July 30th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, July 16th, 2019
First come I; my name is Jowett. There’s no knowledge but I know it. I am master of this college: What I don’t know isn’t knowledge.
Revd. H. C. Beeching
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 5
♥ Q 8 6
♦ A Q 10 4
♣ K 9 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 4 3
♥ A 9 5
♦ K 9 6 3
♣ 4 |
♠ 7
♥ K J 4 3
♦ J 8 7 2
♣ J 8 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 2
♥ 10 7 2
♦ 5
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♦3
You have a straightforward call of one no-trump, suggesting a few scattered values (you would otherwise pass), but fewer than 7 or 8 points. If you had that much, you would take stronger action, with either a jump or a cue-bid. You aren’t stacked in clubs, but one stopper is enough for this call.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ K J 4 3
♦ J 8 7 2
♣ J 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 29th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
(Sunday) should be different from another day. … There may be no relaxation, but there should be no levity.
Samuel Johnson
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K J 4 3
♥ Q 4
♦ K Q 9 7 6
♣ A K |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ A K 7 5 2
♦ J 8 5 3
♣ 10 9 4 |
♠ A 8 7 6 2
♥ J 6 3
♦ 4
♣ J 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9
♥ 10 9 8
♦ A 10 2
♣ Q 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
There is no certainty that dummy will have any ability to ruff clubs — or indeed that dummy will be able to ruff successfully at all; your partner may be able to over-ruff. So it seems premature to lead a trump at trick one; you will surely have time to shift to a trump later. I prefer to lead the heart 10 to the spade ace, as this is less likely to cost a trick.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8 6 4
♥ 10 8
♦ A 2
♣ A J 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
All pass |
|
July 28th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Holding ♠ Q-9-7, ♥ 3-2, ♦ A-J-8-7-2, ♣ K-7-4, I heard a call of one diamond on my right. I passed this to my partner, who doubled. I passed again for penalty; now my left-hand opponent redoubled for rescue, and his partner ran to one heart. Would pass by me now be forcing? What would you have done?
Pony Up, Boise, Idaho
Pass should not be forcing — your side might easily not have more than half the deck here. You’d expect your partner to double with four trumps and an opening bid, but if he doesn’t, will he bid a suit? I don’t think so, unless he has extras —though he might rebid one no-trump, assuming that you must have a few values.
What criteria do you use when opening a weak two? If your hand is: ♠ Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ K-10-6-4-3-2, ♣ 2, what vulnerability and position might make you uncomfortable about opening?
Rusty Nail, Jackson, Miss.
I would never open this hand in fourth seat. In first or second seat vulnerable, I’d be put off by the suitability for either major and the weak diamond spots. I would always open it in third seat; in first seat non-vulnerable, I’d allow my better instincts to be over-ruled and would pre-empt. But I wouldn’t be proud of myself.
Recently, I held ♠ Q-8-7-4, ♥ 9-5, ♦ A-9-3-2, ♣ A-3-2, and responded one spade to my partner’s opening bid of one heart. My partner raised to two spades, and now I thought once we had found a fit, my hand had some suitability for game. How much more would I need to bid on?
Trying Hard, Corpus Christi, Texas
Your aces are working overtime, but your weak spot cards persuade me that trying for game is too aggressive — particularly because a raise to two spades on three cards would not be a great surprise. Make one of your small diamonds or clubs into a trump, and now you are full value for the raise. (Indeed, I might take a shot at four!)
|
When should honors be announced? Someone told me I should declare honors before playing the hand, but this seems to give the opponents too much information. So when is the best moment?
Adding Up, Edmonton , Alberta
Honors do not have to be claimed at the start of play. It is better to claim them when leading the last card in your sequence or when drawing the last trump. If you neglect the claim, you have until the score for the rubber is finalized to claim honors — but the longer you leave it, the harder it may be to convince your opponents.
Holding ♠ K-10-7-4, ♥ Q-3, ♦ 7-2, ♣ A-K-10-7-4, I responded one spade to partner’s one heart. Over her two-heart rebid, I simply bid the heart game. But three no-trump would have been easy facing my partner’s diamond holding of K-Q-10, while four hearts went down when a finesse lost. Was I just unlucky? My partner thinks I should have bid two clubs first and not shown my spades.
Order and Method, New Orleans, La.
