September 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Necessity never made a good bargain.
Benjamin Franklin
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 2
♥ Q J 7 3
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ A K 5 4 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 5
♥ A K 10 4
♦ 10 7 3
♣ 8 6 3 |
♠ A 3
♥ 9 8 5 2
♦ K Q 5 4
♣ Q J 7 |
South |
♠ K Q 9 8 7 6 4
♥ 6
♦ J 2
♣ 10 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
This hand has great potential in support of hearts. The ruffing value in spades, top cards in the side suits and secondary trump honors are all positive features, so a simple raise to two hearts, while correct in terms of high-card points, would be inadequate. A jump raise to three hearts is what this hand is worth. Compare this hand to a 4-4-3-2 shape to see the extra potential here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ Q J 7 3
♦ A 9 8 6
♣ A K 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Man is Nature’s sole mistake!
W.S. Gilbert
W |
North |
None |
♠ A Q J 10 2
♥ 10 8 7 5 4
♦ K 2
♣ 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ A
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ A J 9 7 6 |
♠ 8 5 4
♥ K J 9
♦ 9 8 4 3
♣ K 5 3 |
South |
♠ K 6
♥ Q 6 3 2
♦ A 10 7
♣ Q 10 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
♦Q
Partner has an unbalanced hand with at least five clubs and four spades. Although this shape and heart holding suggest no-trump, a twoclub preference is the better call. If partner has something like a 4=3=1=5 shape, it will not take the defense long to go after the diamonds once the dummy is displayed in one no-trump. Clubs may not be the top-scoring contract, but it is probably the safest.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5 4
♥ K J 9
♦ 9 8 4 3
♣ K 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Back on planet Earth they shatter the illusion The world’s going ‘round in a state of confusion
Ray Davies
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ A K 2
♦ 6 3
♣ Q 10 8 7 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7 6 3
♥ 10 9 6
♦ A J
♣ J 6 4 |
♠ J 5
♥ 8 7 5 4
♦ K 10 8 2
♣ K 9 2 |
South |
♠ A K 4
♥ Q J 3
♦ Q 9 7 5 4
♣ A 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠6
This hand is far from useless in context because the spade jack and diamond king should be useful fillers in partner’s long suits. Two diamonds may be the best partscore to play in, but we cannot be sure how strong partner’s hand is. We could still have a game, so passing now would be too pessimistic. False preference to two spades is best, since if partner makes another bid, we are likely to belong in game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5
♥ 8 7 5 4
♦ K 10 8 2
♣ K 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Errors are not in the art but in the artificers.
Sir Isaac Newton
S |
North |
None |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ Q 8 6
♦ Q 10 2
♣ A K 9 7 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 7 5
♥ K 7 5
♦ A 7 5 4
♣ Q 3 |
♠ K 8 4 3
♥ J 9
♦ 8 6
♣ J 10 8 6 4 |
South |
♠ A 6
♥ A 10 4 3 2
♦ K J 9 3
♣ 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠J
It is normally the duty of the player with shortness in their suit to enter the auction. Here, it is more dangerous to stand idly by and allow the opponents to play two spades than to enter the bidding. After all, a heart contract could easily be in the offing. However, three hearts would be too committal and would overstate the quality of the suit. Double is best; if partner bids three clubs, respect his decision.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6
♥ A 10 4 3 2
♦ K J 9 3
♣ 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
? |
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 9th, 2019
He’s a muddle-headed fool with frequent lucid intervals.
Miguel de Cervantes
N |
North |
Both |
♠ A J
♥ A J 2
♦ K Q 7 3 2
♣ A 9 5 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 2
♥ K Q 10 7 3
♦ 10 8
♣ J 6 |
♠ 6
♥ 9 6 5 4
♦ J 9 5
♣ 10 8 4 3 2 |
South |
♠ K 8 7 5 4 3
♥ 8
♦ A 6 4
♣ K Q 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
I would lead a club. Dummy’s long spades are looming for discards, and unless we cash our top tricks right away, we may never score them. Even though our respective lengths suggest that more diamond tricks will stand up than clubs, we need much less from partner in clubs. Arguably, the king might be the right card to offer up, allowing us to retain the lead if a diamond shift looks necessary at trick two.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4 3
♥ 7 3
♦ J 10 8
♣ K J 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
September 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Recently, you discussed a sequence in which opener bids one spade and the next hand overcalls two clubs. What options are available in the modern game of raising spades, and how would that change for a passed hand?
Pick-up Pete, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
Clearly bidding spades at the two-, three- and four-levels means the same whether you are a passed hand or not, with a cuebid suggesting a high-card limit raise or better. But by a passed hand you can play fit jumps in new suits, while as an unpassed hand you may prefer to use those sequences as natural and weak.
Playing two-over-one, my partner opened one club. I held: ♠ J-9-3, ♥ K-5, ♦ A-J-10-6-3-2, ♣ 10-4. I was planning to bid and rebid my diamonds, but my right-hand opopnent overcalled one spade, and now I did not know if a two-diamond response would constitute an overbid.
Roman Candle, Palm Springs, Calif.
In competition, the doctrine of two-over-one as game forcing can be set aside, since you have to be able to bid when you have shape and some values. Playing weak jump responses, this hand is far too strong, but it is well within the constraints for bidding and rebidding diamonds to suggest quasi-invitational values.
When overcalling a strong no-trump to show a single-suited or two-suited hand, what criteria should I use to decide whether to act or pass in direct and balancing seat? And how should I think about this system at pairs as opposed to teams?
Dumbo, Rockford, Ill.
