Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 10th, 2019

Errors are not in the art but in the artificers.

Sir Isaac Newton


S North
None ♠ Q 9 2
 Q 8 6
 Q 10 2
♣ A K 9 7
West East
♠ J 10 7 5
 K 7 5
 A 7 5 4
♣ Q 3
♠ K 8 4 3
 J 9
 8 6
♣ J 10 8 6 4
South
♠ A 6
 A 10 4 3 2
 K J 9 3
♣ 5 2
South West North East
1 Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 4 All pass
       

♠J

None of the falsecards discussed this week are likely to cost, and all of them offer declarer a different, unsuccessful line of play. Here, West led the unbid suit against four hearts, setting up a spade winner for his side and compelling declarer to bring trumps in for one loser.

Some would tackle trumps by leading to the queen, intending to finesse the 10 on the way back if that loses. However, due to South’s poor intermediates, he preferred to cash the ace, then play toward the queen. In comparison to the other line, this picks up a singleton jack or king offside and the doubleton jack with West, five cases in total. The alternative line succeeds against king-jack-low and jack-nine doubleton offside, only four cases.

Had East dropped the nine under the ace, South would no doubt have led to the queen next, since he could not succeed against king-jack-fourth with West. But our East was made of sterner stuff and nonchalantly dropped the heart jack under the ace, presenting South with an attractive losing option.

Taken in by this, declarer confidently finessed the heart eight on the next round, playing for East to have started with the bare jack or king-jack doubleton. He could survive a 4-1 trump break, since dummy’s spade nine would serve to stop that suit and prevent the force.

Unfortunately for declarer, East won with the heart nine, and yet another apparently unbreakable game had vanished down the drain.



It is normally the duty of the player with shortness in their suit to enter the auction. Here, it is more dangerous to stand idly by and allow the opponents to play two spades than to enter the bidding. After all, a heart contract could easily be in the offing. However, three hearts would be too committal and would overstate the quality of the suit. Double is best; if partner bids three clubs, respect his decision.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 6
 A 10 4 3 2
 K J 9 3
♣ 5 2
South West North East
  1 ♠ Pass 2 ♠
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 9th, 2019

He’s a muddle-headed fool with frequent lucid intervals.

Miguel de Cervantes


N North
Both ♠ A J
 A J 2
 K Q 7 3 2
♣ A 9 5
West East
♠ Q 10 9 2
 K Q 10 7 3
 10 8
♣ J 6
♠ 6
 9 6 5 4
 J 9 5
♣ 10 8 4 3 2
South
♠ K 8 7 5 4 3
 8
 A 6 4
♣ K Q 7
South West North East
    1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 2 NT Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 ♠ Pass
6 ♠ All pass    

K

This week’s themed deals are based on mandatory falsecards in defense. When it cannot deceive partner, or if doing so will not matter, it may pay to try to lead declarer astray.

South somewhat prematurely committed to six spades instead of six diamonds here; then he had to make it. Having taken the heart lead in dummy, he focused on bringing the trumps in for one loser. There would be no problem on a 3-2 break, so declarer turned his mind to the possibility of a 4-1 split.

The percentage play here is simply to finesse the jack, gaining against the four cases of queenfourth onside compared with the one instance of a bare queen offside. This is what declarer would have done if West had followed lazily with the two. But West tried the effect of contributing the 10 at his first turn, offering declarer an alternative.

Seeing that he could now protect a singleton 10 to his left, declarer rose with the ace and returned the jack — and was mightily discomfited when East showed out.

South was just a little naive here. When the spade 10 or nine appeared, rising with the spade ace was playing against the odds. And note that South had an extra chance even if he finessed into East’s four-card suit. After a club return, declarer would win in hand, cross to the trump ace and diamond king to ruff hearts, then try to run the diamonds. If East had been forced to follow to three diamond leads, declarer would have finished in dummy at trick 12 for a trump coup.



I would lead a club. Dummy’s long spades are looming for discards, and unless we cash our top tricks right away, we may never score them. Even though our respective lengths suggest that more diamond tricks will stand up than clubs, we need much less from partner in clubs. Arguably, the king might be the right card to offer up, allowing us to retain the lead if a diamond shift looks necessary at trick two.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ J 4 3
 7 3
 J 10 8
♣ K J 5 3 2
South West North East
Pass 1 ♠ Dbl. 2
Pass 3 ♠ Pass 4
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 8th, 2019

Recently, you discussed a sequence in which opener bids one spade and the next hand overcalls two clubs. What options are available in the modern game of raising spades, and how would that change for a passed hand?

Pick-up Pete, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.

