November 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The best liar is he who makes the smallest amount of lying go the longest way.
Samuel Butler
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 7 6 5 4
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ 9
♣ 10 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 3
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 7 6 5
♣ K Q J 7 2 |
♠ 8
♥ A K Q 10 8 7
♦ A Q 8 4 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 10 9 2
♥ —
♦ K J 10 3
♣ A 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
4 NT |
| 5 ♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♣K
Your hand has improved considerably now that you know of a heart fit. Your singleton diamond will prove useful opposite partner’s likely 1=4=3=5 shape, as will the spade ace and the club intermediates. (Picture partner with king-jack-fifth, for example.) What is more, partner has shown extras with his reverse, so jump to four hearts to suggest no slam interest.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 6 5 4
♥ J 9 6 5
♦ 9
♣ 10 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There is always a well-known solution to every human problem — neat, plausible, and wrong.
H.L. Mencken
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 10 4
♥ K 7 5 3
♦ K 10 2
♣ A 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6
♥ Q 9 4 2
♦ J 9 5 4 3
♣ 8 6 |
♠ K Q 5 3 2
♥ A J 10
♦ A Q 6
♣ J 7 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7
♥ 8 6
♦ 8 7
♣ K Q 9 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦4
It is rarely right to lead from ace-fourth against no-trump, since it often costs a trick and you will frequently have time to switch to that suit if you need to. Because a club lead from our doubleton would be against the odds, we must choose between the red suits. There is an argument for leading a major suit, as West did not use Stayman, but whether you lead a small heart or the diamond five is up to you.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 4 3
♥ J 8 2
♦ 7 5 4 3
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
November 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
What is the right way to signal from length when your partner leads a king (presumably from ace-king) and dummy has the guarded queen in that suit?
Rawhide Rick, Salina, Kan.
In a suit contract, if you might hold a doubleton, you echo with two; that way you never lose your ruff. I suggest play lowest from three, and second-lowest from four. This minimizes ambiguity, though nothing will cover every base. If you cannot have as few as two cards, give count, with a high card suggesting an even number, a low card suggesting an odd number. In no-trump, simply give count — your attitude is implicitly defined by the sight of dummy.
What would you do with ♠ K-10-5-2, ♥ A-Q-8-6-2, ♦ 10-4, ♣ Q-9 when your partner opens one club and rebids one no-trump over your one-heart response? Would you drive to game, settle for part-score or issue an invitation?
Straitjacket, Vancouver, British Columbia
Your hand does not look strong enough to drive to game, when you have at best an eight-card fit in either major and no more than 24 high-card points between you. I’d start with two diamonds, the new minor, looking for a heart fit, and be prepared to give up if I do not find one. If partner bids two spades, showing 4=3=3=3 precisely, I’ll raise to three.
Can you comment on the meaning of jump rebids by opener after a suit opening, when his partner makes a negative double of an overcall by the left-hand opponent? Are jumps forcing in the original suit or in a new suit — and if not, what about a double jump?
Head for Heights, Grenada, Miss.
Let’s consider a onespade overcall of a minor-suit opening, and a negative double from your partner. Now your two-heart call suggests four and a minimum balanced or semibalanced hand. A jump to three hearts suggests four trumps and 14-15 points, potentially unbalanced. A jump in any other new suit or your first-bid suit shows extras but is not forcing. Use the cue-bid to set up a game force.
|
In fourth seat, how should I have developed the following hand: ♠ A-Q-3, ♥ Q-7-6-4, ♦ K-9, ♣ K-9-4-2, when my left-hand opponent opened two spades and my partner doubled? This was a pairs event with both sides vulnerable.
Nosy Rosie, Orlando, Fla.
The choice is between bidding game in hearts or three no-trump, and passing for penalties. You rate to set two spades 500 or more — but declarer can surely take four spade tricks and may scramble a couple more out of dummy’s collection. With these spade honors taking tricks on offense, I would try three no-trump. Four hearts could easily run into ruffs or trump troubles.
Is there any real advantage to playing the version of Key-card Blackwood currently recommended by Eddie Kantar, where a five club response shows one or four key-cards (counting the trump king as a key-card) and five diamonds shows none or three? What do you usually play?
20th Century Blues, Selma, Ala.
Any system accident more than outweighs the benefits of playing the best possible methods. “The perfect is the enemy of the good,” they say. If I use Roman Key-card Blackwood, I play 30/41 responses, though I do see a shift toward the methods you outline. When in Rome …
|
November 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Man in portions can foresee His own funeral destiny.