At teams and at pairs when vulnerable and in direct seat, try to wait for the right shape to bid, since the penalties for wandering in inappropriately can be severe. In balancing seat, and especially non-vulnerable or when a passed hand, I strive to act with any excuse. Sometimes my idea of what is reasonable can be distinctly dubious. Playing a method that allows you to bid with both one-suited and two-suited hands is advisable.
|
What is the best defense against opponents’ three-level pre-emptive bids? I play Michaels Cuebids, but recently my partner mentioned that the principle could be extended to more situations than just a cue-bid. I’m assuming these methods should be combined with take-out doubles and a natural bid in no-trump.
Headliner, Newark, N.J.
Yes, if you play take-out doubles and a natural three no-trump call over a major-suit pre-empt, you can, if you want, give up on playing four of a minor as natural. Instead, play it as that minor and the unbid major, 5-5 pattern. Here, the cue-bid of the major would either be both minors or whatever else you want it to be.
Holding ♠ Q-10-5-4, ♥ 6, ♦ 8-6, ♣ K-10-6-5-4-2 at favorable vulnerability, I heard my partner bid three spades over a one-heart opening. My right-hand-opponent raised to four hearts. What would you do?
Sleeping Dogs, Columbia, S.C.
I do not normally like to jump raise to the five-level pre-emptively, because the opponents often misjudge and decide to defend a level lower. Here, however, I would guess to cramp the bidding with a five-spade bid, hoping to give my opponents the last guess. Will I save if they bid slam? I’m glad you didn’t ask!
|
September 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Against the disease of writing one must take special precautions, since it is a dangerous and contagious disease.
Peter Abelard
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 5
♥ J 9 4 2
♦ A Q J 6 5 3
♣ J 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 4 3
♥ A
♦ K 10 8
♣ Q 9 8 3 |
♠ A 9 7 2
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ 9
♣ K 10 6 2 |
South |
♠ K Q J
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ A 7 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♣3
This is not a great 15-count I admit, but it feels like you should take a call. The choice is to bid one no-trump (ugly without a diamond stopper) or to double with only three cards in an unbid major. Your slight extra values suggest that you have just enough compensation for the lack of shape. so I would double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ A 7 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
? |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
A severed foot is the ultimate stocking stuffer.
Mitch Hedberg
S |
North |
None |
♠ A 6
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A K Q 4
♣ K 7 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 9 8 2
♥ 8
♦ 9 3 2
♣ Q 10 6 |
♠ 3
♥ J 10 9 3
♦ J 10 7 5
♣ J 9 8 4 |
South |
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A K 6 5 2
♦ 8 6
♣ A 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠K
I would take the slow route with a two-heart cue-bid. A jump to the no-trump game would be premature; we could easily belong in spades or even a minor suit. This cue-bid does not guarantee spade support, and I plan to suggest no-trump later, to show a flexible hand with doubts as to the best strain. You would not bid this way with only a singleton spade, so partner can always convert to four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A K Q 4
♣ K 7 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 5th, 2019
God be thanked, the meanest of his creatures Boasts two soul-sides; one to face the world with, One to show a woman when he loves her!
Robert Browning
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ J 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 10 9
♦ K Q 5
♣ K J 10 9 3 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 8 7 5 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5 |
South |
♠ A K 7 4 3 2
♥ J 4 3
♦ A 4 3 2
♣ — |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Clearly the hand is far too good to pass two hearts. Should you drive to four hearts or consult your partner by making an invitational raise? Here, the singleton in partner’s suit is more useful than usual because of the fifth trump. At teams, I could understand driving to game, but at pairs, a simple raise looks right to protect the plus score.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ Q 8 7 5 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A writer is somebody for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people.
Thomas Mann
N |
North |
N-S |
♠ Q J 8 6 2
♥ K Q
♦ K 9 6 4
♣ 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ A K 9 4 3
♥ 5 4
♦ Q J 8 2
♣ Q 5 |
♠ 7 5
♥ A J 10 9 8 3
♦ 10 7 5
♣ J 8 |
South |
♠ 10
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A 3
♣ A K 10 9 7 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
It is risky, but three no-trump is where the money is. I hope to run the club suit, scoring nine quick tricks with partner’s hoped-for major-suit ace. If my major suit holdings were swapped, I would of course raise partner’s suit. And will I sit for it if doubled? I’m glad I don’t have enough space to answer that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A 3
♣ A K 10 9 7 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
? |
|
|
|
|
Mandatory falsecards may temporarily mislead partner, but the trade-off of confusing partner as opposed to declarer is one you can accept if the circumstances are right.
In today’s deal, South exploited the vulnerability with an aggressive four-spade opening. He had good spades, no defense and a singleton in the other major, making this a reasonable tactical move.
A minor-suit lead would have given the contract no chance, but West led a top heart, of course. On seeing the dummy and a discouraging card from his partner, West shifted to a diamond. Declarer took dummy’s ace and threw a diamond on the heart queen, setting up a trick in that suit.
Declarer ruffed the next diamond, crossed to the club ace and led a trump off dummy. When East followed low, declarer won his king. He needed to bring spades in for one loser, and if West had instinctively followed with the five, South would have had to play for ace-doubleton on his right by leading a low trump next, making his game.
However, West was aware of the situation and dropped the 10, creating a losing option for declarer where none had previously existed. South now had to decide whether West had jack-10 doubleton or jack-10-low. The Principle of Restricted Choice could not help because West had two equals either way. The only inference he had was that West might not have found this defense if he had three trumps. So South continued with the spade queen and lost his game.