December 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Most coincidences are simply chance events that turn out to be far more probable than many people imagine.
Ivars Peterson
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ J 8
♦ A Q 9 7 4
♣ A Q 9 |
West |
East |
♠ K 4
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ J 3 2
♣ J 10 8 2 |
♠ J 9 6 3
♥ Q 10 7 4
♦ 10 5
♣ 5 4 3 |
South |
♠ A Q 8 2
♥ A K 5
♦ K 8 6
♣ K 7 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥2
With 5-3-3-2 shape and a doubleton in the opponents’ suit, few would argue with overcalling in your long suit at the one-level. At the two-level, issues of suit quality and tactics play a part. Here, your suit is good, but you do have only five; and yes, doubling may get partner to compete in spades — but are you sure that is such a bad idea? I would double rather than bid two diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 5
♥ J 8
♦ A Q 9 7 4
♣ A Q 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
? |
|
|
|
December 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Information can tell us everything. It has all the answers. But they are answers to questions we have not asked, and which doubtless don’t even arise.
Jean Baudrillard
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ Q 10 5 4
♦ 10 7 6
♣ A 8 5 |
West |
East |
♠ K
♥ 9 7 3
♦ A K J 3 2
♣ J 9 6 3 |
♠ J 10 7 5
♥ J 8 6 2
♦ Q 8 5
♣ 10 4 |
South |
♠ A Q 9 6 3
♥ A K
♦ 9 4
♣ K Q 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
When dealt a three-card sequence like we see in these hearts, my first impulse is to lead it, even when I have another bid and supported suit. It isn’t so much that I expect to set up additional winners; it’s more that a heart seems safe, and my partner will never play me for a suit like this unless I lead it right off the bat.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ J 8 2
♣ K 7 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
December 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Say that you open one club with ♠ A-8-3, ♥ K-J-7-3, ♦ 4-3, ♣ K-J-8-2. Your partner responds one spade. Should you raise spades, bid hearts or rebid at no-trump?
Total Re-call, Phoenix, Ariz.
While it is acceptable to raise partner with three trumps, you should not do so with a completely balanced hand if there is a practical alternative. Here, though, your small doubleton makes your three-card raise eminently sensible. Rebidding one no-trump would be my preference if the diamond four were the queen. Bidding two hearts is out; that would show real extras and a 5-4 pattern.
My left-hand opponent opened a weak three diamonds, and I heard a double from my partner. The next hand bid four diamonds, and I held ♠ A-Q-8-5-3, ♥ K-10-7-2, ♦ 7-4-3, ♣ A. My diamond length looked good for slam purposes, but with this hand, should I settle for game, drive to slam or invite — and in all cases, how should I find the best strain?
Orange Julius, Edmonton, Alberta
I can see why a call of four spades would not do this hand justice, but if the club ace were the king, I would grudgingly settle for that. You cannot really offer a choice of majors except by bidding five diamonds, and since this obviously implies willingness to play slam, maybe you have to do that and accept a sign-off.
In defending against no-trump on an auction where you have not bid, what agreements would you recommend for top-honor leads, especially regarding the request for an unblock?
New Kid on the Unblock, Rome, Ga.
At trick one against no-trump, there are two common (and equally sensible) agreements. You can play that the king asks for unblock (or count), while the ace and queen ask for attitude. Or the ace and queen ask partner to unblock an honor (or to give count if you have no honor), with the king asking for attitude. In the first case, you would lead the king from A-K-J-7-5, for example; in the second case, the ace.
|
Recently, I was playing two hearts and determined after a long disagreement that my right-hand opponent had discarded a diamond when she still had a trump to follow with. Her side did not win any further tricks after that point. It doesn’t feel right that she should escape without penalty, does it?
Sex Cymbal, Durham, N.C.
If the offending side does not win a subsequent trick (including the revoke trick), there is no penalty. The revoke law isn’t really an attempt to restore equity on its own. But if the penalty (be it zero, one or two tricks) does not restore equity, the Tournament Director is empowered to do so. The non-offending side should never get fewer tricks than they did because of the revoke, and the benefit of the doubt will generally go their way.
I had the following hand in fourth seat and heard a one-club call passed around to me. Would you consider it appropriate to let sleeping dogs lie and pass, given my spade shortage, or if not, at what level of diamonds would you bid, holding ♠ 4, ♥ A-J-3, ♦ A-Q-9-7-3-2, ♣ Q-4-3?
Hush Puppy, Fredericksburg, Va.
The spade shortage is disconcerting, but I would not pass. A jump to two diamonds in balancing seat is intermediate, not weak — even if you normally play pre-emptive jump overcalls. With the same hand and a true weak jump (switch the heart ace to the two), I would reluctantly pass, though I would not be happy about it. Partner could still have a balanced 13-count, and our side could make three no-trump, after all.
|
December 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function.