Lord Byron
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K J 9 2
♥ K 8 5 4
♦ A
♣ K 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 4
♥ Q 3
♦ K 9 7 6 5 3
♣ 2 |
♠ 7
♥ J 10 7 6 2
♦ Q J 10 8
♣ Q J 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 5 3
♥ A 9
♦ 4 2
♣ A 7 5 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣2
This is a common problem. If we respond in our weak spade suit and partner rebids two clubs, we will not be able to get our diamonds into the game. (Two diamonds would then be fourth suit forcing.) Best is to lie with one no-trump, enabling us to bid a natural and non-forcing two diamonds if partner finds the likely rebid of two clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 6 4
♥ Q 3
♦ K 9 7 6 5 3
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook.
William James
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 9 6
♥ 10 8 2
♦ Q 9 8
♣ 10 9 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7
♥ 7 5 4
♦ J 10 5 2
♣ Q J 8 7 |
♠ A K Q 5 4 2
♥ 3
♦ 6 4 3
♣ 5 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ A K Q J 9 6
♦ A K 7
♣ A K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠8
We are forced to bid and could either settle for two spades or attempt to find a minor suit fit via a scrambling two no-trump. Given that East has not raised hearts, partner is likely to have a doubleton heart and could easily be 5=2=3=3. In that case, we would prefer to play in spades at a cheaper level. So try two spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6
♥ 7 5 4
♦ J 10 5 2
♣ Q J 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 31st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
What makes a problem a problem is not that a large amount of search is required for its solution, but that a large amount would be required if a requisite level of intelligence were not applied.— Allen Newell and Herbert
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 5
♥ Q 9 8 6 5
♦ 9 6
♣ 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7 3
♥ 4 3 2
♦ 10
♣ Q 9 8 7 5 |
♠ A 4 2
♥ A J 10
♦ J 8 7 4 2
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 8 6
♥ K 7
♦ A K Q 5 3
♣ A K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Four spades and longer hearts
♣7
If you play forcing no-trump and constructive raises, you are allowed to make a simple raise to two hearts with a 10-count. But this hand feels too strong for that. It isn’t just the good trump and aces, it is also the side five-card suit and useful small doubleton. So treat this as a limit raise; bid a forcing no-trump, then jump to three hearts. If you don’t play forcing no-trump, maybe make a limit raise to three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4 2
♥ A J 10
♦ J 8 7 4 2
♣ 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 30th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Politics is the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary.
Robert Louis Stevenson
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 7 4 2
♥ 2
♦ A 10 8
♣ Q 10 9 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 8 5
♥ 8 5
♦ J 7 2
♣ K 8 5 4 |
♠ Q
♥ 9 7 6 4
♦ K 9 6 5 4
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 6 3
♥ A K Q J 10 3
♦ Q 3
♣ A 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
With a four-card major and longer diamonds in response to a club opening, the normal procedure is to bypass the diamonds with a weak hand, preferring to get the major in at a low level. However, your hearts are so poor that you can afford to ignore them for now and respond in your fair five-card diamond suit, maximizing your chances of finding a fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ 9 7 6 4
♦ K 9 6 5 4
♣ J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 29th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, October 15th, 2019
Mathematics is the science which draws necessary conclusions.
Benjamin Peirce
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q 6 3
♥ —
♦ K 10 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ 8 7 6 5 3 2
♦ 8
♣ A 4 |
♠ K 9 5
♥ A K J 10 9
♦ 3
♣ J 9 8 6 |
| South |
♠ J 4
♥ Q 4
♦ A Q J 9 6
♣ K Q 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
4 ♥ |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥8
The textbooks would recommend opening one diamond and rebidding two clubs. Modernists would open one no-trump as often as possible. Here, with honors in your short suits, one no-trump is your best tactical option, serving to rightside most contracts facing a balanced hand. It also pre-empts the opponents while getting your strength across to partner. Do I recommend it? Maybe.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4
♥ Q 4
♦ A Q J 9 6
♣ K Q 3 2 |
October 28th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If a state should pass laws forbidding its citizens to become wise and holy, it would be made a byword for all time. But this, in effect, is what our commercial, social, and political systems do. They compel the sacrifice of mental and moral power to money and dissipation.