Clearly bidding spades at the two-, three- and four-levels means the same whether you are a passed hand or not, with a cuebid suggesting a high-card limit raise or better. But by a passed hand you can play fit jumps in new suits, while as an unpassed hand you may prefer to use those sequences as natural and weak.

Playing two-over-one, my partner opened one club. I held: ♠ J-9-3,  K-5,  A-J-10-6-3-2, ♣ 10-4. I was planning to bid and rebid my diamonds, but my right-hand opopnent overcalled one spade, and now I did not know if a two-diamond response would constitute an overbid.

Roman Candle, Palm Springs, Calif.

In competition, the doctrine of two-over-one as game forcing can be set aside, since you have to be able to bid when you have shape and some values. Playing weak jump responses, this hand is far too strong, but it is well within the constraints for bidding and rebidding diamonds to suggest quasi-invitational values.

When overcalling a strong no-trump to show a single-suited or two-suited hand, what criteria should I use to decide whether to act or pass in direct and balancing seat? And how should I think about this system at pairs as opposed to teams?

Dumbo, Rockford, Ill.

At teams and at pairs when vulnerable and in direct seat, try to wait for the right shape to bid, since the penalties for wandering in inappropriately can be severe. In balancing seat, and especially non-vulnerable or when a passed hand, I strive to act with any excuse. Sometimes my idea of what is reasonable can be distinctly dubious. Playing a method that allows you to bid with both one-suited and two-suited hands is advisable.

What is the best defense against opponents’ three-level pre-emptive bids? I play Michaels Cuebids, but recently my partner mentioned that the principle could be extended to more situations than just a cue-bid. I’m assuming these methods should be combined with take-out doubles and a natural bid in no-trump.

Headliner, Newark, N.J.

Yes, if you play take-out doubles and a natural three no-trump call over a major-suit pre-empt, you can, if you want, give up on playing four of a minor as natural. Instead, play it as that minor and the unbid major, 5-5 pattern. Here, the cue-bid of the major would either be both minors or whatever else you want it to be.

Holding ♠ Q-10-5-4,  6,  8-6, ♣ K-10-6-5-4-2 at favorable vulnerability, I heard my partner bid three spades over a one-heart opening. My right-hand-opponent raised to four hearts. What would you do?

Sleeping Dogs, Columbia, S.C.

I do not normally like to jump raise to the five-level pre-emptively, because the opponents often misjudge and decide to defend a level lower. Here, however, I would guess to cramp the bidding with a five-spade bid, hoping to give my opponents the last guess. Will I save if they bid slam? I’m glad you didn’t ask!


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 7th, 2019

Against the disease of writing one must take special precautions, since it is a dangerous and contagious disease.

Peter Abelard


S North
E-W ♠ 5
 J 9 4 2
 A Q J 6 5 3
♣ J 5
West East
♠ 10 8 6 4 3
 A
 K 10 8
♣ Q 9 8 3
♠ A 9 7 2
 10 7 6 5
 9
♣ K 10 6 2
South
♠ K Q J
 K Q 8 3
 7 4 2
♣ A 7 4
South West North East
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 4 All pass
       

♣3

In a high-level teams game, both tables reached four hearts on the lead of the club three. Both declarers played low from dummy, and East inserted the club 10. Each declarer won the first trick in hand and guessed well to lead a low trump. After winning the ace, both Wests continued clubs to dummy’s jack and East’s king. The defenders continued the accurate play by cashing the spade ace, then forcing dummy with a club.

At the first table, declarer ruffed low, then drew trumps with the jack, king and ace. After cashing the spade king-queen, declarer took a diamond finesse; when that held, he called for the diamond ace. When East discarded a spade, declarer had to concede the setting trick to the diamond king.

The second declarer, warned by the premature appearance of the trump ace, ruffed the third round of clubs with the heart nine and continued with the trump jack. He realized that the contract would depend on West holding the diamond king, and that entries to hand were at a premium, so when East followed with a low trump, declarer overtook dummy’s jack with his queen. Now he was in the right hand to take the diamond finesse. Once that succeeded, declarer led dummy’s trump four to his eight.

After drawing the last trump, declarer cashed his spade winners, then led a diamond to the 10 and jack. The diamond ace was his 10th trick: he had made two spades, three trumps, three diamonds, a club and a club ruff.



This is not a great 15-count I admit, but it feels like you should take a call. The choice is to bid one no-trump (ugly without a diamond stopper) or to double with only three cards in an unbid major. Your slight extra values suggest that you have just enough compensation for the lack of shape. so I would double.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K Q J
 K Q 8 3
 7 4 2
♣ A 7 4
South West North East
  1 ♣ Pass 1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 6th, 2019

A severed foot is the ultimate stocking stuffer.

