September 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I assume you would pass in first seat with ♠ J-8-2, ♥ A-5-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3, ♣ K-9-4. If your partner opens one diamond and the next hand overcalls one no-trump, do you double or assume your partner does not have a full opener?
Trusted Traveler, Lorain, Ohio
This is a very slippery slope. You don’t have to double when the auction tells you that your partner has embellished his initial call, because both opponents have bid strongly. But here, I think you do have to double and take your lumps if partner has psyched. If nothing else, it may discourage him from further flights of fancy.
Holding ♠ K-9, ♥ A-Q-7-2, ♦ Q, ♣ A-K-Q-9-6-3, would you open two clubs or one club, and why?
Hi-Lo Country, Bristol, Va.
Minor-suit oriented hands with average controls often handle well by starting low. Opening one club and jumping to two hearts over one diamond or reversing into hearts over a one-spade response tells partner much about your shape and high cards at the two-level. You will seldom be passed out in one club — and if you are, what chance did you have at game?
I have been struggling to learn New Minor after my partner rebids one no-trump, as a way to explore for game and slam. Is it worth the effort to play, and what would you recommend after a jump rebid by opener of two no-trump? Desperately Seeking Something, Tunica,
Miss.
Yes, New Minor (also called Checkback) is well worth the effort — in the same way that Stayman is an essential adjunct to modern bidding. This way you get to find fits in unbid majors, explore for 5-3 fits, and invite game efficiently. Over two no-trump, using the unbid minor as artificial is possible, but the Wolff Signoff (www.acblunit390.org/Simon/wolff.htm) works well, too.
|
When balancing over the opponents’ opening call, I’m aware that a hand like ♠ Q-6-2, ♥ Q-9-7-5-3, ♦ K-10, ♣ A-J-2 is more than sufficient to bid one heart over one diamond. But would you also balance at any vulnerability when playing pairs over a pre-emptive two diamonds, or even a three-diamond opener?
Lucky Luke, Monterey, Calif.
You are right that this is a simple hand with which to balance over one or two diamonds. But do you have enough to bid over a three-level preempt? I guess I might bid when non-vulnerable, but I wouldn’t be thrilled by the prospect.
Say you have ♠ 9-2, ♥ 5-4, ♦ A-Q-7-3, ♣ Q-J-4-3-2. After your left-hand opponent opens one no-trump and right-hand opponent transfers into hearts, then passes, do you pass, double or bid a suit?
Gerry the Gryphon, Bellingham, Wash.
At pairs non-vulnerable, I think this is just strong enough to act. The right way to get both minors into play is to bid two no-trump, suggesting both minors. Switch your spades with one of the minors, and you might double. Partner will bid spades or a five-card minor of his own, or scramble with two no-trump to get you to pick a minor.
|
September 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Love of fame is the last thing even learned men can bear to be parted from.
Tacitus
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 4
♥ K J 9 8
♦ K J 7
♣ K 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 9 2
♥ Q 7
♦ 10 6 4 3
♣ J 9 |
♠ 7 5 3
♥ 10 6 3
♦ A Q 9 5
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6
♥ A 5 4 2
♦ 8 2
♣ A 10 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
With no aces, but a full opener, do you want to drive your hand to game or merely invite it? I’m firmly in the pessimistic category in this case. I would raise to three clubs and, if partner were unable to make another call, be astonished if game turned out to be makeable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4
♥ K J 9 8
♦ K J 7
♣ K 8 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Into the darkness they go, the wise and the lovely. Crowned With lilies and with laurel they go; but I am not resigned.
Edna St. Vincent Millay
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 9 3
♥ 8
♦ Q J 9 7 6 3
♣ 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 6
♥ Q 10 3 2
♦ K 2
♣ A J 10 8 6 |
♠ 8 7 5 4
♥ K J 6 5 4
♦ 10
♣ Q 9 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 2
♥ A 9 7
♦ A 8 5 4
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
3 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
| Pass |
4 ♥ |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♥3
I would have no objection to doubling on the first rounds despite my sterile shape and the fact that I am facing a passed partner. Now it is imperative that we reopen the bidding by doubling. Don’t let the opponents buy the hand cheaply when they have announced a fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 2
♥ A 9 7
♦ A 8 5 4
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ?? |
|
|
|
September 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
In school they told me, “Practice makes perfect.” And then they told me, “Nobody’s perfect,so then I stopped practicing.
