November 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
When a dog bites a man, that is not news, because it happens so often. But if a man bites a dog, that is news.
Alfred Harmsworth
E |
North |
None |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ K 9
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
West |
East |
♠ A K 8 6 5 3
♥ —
♦ 10 6 5
♣ 8 7 3 2 |
♠ 7 4
♥ 10 7 6 4 2
♦ A 9 2
♣ A J 4 |
South |
♠ Q
♥ A Q J 8 5 3
♦ K 8 7
♣ K 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
It seems logical to bid one no-trump now rather than raising diamonds, since you can also support diamonds later in a competitive auction; whereas if you raise diamonds now, you may have an awkward decision at your next turn. Also, your partner may misjudge how much defense you have, should you raise directly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ K 9
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
? |
|
|
|
November 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Now, O king, establish the decree and sign the writing that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not.
Daniel 6:8
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ 10
♥ A 9 7 5
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ 10 4 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 6
♥ K Q 10 8 4 3
♦ Q J
♣ K |
♠ A J 9 7 5 4
♥ J 6 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ 6 |
South |
♠ 3 2
♥ —
♦ A 9 5 4
♣ A Q J 9 8 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 ♠ |
5 ♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠K
Since this might be your only chance to lead through dummy, I suggest that a low heart is more likely to be successful than a club. Partner rates to have exactly four cards on this auction, and while the jack might work to take three tricks quickly, you could hardly blame your partner for trying to give you a ruff. In any event, you might get in with the club king again for a second heart play, if necessary.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8
♥ J 9 2
♦ J 8 6 5 4
♣ K 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
November 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
What is the best use of Stayman, followed by three of a minor? Should this be natural and weak, invitational, or some kind of forcing call?
Tim the Trumpeter, Arlington, Texas
Common expert opinion is that Stayman, followed by three of either minor, is game-forcing with at least five cards in that minor and an unbid major of four cards (typically the unbid major if partner shows one at his second turn). To sign off in a minor, transfer to that suit and pass the response. On invitational hands with a minor and a four-card major, use Stayman, then raise the response or bid two no-trump as appropriate. The same basic structure applies over a two-no-trump opener.
Recently, my partner passed in first seat, and I opened one spade. After a double from the next hand, she jumped to three clubs. I thought this would be a maximum pass with clubs, but she was sure she had shown a pre-emptive bid. I had always assumed that a pre-emptive bid must be made at your first turn to speak. Who is right?
Jumping Bean, Spokane, Wash.
I would certainly not expect my partner to have a good hand with just clubs. With such a hand, she should bid two clubs or redouble rather than jump. But I also don’t play this call as pre-emptive. (If you can’t open three clubs, what about your hand lets you pre-empt later, other than an initial sorting error?) I suggest you play all passed-hand jumps facing an opener or overcall as fit jumps. See www.bridgeguys.com/Conventions/flower_bids.html.
We recently had a problem when I picked up a balanced 13-count and opened one heart, my five-card major. My partner had a balanced 17-count with only three hearts and four spades. He bid one spade. After I responded one no-trump, how was my partner supposed to explore for slam, given that there was no “unbid” minor?
Scott Free, Pleasanton, Calif.
I’d recommend you use two clubs in this auction as the equivalent of New Minor. For the uninitiated, the call simply sets up a game forcing auction and says nothing about clubs. Your partner can bid hearts at his next turn, and you will either cooperate toward slam with a suitable hand or sign off if minimum. Two diamonds can be natural and non-forcing here.
|
When defending against a suit contract, what are your thoughts on underleading aces or leading them out in bid and supported suits?
Bamboozler, Toledo, Ohio
Even if my partner raises a suit I have opened or overcalled in, I hate to lead out an unsupported ace unless everything else is worse. I’m more likely to do it in a suit my partner introduced first. If I’m defending a contract that was doubled by my partner, it is even less attractive to lead an ace, since the auction has suggested we are not stacked in our long suit. Underleading would be limited to cases where my left-hand opponent has shown (or implied) stoppers in that suit.
Say you are in fourth seat, and an opening bid to your left is passed around to you. How much do you need before you can balance over a minor suit? If the answer is less than is needed for direct action, how does your partner know when to pull in a notch?
Protective Coloring, Pierre, S.D.
