10 8 4
 Q
♣ K 4
South West North East
    Pass Pass
1 ♠ 3 ♣ 4 ♠ Dbl.
All pass      

♣A

This deal arose in the North American trials of 1999, where the next Hall of Fame inductee Michael Seamon was playing with Jimmy Cayne. It was a valiant effort in a losing cause. Against four spades doubled, West led the club ace, producing the three from dummy and the 10 from East.

As West’s jump overcall was expected to be a six-card suit, declarer suspected that East’s double was partly made on the basis of holding a singleton club; so, in tempo, declarer Seamon contributed the king!

West wasn’t quite sure whom to believe, but eventually came down on the side of declarer (a variation on “Who are you going to believe — me, or the evidence before your own eyes?”). He made the unsuccessful switch to a low diamond. Note that if he had led a heart instead, East might have found the return of a low diamond and then still received his club ruff. As it was, though, East rose with the diamond ace, cashed his other red ace, then returned a second diamond.

Granted a second reprieve, Seamon ruffed in hand, then discarded a club on the heart king and ruffed a heart in dummy. When he ruffed a diamond in hand, it brought down West’s king, and a second heart ruff produced the queen from East.

The 4-0 trump break could now be handled in style: The diamond jack let South discard his second club, and he could then take the last three tricks on a high crossruff, with East forced to underruff throughout.



To raise or not to raise? Your trump support is excellent, but your values are soft, and a singleton in partner’s suit is not really an asset. You could certainly persuade me to raise if the spade king were the ace, As it is, though, the fact that partner didn’t bid three diamonds would tilt me to passing now.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 10 8
 5
 J 10 9 6 2
♣ J 5 2
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, April 3rd, 2019

In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action.

Martin Luther King Jr.


N North
Both ♠ K Q 5
 6 5
 A 8 6 3 2
♣ K 8 7
West East
♠ —
 K J 10 9 8 3
 Q J 10
♣ J 9 5 2
♠ 10 8 7 6 2
 7
 9 7 5 4
♣ 10 6 3
South
♠ A J 9 4 3
 A Q 4 2
 K
♣ A Q 4
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 ♠ 2 Dbl. *
Pass 4 NT Pass 5 ♠
Pass 6 ♠ All pass  

*Three-card spade support

Q

When West led the diamond queen against six spades, declarer paused to form a plan, even though his play to the first trick was nearly automatic. He could count to 11 tricks if trumps divided, so he needed a 12th.

One possibility was to try to set up a long diamond in dummy, but that would almost certainly require both trumps and diamonds to behave. Declarer decided that a better shot was to ruff a heart high in dummy and finesse the trump nine after having done so. (This line does offer a better chance of making the contract than trying to set up diamonds.)

So at trick two, declarer led a low trump; but when West discarded a heart, declarer had to reconsider his options. Winning the trick with dummy’s trump queen, declarer then played a heart to the ace and cashed three rounds of clubs. After discarding a heart on the diamond ace, declarer ruffed a diamond low, then exited with a heart. West won the trick with the heart eight and exited with a low heart. As planned, declarer ruffed this with dummy’s trump king.

In the three-card ending, declarer had the trump ace-jacknine remaining, and any lead from dummy would ensure he could score all of the remaining tricks. Declarer made five trumps, the heart ace, a heart ruff, two diamonds and three clubs, for a total of 12 tricks.

It was critical here to cash the clubs and take the diamond ruff before East could discard from the minors on the hearts.



It is hard to know what constitutes a life mission, but as far as I am concerned, if I can prevent players from overcalling two diamonds with these cards, I’ll have accomplished something. Doubling one heart is fine, or bidding one diamond over one club on a different day. But two-level overcalls promise good suits and normally six cards.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q 5
 6 5
 A 8 6 3 2
♣ K 8 7
South West North East
      1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 2nd, 2019

So weary with disasters, rugged with fortune, That I would set my life on any chance, To mend it or be rid on it.

William Shakespeare


S North
N-S ♠ Q J 9 4 2
 Q 7 2
 A Q
♣ A K 3
West East
♠ 10
 K 6 5
 K 5 4 3 2
♣ 6 5 4 2
♠ 6
 A 10 9 8
 J 10 9 8
♣ Q J 10 9
South
♠ A K 8 7 5 3
 J 4 3
 7 6
♣ 8 7
South West North East
2 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ All pass
       

♣2

The odds associated with a finesse are traditionally 50-50, but sometimes you can achieve a 100% result by finessing into the safe hand — and sometimes you can achieve an equally good result by rejecting the finesse altogether.

Consider today’s deal, in which you reach what appears to be the normal contract of four spades, on a passive club lead from West.

To digress for a moment: I would certainly lead a red-suit against that contract myself, since it is far more likely that you need to set up winners than go passive here, but that is another column. Similarly, the question of whether to lead second-highest from four small here would produce different opinions from different players.

You win the club ace and hasten to draw trumps; what next? You should cash the club king and ruff a club to eliminate that suit altogether. Now you must play the diamond ace followed by the diamond queen. Yes, you give up on the finesse, but you have ensured your contract in the process. Whoever wins the diamond king must give you a trick in return, either via a ruff-sluff or by broaching hearts for you, to ensure that you lose no more than two tricks in the suit.

Note that if you take the diamond finesse, you risk going down. When it loses, back comes a diamond, and you will find you still have to lose three hearts.

The technique here, of eliminating the side suits and forcing a favorable return, is one worth adding to your repertoire.



