September 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 9th, 2019
He’s a muddle-headed fool with frequent lucid intervals.
Miguel de Cervantes
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ A J
♥ A J 2
♦ K Q 7 3 2
♣ A 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 2
♥ K Q 10 7 3
♦ 10 8
♣ J 6 |
♠ 6
♥ 9 6 5 4
♦ J 9 5
♣ 10 8 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 8 7 5 4 3
♥ 8
♦ A 6 4
♣ K Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
I would lead a club. Dummy’s long spades are looming for discards, and unless we cash our top tricks right away, we may never score them. Even though our respective lengths suggest that more diamond tricks will stand up than clubs, we need much less from partner in clubs. Arguably, the king might be the right card to offer up, allowing us to retain the lead if a diamond shift looks necessary at trick two.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4 3
♥ 7 3
♦ J 10 8
♣ K J 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Recently, you discussed a sequence in which opener bids one spade and the next hand overcalls two clubs. What options are available in the modern game of raising spades, and how would that change for a passed hand?
Pick-up Pete, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
Clearly bidding spades at the two-, three- and four-levels means the same whether you are a passed hand or not, with a cuebid suggesting a high-card limit raise or better. But by a passed hand you can play fit jumps in new suits, while as an unpassed hand you may prefer to use those sequences as natural and weak.
Playing two-over-one, my partner opened one club. I held: ♠ J-9-3, ♥ K-5, ♦ A-J-10-6-3-2, ♣ 10-4. I was planning to bid and rebid my diamonds, but my right-hand opopnent overcalled one spade, and now I did not know if a two-diamond response would constitute an overbid.
Roman Candle, Palm Springs, Calif.
In competition, the doctrine of two-over-one as game forcing can be set aside, since you have to be able to bid when you have shape and some values. Playing weak jump responses, this hand is far too strong, but it is well within the constraints for bidding and rebidding diamonds to suggest quasi-invitational values.
When overcalling a strong no-trump to show a single-suited or two-suited hand, what criteria should I use to decide whether to act or pass in direct and balancing seat? And how should I think about this system at pairs as opposed to teams?
Dumbo, Rockford, Ill.
At teams and at pairs when vulnerable and in direct seat, try to wait for the right shape to bid, since the penalties for wandering in inappropriately can be severe. In balancing seat, and especially non-vulnerable or when a passed hand, I strive to act with any excuse. Sometimes my idea of what is reasonable can be distinctly dubious. Playing a method that allows you to bid with both one-suited and two-suited hands is advisable.
|
What is the best defense against opponents’ three-level pre-emptive bids? I play Michaels Cuebids, but recently my partner mentioned that the principle could be extended to more situations than just a cue-bid. I’m assuming these methods should be combined with take-out doubles and a natural bid in no-trump.
Headliner, Newark, N.J.
Yes, if you play take-out doubles and a natural three no-trump call over a major-suit pre-empt, you can, if you want, give up on playing four of a minor as natural. Instead, play it as that minor and the unbid major, 5-5 pattern. Here, the cue-bid of the major would either be both minors or whatever else you want it to be.
Holding ♠ Q-10-5-4, ♥ 6, ♦ 8-6, ♣ K-10-6-5-4-2 at favorable vulnerability, I heard my partner bid three spades over a one-heart opening. My right-hand-opponent raised to four hearts. What would you do?
Sleeping Dogs, Columbia, S.C.
I do not normally like to jump raise to the five-level pre-emptively, because the opponents often misjudge and decide to defend a level lower. Here, however, I would guess to cramp the bidding with a five-spade bid, hoping to give my opponents the last guess. Will I save if they bid slam? I’m glad you didn’t ask!
|
September 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Against the disease of writing one must take special precautions, since it is a dangerous and contagious disease.
Peter Abelard
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 5
♥ J 9 4 2
♦ A Q J 6 5 3
♣ J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 4 3
♥ A
♦ K 10 8
♣ Q 9 8 3 |
♠ A 9 7 2
♥ 10 7 6 5
♦ 9
♣ K 10 6 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q J
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣3
This is not a great 15-count I admit, but it feels like you should take a call. The choice is to bid one no-trump (ugly without a diamond stopper) or to double with only three cards in an unbid major. Your slight extra values suggest that you have just enough compensation for the lack of shape. so I would double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J
♥ K Q 8 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
A severed foot is the ultimate stocking stuffer.
