September 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Holding ♠ J-4, ♥ J-4-3, ♦ A-Q-7-4, ♣ Q-7-6-5, I heard my partner open two hearts, and the next hand doubled. What would you advocate bidding now, and why?
How High the Moon, Kansas City, Mo.
Since you expect your partner to be on lead to a spade game or part-score, you’d like him to lead diamonds, wouldn’t you? Rather than raising to three hearts, use a convention called McCabe, where a bid of three diamonds is lead-directing with heart tolerance. In the unlikely case that you want to bail out in three of a minor, you can use two no-trump as a puppet to three clubs. Redouble with a strong hand.
On the first deal of a Chicago rubber, I dealt myself ♠ A-J-4, ♥ 9-7-5-4, ♦ K-8-3, ♣ Q-10-8, and heard my partner open one heart in third chair. When the next hand overcalled two diamonds, what would you say was the value bid with my hand?
Taking Care of Business, Levittown, Pa.
You have a 10-count, but a very balanced one, with the diamond king in your RHO’s suit apparently working well. Conversely, your trumps are weak, facing a third-in-hand opening. So I’d settle for a raise to two hearts and apologize later if we missed a game. My second choice would be a cue-bid of three diamonds to show my limit raise. (A jump to three hearts would be weak and distributional.)
Holding ♠ J-7-6-5-4-2, ♥ 4, ♦ A-K-5, ♣ Q-7-6, how should you bid when you hear partner open one heart, and then over your one-spade response, he bids two clubs?
Torn Up, Boston, Mass.
This hand is almost worth a call of two no-trump in high-card terms. Your spades argue against jumping or rebidding that suit, and your clubs aren’t strong enough to raise, but you might make a lot of trick in clubs, spades or no-trump, so passing feels wrong. A call of two spades is acceptable; I might stretch to rebid two no-trump, to let partner bid game with extras, and otherwise hope to settle for a playable part-score.
|
Do you have any advice for inexperienced players like me who tend to get discouraged when things start to go wrong? Or for my partners, who occasionally replay their failures in their head, to their detriment on the following deal?
High Kicker, Greenville, S.C.
The best advice I can give you is that it is next to impossible to pick up a big swing on one deal to recover from a disaster on the last: The situation will likely get worse if you try. As an aside, many players tend to lose concentration on the first and last deals of a session — the first because they are not settled in, and the last because they want to get out and score up. So one should try harder to concentrate on those deals.
When my right-hand opponent opened the bidding with four diamonds, I had a 4=4=1=4 12-count, so I doubled for take-out. My partner thought this was too aggressive, so I’d welcome your thoughts. The next hand redoubled, and when it came back to me, I ran to four hearts. We ended in five clubs, down 800, but was I wrong to run, or should I have passed with four diamonds hinging on a finesse?
Sad Sack, Mitchell, S.D.
There is no question that your double of four diamonds is geared for takeout: Your call may be aggressive, but it sounds reasonable to me. My partnership plays that all passes of redoubles except at the one-level (and not all of them) are to play, so I would have passed here, like it or not.
|
September 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
There’s nae luck about the house There’s nae luck ava, There’s nae luck about the house When our good man’s awa.
Scottish folk song
W |
North |
E-W |
♠ A K 7 6
♥ 6 4 2
♦ 10 6
♣ J 7 6 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ 7
♦ 5 3
♣ A 9 8 5 4 2 |
♠ J 4
♥ A K J 10 9 5
♦ J 9 8 2
♣ 10 |
South |
♠ 10 8 3
♥ Q 8 3
♦ A K Q 7 4
♣ K Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
When the opponents open one club, you can often exploit the fact that they have not promised length in their suit by overcalling one no-trump with less in their suit than you normally would have for that action. While a one-diamond overcall is safer, this route gets you to major-suits when appropriate. “Too dangerous” is no excuse!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 3
♥ Q 8 3
♦ A K Q 7 4
♣ K Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
? |
|
|
|
September 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
“Self-trust is the essence of heroism.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ A 7 3 2
♥ 10 9 2
♦ Q J 7 6 2
♣ 4 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 8
♥ A K J 5 4
♦ A 10
♣ K 7 5 3 |
♠ J 9
♥ Q 7 6 3
♦ K 9 8 3
♣ Q J 8 |
South |
♠ K 10 6 5 4
♥ 8
♦ 5 4
♣ A 10 9 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
|
♥K
Your partner’s opening bid guarantees at least four cards, unless he has both majors (which he clearly doesn’t here). You cannot by any means guarantee that three diamonds will make, or even come close, but it feels wrong to sell out when you have at least an eight-card fit, and the opponents also have a fit. So I would bid three diamonds now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9
♥ Q 7 6 3
♦ K 9 8 3
♣ Q J 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
To set the cause above renown, To love the game beyond the prize.