Mitch Hedberg


S North
None ♠ A 6
 Q 7 4
 A K Q 4
♣ K 7 3 2
West East
♠ K Q 10 9 8 2
 8
 9 3 2
♣ Q 10 6
♠ 3
 J 10 9 3
 J 10 7 5
♣ J 9 8 4
South
♠ J 7 5 4
 A K 6 5 2
 8 6
♣ A 5
South West North East
1 2 ♠ 3 ♠ Pass
4 Pass 4 ♠ Pass
5 ♣ Pass 6 All pass
       

♠K

After West’s weak jump overcall, North’s cue-bid of three spades promised a game-going hand with at least three hearts. Despite South’s discouraging signoff in game, North continued rather optimistically to what proved to be the delicate slam.

West led the spade king to dummy’s ace, and declarer paused to form a plan. Declarer saw that even if trumps were 3-2, he would only have 11 top tricks. He rejected the idea of ruffing a spade low in dummy as hopeless, and saw that a squeeze on West between spades and a minor suit was impractical because of his need to find trumps breaking.

With known spade length to his left, declarer realized that pressure on East was possible but the key would come from scoring all his small trumps in hand. So he continued by cashing the two top hearts in his hand, followed by the club aceking. After ruffing a club, declarer returned to dummy with the diamond queen to ruff the fourth round of clubs. Declarer next cashed the diamond aceking, then led the fourth diamond from table. When East followed suit, declarer ruffed with his last trump.

At this point, declarer had taken one spade, two trumps, three ruffs and the five minor-suit winners, with the master trump still in dummy.

This line needed West to have either one or two trumps and East to have at least four cards in each minor. If that was not so, East could ruff a minor-suit card and leave declarer with a spade loser.



I would take the slow route with a two-heart cue-bid. A jump to the no-trump game would be premature; we could easily belong in spades or even a minor suit. This cue-bid does not guarantee spade support, and I plan to suggest no-trump later, to show a flexible hand with doubts as to the best strain. You would not bid this way with only a singleton spade, so partner can always convert to four spades.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 6
 Q 7 4
 A K Q 4
♣ K 7 3 2
South West North East
  1 1 ♠ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 5th, 2019

God be thanked, the meanest of his creatures Boasts two soul-sides; one to face the world with, One to show a woman when he loves her!

Robert Browning


W North
N-S ♠ J 9 5
 A K 6
 10 9 8
♣ Q 7 4 2
West East
♠ Q 10 6
 10 9
 K Q 5
♣ K J 10 9 3
♠ 8
 Q 8 7 5 2
 J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5
South
♠ A K 7 4 3 2
 J 4 3
 A 4 3 2
♣ —
South West North East
  1 ♣ Pass 1
1 ♠ Pass 2 3 ♣
4 ♠ All pass    

10

Eric Greco won player of the year for the ACBL by virtue of a series of outstanding finishes in the major events in 2018. I first registered Eric’s talent when he played for the U.S. Juniors over 20 years ago; here he is at work from the finals of the 1997 World Junior Team Championships. It was somewhat ironic that he found one of the best plays of the tournament here, to hold his losses on the deal to 5 IMPs.

In four spades on the opening lead of the heart 10, Greco rose with the king and ran the diamond 10. He won the heart return in dummy, and then passed the diamond nine after a lot of thought.

His plan was to set up the diamonds without letting East in. That would work if hearts were 5-2, but if hearts broke 4-3, there might easily be a trump promotion on the 13th heart.

All was well, since Greco had read the cards correctly, and West had no heart to lead when he took the second diamond. West exited with a club, and declarer ruffed, cashed the top spades and led the fourth diamond to pitch the heart loser to make the hand. Alas for USA, four spades doubled was let through in the other room when the first three tricks started the same way, but declarer then came to hand with a top spade to lead the diamond ace. West forgot to unblock his other top diamond on this trick, so East could not get in to cash the hearts, and the play transposed back to Greco’s line.



Clearly the hand is far too good to pass two hearts. Should you drive to four hearts or consult your partner by making an invitational raise? Here, the singleton in partner’s suit is more useful than usual because of the fifth trump. At teams, I could understand driving to game, but at pairs, a simple raise looks right to protect the plus score.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 8
 Q 8 7 5 2
 J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5
South West North East
    1 ♠ Pass
1 NT Pass 2 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 4th, 2019

A writer is somebody for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people.

