December 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
I was recently confronted with an auction where I had to check the backs of the cards. I heard one spade to my left, a one-no-trump call from my partner and a double to my right. I held ♠ A-Q-3, ♥ 10-5-3-2, ♦ A-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-3. What could be going on, and how does the bidding add up?
Prince of Denmark, Bay City, Mich.
Something certainly smells fishy, does it not? Redouble, assuming that to be strong, and you will discover whether it’s your partner or your left-hand opponent who’s having a little fun. I’d guess that if your side is non-vulnerable, your partner may be experimenting, but if the opponents are non-vulnerable, the opening bidder may crack and remove himself.
As responder, I have received conflicting advice about my second call, or rebid. I had understood that if I initially respond one heart, a rebid by me of my own suit would guarantee six hearts. But my partner says if he has a weak hand, he must rebid his suit, no matter how weak it is, to show five. Any comments?
Seconds Out, Secaucus, N.J.
I always like to be able to confirm my correspondents’ opinions. Since opener will always raise his partner with four trumps, or with three when his hand is not balanced, the failure to raise basically denies a fit. So, responder will almost never repeat a five-card suit unless it looks like six. As responder, support partner, bid no-trump, or pass with five cards in your original suit and a hand that has no game interest.
I passed in first seat at matchpoint pairs, holding ♠ J-7-4-3, ♥ A-J-5-4, ♦ Q-8-3, ♣ K-4 and heard my LHO open one no-trump, which was passed around to me. We play Cappelletti, where a double by a passed hand would be a maximum pass. Would you do that, or balance with two diamonds to show the majors, or just let them play one no-trump?
On the Brink, Portland, Ore.
You left out the critical piece of information, namely the vulnerability. Think of vulnerability as a traffic signal. With neither side vulnerable, the light is green; with both sides vulnerable, it is red; and with equal vulnerability, the light is yellow. I would act at green, pass at red, and bid at yellow with 4-4 only if this hand had the king in spades rather than clubs. With 5-4 shape, I’d probably act at any vulnerability.
|
I enjoy your column and wondered where you get the quotes that precede the hand? Do you research them yourself or have a secret source?
Whirly Bird, Charleston, S.C.
For the quotes, Bartlett’s, The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations and wikiquote.org are fertile sources. My editor warns me when my choice is inappropriate (fortunately not more than once every three months) or misattributed. When I can find something that makes me think, or smile, I’m happy.
Playing rubber bridge, I held ♠ K-J-10, ♥ 9-7-5, ♦ A-K-J, ♣ K-10-4-2. My right-hand opponent opened one spade; I overcalled one no-trump and was doubled to my left. I bought a near-Yarborough in dummy and struggled to escape for three down. My partner said I needed more than 15 points to make this call; was she right?
Caught Out, Monterey, Calif.
Let she who is without sin … Your spade values are worth far more than 4 points here; bid one no-trump at any vulnerability and position, and blame your partner’s luck if she has a bad hand. It’s certainly not your fault.
|
December 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to stay in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that.
Lewis Carroll
S |
North |
Both |
♠ 7 5 3
♥ 10 2
♦ 7 6 4 3
♣ A K 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 2
♥ J 9 6
♦ Q 10 5 2
♣ 10 5 |
♠ J 9
♥ A 8 5 3
♦ J 9
♣ J 9 7 6 4 |
South |
♠ A K 6 4
♥ K Q 7 4
♦ A K 8
♣ Q 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠2
Partner has shown four spades and no great slam interest. It seems obvious to bid four spades, but might you risk four diamonds as implicitly agreeing spades and a diamond cue-bid? It depends on how smart you think your partner is! Maybe a call of four spades can avoid disaster if what is obvious to you isn’t so crystal-clear to him.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 6 4
♥ K Q 7 4
♦ A K 8
♣ Q 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
To err is human, but to really foul things up you need a computer.
Anonymous
W |
North |
E-W |
♠ K Q 10 4
♥ —
♦ K Q J 9 8
♣ J 10 8 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 5 2
♥ 9 6 5 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A K 3 |
♠ A J 9 3
♥ J 10 8 7
♦ 10 5 2
♣ Q 6 |
South |
♠ 8 6
♥ A K Q 4 3
♦ A 3
♣ 9 7 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
Does it matter?
I can see the argument for rebidding one no-trump rather than two clubs. The former call defines the range of your hand and avoids introducing an honorless suit; but in my opinion, 5-4-2-2 hands play better in a suit contract whenever you can find a fit. So I would bid two clubs, even though I sympathize with the other position.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6
♥ A K Q 4 3
♦ A 3
♣ 9 7 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
‘Will you walk into my parlor?’ said the Spider to the Fly; ‘ ’Tis the prettiest little parlor that ever you did spy.’