John Spalding
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 7
♥ 8 4
♦ A Q J 8 7
♣ Q 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 6
♥ A 10 3
♦ K 2
♣ 10 9 8 7 5 |
♠ 10 5 3 2
♥ Q 9 2
♦ 6 4 3
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
♠ J 8 4
♥ K J 7 6 5
♦ 10 9 5
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
It seems normal to lead partner’s suit, but this may be our only time on lead, so we should aim to do some damage with it. Only one diamond winner is likely to stand up here, given our length. So, our best bet may be to lead a top heart through dummy’s hypothetical tenace. One or two quick tricks in the suit may be all we need, and if we do not take them now, they may go away on dummy’s clubs.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5
♥ Q J 7 6
♦ 8 6 3 2
♣ J 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♦ |
3 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
October 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I don’t ever seem to have a hand where I want to play a part-score in the minor facing a no-trump opening bid. So, would it make sense to play transfers into a minor suit as at least invitational?
Humble Pie, Willoughby, Ohio
My experience and yours do not mesh. With a weak hand and a long suit, you really should play the minor suit, I believe. As an aside, I can understand using a two-spade response to one no-trump as a balanced range ask or a hand with one minor and invitational values, so that transfers to a minor are either weak or strong (and Stayman now guarantees a major). But that would require detailed discussion.
What should you do when holding ♠ 5-2, ♥ K-10-4-3, ♦ J-9, ♥ A-Q-7-6-2 if you heard your partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one heart? Is this hand really a two-club call, or would you elect to play for penalty?
Apple Pie Order, Beaverton, Ore.
If you gave me just one guess, I would say it was right to bid one no-trump, but to compete in clubs if the opponents bid spades. The attraction of bidding one no-trump is that you allow your partner to act again if he has either extras in shape or values.
What, if any, are some simple rules that will help me master the general principles of the percentages? Number Crunchers Anonymous, Union City,
Tenn.
An even number of cards are less likely to break than to divide evenly (with the exception of the 1-1 break). The more cards missing, the closer to onethird is the likelihood of an even break. An odd number of cards will usually break as evenly as possible — and the more cards that are out, the closer to twothirds is the likelihood of that break. In those instances, the next-most even break comes in at about a 1 in 5 chance.
|
My experienced partner threw me a curve, and I dropped the ball. How would you cope with ♠ J-7-4-2, ♥ A-2, ♦ K-6, ♣ K-J-9-5-2 after opening one club and hearing one spade on your left, then three spades from your partner?
Scoring Table, Bremerton, Wash.
A jump cue-bid here should have a very precise meaning. It is a raise in clubs with a singleton spade — in other words, a splinter raise. Your hand is not suitable for no-trump, but it is very suitable for clubs (imagine partner with the heart and diamond controls, plus five clubs to the ace). Cue-bid four diamonds now — don’t even think of bidding three no-trump or closing out the auction at five clubs.
How would you respond to a two-diamond opening if you held ♠ Q-J-7, ♥ K-9-3, ♦ A-7-4-2, ♣ Q-10-4? How would you rate passing, raising or inquiring with two no-trump?
Blunderbuss, Atlanta, Ga.
I don’t think my side can make game here, but I have enough values to expect the opponents not to make game anywhere, either. The choice is to raise to three diamonds at once (maybe that will draw my opponents in) or to pass and bid up to three diamonds if necessary. Either approach makes sense — I think I favor the latter, but it is close.
|
|
France made a good start at the 2014 European Team Championships, but then lost heavily to Monaco, the eventual silver medalists, in the third round.
Having agreed hearts as the trump suit, East, Tor Helness, tried for a slam, but was happy to defend against five spades doubled. Geir Helgemo led the club king, which was won in hand by declarer Michel Bessis, who drew trumps in two rounds ending in dummy. Now came the critical point. The diamond nine hit the baize, and Helness showed his class by ducking in tempo. Now Bessis had a decision to make. When he rose with the king, he no longer had a way to make his contract.
Had he run the nine, he would have been home free — he could come to hand by ruffing a heart, then establish a diamond with a double loser-on-loser play in that suit, thus making 11 tricks.
Of course, had the diamond nine lost to the queen, South would almost certainly have been two off, but Helness’s strong bidding perhaps indicated the diamond position. You could certainly argue that gambling plus 850 against minus 500 is better odds than a guaranteed minus 200.
In the other room, again the five-level was reached, and the first three tricks were identical; but this time when the diamond nine was played from dummy, East hopped up with the ace. That was a pardonable error, but one that made life easy for declarer. France had not doubled the contract, but it was still 13 IMPs to Monaco.