Thomas Mann


N North
N-S ♠ Q J 8 6 2
 K Q
 K 9 6 4
♣ 4 2
West East
♠ A K 9 4 3
 5 4
 Q J 8 2
♣ Q 5
♠ 7 5
 A J 10 9 8 3
 10 7 5
♣ J 8
South
♠ 10
 7 6 2
 A 3
♣ A K 10 9 7 6 3
South West North East
    1 ♠ 3
4 ♣ Pass 4 Pass
5 ♣ All pass    

♠K

After some aggressive bidding from almost everybody at the table, West led a top spade against five clubs and shifted to a heart. When East won and returned the suit, South saw that it would be suicidal to try for a heart ruff in dummy, since West was all but certain to ruff in ahead of dummy. So declarer banged down the club ace-king and breathed a sigh of relief when the suit split.

Since his heart seven was surely going to be a menace against East, declarer could see that both opponents were going to be squeezed dry on the run of the trumps. West was in sole possession of the spade guard, so who would be able to hold onto the diamond guard?

On the last club, everyone came down to three cards. West had to keep the spade ace and reduced himself to two diamonds. When dummy let go of the spade queen from the board, East came under the gun. He had to allow declarer his game-going trick by unguarding one of the red suits.

Hard as it may seem, West could have attacked the entry to the double menace by shifting to diamonds at trick two, or East could have broken up the timing for the squeeze by ducking the first heart.

I suppose East might have figured out that even if South had four hearts, the heart losers were going nowhere. And if declarer held the diamond ace-queen, they would have to be doubleton. So, ducking the first heart must be right, hard as that might seem.



It is risky, but three no-trump is where the money is. I hope to run the club suit, scoring nine quick tricks with partner’s hoped-for major-suit ace. If my major suit holdings were swapped, I would of course raise partner’s suit. And will I sit for it if doubled? I’m glad I don’t have enough space to answer that.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 10
 7 6 2
 A 3
♣ A K 10 9 7 6 3
South West North East
  1 1 ♠ 3
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 3rd, 2019

A community is like a ship; everyone ought to be prepared to take the helm.

Henrik Ibsen


W North
None ♠ A J 5
 7 5
 J 9 7 5 4
♣ K 8 4
West East
♠ 3
 10 9 2
 A K Q 6 2
♣ 9 6 3 2
♠ 8 7 6 2
 K J 6 3
 10
♣ A J 10 5
South
♠ K Q 10 9 4
 A Q 8 4
 8 3
♣ Q 7
South West North East
  1 Pass 1
1 ♠ Dbl.* 2 Pass
2 NT Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

*Three hearts

K

This hand came along at the 2017 Vanderbilt Trophy in the North American Spring Nationals; at the wheel was Jan Jansma of the Netherlands.

West opened the bidding light, then compounded his felony with a support double to show three hearts. This didn’t keep North-South from reaching the spade game, though, after North made an unassuming cue-bid. South suggested no-trump initially, then despite his partner’s retreat to three spades, he awarded himself a fourth spade.

It is difficult to consider any lead other than a top diamond from West’s hand, and it was the king that was tabled. West switched to his singleton trump at trick two, but it came too late. Jansma won with dummy’s ace, finessed the heart queen successfully, cashed the heart ace and ruffed a third heart low in dummy.

Then, planning to ruff his last heart in dummy, declarer played a low club toward his queen. Divining declarer’s intentions, East rose with the ace and played another trump. This served to give declarer a 10th trick, but it was not immediately clear how South could make use of it, given the club blockage and the lack of a side-suit entry to dummy. However, South drew the rest of East’s trumps and cashed his own club queen. He then exited with his last heart. East won with the king, but with no diamonds remaining, he was forced to resurrect dummy’s club king for the game-going trick. East had been used as a stepping-stone to reach dummy’s stranded winner.



I would pass here. A two-level overcall usually promises a six-card suit and for good reason. Even though I have excellent diamonds and want them led, I have no desire to win the contract, and my heart holding is very bad for declaring. The real danger may be that partner leads a club, not a diamond, against a spade game; I’ll pay off to that.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 3
 10 9 2
 A K Q 6 2
♣ 9 6 3 2
South West North East
      1
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 2nd, 2019

Truth sits upon the lips of dying men.

Matthew Arnold


S North
Both ♠ A K 9 6 4
 K 8 5 4
 A 9
♣ A 9
West East
♠ 10 3
 9 6 3 2
 K J 10 8 5 3 2
♣ —
♠ Q J 8 7 5
 —
 6 4
♣ J 10 8 6 4 2
South
♠ 2
 A Q J 10 7
 Q 7
♣ K Q 7 5 3
South West North East
1 3 4 Pass
4 Pass 4 NT Pass
5 Pass 5 ♠ * Pass
7 All pass    

*Asking for the trump queen

2

In today’s deal, West’s weak jump overcall only served to help declarer place the cards. Having found out his side had all the keycards, North asked for the trump queen. South knew his partner was interested in a grand slam, so with the queen and a source of tricks, South needed no further encouragement to go for the big prize.

