June 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The nice part about being a pessimist is that you are constantly being either proven right or pleasantly surprised.
George Will
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 7
♥ J 4
♦ A K Q 5
♣ A Q 9 8 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 9 8 6 5
♥ 7 5 2
♦ J 9 3
♣ 4 |
♠ 4 3
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ 10 8 2
♣ J 10 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 2
♥ A Q 10 3
♦ 7 6 4
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
One must agree how to show a weak hand after opener’s reverse. One style is for simple calls to be non-forcing with fourth suit strong. Alternatively, use a two no-trump call as weak, or even (my favorite) to use the cheaper of fourth suit and two no-trump as a potentially weak hand. In this last style you’d bid a forcing two no-trump here, planning to raise three no-trump to four no-trump, to invite slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 2
♥ A Q 10 3
♦ 7 6 4
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Nothing that grieves us can be called little: by the eternal laws of proportion a child’s loss of a doll and a king’s loss of a crown are events of the same size.
Mark Twain
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 5 2
♥ K J 7
♦ K 6 3 2
♣ Q 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K Q 6 4
♥ 10 9 3
♦ 8
♣ J 6 5 2 |
♠ 10
♥ 8 6 4 2
♦ 10 7 5 4
♣ K 10 9 4 |
| South |
♠ J 8 7 3
♥ A Q 5
♦ A Q J 9
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
There is a place for subtlety and delicacy in bridge; this is not it. You have a balanced hand and should treat it as such by jumping to two no-trump now. I’m not saying there aren’t hands where a one spade response might work, but the odds favor describing balanced hands as such as soon as you reasonably can. Your partner can always check back for a spade or heart fit if he wants to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 3
♥ A Q 5
♦ A Q J 9
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Life isn’t about finding yourself. Life is about creating yourself.
G. B. Shaw
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 8
♥ 8 6 2
♦ K J 6
♣ K 10 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 7 4 3
♥ ? 9
♦ 9 7 3
♣ 8 7 |
♠ 6 5
♥ ? 3
♦ A 8 4
♣ A Q J 9 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A 2
♥ K J 10 7 5 4
♦ Q 10 5 2
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
3 ♣ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
If the afterlife consists of being faced with problems of this sort, I’m not sure I will enjoy it too much. With no passive lead available you have to guess which four-card suit to lead, and while the club suit is slightly more attractive to me, I will go for the major over the minor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ K J 2
♦ 10 3
♣ K 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Do you prefer to play a two-overone style where responder’s rebid of his suit is not forcing, or do you like the current style of playing two-over-one game-forcing? Am I correct in assuming that one has to play forcing no-trump with either style?
Standard Bearer, Peru, Ind.
My go-as-you-please roots inspire me toward a less constricting approach than two-overone game-forcing. But even when I consent to the strait-jacket, I opt to play one no-trump as non-forcing. Opener can pass with a balanced minimum, since responder should never hold anything more than balanced 12 or 13 count when he bids one no-trump. You might miss an occasional marginal game, but you stay sensibly low more often.
I find bidding in balancing seat very hard. I was in fourth chair with: ♠ K-9-8-6-4, ♥ Q-4 ♦ K-9, ♣ Q-8-7-4 and heard my LHO open one heart. My RHO responded one no-trump and passed the two diamond rebid. Was it right to re-open with this hand, and if so should I double or bid spades?
Tightrope, Jackson, Miss.
Yes I would balance, and would choose to bid two spades, because of the extra length in that suit. At this point though our target is to find our best fit, not our highest scoring contract, the extra spade is a very convincing reason to bid the suit, in addition to the fact that both opponents appear not to have spade length.
As someone who always seems to fall back on leading fourth highest of dummy’s longest and strongest, I would welcome your thoughts on when to go active and when passive against no-trump.
Benedict Arnold, Chicago, Ill.
Leading passively is far harder to do than it might seem, but it works for me at notrump more often than at suits. If both opponents are known to be stretching and appear to be limited, it may seem sensible, or if the cards are known to lie badly. Also on blind auctions broken four-card suits are often less attractive than sequences in three-card suits, or leading from three or four small.
|
As opener I frequently guess wrong when deciding whether to make a simple call in a new suit, or to jump in a suit or in notrump. For example, with: ♠ 3-2, ♥ K-3, ♦ A-Q-10-8-4, ♣ A-K-J-7 having opened one diamond and heard partner respond one spade, where do you stand on a rebid of two clubs, three clubs, or two notrump? How would you feel if partner had responded one heart?
Kangaroo Court, Delray Beach, Fla.
This hand is close to a three club call, but you would need another card to be fully happy to force to game without a real fit. I despise a call of two no-trump, though I admit it might work on a good day. It is even clearer to bid two clubs over a one heart response. Never jump shift without knowing where you are going at your next turn over simple preference.
My LHO opened one diamond. My partner overcalled one spade and my RHO raised to two diamonds. Even though we were vulnerable I competed to two hearts with queen-jack fifth of hearts, a doubleton spade, and an outside ace, to push the opponents up a level. My partner insisted this hand was too weak to act here, even though the opponents duly went to three diamonds. Was I out of line?
Grumpy, Philadelphia, Pa.
A two heart call is nonforcing here so the lower end of the range for the bid is quite low — though maybe not this low! You wouldn’t need much more to act, in my opinion. A sixth heart or a side queen would be quite sufficient if you were prepared to play hearts facing a doubleton. For the record, remember that doubling two diamonds suggests hearts and a good hand.
|
June 13th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
The true way to be deceived is to think oneself more clever than others.
