October 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Does the way to deal with rebidding a balanced 18-19 count after opening at the one-level differ, depending on whether your partner responds at the one- or two-level?
Falling Flat, Wilmington, N.C.
The answer depends a little on whether you play two-over-one game-forcing. If so, a sequence such as one heart – two clubs – two no-trump suggests 1214, but can also be made with a balanced 18 points or more, and even with club support, planning to bid on over partner’s raise to three no-trump. If your partner responds at the one-level, be it with a suit or a call of one no-trump, you typically rebid two no-trump.
Holding ♠ A-3, ♥ K-9-8, ♦ J-9-2, ♣ Q-10-8-6-4, I passed over a onediamond opener to my right. Now I heard one no-trump to my left and a double from my partner. Since I know my Left Hand Opponent had clubs, should I bid that suit now?
Butter Ball, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
Your partner won’t just have the majors — he has a Michaels two-diamond call available to show 5-5 in the majors (or even 5-4 in a pinch). So he ought to have at least three clubs. Rightly or wrongly, I’d jump to three clubs, hoping partner can bid a major or try for three no-trump if he has real extras.
Assuming your agreement is that opening two of a major in fourth seat is an intermediate hand, what should constitute an intermediate hand?
Hospital Pass, Calgary, Alberta
The first requirement is a good suit, intermediate perhaps meaning 10-13 points or so if the opening is in a red suit, a fraction less in spades. With a poor suit, you would open at the one-level or pass, depending on your controls and where you were within that range.
|
In your commentary on a recent lead problem, you advocated leading an unbid suit of Q-10-2 against no-trump. You did not say, however, which card you would lead. My thought on the matter would be to lead the queen to try to unblock the suit for later play. It might also trap the king in my left-hand opponent’s hand. If I led the two, wouldn’t it suggest to my partner that I held four?
Honest Abe, Atlantic City, N.J.
I’m not a big fan of leading the honor from a three-card suit, even when partner has bid them, either against no-trump or against suits. In this precise position, you may build declarer a second stop if he started with A-J-x or K-J-x. What your partner would believe you would normally do is to lead low from honor-third. And even if he might expect you to have four cards in this suit, it is unlikely that much harm will come to you – assuming that you have hit on the right suit to lead.
I picked up ♠ Q-10-2, ♥ A-8-7-2, ♦ 9-6-3, ♣ A-J-5 and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one no-trump. I doubled for penalty, and my right-hand opponent ran to two clubs. Was I justified in doubling, or is it better to pass and let partner act with extra shape himself?
Lowering the Boom, Pueblo, Colo.
There is no simple answer here; my instincts are that double shows four trumps or a maximum defensive hand with three. Admittedly, this way you let them off the hook sometimes, but I think it is better to use double as “the goods,” not as a speculative attempt to take a penalty. This hand just about qualifies, and as long as you make the call in tempo, partner can remove with a really unsuitable hand.
|
October 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Where a technique tells you ‘how’ and a philosophy tells you ‘what,’ a methodology will contain elements of both ‘what’ and ‘how.’
Peter Checkland
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ Q 10 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 9 8 7 4
♦ 10 9 8 5 2
♣ 2 |
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ 6 3
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
South |
♠ A Q
♥ K J 6
♦ K Q J
♣ A K J 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT * |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Quantitative
♦10
While this may look like a dead minimum for a jump to two spades, that is clearly the right call. Your hand improved dramatically when your partner suggested relative shortness in clubs, meaning that all your honors are working overtime. Had your Left Hand Opponent opened a red-suit, it would be less clear that jumping to two spades is the right call — though you might do it anyway.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ Q 10 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To know is nothing at all; to imagine is everything.
