May 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
My expectations were reduced to zero when I was 21. Everything since then has been a bonus.
Stephen Hawking
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ A Q J 5
♥ 9 6
♦ K 9 6 3
♣ K Q J |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7
♥ Q J 10 3 2
♦ 7
♣ 9 7 5 2 |
♠ 6 2
♥ K 8 5 4
♦ Q 10 5 4
♣ 10 8 4 |
South |
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ A 7
♦ A J 8 2
♣ A 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Balanced slam try for spades
♥Q
Unless playing with an extremely conservative partner, I would advocate passing here. When you doubled two hearts in direct seat, you showed a shape-suitable opening bid at the very least. Partner had ways to invite game and chose not to. With bad breaks on the horizon and the defenders’ high cards in the minors likely to be over your aces, is it really worth another try? I don’t think so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ A 7
♦ A J 8 2
♣ A 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Laugh, and the world laughs with you; Weep, and you weep alone.
Ella Wheeler Wilcox
W |
North |
None |
♠ J 10 8 5 3
♥ Q J
♦ 9 3
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 4
♥ 10 9 8 7 5 4 3
♦ A
♣ A 10 8 |
♠ —
♥ 6 2
♦ K J 8 7 6 5 4 2
♣ J 9 3 |
South |
♠ A K 9 7 6 2
♥ A K
♦ Q 10
♣ K 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
You may not have a great hand, but you already denied any real values when you bid only three spades at your first turn. That said, do you trust your partner enough to play him for the slam-try he has already shown? If you do, then I think you must bid more than four spades now. Inventing a four-heart cue-bid or jumping to five spades might be best now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8 5 3
♥ Q J
♦ 9 3
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 23 Comments
I’ll bet my money on the bobtail nag Somebody bet on the bay.
Stephen Foster
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ 8
♥ 8 6 2
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ 9 7 6 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 9 3
♥ A K Q 5 3
♦ K 5 4
♣ 10 3 |
♠ 7 5 4 2
♥ J 10 9 4
♦ Q 9 6
♣ A 5 |
South |
♠ A K Q J 6
♥ 7
♦ A J 10
♣ K Q J 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT * |
3 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Puppet to three clubs
♥K
I can see the attraction of heading for six clubs, but with so many holes to fill, this hand seems more about game than slam. Four spades may be considerably easier to make than five clubs, so I would simply bid four spades now. For slam to make, you would need partner to have an ace and either long clubs or the diamond king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J 6
♥ 7
♦ A J 10
♣ K Q J 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 30th, 2019
There is always inequity in life. Some men are killed in a war, and some men are wounded, and some men never leave the country. … Life is unfair.
John F. Kennedy
W |
North |
Both |
♠ K 10 9 4
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ Q
♣ A Q 8 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ K Q 2
♦ A 10 9 8 7 5
♣ J 7 3 |
♠ Q J 8 2
♥ 9 7 5
♦ J 2
♣ 10 9 6 5 |
South |
♠ A 7 6 3
♥ A J 8
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ K 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
I am torn here between bidding no-trump and raising clubs; if the latter, I wonder what level to raise to. The problem is that if North is short in hearts, we might make game in clubs (and would go down in three no-trump), but my partner will not know his cards are fitting. Still, a raise to three clubs is the value bid, and with no side-suit aces, part-score is likely to be the limit if partner holds a minimum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 9 4
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ Q
♣ A Q 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
It is characteristic of mankind to make as little adjustment as possible in customary ways in the face of new conditions.
Robert and Helen Lynd
S |
North |
Both |
♠ A 9 4
♥ J 7 5
♦ J 9 3 2
♣ J 8 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ 9 3
♦ K 6 4
♣ 10 7 3 2 |
♠ K 5 3
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ 7 5
♣ A K 6 5 |
South |
♠ Q J 7
♥ A K Q 6
♦ A Q 10 8
♣ Q 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠2
Unless they are extremely subtle and devious, your opponents have conducted an auction that suggests they have a heart weakness. As long as you have no reason to suspect them of being confidence tricksters, lead the heart king and try to hit declarer’s soft underbelly.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8 6 4
♥ K 5
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
May 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
When a deal is passed out on the first round of a duplicate, are we allowed to re-deal the hand without asking the director for permission?
Thrown for a Loop, Naples, Fla.
While the paying customer has one fewer deal to play because of the throw-in, that would be missing the point. Say I or my partner had passed a hand others might open. Should we not get the good or bad result from that decision? Also, you can be confident that on most pass-outs, someone, somewhere, will find a reason to bid, no matter how flimsy the pretext.
If a defender shows his card, when may he be excused from playing that card, assuming it has not actually been put on the table? I thought I was allowed to change my mind here.
Faulty Towers, Wilmington, N.C.
There are different rules for declarer and the defenders. For declarer, a card has to be played — or the equivalent of played — rather than accidentally dropped. (Declarer doesn’t have a partner who might benefit from unauthorized information.) For the defenders, a card is played if it is actually or potentially in view. Thus, a partly or wholly visible card is normally treated as played.
I picked up ♠ 9-4, ♥ 7-4-2, ♦ A-Q-7-5-3, ♣ K-3-2 and heard one club from my partner, then one spade on my right. Is this hand suitable for a negative double? I thought not, so I passed, and now a raise to two spades was passed back to me. What would be appropriate now?
Lurking Warbeck, Dodge City, Kan.
