October 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I don’t ever seem to have a hand where I want to play a part-score in the minor facing a no-trump opening bid. So, would it make sense to play transfers into a minor suit as at least invitational?
Humble Pie, Willoughby, Ohio
My experience and yours do not mesh. With a weak hand and a long suit, you really should play the minor suit, I believe. As an aside, I can understand using a two-spade response to one no-trump as a balanced range ask or a hand with one minor and invitational values, so that transfers to a minor are either weak or strong (and Stayman now guarantees a major). But that would require detailed discussion.
What should you do when holding ♠ 5-2, ♥ K-10-4-3, ♦ J-9, ♥ A-Q-7-6-2 if you heard your partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one heart? Is this hand really a two-club call, or would you elect to play for penalty?
Apple Pie Order, Beaverton, Ore.
If you gave me just one guess, I would say it was right to bid one no-trump, but to compete in clubs if the opponents bid spades. The attraction of bidding one no-trump is that you allow your partner to act again if he has either extras in shape or values.
What, if any, are some simple rules that will help me master the general principles of the percentages? Number Crunchers Anonymous, Union City,
Tenn.
An even number of cards are less likely to break than to divide evenly (with the exception of the 1-1 break). The more cards missing, the closer to onethird is the likelihood of an even break. An odd number of cards will usually break as evenly as possible — and the more cards that are out, the closer to twothirds is the likelihood of that break. In those instances, the next-most even break comes in at about a 1 in 5 chance.
|
My experienced partner threw me a curve, and I dropped the ball. How would you cope with ♠ J-7-4-2, ♥ A-2, ♦ K-6, ♣ K-J-9-5-2 after opening one club and hearing one spade on your left, then three spades from your partner?
Scoring Table, Bremerton, Wash.
A jump cue-bid here should have a very precise meaning. It is a raise in clubs with a singleton spade — in other words, a splinter raise. Your hand is not suitable for no-trump, but it is very suitable for clubs (imagine partner with the heart and diamond controls, plus five clubs to the ace). Cue-bid four diamonds now — don’t even think of bidding three no-trump or closing out the auction at five clubs.
How would you respond to a two-diamond opening if you held ♠ Q-J-7, ♥ K-9-3, ♦ A-7-4-2, ♣ Q-10-4? How would you rate passing, raising or inquiring with two no-trump?
Blunderbuss, Atlanta, Ga.
I don’t think my side can make game here, but I have enough values to expect the opponents not to make game anywhere, either. The choice is to raise to three diamonds at once (maybe that will draw my opponents in) or to pass and bid up to three diamonds if necessary. Either approach makes sense — I think I favor the latter, but it is close.
|
October 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The world’s a scene of changes; and to be Constant, in Nature were inconstancy.
Abraham Cowley
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 5
♥ A 4 2
♦ A K J 8 5 2
♣ 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 7 2
♥ K 10 3
♦ Q 7 6
♣ Q 10 3 |
♠ K J 9 6 4
♥ 9 6 5
♦ 10
♣ 9 8 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A 3
♥ Q J 8 7
♦ 9 4 3
♣ A K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
A disciplined pass is in order. If you could raise to two hearts, you would, but competing to the three-level is too much with a weak no-trump hand and bad trumps. To bid three hearts, you would have to be slightly less balanced. You shouldn’t miss anything by passing, as partner will surely act again if he has extras. Give me ace-jack-fourth of hearts instead of the spade ace, and I might break discipline, I admit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 3
♥ J 8 7 2
♦ 9 4 3
♣ A K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Throw away the dearest thing he owed As ’twere a careless trifle.
William Shakespeare
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ A 7
♦ A K 5 4
♣ Q 9 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 4
♥ J 6 5 4 2
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ K 5 |
♠ K Q J 8 7
♥ 10 9 8
♦ Q J
♣ J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A 9 5
♥ K Q 3
♦ 7 3 2
♣ A 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
All of our red-suit honors look horrible, and the lack of shape makes this a pass in any other position. However, in third seat, all that really matters is the quality of our spades. We should open one spade to get the lead in and to allow our partner to compete in the boss suit — though hopefully not too far. Some would even try pre-empting to two spades, which is not silly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 8 7
♥ 10 9 8
♦ Q J
♣ J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, October 10th, 2019
Never before have so many people understood so little about so much.