Mitch Hedberg
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A 6
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A K Q 4
♣ K 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 9 8 2
♥ 8
♦ 9 3 2
♣ Q 10 6 |
♠ 3
♥ J 10 9 3
♦ J 10 7 5
♣ J 9 8 4 |
| South |
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A K 6 5 2
♦ 8 6
♣ A 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
I would take the slow route with a two-heart cue-bid. A jump to the no-trump game would be premature; we could easily belong in spades or even a minor suit. This cue-bid does not guarantee spade support, and I plan to suggest no-trump later, to show a flexible hand with doubts as to the best strain. You would not bid this way with only a singleton spade, so partner can always convert to four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6
♥ Q 7 4
♦ A K Q 4
♣ K 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 5th, 2019
God be thanked, the meanest of his creatures Boasts two soul-sides; one to face the world with, One to show a woman when he loves her!
Robert Browning
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 9 5
♥ A K 6
♦ 10 9 8
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6
♥ 10 9
♦ K Q 5
♣ K J 10 9 3 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 8 7 5 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 7 4 3 2
♥ J 4 3
♦ A 4 3 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
Clearly the hand is far too good to pass two hearts. Should you drive to four hearts or consult your partner by making an invitational raise? Here, the singleton in partner’s suit is more useful than usual because of the fifth trump. At teams, I could understand driving to game, but at pairs, a simple raise looks right to protect the plus score.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8
♥ Q 8 7 5 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ A 8 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
A writer is somebody for whom writing is more difficult than it is for other people.
Thomas Mann
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 8 6 2
♥ K Q
♦ K 9 6 4
♣ 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 9 4 3
♥ 5 4
♦ Q J 8 2
♣ Q 5 |
♠ 7 5
♥ A J 10 9 8 3
♦ 10 7 5
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ 10
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A 3
♣ A K 10 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
It is risky, but three no-trump is where the money is. I hope to run the club suit, scoring nine quick tricks with partner’s hoped-for major-suit ace. If my major suit holdings were swapped, I would of course raise partner’s suit. And will I sit for it if doubled? I’m glad I don’t have enough space to answer that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A 3
♣ A K 10 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
3 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
A community is like a ship; everyone ought to be prepared to take the helm.
Henrik Ibsen
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A J 5
♥ 7 5
♦ J 9 7 5 4
♣ K 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 2
♦ A K Q 6 2
♣ 9 6 3 2 |
♠ 8 7 6 2
♥ K J 6 3
♦ 10
♣ A J 10 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 9 4
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ 8 3
♣ Q 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl.* |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Three hearts
♦K
I would pass here. A two-level overcall usually promises a six-card suit and for good reason. Even though I have excellent diamonds and want them led, I have no desire to win the contract, and my heart holding is very bad for declaring. The real danger may be that partner leads a club, not a diamond, against a spade game; I’ll pay off to that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ 10 9 2
♦ A K Q 6 2
♣ 9 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 16th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Truth sits upon the lips of dying men.
Matthew Arnold
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 9 6 4
♥ K 8 5 4
♦ A 9
♣ A 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 3
♥ 9 6 3 2
♦ K J 10 8 5 3 2
♣ — |
♠ Q J 8 7 5
♥ —
♦ 6 4
♣ J 10 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A Q J 10 7
♦ Q 7
♣ K Q 7 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
3 ♦ |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♠ * |
Pass |
| 7 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Asking for the trump queen
♥2
I would lead the diamond two. My best shot appears to be to give partner a diamond ruff when I get in with the heart ace. It is unlikely that a club trick will stand up, but if it does, we can probably try it later on. Note that a spade lead is unlikely to do much good. If partner has the spade king over dummy’s ace, he will probably score it sooner or later.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 2
♥ A 5
♦ 10 8 6 2
♣ K 8 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
| 5 ♣ |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
September 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 1st, 2019
|
Does a successful doubled contract produce a game even if game has not been bid, or do the extra scores go above the line? Both interpretations make sense to me, but which is correct?
Bonus Baby, Tucson, Ariz.
When you make a doubled part-score, the score for the contract goes below the line. Thus, three diamonds doubled scores as twice 60 or 120. Since that number exceeds 100, it qualifies for the game bonus. The insult, game bonus, and overtricks go above the line — as usual. Two clubs doubled scores as 80 — thus no game bonus; two diamonds redoubled is 160 and thus generates the game bonus.
