On Percentage Play’s query of AQx opposite J10xx for no loser, is it best (if havign to lead from the J10 hand) to start with the 10 just in case West dozes of with Kx? He / she shouldn’t but it does seem to be a chance to nothing.
Regards,
Iain
Iain ClimieSeptember 4th, 2022 at 12:09 pm
Hi Bobby,
On Percentage Play’s query of AQx opposite J10xx for no loser, is it best (if havign to lead from the J10 hand) to start with the 10 just in case West dozes of with Kx? He / she shouldn’t but it does seem to be a chance to nothing.
Regards,
Iain
Iain ClimieSeptember 4th, 2022 at 12:19 pm
Curious, appears to be an echo
jim2September 4th, 2022 at 4:37 pm
On the hand with the dueling long minor suits, the text: …”six clubs, which is no worse than the spade finesse.”
I think diamonds must ALSO be 3-2. On a trump lead, for example, if a top diamond is ruffed declarer has essentially no play.
Steve ConradSeptember 5th, 2022 at 9:34 am
Uh oh — is this another dark Monday with no bridge column from Bobby Wolff?
Subscribe to our feed
Bridge-related
Hi Bobby,
On Percentage Play’s query of AQx opposite J10xx for no loser, is it best (if havign to lead from the J10 hand) to start with the 10 just in case West dozes of with Kx? He / she shouldn’t but it does seem to be a chance to nothing.
Regards,
Iain
Hi Bobby,
On Percentage Play’s query of AQx opposite J10xx for no loser, is it best (if havign to lead from the J10 hand) to start with the 10 just in case West dozes of with Kx? He / she shouldn’t but it does seem to be a chance to nothing.
Regards,
Iain
Curious, appears to be an echo
On the hand with the dueling long minor suits, the text: …”six clubs, which is no worse than the spade finesse.”
I think diamonds must ALSO be 3-2. On a trump lead, for example, if a top diamond is ruffed declarer has essentially no play.
Uh oh — is this another dark Monday with no bridge column from Bobby Wolff?