James Burke
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 10 7 5
♥ A 10 7 4 2
♦ Q
♣ 9 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 4
♥ Q
♦ J 8 7 3
♣ K 10 8 3 |
♠ 6 2
♥ K 8 5 3
♦ A 10 9 6
♣ Q J 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 3
♥ J 9 6
♦ K 5 4 2
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Transfer to hearts
♦3
With four-card support, a source of tricks and shortness, you have too much for a simple raise to two spades. An invitational three spades seems closer to the mark than a drive to game. While partner may not evaluate his hand properly, it might not be critical. It will not be terrible if partner thinks the diamond king is working; at the very least, it will provide a slow trick opposite our queen.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 5
♥ A 10 7 4 2
♦ Q
♣ 9 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
For fools rush in where angels fear to tread.
Alexander Pope
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ Q J
♦ A J 4
♣ A 10 9 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 4 3
♥ K 10 9 8 3
♦ K Q 6 5
♣ 2 |
♠ J 10 9 7
♥ 6 4 2
♦ 3 2
♣ Q J 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A 6 5
♥ A 7 5
♦ 10 9 8 7
♣ K 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥10
Raise to two spades at once. You can’t go wrong by limiting your hand and simultaneously supporting your partner. Not only might you end up in the wrong part-score if you rebid two diamonds, but you might also miss a game if partner has a distributional hand with five spades and no support for your suits. You may also get too high if you don’t put the brakes on sooner rather than later.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ K 10 9 6 3
♦ K Q 6 5
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, October 8th, 2019
I’m tired of Love: I’m still more tired of Rhyme. But Money gives me pleasure all the time.
Hilaire Belloc
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ A 2
♥ Q J 9 4 3
♦ A 8 4
♣ K 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 6 3
♥ 10 8 5
♦ Q 5 3
♣ 10 6 4 |
♠ 9
♥ A K 7 6
♦ J 10 9 2
♣ A 8 7 2 |
| South |
♠ K 10 8 7 5 4
♥ 2
♦ K 7 6
♣ Q J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
There are three sensible policies that five-cardmajor adherents can follow here. They can open one of a minor and rebid one no-trump over one spade, or open one diamond and rebid two clubs over one spade. With most of my points in hearts, I tend to open my better minor and rebid one no-trump. Here, I would bid one club.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9
♥ A K 7 6
♦ J 10 9 2
♣ A 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
As soon as he saw the Big Boots, Pooh knew that an Adventure was about to happen, and he brushed the honey off his nose with the back of his paw, and spruced himself up as well as he could, so as to look Ready for Anything.
A.A. Milne
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 7 4 2
♥ —
♦ A K J 10 2
♣ A 9 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 5
♥ A K J 6
♦ 9 4
♣ 10 5 |
♠ K 8 6
♥ 9 4
♦ 8 6
♣ K Q J 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ Q 10 8 7 5 3 2
♦ Q 7 5 3
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
| 4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠Q
You should try to establish tricks for partner in the minors, but which one? It may be best to take the heart king first, retaining the lead to switch through dummy at trick two. You might not get in again, after all, and hopefully you will know what to do after a look at dummy. Note: Partner might have bid a minor at his second turn if he had known what the best defense was.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ K 9 4
♦ J 10 8 6 3 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♥ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
October 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, October 6th, 2019
|
How should I value 10s and five-card suits in deciding whether to upgrade my hand into or out of a one no-trump opener, but also in deciding whether to open 11-counts at all?
Princess Pushy, Panama City, Fla.
Never upgrade a 4-3-3-3 hand. Consider adding a point when opening one no-trump (and especially when responding to one no-trump with a five-card suit that includes a top honor and decent intermediates — you will know them when you see them). When considering opening a suit, 5-4 shape is worth an extra point, but not if it means you can’t easily introduce your four-card suit at your next turn.
What would you bid with this hand: ♠ 6-2, ♥ J-9-2, ♦ A-Q-10-4-3, ♣ Q-7-4, when, as a passed hand, you hear one spade to your left, three hearts from partner (intermediate) and three spades to your right? Do you have enough to bid here?