F. Scott Fitzgerald
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ A 10 8
♥ 10 8
♦ K Q 6 5
♣ J 10 7 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 3
♥ A 6
♦ A J 8 3 2
♣ K Q 5 2 |
♠ Q J 7 6 4
♥ 7 2
♦ 10 9
♣ A 9 8 6 |
South |
♠ K 5 2
♥ K Q J 9 5 4 3
♦ 7 4
♣ 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠9
You could make a case for bidding two spades, since you have denied three-card support already (switch the majors, and that case becomes even better). However, since you are facing a card-showing double with an emphasis on take-out, I would simply bid three clubs, getting your minor-suit pattern across as efficiently as possible. There may be room to show spade support later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 3
♥ A 6
♦ A J 8 3 2
♣ K Q 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
When a man’s life is at stake, no delay is too long.
Juvenal
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ A 7 4 3
♥ 9 7 4
♦ A 7 4 2
♣ 8 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ A K Q J 10 8 6
♦ 6
♣ K 6 2 |
♠ K J
♥ 5 3
♦ J 10 8 3
♣ Q J 10 7 4 |
South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 6
♥ 2
♦ K Q 9 5
♣ A 9 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♥K
You have a good hand for the auction so far. So, you must compete again, and the fact that you bid only two clubs the first time out and didn’t try for game means that (assuming partner is on the same wavelength) it should be safe to bid two no-trump now. This shows clubs and diamonds — presumably equal or better clubs — and lets partner off the hook if he has doubled on an off-shape hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J
♥ 5 3
♦ J 10 8 3
♣ Q J 10 7 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
? |
|
|
|
December 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Some evils admit of consolations, but there are no comforters for dyspepsia and the toothache.
Henry Lytton Bulwer
W |
North |
None |
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 5 4
♦ A Q J 10 4
♣ Q 10 |
West |
East |
♠ A K Q 10 8
♥ J 9 7 2
♦ 6 2
♣ K 8 |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ 3
♦ 9 8 7
♣ 9 7 6 5 3 2 |
South |
♠ 9 3
♥ A Q 10 8 6
♦ K 5 3
♣ A J 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Fit jump in support of diamonds
♠K
This should be a takeout double, not a penalty double. (Your heart length alone should argue for that, even if you don’t have any firm agreements here.) I wouldn’t want to introduce a spade suit this weak, so I’d repeat the diamonds. After all, 100 honors should count for something.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 6 5
♥ K 5 4
♦ A Q J 10 4
♣ Q 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Those who live in a cold climate and in Northern Europe are full of spirit but wanting in intelligence and skill; and therefore they keep their freedom, but have no political organization and are incapable of ruling over others.
Aristotle
S |
North |
Both |
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 9 7 5
♦ A 7 2
♣ A K 7 |
West |
East |
♠ J 9 6
♥ 8 3 2
♦ K 10 5 3
♣ Q 9 5 |
♠ Q 10 5 3
♥ Q J 6 4
♦ Q 9 4
♣ 10 6 |
South |
♠ A K 7 4
♥ K
♦ J 8 6
♣ J 8 4 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♦3
Life is too short to worry about reaching slam off two cashing spade tricks (what does partner have if that were so?). Your hand is not ideal for Blackwood, though — you want partner to do the asking, since you have such an easy hand to show. I would cue-bid four clubs and hope partner can take control. Over a four-heart signoff, I would bid five diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 2
♥ A 10 9 7 5
♦ A 7 2
♣ A K 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Fear? What has a man to do with fear? Chance rules our lives, and the future is all unknown. Best live as we may, from day to day.
Sophocles
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ K Q
♥ Q
♦ A 10 7 6 5
♣ K J 9 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ A J 8 7 6 5 3 2
♥ 7
♦ 9 4 3
♣ 2 |
♠ 9
♥ J 10 9 8 6 3
♦ K Q J 2
♣ A 3 |
South |
♠ 10 4
♥ A K 5 4 2
♦ 8
♣ Q 10 8 7 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥7
Your partner has produced a natural and non-forcing sequence, knowing nine of your 10 minor-suit cards. You have at most a queen above average and no reason to assume your partner bid inaccurately when he told you he wanted to play a heart part-score. Pass gratefully and let him try to make his contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q
♥ Q
♦ A 10 7 6 5
♣ K J 9 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all — in which case, you fail by default.