If you agree that this hand is worth a force to game, it makes sense to respond in your longest suit. Bid clubs, then introduce your spades, the latter delivering a four-card suit most, if not all, of the time. The spade call does not say anything about extras beyond your initial statement of game-forcing values, but lets you support hearts later and help your partner decide on the best game.
|
July 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
What I had not foreseen Was the gradual day Weakening the will Leaking the brightness away.
Stephen Spender
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 8 6
♥ 6 4
♦ 8 6 4 2
♣ A K Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 7 5 2
♥ 10 5 2
♦ A K 9 5 3
♣ 10 |
♠ A Q 10 3
♥ 8 7
♦ Q 10 7
♣ J 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ J 4
♥ A K Q J 9 3
♦ J
♣ 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Is this hand worth a game-forcing action? I say no, with precisely zero of your high cards in partner’s suits, and just one spade stopper for no-trump. Imagine how badly three no-trump will play facing a partner with the ace-queen in each of his long suits. If you invite to game by raising to three diamonds, you will rarely miss a good game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 6
♥ 6 4
♦ 8 6 4 2
♣ A K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Reading is to the mind what exercise is to the body.
Joseph Addison
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 6
♥ J 10 3
♦ 9 7 6 4
♣ Q 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ Q 8 7 2
♦ A K 10 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
♠ Q J 3
♥ 6 4
♦ Q J 8 2
♣ K 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 9 8 7 4 2
♥ A K 9 5
♦ 3
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Double by you is takeout, showing extras. Your partner can pass with trump tricks, but if he bids, you will be happy to hear him act no matter what he chooses. While you can bid four clubs, there is no reason to expect your partner has real club length. As usual, it is better to ask your partner what he has than to tell him.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ Q 8 7 2
♦ A K 10 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Tide nor time tarrieth no man.
Robert Greene
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 7 6 2
♥ A K 4 2
♦ K Q J 9
♣ 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 5
♥ 9 7 6
♦ 10 8 6 3
♣ Q 7 5 2 |
♠ K Q 3
♥ Q 10 3
♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ K 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A 9 8 4
♥ J 8 5
♦ A
♣ A J 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦3
Despite your lack of fit for clubs, you probably need to force your hand to game. The best way to start is with a cuebid of two spades, hoping to find a red-suit fit. If you next rebid three no-trump over three clubs, this should imply doubt about whether this is the right contract, allowing your partner to remove from three no-trump with very short spades and an appropriate hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 6 2
♥ A K 4 2
♦ K Q J 9
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If you’re anxious for to shine in the high aesthetic line as a man of culture rare …
W.S. Gilbert
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 8 6 3
♥ —
♦ J 4
♣ A K Q J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ K
♥ Q J 10 8 7 4 2
♦ 6 3
♣ 8 6 5 |
♠ A 4
♥ K 6 5
♦ Q 10 9 8 7 2
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 7 5 2
♥ A 9 3
♦ A K 5
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 ♥ |
4 ♥ |
6 ♥ |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
You have more than enough to join in with a call of two diamonds, which is natural and suggests not much in the way of support for your partner. This hand is worth one call but not two, and it certainly feels like it is more about diamonds than spade support.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 4
♥ K 6 5
♦ Q 10 9 8 7 2
♣ 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Courtesy is fundamental: Sometimes it keeps at bay even snarling people.
Fausto Cercignani
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 10 9
♥ A J 8 7 5 3
♦ A 5
♣ K |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ K Q 9 4
♦ Q 6 4
♣ J 9 7 3 |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 10 2
♦ K J 8 7 2
♣ Q 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 4
♥ 6
♦ 10 9 3
♣ A 8 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
It looks easy enough to bid three diamonds here, but sometimes your partner will have extras with four hearts and five clubs, and you will have gone past your best strain. Wouldn’t it be better to offer partner a choice of minors? You can do that with a call of two no-trump. Your failure to bid one no-trump at your first turn means that the call now suggests this sort of pattern in the minors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 10 2
♦ K J 8 7 2
♣ Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
In statesmanship get the formalities right, never mind about the moralities.
