August 23rd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Holding: ♠ 9-2, ♥ 10-9-6-5-2, ♦ J-2, ♣ K-7-4-3 how would you respond to a two no-trump opening bid? Would you pass, or settle for partscore in hearts, or drive to game – and if so which?
Level Best, Cartersville, Ga.
I think it would be trying to land on the head of a pin to pass two no-trump or to transfer to hearts and stop in three. I think one should transfer to hearts and bid three no-trump. Partner can pick which game he wants to play in. Although you have a little extra shape, you cannot insist on playing hearts unless partner produces a fit. Let him make the call.
I was faced with an auction recently where my partner heard me double one heart. The next hand redoubled, and my partner jumped to three clubs, telling me later that he meant this as weak rather than based on high cards. Is this a normal approach – since the call would surely have been invitational without the redouble?
Upping the Ante, Westhampton, N.Y.
You can certainly argue that if the first three hands all show approximately opening values, the fourth hand cannot be strong. So while a jump by fourth hand would indeed be invitational over everything but third hand’s redouble, it is reasonable to play than in this one sequence the jump should be based more on shape than high cards. I might have a five- or six-card suit and 5-8 points, perhaps.
I read your column online and have a question. I held ♠ A-3, ♥ A-Q-9-7-4-2, ♦ K-J-3, ♣ A-7. My partner dealt and opened one club and rebid two clubs over my one heart response. What is the right way to create a forcing auction now? At the table I bid two spades, my partner raised, and a convoluted auction ended in four no-trump, making seven.
Strong-arm Tactics, Frankfurt, Germany
|
A plausible auction would see you bid two diamonds over two clubs, and when your partner jumps to three no-trump you might close your eyes and bid six no-trump. A new suit by you is forcing for one round at your second turn, and two diamonds saves space while encouraging partner to support you economically. Incidentally, I can’t imagine on what hand your partner would raise spades at his third turn if he couldn’t bid them at his second turn!
Holding: ♠ Q-7-2, ♥ Q-4, ♦ A-J-9-3-2, ♣ K-4-3 I opened one diamond and heard my partner respond one spade. The next hand bid two hearts; is it right for me to pass or bid two spades now?
Raiser’s Edge, Waterbury, Conn.
With a minimum hand and only three trumps, particularly where your heart holding sounds to have gotten worse from the auction, pass is the discreet action, though bidding two spades is not terrible. But surely if you can make anything, your partner will have enough to bid again. Incidentally, support doubles (which show a three-card raise here) are becoming more and more popular. If you play this style, then you would have no good reason not to double.
I’m interested in your views as to when shape trumps high cards. Holding: ♠ J-6 ♥ Q-2, ♦ A-K-10-8-7-4, ♣ 1-0-9-3 do you consider this a one diamond opening? If you don’t open one diamond would you pass rather than showing a weak hand with a two diamond preempt?
Princess Pushy, Twin Falls, Idaho
Wolff’s first laws of preempting: Never pass a hand with a good suit. Open one, two, or three, but don’t pass. Here I’d open two diamonds anywhere except in first seat non-vulnerable — where I might consider opening one diamond. Make the club 10 the jack and I open one diamond, in all seats, except in second seat vulnerable.
|
August 22nd, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Logic and sermons never convince.
Walt Whitman
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 5
♥ —
♦ A 6 3 2
♣ A J 9 8 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 8 2
♥ K 8 7 5 2
♦ 10 9
♣ 10 3 |
♠ Q J 6 3
♥ J 9 6
♦ J 7 5
♣ K Q 6 |
| South |
♠ K 10 4
♥ A Q 10 4 3
♦ K Q 8 4
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦10
You have a good hand, one that has been improved by the opponents bidding your short suit. Try two diamonds now, planning to compete in spades at your next turn. If you play support doubles to show three-card support you can do that, but you should plan to bid past the two-level at your next turn by introducing your diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 4
♥ A Q 10 4 3
♦ K Q 8 4
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 21st, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
For the things we have to learn before we can do them, we learn by doing them.