West, unwilling to risk a pointed-suit attack, led a safe trump, ducked in dummy. When East showed out, South could count only 11 tricks. One line might have been to ruff clubs in dummy. However, the combination of West’s overcall plus his known trump length marked him with a minimum of 10 red cards, and therefore no more than three in the black suits.

Still, the corollary to West having these red-suit cards meant that East had an equivalent number of black-suit cards, which might render him ripe for a squeeze. South saw that he could generate one extra trick from a dummy reversal. He won the trump lead with the ace, cashed the heart queen and led a spade to the ace (West following suit, to declarer’s relief), then trumped a spade with the jack. A diamond to the ace was followed by another spade, this time ruffed with the 10. Declarer next led his last trump, the seven, and overtook it with the eight.

The heart king pulled West’s last trump, and East was squeezed. That player could not retain four clubs and two spades. Rather than watch East squirm, South showed him his hand, and East conceded defeat.



I would lead the diamond two. My best shot appears to be to give partner a diamond ruff when I get in with the heart ace. It is unlikely that a club trick will stand up, but if it does, we can probably try it later on. Note that a spade lead is unlikely to do much good. If partner has the spade king over dummy’s ace, he will probably score it sooner or later.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 7 2
 A 5
 10 8 6 2
♣ K 8 7 4 2
South West North East
Pass 1 2 ♣ 2
5 ♣ 6 All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 1st, 2019

Does a successful doubled contract produce a game even if game has not been bid, or do the extra scores go above the line? Both interpretations make sense to me, but which is correct?

Bonus Baby, Tucson, Ariz.

When you make a doubled part-score, the score for the contract goes below the line. Thus, three diamonds doubled scores as twice 60 or 120. Since that number exceeds 100, it qualifies for the game bonus. The insult, game bonus, and overtricks go above the line — as usual. Two clubs doubled scores as 80 — thus no game bonus; two diamonds redoubled is 160 and thus generates the game bonus.

I heard my partner open with an artificial two-club bid with ♠ A Q-9-4-2,  —-,  A-Q-10, ♣ A-J-10-9-5. I responded two diamonds, then raised a two-spade call to game with ♠ K-J-8-6-3,  J-9-4,  8-3-2, ♣ 8-4, and we played there. How might we have bid our cards to slam — or should we have been content with game?

Orpheus, Hartford, Conn.

A two-club opening on an unbalanced hand is game-forcing unless responder bids two diamonds, then issues a double negative at his second turn. Your partner should have opened one spade; after you jumped to four spades, he could have shot to slam — which is an excellent spot. Of course, had you raised two spades to three (showing a better hand than a jump to game), you still might have recovered.

Holding ♠ Q-10-5-4,  A,  A-10-8-2, ♣ A-Q-J-4, it felt right to open one diamond and jump to three spades over the one-spade response. My partner felt I could have driven to game or even bid four hearts as a splinter raise. Where do you stand on this issue?

Billy Goat, Augusta, Ga.

Your values are on the cusp between a drive to game and an invitation — the singleton ace doesn’t really pull its full weight. I wouldn’t jump to four hearts with a 4-1-4-4 shape unless I had full value in high cards. This hand is not worth that action, so your choice was a little pessimistic but entirely reasonable.

How important do you think it is to learn the precise percentages at bridge? How much of correct declarer play and defense is about table feel and table presence?

10 Gallon Matt, Cedar Rapids, Iowa

You do not have to learn all the percentages; a few simple ones are enough. (Kelsey and Glauert’s book on practical odds should suffice.) Table presence outranks percentages all the time! But you must learn to hone your card-reading skills, to try to learn when you can trust your instincts and when you cannot.

Holding ♠ A-J-9,  K-Q-J-9-3-2,  10-2, ♣ A-J, my partner opened three diamonds in first chair. Would your decision to bid on or pass be influenced by vulnerability more than by your choice of partner? Would it matter if the pre-empt was in second seat?

Steven’s Son, Detroit, Mich.

I know that four hearts might make when facing heart length, but if I bid three hearts, will partner be able to bid three no-trump if he has no fit in hearts? Probably not. It is much more likely that I can make three no-trump my way up, so I might gamble it out. Facing a pre-empt in first seat at favorable vulnerability, I would pass.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].