Mary Howitt
S |
North |
Both |
♠ A 10 7
♥ J 6 5 4
♦ Q 7 4
♣ Q 4 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 6 4 2
♥ 8 3
♦ J 9 6
♣ A 8 6 5 |
♠ Q J 8 5
♥ Q 7
♦ A 10 8 2
♣ J 10 2 |
South |
♠ K 3
♥ A K 10 9 2
♦ K 5 3
♣ K 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
Normally the range of a one-no-trump response is 7-10, but this hand probably falls outside that range for more than one reason. The intermediates are spectacular, the spade cards are worth more than 3 points, and there is a builder in hearts for partner’s long suit. I would stretch to a response of two no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 8 5
♥ Q 7
♦ A 10 8 2
♣ J 10 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
? |
|
|
|
December 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The truth is too simple: One must always get there by a complicated route.
George Sand
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ 7 2
♥ A K 10 8 7 4
♦ 7 4
♣ 9 8 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 8 4
♥ 6
♦ J 10 9 6 3
♣ K 10 5 3 2 |
♠ A K 5 3
♥ J 9 3 2
♦ A 8 2
♣ Q 4 |
South |
♠ Q J 10 9 6
♥ Q 5
♦ K Q 5
♣ A J 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♦J
It is important to understand the logic of opening in third seat. While you can stretch to make a lead-directing call with a good suit and full values (say 13-14 points), you have no reason to assume that it is not your hand. So make the call you would have made in another seat, here one diamond. You might break this rule for an exceptionally good four-card major, but not here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 5 3
♥ J 9 3 2
♦ A 8 2
♣ Q 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 18 Comments
Mad, bad and dangerous to know.
Lady Caroline Lamb, of Lord
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ Q J 8 2
♥ 8 5 3 2
♦ A J 5
♣ A 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ A K Q 10 9 7 6
♦ 9 2
♣ K J |
♠ K
♥ J 4
♦ Q 10 8 6 3
♣ Q 10 9 4 2 |
South |
♠ A 10 9 7 5 3
♥ —
♦ K 7 4
♣ 8 7 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
1 NT * |
4 ♠ |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Clubs
♥K
I would respond two diamonds rather than two clubs, planning to compete over two hearts by bidding my clubs. It is also quite likely that partner has a good hand with spades, in which case I will again be better placed to bid my suits in economical order if I start with diamonds rather than clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ J 4
♦ Q 10 8 6 3
♣ Q 10 9 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
December 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Our life is frittered away by detail. … Simplify, simplify.
Henry David Thoreau
N |
North |
N-S |
♠ A K Q 5
♥ A K 10 7
♦ 5
♣ K Q 8 7 |
West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 3
♥ 9
♦ 10 9 7 6 3
♣ A 10 4 |
♠ 10 4
♥ 8 5 4 3
♦ Q J 8
♣ 9 5 3 2 |
South |
♠ 7 6 2
♥ Q J 6 2
♦ A K 4 2
♣ J 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ * |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Short diamonds, agreeing hearts
♦10
Partner’s (not entirely surprising) failure to compete any further in diamonds makes me slightly reluctant to lead that suit. A spade lead looks like it is going to find partner’s length. While it might set up a discard for declarer, the fact that West responded one no-trump makes this slightly less likely than usual, so I would lead the spade six.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 6
♥ 7 2
♦ K J 8 7 4
♣ K 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
|
December 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I held ♠ A-Q-9-6-3, ♥ Q, ♦ Q-7-3, ♣ J-10-8-4 and opened one spade in third seat; I heard an overcall of two hearts to my left. When this came back to me, I had to decide whether to pass or double for take-out. I decided to pass, but we could have set the part-score 800 if I had doubled. Was I a wimp?
Egg On My Face, Saint John, New Brunswick
You got a little unlucky, I think. Reopening would have been clear-cut if your heart queen had been, say, the club king. As it was, you could either argue that pushing the opponent into a silly spot had earned you a good result, or you could put the pedal to the metal and go all out for the penalty. In the end, this comes down to a question of temperament.
What is the best way to respond to partner’s penalty double of one no-trump? Obviously, one tends to pass with values; but with a weak hand, should one play a conventional scheme of response or just play natural?
Needing a Nudge, Palm Springs, Calif.
Running to your longest suit with fewer than 5 points is perfectly playable. Similarly, transfers in response to partner’s penalty double of a weak no-trump allow you to bid out your good hands, rather than sitting for the double and not getting your suits into play. In effect, after a penalty double of a strong no-trump, you pretend your partner has opened one no-trump, with Stayman and transfers.