Anatole France
N |
North |
N-S |
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
West |
East |
♠ K J 10 2
♥ Q J 10 5 3
♦ K 10 3
♣ 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ 9
♦ 6 2
♣ A K J 10 7 4 |
South |
♠ Q 7
♥ 6
♦ Q J 9 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣* |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*16 or more high-card points
♣5
This may be an unpopular answer, but facing a pre-empt in first seat (especially a non-vulnerable one), I think it is right to pass and try to go plus there. Yes, there are hands where game will make, but even if partner holds ace-kingseventh of clubs, you still haven’t made four hearts or five clubs. Vulnerable at teams, you might persuade me to bid three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
3 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
William Blake
W |
North |
Both |
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ Q J 9 7
♦ K 9 5
♣ K Q 10 |
♠ 7 4
♥ A 4
♦ J 10 8 3 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
South |
♠ A K J 10 9 6 2
♥ K 8
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♣K
Your double suggested values; your partner’s four no-trump call suggests two places to play. It makes sense to bid five clubs now; if your partner corrects that to five diamonds, you can bid five hearts, since the 5-4 fit rates to play better than diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In the perfect chess combination, as in a first-rate short story, the whole plot and counter-plot should lead up to a striking finale, the interest not being allayed until the very last moment.— Frederic Yates and William
E |
North |
Both |
♠ K Q J 5 4
♥ 10 8 2
♦ 4 3 2
♣ 10 9 |
West |
East |
♠ A 10 7 6
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ 6 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ K Q 4
♦ A Q J 5
♣ K 8 7 |
South |
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Stronger than passing
♦10
This hand is on the cusp of passing, trying to settle for a plus score, or bidding three clubs to show your 5-5 pattern and non-forcing extras. I’d take the latter route — if for no other reason than that three clubs may be easier to make than two hearts if your partner has two hearts and three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Henceforth I ask not good fortune, I choose good fortune.
Walt Whitman
S |
North |
Both |
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ Q J 8 4 3
♣ 9 7 |
♠ 10 8
♥ J 10 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
South |
♠ A J 9 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 6
♣ K Q 10 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*transfer to spades
♦Q
North is unlikely to have even as much as the doubleton ace in spades. Since he did not rebid his clubs initially, he might have given preference to spades at his third turn if he could. You have a choice of forcing calls in the red suits to probe: Three diamonds looks best. You can revert to five clubs if partner raises, but you do not want to suggest half a heart stopper, as a call of three hearts might do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Shallow brooks murmur most, deep silent slide away.
Sir Philip Sidney
N |
North |
N-S |
♠ K 8 4
♥ J 3
♦ A K J 6 5
♣ 10 7 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ K 10 7 6
♦ 4 3
♣ J 9 8 2 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ A 6 4 |
South |
♠ A Q J 7 6 5
♥ A 8
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ * |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two key-cards, no trump queen
♣2
Do you go active or passive here? I do not like a diamond lead, which can give up a trick in so many different ways while really not having much upside. Since the heart spots also spell danger in terms of conceding a trick unnecessarily, I will go with a low spade (the four, not the seven!).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 9 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ 9 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
October 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
In a teams game, I picked up ♠ 7, ♥ Q-10-8-6-4, ♦ A-J-10-2, ♣ K-J-10 and passed in second chair. Do you agree? When I heard a spade to my left and a one-no-trump call to my right, should I have acted? If so, with what call?
Wimpy Kid, Riverside, Calif.
Because you can bid your two suits in comfortable order and you have decent controls and useful builders in your intermediates, this hand represents a minimum but respectable opening of one heart. If you do pass, you should double one no-trump for take-out and let your partner play in clubs if he selects that suit.
I am trying to work out how to combine a quantitative bid of four no-trump with Blackwood, while also using four no-trump as regressive. I know you cannot combine all possibilities in a short answer, but what are the basic principles from which we should build?
Low-Key Loki, Cartersville, Ga.
A simple rule is that if your last call in any auction was three no-trump and your partner bids a minor, four no-trump is regressive. If the previous call was in no-trump, then four no-trump is quantitative. Four no-trump may also be quantitative if you have an artificial way to agree the major (after Stayman finds one, for example, or after partner completes a transfer), but instead you jump to four no-trump. In most other sequences, use four no-trump as Blackwood — unless you agree that it isn’t.
I picked up ♠ K-9-4, ♥ A-Q-9, ♦ K-10-8-7-4, ♣ K-3, and when I heard my right-hand opponent open one club, I elected to double rather than bid one diamond or one no-trump. My thinking was that I wanted to get the majors into play, but three no-trump was actually a reasonable spot. Any comments?