Sir Henry Newbolt
W |
North |
None |
♠ Q
♥ 5 4
♦ K Q 10 9 3
♣ Q 10 4 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ A 3
♥ 10 8 2
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ A 7 6 5 |
♠ K 10 9 7 6 5 2
♥ J
♦ J 6 4
♣ K J |
South |
♠ J 8 4
♥ A K Q 9 7 6 3
♦ A
♣ 9 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠A
Is a simple raise to three diamonds sufficient? Let’s say partner has 5-4 shape and three aces; you probably have three losers one way or another unless partner has a singleton club, but ruffing out that suit may prove troublesome. So I would just bid three diamonds. Make the club queen the king, and I might do more.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q
♥ 5 4
♦ K Q 10 9 3
♣ Q 10 4 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
One of the pleasures of middle age is to find out that one was right, and that one was much righter than one knew at, say, 17 or 23.
Ezra Pound
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ Q 5
♥ A Q 7
♦ A 9 3
♣ A K 7 6 5 |
West |
East |
♠ A J 10 9 7
♥ 10 9 2
♦ K 7 6
♣ Q 10 |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ 8 6 5 3
♦ J 10 8
♣ J 8 4 |
South |
♠ K 6 4
♥ K J 4
♦ Q 5 4 2
♣ 9 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠J
This call is simply natural and does not guarantee a fit. (There are plenty of ways your partner might not have enough for a two-level overcall.) I would pass now, but be prepared to compete to three clubs over further red-suit competition.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 10 9 7
♥ 10 9 2
♦ K 7 6
♣ Q 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Who knows when some slight shock, disturbing the delicate balance between social order and thirsty aspiration, shall send the skyscrapers in our cities toppling?
Richard Wright
S |
North |
Both |
♠ J 9 7 3
♥ 7 2
♦ Q 9 2
♣ A K 5 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K 8 6
♥ A 10
♦ 10 8 6 4
♣ 8 6 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 4 2
♥ 9 8 6 5 3
♦ A 3
♣ 10 7 |
South |
♠ A 5
♥ K Q J 4
♦ K J 7 5
♣ Q J 9 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♦4
Your partner’s jump in the opponents’ suit suggests game-forcing values with short spades and probably a one-suited hand. (He might have begun with a cue-bid if he were interested in playing in clubs or hearts.) You can see three no-trump might be in danger, but slam in diamonds is a real possibility. Cue-bid four clubs and be prepared to cooperate again if partner cuebids four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 7 3
♥ 7 2
♦ Q 9 2
♣ A K 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
September 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Busy as a one-armed man with the nettle-rash pasting on wallpaper.
O. Henry
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ A 5
♥ K J 10 9
♦ 9 6
♣ K J 5 4 3 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8
♥ A 8 7 2
♦ J 8 7 2
♣ 10 8 |
♠ J 10 7 6 4
♥ Q 6 5
♦ A K 10 5
♣ 9 |
South |
♠ K 3 2
♥ 4 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ A Q 7 6 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
3 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
You can infer that declarer has five hearts, with probably close to a 2-5-3-3 shape. Opener has only five spades and at most two hearts, while your partner is maybe 3-3-3-4. I would lead a club to play for ruffs, thinking that I should be able to score my heart queen later on in the hand.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 2
♥ Q 9 2
♦ Q 10 5 4 2
♣ 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
September 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
If the opposition overcalls our side’s no-trump opening bid, what combination of takeout and penalty doubles would you advocate?
Wellington Boot, Orlando, Fla.
First of all, simplest is best. How about this agreement: If double is the first action from either side (other than one or more passes) after the no-trump call, then the double is takeout. As soon as your side makes a positive call, most doubles are penalty. If you transfer and then double any opposition intervention, that shows values rather than being a trump stack; most other doubles show trump length.
We were playing against strong opponents. My LHO opened four hearts, doubled by my partner to show cards. I had 12 points and six spades to the A-Q-J with a singleton heart. What would you suggest, knowing your partner is conservative by temperament?
John Stuart Mill, North Bay, Ontario
If you don’t simply jump to slam, a five-spade call here could just be a better hand than one that would bid four spades. Some might believe that bidding four no-trump (which is typically two-suited for the minors), followed by correcting partner’s response to five spades, shows a heart control. If so, the jump to five spades might be a slam try, typically with no heart control.