Steven Wright
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 6 3
♥ A K 10 4
♦ Q 6 5
♣ 10 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4
♥ Q 9 8 7
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q J 7 6 |
♠ J 10 8 7 5
♥ J 5
♦ J 10 9 2
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A 9 2
♥ 6 3 2
♦ A K 7 3
♣ K 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
Half the world believes in bidding suits up the line here. The rest — including me — believe that their partner either has no major (if they have less than invitational values) or that they will be good enough to bid their major over a rebid of one no-trump. This style is called Walsh, and the implication is that if you bid one heart now, you guarantee real clubs. So, I would bid one no-trump now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 3
♥ A K 10 4
♦ Q 6 5
♣ 10 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Your lost friends are not dead, but gone before, Advanced a stage or two upon that road Which you must travel, in the steps they trod.
Antiphanes
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J
♥ A J 9 7 6
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ J 7 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 8 5 3
♥ Q 8
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 9 8 5 |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ 10 5 4 3 2
♦ 2
♣ A 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 4 2
♥ K
♦ K J 10 6 3
♣ K Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
Had the opponents not intervened, you would have rebid two clubs, of course. But here you do not have to bid — the opponents surely aren’t going to pass out one heart doubled, are they? With clubs a relatively unlikely place for your side to play, and given your lack of aces, I think I would pass and see what happens next. I’d be prepared to introduce my clubs at my next turn, maybe.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4 2
♥ K
♦ K J 10 6 3
♣ K Q 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
A smattering of everything and a knowledge of nothing.
Charles Dickens
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7 5 3
♥ 6 4
♦ A 7 2
♣ 10 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 4 2
♥ K J 10 8
♦ K Q J 9
♣ 8 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 7 5 3
♦ 8 5 3
♣ K 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ A 2
♦ 10 6 4
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
The only way to show a good hand here is to start with a double. Your plan will be to rebid in no-trump at your next turn, and the question is whether a simple bid (showing more than a strong no-trump) will suffice. Given that your club honors should be pulling extra weight, you might consider jumping to two no-trump over a red-suit call from your partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 9
♥ A 2
♦ 10 6 4
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Reason still keeps its throne, but it nods a little, that’s all.
George Farquhar
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ K 10 6 4
♣ A 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 5
♥ A K Q 9 8 4
♦ 8 3
♣ K 9 8 |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ J 10
♦ J 9 5 2
♣ J 10 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 4 3
♥ 7
♦ A Q 7
♣ Q 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
This auction calls for a heart lead. It is akin to a Lightner double, in which the double of a high-level contract calls for dummy’s first-bid suit. There is no reason not to lead the top of your doubleton. You could make a case for leading high from a three-card suit as well, but that is a bit of a digression.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5 4 2
♥ J 3
♦ 10 8 3
♣ J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
September 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
Holding ♠ J-9, ♥ A-Q-J, ♦ A-10-4-3, ♣ A-7-6-4, I believe I have a straightforward opening of one no-trump. After my left-hand opponent overcalls two spades, how should my partnership play a double over and under the trumps — and what should I do if the auction comes back to me?
Crowded House, Pasadena, Calif.
It is sensible to play all doubles of a natural call (or of a two-suited call that names one of the two suits naturally) as take-out, if and only if it is the first call your partnership has made after the no-trump opener. So both sides play take-out doubles of two spades here. I’d make that call in this case; this shape is perfect for it, and my partner can bid his suit. If he has two places to play, he can bid two no-trump.
I understood that following an overcall after your partner opens, as responder you can always start with a take-out double, no matter what was bid to your right. In what cases would double be for penalty?
Red Flag, Cartersville, Ga.
If you play negative doubles in response to an opening bid, it means that all initial doubles of overcalls of four spades or lower are emphasized toward take-out. Doubles of three spades and higher may tend toward optional, though. Doubles of no-trump bids and of artificial calls that show two-suited hands, however, suggest a desire to defend. (When the opponents find a fit, all doubles by either player at their second turn tend to be take-out).