When in balancing seat, mentally add a king to your high cards and bid appropriately, while responder should take a king off. So if I had 14 points and did balance with a suit call, I would consider moving over a simple raise from my partner (for which the range is approximately 8-10 points, not 5-7 points). If I double, I might raise a simple response from my partner with support and 15-17 points.
|
November 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
No battle plan ever survives contact with the enemy.
Helmuth von Moltke
N |
North |
N-S |
♠ A Q 10 4
♥ 4
♦ A 6 3
♣ A K Q 6 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 6 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ 4 |
♠ —
♥ A Q J 10 8 3 2
♦ J 8 5 4
♣ 10 7 |
South |
♠ J 7 5 2
♥ 7 6
♦ K 7
♣ J 9 8 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
Normally, a 5-4 hand should seriously consider reverting to the major, but here, the fact that you are short in partner’s suit and your major is weak argues for passing. For the record, if your majors were switched, you might rebid your suit, more confident that your partner will not have a singleton in that suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 6 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 19th, 2018
Life without industry is guilt, industry without art is brutality.
John Ruskin
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ 3
♥ A 10 8 4 2
♦ J 10 9 7 6 5
♣ 10 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 5 2
♥ K 9 5
♦ A K
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ J
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q 9 2 |
South |
♠ A 7
♥ Q 7 6 3
♦ 4
♣ A J 8 6 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ * |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
4 NT * * |
Dbl. |
Pass |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
5 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Clubs, 10-15 points
**Two places to play
♠K
The three-heart call is forcing. Once you bid voluntarily, your partner showed real extras, so you must bid again. This hand doesn’t feel right for a bid of three no-trump, so the choice is to bid clubs or raise hearts. I think a four-club call is more flexible. If partner bids four diamonds, you can bid four hearts and maybe get back to hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ J
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
November 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
We view things not only from different sides, but with different eyes; we have no wish to find them alike.
Blaise Pascal
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ A 8 5 4
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 8 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 10 9 7 |
♠ 10 7
♥ 10 7 6 2
♦ J 7 3 2
♣ Q 6 3 |
South |
♠ A J
♥ K Q J 9 3
♦ A K Q
♣ A K 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
A simple one here. Diamonds will surely play better than no-trump, so you can bid a non-forcing three diamonds, hoping desperately that your partner can give delayed preference to spades with a doubleton, whereupon you can bid four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 10 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 31st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 17th, 2018
Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.
Ambrose Bierce
W |
North |
E-W |
♠ K 10 7
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ K 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 4 2
♥ 9 5
♦ A K Q 8
♣ 10 6 4 3 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 7 2
♦ 10 9 6 3
♣ J 9 8 7 5 |
South |
♠ A J 9 6 5 3
♥ 8 6 4
♦ J 5
♣ A Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Jumps by a passed hand facing an overcall should be played as fit. Your partner can’t have only spades, or he would have overcalled or bid one spade at his second turn. I’d expect a hand with good spades and heart support. This hand has enough extras to jump straight to four hearts now to protect the club king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ K 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
A straw vote only shows which way the hot air blows.
O. Henry
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ 9 7 5 2
♥ Q J 10
♦ A Q J 5
♣ K 9 |
West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ 9 8 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
♠ Q J 10 8 6
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 |
South |
♠ A K 4
♥ K 8
♦ K 10 7
♣ Q J 6 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠3
If you were in direct seat, you would bid one no-trump, of course. But in balancing seat, this hand looks too strong for a call where the range is traditionally played as 10-15. Start by doubling, planning to rebid one no-trump over your partner’s cheap response in a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 4
♥ K 8
♦ K 10 7
♣ Q J 6 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Dost thou laugh to see how fools are vexed To add to golden numbers, golden numbers?
Thomas Dekker
N |
North |
Both |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K J 3
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ K 9 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K 3
♥ Q 9 7 6
♦ J 8 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
♠ 10 8 7 6
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 9 7 5
♣ J 3 2 |
South |
♠ A J 5 2
♥ A 10 5
♦ A Q 10
♣ A Q 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
The only person who has actually shown clubs at this table is East, not your partner. Your partner may have three or four clubs, but leading a club is more likely to cost a trick than gain one, in my opinion. The spade jack looks like a relatively safe lead to me.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 5
♥ J 5 3
♦ J 8 3 2
♣ Q 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
October 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Does the way to deal with rebidding a balanced 18-19 count after opening at the one-level differ, depending on whether your partner responds at the one- or two-level?