Aristotle
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K
♥ A 7 5
♦ K J 7 4 2
♣ A J 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 2
♥ J 10 3
♦ 10 9 6
♣ Q 9 5 |
♠ Q J 10 9 3
♥ 9 8 6 4
♦ A Q 5
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ A 5 4
♥ K Q 2
♦ 8 3
♣ K 8 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Your partner’s second double is card-showing not penalty. You have implicitly denied four cards in either major or you would have acted over the first double. That being said, a 4-3 heart fit looks quite playable, and your clubs are not worth bidding at the three-level. So bid two hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ K Q 2
♦ 8 3
♣ K 8 4 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 20th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
You can go where you please, you can skid up the trees, But you don’t get away from the guns!
Rudyard Kipling
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A K J 3
♥ A Q 4
♦ 10 9 6 3
♣ K 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 2
♥ K J 9
♦ K J 8 5
♣ A 2 |
♠ 9 7
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A Q 7 4
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
♠ 6 5 4
♥ 10 3 2
♦ 2
♣ Q 9 8 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
In this sequence you have more than enough to bid two hearts; and you would definitely want to bid hearts rather than diamonds, since partner’s double is more about majors than unbid minors. Yes, if you were defending to clubs you would hope for a diamond not a heart lead — but there again, if your side can make game, it is far more likely to be in hearts than in diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ 8 7 6 5
♦ A Q 7 4
♣ J 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 19th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Wisely and slow; they stumble that run fast.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 4
♥ A Q 2
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ J 10 8 6
♦ 4
♣ 10 9 6 5 3 2 |
♠ 10 8 7 3 2
♥ 5 3
♦ J 6 5 2
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 9
♥ K 9 7 4
♦ K 9 7
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
7 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣5
With a 22-count it is possible to go high or low, that is to say by treating the hand as a balanced 20-22 or a balanced 22-24. Here the quality of your honors and your chunky five-card minor, solidified by the 10 – not an irrelevant spot-card – should persuade you to go high. Open two clubs and rebid two no-trump at your next turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 4
♥ A Q 2
♦ A Q 10 8 3
♣ A J |
August 18th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Reality is easy. It’s deception that’s the hard work.
Lauryn Hill
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 6
♥ A Q 3
♦ J 10 7 6 3
♣ J 8 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5 4 3
♥ J 9 7
♦ K 8
♣ Q 9 6 2 |
♠ J 9 7 2
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A 5
♣ A 7 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ K 8 4 2
♦ Q 9 4 2
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
The playing strength in the form of a five-card suit with decent intermediates makes this just worth a quantitative jump to four no-trump. If your partner doesn’t declare the hands so well, settle for the simple raise to three no-trump and be prepared to apologize for your discretion.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6
♥ A Q 3
♦ J 10 7 6 3
♣ J 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 17th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
’Tis the good reader that makes the good book.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q J 9
♥ A K 7 4 3
♦ Q 9 2
♣ 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 4
♥ J 8 2
♦ A J 6 5 3
♣ Q 9 7 |
♠ 5 3
♥ Q 10 9 6 5
♦ K 8
♣ 10 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ 10 8 7 6 2
♥ —
♦ 10 7 4
♣ A K J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
It feels right to try to cash heart winners rather than go for the surprise spade lead, but having said that, you should lead the heart king rather than a small heart. Your plan is to retain the lead and shift to a spade if necessary. If declarer or dummy has the heart ace, you are unlikely to have done your side any serious harm.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 4 3
♥ K 9 7 5
♦ 7 5 4
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
| Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
August 16th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, August 2nd, 2015
|
I opened one club, and the next hand overcalled one spade. When the next two hands passed, should I have passed too, holding: ♠ 7-4, ♥ K-10-8-4, ♦ A-Q-2, ♣ K-J-4-3? I did have a minimum balanced hand, I thought.
Balancing Act, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
This is a tough one for intermediate players to understand. But when you play negative doubles, you should always re-open with a double when you are short in the opponents’ suit. Here you would expect partner either to have a minimum hand and no clear action – when I admit you might regret re-opening – or a penalty double of spades, when passing will not prove represent your side’s best result.
Holding: ♠ 9-2, ♥ K-9-6-5-2, ♦ J-2, ♣ K-7-4-3 I heard my partner open one spade and I responded one no-trump. When my partner bid two diamonds I corrected to two spades, missing a 5-4 heart fit (my partner had a 5-4-4-0 shape and was trying to find a fit). Who went wrong here?
Broken Hearted, Briarcliff Manor, N.Y.