Mark Twain
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 3
♥ K 7 5
♦ K Q 9 5
♣ K J 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 4
♥ 9 8 6 3
♦ 3
♣ 8 4 2 |
♠ 8 6 5 2
♥ 10 4 2
♦ J 6 4 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K Q
♥ A Q J
♦ A 10 8 7
♣ A Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
7 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
On blind auctions, it is easy to lead from real length or from sequences. If you can’t do either, you want to find your partner if you are weak, or try to avoid blowing tricks if you have nothing attractive to lead. Leading from ace-third is out. Of the two four-card suits, I prefer almost anything to leading from ace-fourth. A small diamond is the least of all evils, but a doubleton club is not completely absurd.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5 2
♥ A 9 3
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
July 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, July 7th, 2019
|
What can you do at the duplicate club when you fear you may not have time to finish a round, but your opponents insist on discussing who should have done what on an earlier deal? Do you have a patented method to limit conversations?
Tony the Tortoise, Olympia, Wash.
You cannot stop a postmortem when a partnership is trying to apportion blame. I try humor or downright sarcasm. “I’m sorry to have held you up — we can catch up if we start the new deal at once.” If my partner is talking to just one of the opponents, I sometimes ask the innocent opponent please to stop talking. If the discussion has been about clothes (as it so often is), I compliment my male opponent on his shoes.
In fourth seat, would you open at rubber bridge, Chicago scoring, at favorable vulnerability with: ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ Q-5-3, ♦ 10-5, ♣ K-9-4-2. If so, with what call?
Tubby the Tuba, Horn Lake, Miss.
For the benefit of my readers who are unfamiliar with Chicago scoring, you play four deals with the same partner; one hand at each of the four vulnerabilities. To take advantage of the opponents’ vulnerability, you should make sure to bid here. I suggest you open one spade to keep the opponents out.
Recently I held ♠ A-8, ♥ K-J-7-6, ♦ K-Q-J-6-4-3, ♣ 8. I opened one diamond and heard my left-hand opponent bid one spade. My partner doubled, and the next hand bid four spades. What would you advocate, and why?
Humble Pie, San Antonio, Texas
Double would be extras and not specifically takeout. Your partner would remove only with real extra shape, but here it is you with the shape. Accordingly, I would bid four no-trump, intending it to be diamonds and a second suit. If your partner bids five clubs, you can correct to five diamonds to show the red suits and a hand like this one.
|
Yesterday afternoon, after passing in first chair with: ♠ Q-J, ♥ Q-9-6-5-4, ♦ J-9-3, ♣ A-10-3, I heard my partner open two no-trump. Is this hand worth a slam try, or would you simply sign off in game (and where)?
Lumpfish, Huntington, W. Va.
All your soft values suggest that you might not want to find hearts even if you have a 5-3 fit. I wouldn’t want to try for slam unless I found four hearts opposite, so I would use Stayman rather than transferring. My plan is to opt for three no-trump unless partner shows hearts. If he does, I will bid three spades, an artificial call to set hearts as trump and show at least a little slam interest.
When would you suggest leading an unsupported ace against a suit if you have bid or overcalled in that suit and your partner has raised?
Sceptic Tank, Huntsville, Ala.
Against part-scores, the need to cash out is far smaller than against a game — the likelihood is that your opponents have limited values. When your partner shows four or more trumps, the likelihood of it being wrong to cash out the ace drops dramatically. Facing a simple raise, leading an unsupported ace — especially when your right-hand opponent is strong — is normally a council of desperation.
|
|
In “Master Play in Contract Bridge,” Terence Reese shows this intriguing deal played by world champion Karl Schneider of Austria in an early European Championship game.
Both tables played four spades. After a club lead, the British declarer drew four rounds of trumps, then successfully finessed the diamond queen for a heart discard.
But at the other table, on the auction shown, West led the diamond three. Declarer guessed to win the diamond ace, then played a spade to the nine, putting West on play before he had had a chance to observe his partner’s discards. West laid down the heart ace, but could not read his partner’s heart four, so switched to a club, hoping that his partner had the ace. When East correctly played low, South won cheaply and ran his four top trumps. Then he cashed the club ace and played the last spade.
In the three-card ending, dummy had the bare heart queen and the K-9 of clubs, while South had the bare club queen and two hearts in hand. East had to pitch a heart to keep his club guard, so South cashed the club queen, exited with a heart and won the last trick with dummy’s club king.
West’s defense would have been right if South had held the heart king and something like Q-J-x in clubs. But would South then have ducked the first trump? West’s heart holding should have told him that declarer’s strategy of ducking an early trump must have been based on hoping to discard hearts on clubs, not clubs on hearts.