What supplement, if any, do you use to the Milton Work 4-3-2-1 high-card point count? For instance, should one count each card over four in any suit as worth a point? Or is there only a specific set of sequences where such evaluation is appropriate?
Count von Count, Duluth, Minn.
I do use this scale of valuation when deciding whether to respond to a one no-trump opener. Add on a point for any five-card suit headed by at least one top honor plus decent intermediates. It is also useful when deciding whether to open a weak two. If I have a six-card suit, I add on 2 points; with a four-card side suit, I add on 1 more point for that. If I get to 13, I open at the one-level if I have a trick and a half on defense.
|
I held ♠ Q-J-7-3, ♥ Q-9-4, ♦ 7-6-3, ♣ A-Q-4 and heard one club from my partner, then two diamonds on my right. I doubled — did I have a sensible alternative? When my partner rebid two hearts, I still had no idea what to do. What would you suggest?
Mistletoe, Union City, N.J.
Doubling an overcall, then bidding a new suit tends to show a hand too weak to make that call directly. So you cannot correct two hearts to two spades — that would suggest five or more spades and 8-10 points, perhaps. Your actual hand offers an impossible rebid, so maybe pass two hearts and hope it won’t be too silly. Correcting to three clubs will get you to spades if partner has four, but you might also end up playing a 3-3 fit facing a 3-4-3-3 pattern!
When my right-hand opponent opens, I need some guidance as to when to double and when to overcall with a single-suited hand and upward of 15 high-card points. Does it matter what they opened or where my long suit is?
Picking a Path, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Typically, if they opened one spade, it may be best to overcall and come again, or you risk being pre-empted. Anytime you can start with a two-level overcall, you should consider that action, since you have already shown a good hand and good suit. When the choice is to double or bid at the one-level, 16-17 points is the cusp. Especially when you have spades, you may hope to double and bid the suit more economically than when you have a red suit.
|
December 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
When you ain’t got nothing, you got nothing to lose. You’re invisible now, you got no secrets to conceal.
Bob Dylan
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ K 7 5
♥ J 10 6
♦ J 8 3
♣ Q 10 9 8 |
West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 8 7 2
♦ 6 5 2
♣ A K J 7 5 2 |
♠ A J
♥ K Q 9 5 3
♦ K 10 9 4
♣ 6 4 |
South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 6 4 2
♥ A 4
♦ A Q 7
♣ 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
|
♣K
Does this hand meet the minimum requirement for a call of two diamonds? My instinct is that acting here, while technically very dangerous, is something that you will tend to get away with more often than not. If you are going to bid, do it confidently! Who is to say you don’t have an ace or extra card more than you actually have? I might be more cautious when vulnerable at teams, though.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J
♥ K Q 9 5 3
♦ K 10 9 4
♣ 6 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
? |
|
|
|
December 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The laws of God, the laws of man, He may keep that will and can.
A.E. Housman
W |
North |
E-W |
♠ 10 9 2
♥ 6 5 4 2
♦ Q 9 8 2
♣ A J |
West |
East |
♠ K 7 5 3
♥ Q 10 7
♦ 10 3
♣ 10 7 6 3 |
♠ 6
♥ K J 9 8 3
♦ K J 4
♣ Q 9 5 2 |
South |
♠ A Q J 8 4
♥ A
♦ A 7 6 5
♣ K 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
I would start by redoubling, rather than bidding my suits, planning to double them if they escape to a minor. If my partner doubles the opponents’ escape to two hearts, I would sit for it. If two hearts comes around to me, I suppose I will bid three diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 8 4
♥ A
♦ A 7 6 5
♣ K 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
|
At both tables in a local teams match, South declared three no-trump, and each West led a fourth-highest spade, the two. The first declarer took the trick with the spade king and played the ace, king and another diamond. West won the trick with the diamond 10 and cashed the diamond queen, East discarding a low heart and a low club.
Declarer took West’s exit of the spade queen with the king, then cashed the club queen, ace and king. Next, he led the heart two toward his hand. East played low, and declarer’s heart queen won the trick. Alas, with only king-six-four of hearts left, declarer was endplayed to lead hearts from his hand, and he lost the last three tricks to finish down one.
At the other table, declarer counted seven top tricks, with another available in hearts. He judged that the best chance of making the contract was to play West for the heart jack.
Accordingly, this declarer ducked the first trick, won the second spade and led a low heart at trick two. West rose with the heart jack and played the spade queen. Declarer took this with the ace and continued with the heart six. Dummy’s 10 forced East’s ace and declarer claimed nine tricks: two spades, two hearts, two diamonds and three clubs.
Had the first heart lost to East’s jack, he would not have had a spade to lead, and at worst declarer would have been able to use his club entry to dummy to pick up an original ace-jack-third of hearts in East.