Your partner’s responsibility here was to rebid two hearts not two diamonds, to look for the higher scoring contract. The two diamonds call is almost sure to lose any eight-card heart fit (and even, as here, a 5-4 fit). Missing a diamond fit is a ‘minor’ disaster by comparison.
Do you favor opening in third or fourth seat with a four-card major? If you would, how good a suit should you have? What would be the minimum for such an action?
Robbery with Violins, Midland, Mich.
|
Yes, one can make such a call with a minimum, and it can be made on any hand where the quality of the majorsuit is significantly better than the minor, and the hand is only worth one call. For example, I would open ace-queen fourth of spades rather than queen-fourth of clubs in an 11-count, but not in a 14-count, where I plan to bid again if given the chance.
I’m embarrassed to say I don’t really understand what exactly people mean by the term ‘Two over one’? Is it part of Standard American?
Slow Learner, Boca Raton, Fla.
The underlying concept behind ‘Two over one’ is that a two-level response to a one-level opening, if not in competition, sets up a game-forcing auction. Many people play ‘two over one’ is game forcing UNLESS responder repeats his suit. I’m happy to play either style; I think these approaches are about as common as the old-fashioned style where a two-level response does not guarantee a second bid. The former style is becoming close to standard in tournament play.
Holding: ♠ Q-4-3-2, ♥ 6, ♦ K-J-7-2, ♣ A-K-9-6 I opened one club, (do you agree?) and raised a one spade response to two. What is the right way to continue over a bid of three clubs from my partner?
Enigma Machine, Danville, Ill.
The three-club call is forcing. I think I can show the nature of my hand precisely by jumping to four hearts. Having limited my hand by my simple raise at my previous turn, my jump in a new suit is an unusual variety of splinter-bid in support of spades. We may not be able to make slam, but my partner should envisage a hand of this approximate shape and strength, and make his own arrangements.
|
August 15th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
When a man is tired of London, he is tired of life.
Samuel Johnson
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ A 5 4
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ Q J 8 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 7
♥ 9 4
♦ Q 6 5
♣ A K 6 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 3
♥ K J 10 6 5 2
♦ 10
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
♠ K 6 2
♥ A 8 7 3
♦ A J 9 8 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
This auction is traditionally played as forcing – though whether you play change of suit forcing after a one-level overcall is down to partnership agreement. You cannot raise hearts, so the question is whether to rebid two no-trump or repeat the clubs. You have so few tricks I prefer a three-club rebid; but it is close.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ Q
♦ K 7 4
♣ Q J 8 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 14th, 2015 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Life doesn’t offer charity, it offers chance.
Amit Kalantri
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 10 5
♥ 5 4
♦ A K J
♣ J 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 2
♥ J
♦ Q 10 9 8 3
♣ Q 10 8 |
♠ 8 7 3
♥ K 8 3 2
♦ 7 6 5 2
♣ K 6 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ A Q 10 9 7 6
♦ 4
♣ A 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
When you have a 12-count with two four-card suits, the question is not whether to open the bidding, but with what to open. I can imagine 12-counts I would pass but this is not one of them. Yes opening one club is hardly lead-directing, and in third seat I would understand bidding one diamond – or even one spade. But in first seat it looks normal to open one club and bid the spades the next time round.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 5
♥ 5 4
♦ A K J
♣ J 5 3 2 |
|
Good sense dictates how this minor suit game should be handled. It also helps to remember as declarer that if only you need to take 11 tricks, you can afford to lose two.
To reach five diamonds, North judged well in the auction. South would no doubt have been expecting more from him in the way of honor points for his initial response, but North could see that as South was almost certainly marked with a singleton or void club by his rebid of three no-trump, the club suit was unlikely to be easy to develop in a no-trump contract.
West led a diamond, since nothing else looked attractive, and South took stock. The most realistic chance for 11 tricks is to set up dummy’s clubs; so with this in mind, declarer cashed the trump king and queen, then led a club to the ace.
The ensuing club ruff passed off peacefully. Next came the heart ace for a spade discard from dummy, followed by a diamond to the ace, extracting the last defensive trump in the process. Declarer then simply gave up a club. All that was now left for the defense was one spade trick, there being a trump left in dummy as access to the set-up clubs.
Declarer had planned the play with care from trick one, appreciating that two tricks could be lost. If declarer had ruffed two clubs in the South hand, the timing goes awry. Trump control is lost, and with that, the established club winners.