Falling Flat, Wilmington, N.C.
The answer depends a little on whether you play two-over-one game-forcing. If so, a sequence such as one heart – two clubs – two no-trump suggests 1214, but can also be made with a balanced 18 points or more, and even with club support, planning to bid on over partner’s raise to three no-trump. If your partner responds at the one-level, be it with a suit or a call of one no-trump, you typically rebid two no-trump.
Holding ♠ A-3, ♥ K-9-8, ♦ J-9-2, ♣ Q-10-8-6-4, I passed over a onediamond opener to my right. Now I heard one no-trump to my left and a double from my partner. Since I know my Left Hand Opponent had clubs, should I bid that suit now?
Butter Ball, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
Your partner won’t just have the majors — he has a Michaels two-diamond call available to show 5-5 in the majors (or even 5-4 in a pinch). So he ought to have at least three clubs. Rightly or wrongly, I’d jump to three clubs, hoping partner can bid a major or try for three no-trump if he has real extras.
Assuming your agreement is that opening two of a major in fourth seat is an intermediate hand, what should constitute an intermediate hand?
Hospital Pass, Calgary, Alberta
The first requirement is a good suit, intermediate perhaps meaning 10-13 points or so if the opening is in a red suit, a fraction less in spades. With a poor suit, you would open at the one-level or pass, depending on your controls and where you were within that range.
|
In your commentary on a recent lead problem, you advocated leading an unbid suit of Q-10-2 against no-trump. You did not say, however, which card you would lead. My thought on the matter would be to lead the queen to try to unblock the suit for later play. It might also trap the king in my left-hand opponent’s hand. If I led the two, wouldn’t it suggest to my partner that I held four?
Honest Abe, Atlantic City, N.J.
I’m not a big fan of leading the honor from a three-card suit, even when partner has bid them, either against no-trump or against suits. In this precise position, you may build declarer a second stop if he started with A-J-x or K-J-x. What your partner would believe you would normally do is to lead low from honor-third. And even if he might expect you to have four cards in this suit, it is unlikely that much harm will come to you – assuming that you have hit on the right suit to lead.
I picked up ♠ Q-10-2, ♥ A-8-7-2, ♦ 9-6-3, ♣ A-J-5 and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one no-trump. I doubled for penalty, and my right-hand opponent ran to two clubs. Was I justified in doubling, or is it better to pass and let partner act with extra shape himself?
Lowering the Boom, Pueblo, Colo.
There is no simple answer here; my instincts are that double shows four trumps or a maximum defensive hand with three. Admittedly, this way you let them off the hook sometimes, but I think it is better to use double as “the goods,” not as a speculative attempt to take a penalty. This hand just about qualifies, and as long as you make the call in tempo, partner can remove with a really unsuitable hand.
|
|
At the 1998 Cap Gemini World Pairs Invitational, we saw a relative rarity when Paul Chemla of France made an error in declarer play. His dissatisfaction with a bad guess on a high card must have been doubled upon discovering that he did not require the guess at all!
While three no-trump may be the best spot for North-South, the contract of four hearts on the lead of a top spade looked perfectly reasonable. After some thought, West shifted to the diamond six, middle of three cards, and East defended well by putting in the nine.
Declarer won in hand and crossed to the heart king, then continued with the heart nine. East continued his accurate defense when he covered, to deprive declarer of an entry to dummy. Now Chemla could draw all the trumps, but in the process, he made the mistake of pitching all of dummy’s spades. Now a diamond to the jack, ducked, left him needing to find the club jack in the endgame. Since West clearly had the length, and from the auction East had the club ace, Chemla got it wrong by playing West for the club jack.
A better line would have been to leave one spade in dummy while drawing trumps, reducing to one spade, three diamonds and two clubs. Now when you lead a diamond to dummy after drawing trumps, East must duck it as before. But now you ruff dummy’s spade back to hand and lead a third round of diamonds. East takes it, but is endplayed to lead clubs away from his ace in the three-card ending.