Silent Sam, Honolulu, Hawaii
I would bid — but I would not raise to four hearts. As a passed hand, I can bid four diamonds, a natural call, but one that promises support for hearts. This gets my partner off to my preferred lead against four spades if the opponents decide to bid on over our four-heart contract. The chance that we get doubled here is smaller than that this is the key lead for the defense.
Please compare the merits of leading second-highest from bad suits against leading fourth-highest, or third-and-lowest. Can you combine the two methods?
Bats in the Belfry, Elkhart, Ind.
Third-and-lowest can never sensibly be combined with second-highest leads. If you must lead a card from three or four small to deny an honor in a suit where you’ve shown length, make it the top card. As long as you don’t lead MUD (middle-updown) from three cards against suits, any lead method is fine by me. At no-trump, leading second from four may be sensible, but be aware that partner will not always be able to read it.
|
I found myself in second seat, holding ♠ K-9-7-2, ♥ A-K-8-3, ♦ 9-6-4, ♣ K-10, and I elected to double a one-diamond opening bid. I heard one heart to my left and two clubs from my partner. Was I wrong to try to improve the contract by bidding two no-trump? I did not achieve my target!
Barnacle Bill, Doylestown, Pa.
The main focus of a double of a minor is suitability for the unbid majors, with opening values. If you do not have three or more cards in both majors, you will always deliver real extras. When balanced, pass with a minimum opener and unsuitable shape, if overcalling on a chunky four-card suit at the one-level doesn’t feel right. Here, double was a good gamble, but you lost out. Do not bid on and make it worse.
Where can I learn about advanced card play concepts such as squeezes?
Trumpet Major, Bennington, Vt.
I would strongly advise you to focus on drawing trumps, taking finesses and cashing winners, and to ignore more complex concepts. Even at the top level, most errors fall into one of these categories. “Squeezes Made Simple” by Marc Smith and David Bird might help — or make things much worse.
|
October 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Nothing is so good as it seems beforehand.
George Eliot
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ 10 4
♦ 6 5
♣ A 10 9 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ A K 9 8 3
♦ Q 10 8 2
♣ K Q 2 |
♠ 8 7 4 2
♥ Q 7 5 2
♦ 4
♣ J 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ J 6
♦ A K J 9 7 3
♣ 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Here your first bid of one heart was fine, though with an extra queen, a call of one spade — planning to compete in hearts next — would have been right. On your actual auction, some people quite sensibly play a “next-step negative,” also called a Herbert negative, after the cuebid. If you can’t bid two diamonds to show this hand, you have to bid two hearts now, since two spades would show 5-9 or so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 4 2
♥ Q 7 5 2
♦ 4
♣ J 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 3 2
♥ A 5 3
♦ 3 2
♣ A 8 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 5 4
♥ Q 9 8 2
♦ Q J 10
♣ K J 9 |
♠ 10 6
♥ J 10
♦ 9 8 7 6 5
♣ 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 8 7
♥ K 7 6 4
♦ A K 4
♣ Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ * |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Checkback
♦Q
Even with four-card support and 10 points, with its lack of aces and flat shape, this hand is worth only a simple raise. We certainly would not like partner to bid game with a maximum weak no-trump. One of the easiest ways in a strong no-trump base to turn a plus into a minus is to invite game facing an opener with an unremarkable 10-point hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ Q 9 8 2
♦ Q J 10
♣ K J 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The mathematical odds when missing four cards to the queen are to play for the drop, but the percentages are close enough that almost anything could influence the play.
In today’s deal, declarer opened a strong no-trump and was raised immediately to game since North had no reason to explore for any other contract. Life would have been easy on any lead but a spade, but when West led a fourth-highest spade two, declarer realized he needed to guess diamonds to have any realistic chance to make his game.
He started by leading the diamond nine and put up dummy’s king, then crossed to the club ace and led a diamond toward dummy. When West followed small, South paused to reassess the evidence.
West had led his long suit against three no-trump, and the spade two suggested he had only four cards in the suit. Was it likely that he had a doubleton or three hearts? South decided that if East had five spades and West four, with no longer suit on the side, West was more likely to have started with three diamonds than two. So declarer took the diamond finesse and came home with ten tricks.
It is hard to argue with success, so I won’t! I will say that, as declarer, you should not automatically assume that the opening leader is short in a critical suit just because he made the opening lead. After all, he has to have a long suit somewhere! If he is known to have five or six cards in the long suit, that is a horse of a different color.