Chop Suey, Winston-Salem, N.C.
These days, not only does an opening bid of one club not promise clubs, but the partner of the opening bidder will furthermore not be sure if opener has a balanced hand or a real club suit. Bidding one no-trump over one club is not without risk, but it does describe your assets well. Remember: You probably will find a 5-3 major fit if you have one this way, but do you really want to find a 4-3 major? I’m not sure you do.
|
In one of your columns, you mentioned Ogust responses to a weak two. Please expand on the details of this scheme and the reasoning behind it.
Mock Turtle, Henderson, Nev.
The Ogust scheme of responses to a two no-trump inquiry after a weak two opening accepts that weak two-bids may be based on only a moderate suit. The responses to the inquiry let opener bid three clubs or three diamonds with a bad hand (the latter showing a good suit), and three hearts or three spades with a good hand, promising a minimum and maximum suit, respectively. Using this scheme allows you to be slightly more flexible in pre-empting.
In fourth chair facing a passed partner, I elected not to overcall one heart over one diamond because of the poor quality of my long suit, with ♠ Q-2, ♥ J-7-5-3-2, ♦ A-K-J, ♣ Q-7-3. Would you have acted here? If so, how much worse a hand would you need before you passed instead of overcalling?
Care Bear, Huntington, W. Va.
An overcall should promise either a reasonable hand or a suit you cannot afford to keep silent about. In this case, you have a full opener and no reason to assume bidding will work to your disadvantage. Turn the diamond king into a small diamond and I would pass, reluctantly.
|
October 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.
Douglas Adams
W |
North |
None |
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 10 6
♣ K 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ K 10 9 8 2
♥ K 5 3
♦ Q 8 2
♣ 4 3 |
♠ 6 3
♥ A 8 6
♦ J 7 5 3
♣ 10 9 7 2 |
South |
♠ Q J 4
♥ Q 9 4
♦ A 9 4
♣ A Q J 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠10
Since your partner has guaranteed six clubs on this auction (which wouldn’t be absolutely guaranteed over a one-spade response, by the way), you can see you have a good chance of running nine quick tricks facing little more than six clubs to the ace-queen and the diamond ace. Rather than risk missing game, I would simply bid three no-trump now without consulting my partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 10 6
♣ K 6 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
October 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
I always voted at my party’s call And I never thought of thinking for myself at all.
W.S. Gilbert
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ 8 6
♦ 8 7 3
♣ A Q 8 6 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ J 10
♣ J 7 5 3 2 |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ Q 6 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 |
South |
♠ A Q J 10 3
♥ A K 4 2
♦ A K 9
♣ K |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT* |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Waiting
♥J
Some people play Equal Level Conversion, meaning that correcting two clubs to two diamonds here does not show any extra values. I’m not a fan of that approach, so I can bid two no-trump without feeling I’m stepping too far out of line. My diamond builders are working overtime, so I have enough to invite game, even though I still don’t have a great hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ J 10
♣ J 7 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
The basic arts of declarer play consist, as a friend of mine once said, of drawing trumps, taking finesses and cashing winners. But there is also a place for squeezeplay and other, more challenging arts. Today’s deal involves both simple and complex skills.
You reach six no-trump and receive the lead of the diamond 10, which you win in hand. Despite your combined 33 high-card points, slam is a fairly dicey affair, thanks to the duplication and wasted values in diamonds.
At trick two, you try a heart to the queen, hoping that it will lose to the ace. It does, and East returns a passive diamond. How should you plan the play from here on in?
No matter how you intend to manage the play outside clubs, you should plan on the club finesse working. You must win the second diamond in hand, cash the club ace — to protect against West having the singleton queen — and must then take the spade ace and queen, followed by the heart king and jack. At that point, you will cross to table with a diamond.
Next, you take the spade king, throwing a club from hand. If the spade jack has fallen, you cash the last spade winner and take the club finesse. If East has kept the spade jack, he must have reduced to two clubs. So now the clubs will produce four tricks, thanks to the club finesse.
Note that if East ducks the first two hearts, he will be caught in a triple squeeze and be forced to concede the overtrick!