J.K. Rowling
S |
North |
Both |
♠ 4 2
♥ A K 9 4 3
♦ A K 5
♣ A Q J |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 5
♥ Q 10 8 6
♦ 9 3 2
♣ 9 8 |
♠ Q 8 7
♥ 5
♦ 10 8 7 4
♣ 7 6 5 3 2 |
South |
♠ A K 6 3
♥ J 7 2
♦ Q J 6
♣ K 10 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
In situations like this, there are only two practical options for the lead: the unbid minors. With hearts likely to provide discards for declarer, should you lead the shorter minor or the stronger one? My instincts are to try to build tricks in clubs for our side. If the spade queen represents a trick, you may be able to get in later to play diamonds through dummy.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 2
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ 9 6 5
♣ Q 7 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
December 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
I was recently confronted with an auction where I had to check the backs of the cards. I heard one spade to my left, a one-no-trump call from my partner and a double to my right. I held ♠ A-Q-3, ♥ 10-5-3-2, ♦ A-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-3. What could be going on, and how does the bidding add up?
Prince of Denmark, Bay City, Mich.
Something certainly smells fishy, does it not? Redouble, assuming that to be strong, and you will discover whether it’s your partner or your left-hand opponent who’s having a little fun. I’d guess that if your side is non-vulnerable, your partner may be experimenting, but if the opponents are non-vulnerable, the opening bidder may crack and remove himself.
As responder, I have received conflicting advice about my second call, or rebid. I had understood that if I initially respond one heart, a rebid by me of my own suit would guarantee six hearts. But my partner says if he has a weak hand, he must rebid his suit, no matter how weak it is, to show five. Any comments?
Seconds Out, Secaucus, N.J.
I always like to be able to confirm my correspondents’ opinions. Since opener will always raise his partner with four trumps, or with three when his hand is not balanced, the failure to raise basically denies a fit. So, responder will almost never repeat a five-card suit unless it looks like six. As responder, support partner, bid no-trump, or pass with five cards in your original suit and a hand that has no game interest.
I passed in first seat at matchpoint pairs, holding ♠ J-7-4-3, ♥ A-J-5-4, ♦ Q-8-3, ♣ K-4 and heard my LHO open one no-trump, which was passed around to me. We play Cappelletti, where a double by a passed hand would be a maximum pass. Would you do that, or balance with two diamonds to show the majors, or just let them play one no-trump?
On the Brink, Portland, Ore.
You left out the critical piece of information, namely the vulnerability. Think of vulnerability as a traffic signal. With neither side vulnerable, the light is green; with both sides vulnerable, it is red; and with equal vulnerability, the light is yellow. I would act at green, pass at red, and bid at yellow with 4-4 only if this hand had the king in spades rather than clubs. With 5-4 shape, I’d probably act at any vulnerability.
|
I enjoy your column and wondered where you get the quotes that precede the hand? Do you research them yourself or have a secret source?
Whirly Bird, Charleston, S.C.
For the quotes, Bartlett’s, The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations and wikiquote.org are fertile sources. My editor warns me when my choice is inappropriate (fortunately not more than once every three months) or misattributed. When I can find something that makes me think, or smile, I’m happy.
Playing rubber bridge, I held ♠ K-J-10, ♥ 9-7-5, ♦ A-K-J, ♣ K-10-4-2. My right-hand opponent opened one spade; I overcalled one no-trump and was doubled to my left. I bought a near-Yarborough in dummy and struggled to escape for three down. My partner said I needed more than 15 points to make this call; was she right?
Caught Out, Monterey, Calif.
Let she who is without sin … Your spade values are worth far more than 4 points here; bid one no-trump at any vulnerability and position, and blame your partner’s luck if she has a bad hand. It’s certainly not your fault.
|
|
In today’s deal, John Holland (a regular medalist for England in Open and Senior teams events) was declarer at six no-trump, against which West led a heart. Holland optimistically inserted the jack; if that had held and diamonds had broken 3-2, that would have been 12 tricks, and any pedagogical interest in the deal would have vanished. But when East covered the jack with the queen, Holland won his ace.
When diamonds broke, Holland cashed them all, discarding a heart and spade from hand. (Since five tricks are impossible against the 5-0 break, it is right to lead the diamond ace or queen first, in case East has a bare jack or 10. Then a low diamond to hand reveals whether a finesse of the nine is necessary.)
On the run of the diamonds, East discarded two clubs and a heart. When declarer cashed the club king and led to dummy’s queen, East pitched a small spade. Since it now appeared East had begun with four cards in each major, how should declarer continue?
It looked as if declarer would need a successful finesse of the spade queen to bring his trick total to 12. But Holland spotted a small extra chance when he led a low spade from dummy; after East contributed the five, he put in his eight. This play would guard against East holding both the jack and nine, and Holland’s foresight gave him his slam. An alternative would have been to run the spade 10, and if that were covered, later to finesse the eight.