Should you wait until you have all suits properly controlled before launching into Blackwood? Or should you cue-bid instead?
Mumbo-Jumbo, Muncie, Ind.
Don’t use Blackwood if you are sure you won’t know what to do over the response. In other words, if your hand consists of the first-round controls but not second- and third-round controls, let your partner ask; cue-bid instead to let him do so. When your side has more than enough high-card points for slam, it is not terrible to use Blackwood with one suit that may be unguarded if no sensible alternative exists.
|
Please tell me how I can discreetly ask my opponents not to look at my partner’s cards — or find a way to help my partner hold his cards back!
Hiding in Plain Sight, Dodge City, Kan.
One thought is that you might ask an opponent to hold his cards back, and then extend the warning to your partner. Incidentally, one thing that always gets my goat is people who count their suits so their partner (but only their partner) might see, if they are looking. That should be firmly if politely discouraged, too.
What scheme of responses do you recommend to a two-club opener? Do you prefer complex over simple schemes, and what is your opinion of control-showing responses?
Tripe and Onions, Troy, N.Y.
I recommend a simple scheme of responses. I’m happy to bid two hearts with positive values and a reasonable suit, whereas a two-spade call needs two top honors in five or more cards, or a six-card suit and one top honor. I can see the logic of using all other calls as natural, but if you prefer something artificial, use two no-trump as clubs with limited values. Bids at the three-level would then be natural with very good suits (or transfers if you want to live a little).
|
August 31st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, August 17th, 2019
Art is a human activity having for its purpose the transmission to others of the highest and best feelings to which men have risen.
Leo Tolstoy
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7
♥ J 4
♦ A 10 7 5
♣ 10 7 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 2
♥ Q 10 9 6
♦ 9 6 2
♣ Q J 9 |
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 7
♦ J 4 3
♣ A K 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6
♥ A K 8 5 3 2
♦ K Q 8
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Takeout
♣Q
Your partner’s double should be take-out showing values, presumably with no more than two spades and two or three diamonds. Since he did not overcall one heart, he must have at least four clubs, so it seems right to bid three clubs now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 5 4 3
♥ 7
♦ J 4 3
♣ A K 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 30th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
There is a loveliness exists, Preserves us, not for specialists.
W.D. Snodgrass
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ Q J 6 2
♦ Q 8 7 4 2
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J
♥ K
♦ K 10 9 6
♣ A 9 7 5 3 2 |
♠ A K 10 9 5 4
♥ 10 8
♦ 5 3
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
♠ 7 6
♥ A 9 7 5 4 3
♦ A J
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
My general rules about whether to bid and what to bid on marginal hands that include a six-card suit start from the assumption that you should always bid immediately with a good six-card suit. Whether you act at the one- or two-level will depend on the specific hand, of course, but this hand has a bad suit and isn’t worth a one-level opener in first seat, so I’d pass.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 6
♥ A 9 7 5 4 3
♦ A J
♣ J 10 8 |
|
Journalist Kees Tammens has just retired from his duties with the Dutch team as coach, reporter and cheerleader. This was one of his last contributions to the bulletin. As West, when your lead of the spade king against four hearts holds the trick, you must decide what to do next.
A spade continuation may seem harmless, but it would give declarer the chance for a brilliant maneuver. He could play the spade ace and ruff a spade, lead a heart to the ace, then draw trumps in three rounds, cash both top clubs and endplay East with the third club.
The endplay holds the diamond losers to one and makes the contract. We all wanted to know which declarer if any had played like that. Aarnout Helmich, coach of the Dutch girls’ team (and himself a junior world champion in 2011 and 2012), was proud to announce that after the defense of repeated spade leads, Juliet Berwald of the Netherlands had executed this very neat endplay in her debut in international bridge.
But now you ask: Was there a defense, and if so, did anyone find it? Yes — a diamond shift by West at trick two beats the contract. And, indeed, Brad Johnston from New Zealand found the killing diamond shift when Dutch declarer Thibo Sprinkhuizen ducked the opening top spade lead. While this only led to a flat board (since game was far easier to defeat in the other room after a spade lead, where North was declarer), kudos to Brad here.