Your partner is suggesting a long heart suit (but maybe only five cards). Opinions differ as to whether this should be forcing, but your heart support and working cards in the minors argue for a raise to game, regardless of partner’s intentions. However, fans of transfers might consider employing them here, too!

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 9 4 2
 Q 7 2
 A Q
♣ A K 3
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
2 NT Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, April 1st, 2019

I have seen the moment of my greatness flicker,
And I have seen the eternal Footman hold my coat, and snicker.

T.S. Eliot


N North
E-W ♠ Q 8 4 2
 Q 5 4 2
 Q J
♣ A K 2
West East
♠ 10
 K 8 7
 K 8 4 3
♣ Q 10 8 7 4
♠ J 9 7 5 3
 A 6
 7 6 2
♣ J 9 6
South
♠ A K 6
 J 10 9 3
 A 10 9 5
♣ 5 3
South West North East
    1 ♣ Pass
1 Pass 2 Pass
2 NT * Pass 4 All pass
       

*Forcing

♠10

Today’s deal comes from the 1989 European Championship and was declared by Tony Forrester, who played in four hearts on the spade 10 lead. Forrester has been ever present on the Great Britain and now England teams over the last 35 years. He is well known as being both a tough opponent to play against because of his imaginative and aggressive bidding, and also for being an excellent technician.

The contract of four hearts seemed reasonable, but when the spade 10 was led, the risk of a ruff on defense suddenly became a serious one.

If declarer were to win the opening lead and try to draw trumps, the defense would score their ruff, play off their top trumps, then exit in clubs. They would eventually collect a diamond winner.

Forrester had other ideas; he won the opening lead, played the club ace and king, then ruffed a club in hand before playing the heart jack. East won the heart ace and returned a spade. The good news was that his partner could ruff and cash the heart king, but after that, he was endplayed. With only minor-suit cards left, he could exit in diamonds into the tenace or play a club, at which point declarer would pitch dummy’s diamond loser(s) and take the rest via his top spades, the diamond ace, and the three trumps.

This deal emphasizes how often, when you need cooperation from your opponents, eliminating the side suits early can put additional pressure on the defenders, sometimes in unexpected ways.



There are very few clues to go on as to whether a club or heart lead will work out better. Clearly, neither a spade nor diamond looks attractive, but I’d guess a club lead needs less from partner than a heart, where even finding a five-card suit opposite would leave us a long way from establishing the suit.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ K 10 3
 J 5 4
 J 10 7 6
♣ K 7 4
South West North East
  1 ♠ Pass 2
Pass 3 Pass 3 NT
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, March 31st, 2019

I’m never sure when to raise the ante after my partner pre-empts at the two- or three-level. For example, if your partner opens two hearts, would you raise to three hearts when your right-hand opponent passes? You hold: ♠ Q-J-3,  Q-6-5,  K-J-7, ♣ Q-10-4-2?

Salt and Pepper, Pasadena, Calif.

Don’t be swayed into thinking you should act with a hand like this, with all those soft defensive cards. You have no tricks for your partner, and if he happens to have six hearts to the ace and a soft minor honor, each side might be struggling at the two- or three-level.

You recently ran a deal where declarer had the doubleton AJ of spades facing the queen in dummy. To make his slam, he needed to lead the jack from his hand rather than starting with the ace. Am I correct that his leading the jack would have been a Morton’s Fork Coup? If not, does the coup have a name?

Happy Camper, Orlando, Fla.

A classic Morton’s Fork involves a “damned if you do, damned if you don’t” decision. But here, ducking the spade king has no downside for the defenders, so it is not a Morton’s Fork. Make it the doubleton queen facing king-third: If a defender hops up with the ace, it sets up an extra winner for declarer; but if the defender ducks, declarer can take the king, then pitch his second card. That is the classic Morton’s Fork.

In a recent Bid With the Aces, you recommended opening one club, then raising one spade to two, with ♠ Q-J-3,  7-2,  J-6, ♣ A-Q-J-9-5-3. After South does so, what should he bid if North makes what seems like a game-try of a red suit?

Groomsman, Hamilton, Ontario

I guess I’d rebid three spades without much enthusiasm. I’d be trusting that my partner had five spades for the call in a red suit. If all he wanted to do was locate my fourth trump, he could use two no-trump as an artificial relay — called Spiral Scan by some. Responses here are to use steps, showing three trumps minimum, three with a maximum, four with a minimum, and four with a maximum.

What happens when declarer plays two cards at once? Is one of them a penalty card, or are there any other lead penalties that might arise?

Double Your Pleasure, Rockford, Ill.

Declarer is not subject to the penalty card rules — those apply only to the defenders. The logic is that the defenders can pass unauthorized information to each other by reveling that extra card, while declarer has no one to pass information to. If the two cards are truly simultaneous, declarer picks up his mistake without penalty.

I was fourth to speak, with: ♠ Q-10-2,  J,  K-10-5-3, ♣ A-Q-8-3-2. When I heard one spade to my right, I bid two spades. As soon as I did so, I realized I had meant to bid two no-trump for the minors. Am I allowed to correct from hearts when my partner bids three hearts, and this gets doubled?

Sold Short, Trenton, N.J.

The problem here is that if your partner has alerted and explained the bid, you will be ruled against. This is because your story, however honest, will not be accepted; the explanation given by your partner will be treated as the reason you woke up. If nobody alerted or asked, you can do what you like — you are not in possession of unauthorized information. By the way, the Unusual No-trump guarantees a 55 pattern. Don’t do it with a hand like this one! Pass and balance later.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].