You were right not to double or bid two diamonds, though you might take the latter action as a passed hand. Here, I’d bid two no-trump at my second turn if I trusted my partner to be fully present. A call of two no-trump is logically take-out for the minors, not natural. It denies four clubs, since I would already have raised if I had that hand. Something like this hand would therefore be perfect for the call.
|
Is there a simple way to learn the rules for the percentages as they apply to calculating how the opponents’ missing cards might divide?
Life’s a Bore(l), Honolulu, Hawaii
In broad terms, two missing cards will probably split, but in all other cases, an even number of missing cards will probably not divide evenly. The odds of them splitting exactly are slightly more than 1 in 3 in most cases, while a one-from-even split is a 50-50 shot. An odd number of cards split as close to evenly as possible, with odds about 2 in 3 for that. Start from those numbers; for other cases, the more normal the split, the more likely it is.
I was second to speak, with ♠ A-8, ♥ A-Q-7-3-2, ♦ J-4-3-2, ♣ A-4, and I opened one heart. The next hand doubled, and my partner jumped to three hearts. I passed, and we missed a game. Afterward, he said there was no way to show less than a limit raise but more than a pre-empt. He mentioned the concept of a mixed raise. Have you heard of this call?
Mixed Nuts, Detroit, Mich.
A mixed raise is a jump cue-bid in competition, facing an overcall, to show a four-card raise with 6-9 points or so. It is mixed, as it has the shape for a pre-emptive raise and the values for a single raise. Since this call has no other useful meaning, it makes good sense to play this convention — as long as your partnership has agreed. One could also use the jump in the unbid major after a major suit is doubled to show precisely this hand; so here, a call of two spades would show this.
|
May 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is: infinite.
William Blake
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ A K
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ K 9 6 3
♣ A 10 4 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6
♥ 7 6
♦ J 10 5
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
♠ 10 7 5 4
♥ 4 3
♦ A Q 8 4
♣ K Q 5 |
South |
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 2
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
It is worth emphasizing why your response maybe be different after a balancing double than after a direct-seat double. A direct double shows opening values or more; a balancing double may be as much as a king less than that. So, responder to the balancing double bids as if he has transferred a king to his partner. Here, responder jumps to two hearts; he would not do so facing a balancing double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 2
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
May 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Everything happens to everybody sooner or later if there is time enough.
George Bernard Shaw
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ K Q 9 7 6 4
♥ Q 3
♦ J 7 5
♣ A 8 |
West |
East |
♠ A 8 5
♥ K 8 7 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ J 4 2 |
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ J 9
♦ 10 9 4 2
♣ Q 7 3 |
South |
♠ —
♥ A 10 6 5 2
♦ A Q 8
♣ K 10 9 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
Even though the opponents seem prepared to go quietly, it is worthwhile to invest a small amount to make their lives more difficult in case West plans to re-open the bidding. You should raise to three spades to force his next action to come at a more uncomfortable level. This may turn a plus score into a minus, but overall, the investment looks sound to me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 5
♥ K 8 7 4
♦ K 6 3
♣ J 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
May 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
But I, being poor, have only my dreams, I have spread my dreams under your feet; Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
W.B. Yeats
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 9 2
♥ K J 10 5
♦ A Q 9
♣ A 8 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ 9 8 7 3
♦ 7 5 2
♣ Q 10 9 6 |
♠ Q J 10 8 5 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ K 6 3
♣ J |
South |
♠ A K 6
♥ Q 4
♦ J 10 8 4
♣ K 7 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠7
It isn’t clear whether you belong in diamonds or three no-trump, but you don’t really have any slam ambitions yet. Bid three clubs to show where you live and let partner help you decide what strain to end up in. When in doubt, it is always better to let partner tell you what he has, rather than deciding for him.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 2
♥ K J 10 5
♦ A Q 9
♣ A 8 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
May 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Some problems are so complex that you have to be highly intelligent and well informed just to be undecided about them.
Laurence Peter
East |
North |
None |
♠ K Q 4 2
♥ A 9 8
♦ Q 9 6 2
♣ A K |
West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7 3
♥ K 10 6 5 2
♦ 7 5
♣ 8 3 |
♠ 8
♥ J 7
♦ J 8 3
♣ Q J 10 6 5 4 |
South |
♠ A J 6 5
♥ Q 4 3
♦ A K 10 4
♣ 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
3 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All Pass |
♣8
Creeping or Crawling Stayman allows you to bid two clubs here and correct a response of two diamond to two hearts to offer a choice of the majors. Opener tends to pass unless he has three spades and two hearts, so this way you can remove yourself from one no-trump and find a reasonable partscore whatever your partner has.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 7 3
♥ K 10 6 5 2
♦ 7 5
♣ 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal shows how a careful declarer can find an unlikely extra chance in a situation where the success or failure of his contract appears to depend on one thing only. Having been given that huge hint, be honest: How would you play six spades on a top heart lead from West?
I’m absolutely confident that a significant percentage of bridge players (hopefully not my readers!) would win the heart and draw trumps, then take an early diamond finesse of the jack. The good news is that the finesse will work; the bad news is that the 4-1 break will leave you helpless.
But what is the hurry to take that finesse? Win the heart lead and draw trumps in three rounds, then cash all the club winners and exit with the second heart. You aren’t giving up anything, but you force the defenders to give you a ruff-sluff or lead diamonds for you. Say West wins the heart and leads a low diamond. You capture East’s card, go to dummy with the diamond king, and have a marked finesse against East’s remaining diamonds. On any other defense, you can discard a diamond from one hand and ruff in the other. Then you can take the diamond finesse against the queen and claim 12 tricks.
This line of play never loses when the contract can be made, and it ensures you can always survive the 4-1 diamond breaks with the queen onside.