La Rochefoucauld
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 6 3
♥ 7 4 3
♦ 9 7 4 3
♣ K Q 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4
♥ A Q J 10 9 6
♦ A K Q
♣ 6 2 |
♠ 9 5 2
♥ 8
♦ 10 8 6 5 2
♣ J 10 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 10 8
♥ K 5 2
♦ J
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
The simple option would be to bid four spades, but a more ambitious action uses a spot of delicate modern science. How about a call of four diamonds? Since a bid of three diamonds would be natural and game-forcing, a jump to four diamonds is a self-agreeing splinter, showing short diamonds and a hand worth game in spades. Facing ace-queen fifth in hearts, you do have 12 tricks, after all.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J 10 8
♥ K 5 2
♦ J
♣ A 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 12th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Small habits, well pursued betimes, May reach the dignity of crimes.
Hannah More
| E |
North |
| East-West |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ J 8 4 3
♦ A 5
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 3 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ 7 6
♣ A K Q 9 |
♠ J 8 6
♥ 2
♦ J 10 9 4 3 2
♣ J 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 4
♥ A K 7 6 5
♦ K Q 8
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
You may be regretting your decision to respond to one diamond but it is too late now. Much as you would like to pass, that is verboten. Your partner’s bid is game-forcing, in theory. Give preference to three diamonds and hope partner can bid no-trump, so you do not have to.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 5
♥ J 8 4 3
♦ A 5
♣ 10 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 11th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
It does not take much strength to do things, but it requires a great deal of strength to decide what to do.
Elbert Hubbard
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 7 4 2
♥ K J 8 7
♦ Q 10 6 4
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 5 3
♥ Q 9
♦ A 9 8 7
♣ Q 10 |
♠ J 10
♥ A 10 6 4 3 2
♦ K J 3
♣ J 7 |
| South |
♠ 6
♥ 5
♦ 5 2
♣ A K 9 8 6 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
You may not have any real extras but your shape strongly suggests that if you have a fit you can make game. Whether that game is diamonds or notrump (or a seven-card fit in a major) may not be clear to you right now, but if you show threeplus diamonds now, by bidding three diamonds, your partner may be in better shape than you to determine the final contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 7 4 2
♥ K J 8 7
♦ Q 10 6 4
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 10th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
To do two things at once is to do neither.
Horace
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ K 6 5
♦ A Q 7
♣ Q 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ J 10 8 4
♦ 10 8 6 4 2
♣ K 10 2 |
♠ 6 4
♥ 9 7 2
♦ K J 9 3
♣ J 9 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A K J 8 7 5
♥ A Q 3
♦ 5
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
In my preferred style, where my partner will rebid a major in front of a minor with a hand worth only one action, it is relatively clear to bid one notrump now. Rebidding one spade would guarantee four spades with real clubs, rather than a balanced hand. The point is that partner either does not have spades or is about to bid them now, with at least a decent invitation in high cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 3 2
♥ K 6 5
♦ A Q 7
♣ Q 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 9th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
But as I raved and grew more fierce and wild At every word, Methought I heard one calling ‘Child’.
George Herbert
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 10 8
♥ A K 3
♦ 9 7
♣ A Q 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ 10 8 6 5 2
♦ 10 2
♣ K 7 6 |
♠ 4
♥ Q J 9 4
♦ K Q J 5 4 3
♣ J 10 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 7 6 2
♥ 7
♦ A 8 6
♣ 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦10
There is room for discussion as to what is right here. Some would rebid two clubs (unattractive with a five-card suit) some will rebid one no-trump — equally unattractive with a small doubleton in a side suit, to my mind. I prefer to raise to two spades, judging my good trump intermediates and sidesuit doubleton to offer as much as any four-card trump holding in a balanced hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8
♥ A K 3
♦ 9 7
♣ A Q 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 8th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Survival is nothing more than recovery.
Dianne Feinstein
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10 8 5
♥ K 9 7
♦ 7 6 5 3
♣ 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 4 3
♥ Q 5 3
♦ J 9
♣ K 8 7 6 3 |
♠ 9 2
♥ 8 6 4 2
♦ A 10 8 2
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ A J 10
♦ K Q 4
♣ Q J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣6
My best guess is that diamonds offer a far more fertile chance to defeat the game here than do clubs. That being so, I will lead the diamond ace, prepared to surrender the overtrick at teams, from time to time, while maximizing my chance of leading the right minor, or perhaps shifting to clubs if the play to trick one makes continuing diamonds impractical.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 4 3
♥ 10 8
♦ A Q 3
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
When a contract seems to depend on a reasonable break in a long suit, you should always consider what other chances you might have if the key suit doesn’t behave.
In today’s deal South was constrained to open one diamond. Thereafter he tried to apply the brakes, but North had the bit between his teeth, and would not let his partner out below six notrump, against which West led the spade king. The contract was certainly reasonable, but South didn’t give it his best shot.
After winning the spade in hand, South returned the spade jack and threw a diamond from dummy. West led a third spade and this time dummy discarded a heart. Declarer next tried the king and another club, but when West showed out he was in deep trouble, since he had discarded potential winners from dummy. He ended up a trick short.
Try the effect of leading your low club to the ace at trick two. The next club lead exposes the position and now, when South leads the spade jack from hand, he knows to discard a club from dummy. With the heart finesse right, there are all sorts of additional chances for the 12th trick, either from the diamond breaking, as they do here, or from a squeeze on either opponent, since there are threats in all four suits.
Furthermore, if the clubs had proved to be 3-2, declarer could still have set up his 12th trick from the spades, with no need to rely on either red suit.