I heard my partner open with an artificial two-club bid with ♠ A Q-9-4-2, ♥ —-, ♦ A-Q-10, ♣ A-J-10-9-5. I responded two diamonds, then raised a two-spade call to game with ♠ K-J-8-6-3, ♥ J-9-4, ♦ 8-3-2, ♣ 8-4, and we played there. How might we have bid our cards to slam — or should we have been content with game?
Orpheus, Hartford, Conn.
A two-club opening on an unbalanced hand is game-forcing unless responder bids two diamonds, then issues a double negative at his second turn. Your partner should have opened one spade; after you jumped to four spades, he could have shot to slam — which is an excellent spot. Of course, had you raised two spades to three (showing a better hand than a jump to game), you still might have recovered.
Holding ♠ Q-10-5-4, ♥ A, ♦ A-10-8-2, ♣ A-Q-J-4, it felt right to open one diamond and jump to three spades over the one-spade response. My partner felt I could have driven to game or even bid four hearts as a splinter raise. Where do you stand on this issue?
Billy Goat, Augusta, Ga.
Your values are on the cusp between a drive to game and an invitation — the singleton ace doesn’t really pull its full weight. I wouldn’t jump to four hearts with a 4-1-4-4 shape unless I had full value in high cards. This hand is not worth that action, so your choice was a little pessimistic but entirely reasonable.
|
How important do you think it is to learn the precise percentages at bridge? How much of correct declarer play and defense is about table feel and table presence?
10 Gallon Matt, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
You do not have to learn all the percentages; a few simple ones are enough. (Kelsey and Glauert’s book on practical odds should suffice.) Table presence outranks percentages all the time! But you must learn to hone your card-reading skills, to try to learn when you can trust your instincts and when you cannot.
Holding ♠ A-J-9, ♥ K-Q-J-9-3-2, ♦ 10-2, ♣ A-J, my partner opened three diamonds in first chair. Would your decision to bid on or pass be influenced by vulnerability more than by your choice of partner? Would it matter if the pre-empt was in second seat?
Steven’s Son, Detroit, Mich.
I know that four hearts might make when facing heart length, but if I bid three hearts, will partner be able to bid three no-trump if he has no fit in hearts? Probably not. It is much more likely that I can make three no-trump my way up, so I might gamble it out. Facing a pre-empt in first seat at favorable vulnerability, I would pass.
|
September 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Do not commence your exercises in philosophy in those regions where an error can deliver you over to the executioner.
Georg Christoph Lichtenberg
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ K 5
♥ A Q 8 7 5
♦ A 6 5
♣ 8 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 8 4
♥ 10 9 4 2
♦ 8
♣ J 9 2 |
♠ Q 7 2
♥ K J
♦ K 10 9 2
♣ Q 10 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ 6 3
♦ Q J 7 4 3
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
This auction should be played as forcing. If your partner had a limit raise in diamonds, he would invite at his first turn or pass your non-forcing three-club call. If you believe you are being forced to act, bid three spades, showing values and implicitly denying even half a heart stop, in which case you would have bid three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 3
♥ 6 3
♦ Q J 7 4 3
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This week’s themed deals are based on mandatory falsecards in defense. When it cannot deceive partner, or if doing so will not matter, it may pay to try to lead declarer astray.
South somewhat prematurely committed to six spades instead of six diamonds here; then he had to make it. Having taken the heart lead in dummy, he focused on bringing the trumps in for one loser. There would be no problem on a 3-2 break, so declarer turned his mind to the possibility of a 4-1 split.
The percentage play here is simply to finesse the jack, gaining against the four cases of queenfourth onside compared with the one instance of a bare queen offside. This is what declarer would have done if West had followed lazily with the two. But West tried the effect of contributing the 10 at his first turn, offering declarer an alternative.
Seeing that he could now protect a singleton 10 to his left, declarer rose with the ace and returned the jack — and was mightily discomfited when East showed out.
South was just a little naive here. When the spade 10 or nine appeared, rising with the spade ace was playing against the odds. And note that South had an extra chance even if he finessed into East’s four-card suit. After a club return, declarer would win in hand, cross to the trump ace and diamond king to ruff hearts, then try to run the diamonds. If East had been forced to follow to three diamond leads, declarer would have finished in dummy at trick 12 for a trump coup.