|
You recently raised the issue of the many names given to various modern doubles. Isn’t the first requirement to agree when Penalty Doubles apply? Beyond that, any double that is not a conventional alertable call, should not even need a name — partner can simply work out what it must mean in the context of the auction.
Monkee Mike, Fayetteville, N.C.
Up to a point, I agree. But some doubles (Snapdragon doubles to show the fourth suit) may be counter-intuitive, so do require detailed agreement. Even the simple responsive double isn’t entirely straightforward. A relatively modern expression of “you’ll recognize it when you hear it” is otherwise not too far from the truth.
I was reading about the ‘Vanderbilt Trophy’ recently. Was the donor connected to the Commodore of the same name?
Lost Louis, Springfield, Mass.
Harold Vanderbilt was a famous bridge player, and a great grandson of the Commodore. He devised and codified the rules of bridge, 100 years ago, and presented the trophy that bears his name as well as playing the game at the top level. He lived to a ripe old age and died less than 50 years ago.
When partner sets up a game force with the fourth suit, which takes precedence, raising partner or bidding no-trump? when I held ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ J-9-4-2 I opened one club and responded one spade to my partner’s one diamond call. Now he bid two hearts, and I wasn’t sure what to focus on next.
Pigling Bland, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
First things first: I might have bid one no-trump at my second turn, knowing partner either didn’t have spades or would bid them at his next turn. That said, I’d definitely bid two notrump next. Diamonds can wait, and when in doubt the more economical action leaves more room to explore.
|
Where do you stand on the appropriate number of cards to hold when preempting? I’m often torn between a three-level action on a six-card suit, or even the occasional five-card weak two in third seat. If you feel the same urges, when if ever do you give in to them?
Cave Man, Dodge City, Kan.
For sure a three-club opener may be six (since you have no other preempt available). Hands with high offence and low defense (say, a suit of KQJxxx especially when accompanied by some side-suit shape) might more closely resemble a three-level preempt than a two-level action. The same occasionally applies to a five-card two-level preempt; but they are the exception.
I wasn’t sure how to advance this hand from a recent duplicate pairs tournament at our club. I responded one no-trump to one spade, and when my partner bid two hearts I gave preference to two spades with ♠ J-4, ♥ K-8, ♦ A-5-3-2, ♣ Q-10-5-3-2. Now my partner bid three hearts and I thought I had to go to game but wasn’t sure whether to pick spades hearts or no-trump. What would you recommend?
Direction Finder, Albuquerque, N.M.
Since you are clearly not in a game-forcing auction you can bid four of a minor to get partner to pick a game if you think that appropriate and partner would understand this. I suppose your partner could technically be 6-5 either way round, but I imagine if he had a strong hand with 5-6 in the majors he would have opened one heart, planning to reverse into spades. So my best guess would be to bid four spades now rather than three no-trump.
|
In today’s deal from last year’s world championships in Chennai, Ifti Baqai was playing with Mirza Hussein on the Pakistani team. It was the penultimate round of the Transnational Teams qualifier, and he first reached a thin game, then threaded the needle to bring it home.
The raise to game was on the sporting side, but the final contract had decent play. West led the club king and East followed to show an even number. West then shifted to the heart seven, covered with the ten, East playing low. Baqai now played the club six to the 10 and ace. Back came a low spade, and declarer won the ace and ruffed a spade, West producing the 10. Next he trumped a club, with West contributing the queen.
When Baqai led a spade off dummy and saw East follow low, he judged very well to pitch a small diamond. West had to win and was forced to return a diamond. Baqai won the queen in hand, and could ruff his winning club in dummy, to take the trump finesse for 10 tricks.
If on the third spade East had risen with the king, crashing his partner’s queen, Baqai would still have pitched a small diamond. Now when East shifted to a diamond, declarer could have gone up with the ace, trumped his winning club in dummy, then pitched the diamond queen on the spade jack. He would thus have remained in dummy to take the trump finesse for his 10th trick.