My question is about which card to lead on the second round of a suit. In this instance, my partner led a low card against three no-trump and found a singleton in dummy, while I had Q-10-5-4. Declarer captured my queen with his ace and lost a finesse to me. Should I now lead back the four or the 10?
Rube Goldberg, Holland, Mich.
Either play may be right, though some critical factors are which spot partner led (does he have four or five cards?) and whether you need to cash out to set the game. The 10 is probably only essential if you need to cash three tricks in the suit on the go. Regardless, there is no definitively right answer, but the four is the right count card if that is what is important to partner.
|
I find it very hard to know when, as first, second or third hand, I should play the higher from touching honors and when the lower. Also, when discarding, the same point applies. Is there a simple rule?
Follow my Leader, Albuquerque, N.M.
This is a potential minefield, as my answer will show. As third hand, you try to win the trick by following with the lower of touching honors; however, when dropping an honor under partner’s ace or king lead, you play the higher from touching honors. When declarer leads a suit and you are second to play with two touching honors, I suggest you play the lower one, but you should play the top from a sequence of three honors. As long as your partnership has an agreement — any agreement — it is better than nothing.
In one of your deals a month or two ago, the dealer held ♠ A-Q-6-2, ♥ K-5-4, ♦ A-10-5-3-2, ♣ 2, and opened one diamond. He then had a rebid problem over a game-forcing response of two clubs. How would you evaluate the possibilities — and would you do the same if opener’s diamond 10 were the queen?
Second Chances, Washington, D.C.
A rebid of two no-trump shows a balanced hand, not an unbalanced hand like this. It may contain a four-card major, but it denies as much shape as this. Since I don’t believe in rebidding a five-card diamond suit just to show I have one, I am happy to bid two spades with both hands. However, if you feel that call would systematically promise extras — then a two-diamond rebid, planning to raise spades or bid no-trump next, is also acceptable.
|
September 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Virtue is the fount whence honor springs.
Christopher Marlowe
S |
North |
Both |
♠ J 9 8
♥ A Q 10
♦ K 6 2
♣ A J 10 2 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ 8 3
♣ Q 7 6 5 |
♠ 6 4
♥ K J 8
♦ J 10 7 5
♣ K 9 8 3 |
South |
♠ A K Q 10 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ A Q 9 4
♣ 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT * |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*15-17 balanced
♥2
Your concentrated honors mean that you have just enough to risk a call of two diamonds. This makes it harder for your opponents to get to clubs. If you have a seven-card fit in either spades or diamonds, it should play well enough.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 10 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ A Q 9 4
♣ 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
August 31st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The worst day at the beach is better than the best day at work.
Unknown
E |
North |
E-W |
♠ 9 8 7 5 4
♥ 7
♦ 10 6 2
♣ K 10 9 3 |
West |
East |
♠ J 10 3
♥ K 9 6 5 3
♦ 5
♣ Q 8 5 2 |
♠ A K Q 6 2
♥ Q J 4
♦ A 9
♣ J 7 6 |
South |
♠ —
♥ A 10 8 2
♦ K Q J 8 7 4 3
♣ A 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
|
♦5
Are you happy jumping to four spades here? You should be, since the call is basically pre-emptive rather than a strong call. With a better hand, such as the spade ace instead of the four, one can use a jump to three no-trump to show a raise to four with some defense. I prefer that meaning for the call rather than having it show a balanced 13-15.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 7 5 4
♥ 7
♦ 10 6 2
♣ K 10 9 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
All of this week’s deals come from the 2017 World Championships from Lyon, France.
Steve Weinstein declared three no-trump here against the Dutch and found an intriguing line. You might try to match him by looking only at the North-South cards.
When West somewhat surprisingly has a heart to lead against three no-trump, you take the third heart as West pitches two clubs. Plan the play.
Weinstein led the club king from hand, ducked by West. Now declarer inferred that West was 1-6 in hearts and clubs, and the carding suggested West ought to be 4=1=2=6. If so, it would be futile to play diamonds from the top, as East would win the fourth and cash out. Similarly, if declarer played a second club, West would win and play back a club, breaking up any pressure in the ending.
But what if West had the doubleton diamond jack? He would win his jack and return a spade, but you play a second club and set up your ninth winner. There are two points to note about this line: First, you must play a top club before ducking a diamond, or West can win and play a spade, killing your communications. The second is that West needed to duck the first club, or he would subsequently have been squeezed in the black suits.
Weinstein went for broke and made the brave play of a low diamond from hand. The line failed when East could win his diamond jack and run the hearts, but it was still a highly imaginative try, I thought.