August 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Now for good luck, cast an old shoe after me.
John Heywood
W |
North |
Both |
♠ A 3 2
♥ 5 4
♦ A J 10 9 4
♣ K Q 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 4
♥ 10 6
♦ 8 3 2
♣ J 8 7 |
♠ 8 7
♥ 9 8 7 3
♦ K 7 6 5
♣ A 10 9 |
South |
♠ 9 6 5
♥ A K Q J 2
♦ Q
♣ 6 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
♠K
With a choice of suits to lead on a blind auction, it’s common to lead from a five-card holding or from a sequence of honors. When you don’t have that choice and are confronted by two four-card majors, try not to give up a trick if you can. That makes a spade lead far more attractive than a heart; I’d lead the seven, not the three (second from four small, top from three small), but either card is acceptable.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ A Q 9 4
♦ J 4
♣ Q 10 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
August 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
I’m a long-time party bridge player (Chicago scoring), and I’m beginning to play duplicate, but I’m struggling. I know there are some differences in the two philosophies, for example, in sacrificing at duplicate. Can you recommend a book to help me to get into playing duplicate?
Heartless Hal, Dallas, Texas
I like “The Complete Book of Duplicate Bridge” by Kay, Silodor and Karpin, and “Duplicate Bridge: How to Play, How to Win” by Edgar Kaplan. Both books cover the basics well. Anything by Mike Lawrence or Reese, Kelsey and Kantar is worth reading. For modern bidding techniques, Larry Cohen has written a lot about the Law of Total Tricks.
If declarer has revoked in a doubled vulnerable contract and is set one trick, which becomes two after the penalty, how much will that cost him? Are both undertricks calculated based on the double? In addition, if the doubled contract had been made, how would the revoke trick penalty be handled?
Score Keeper, Walnut Creek, Calif.
Revokes are tricky things (generally a one-trick penalty, but occasionally two), but you did not ask me that question, so I won’t answer it! First of all, calculate the result of the contract in terms of making or going down, after the revoke penalty. Then look at the score. The answer here is down one, plus a revoke penalty to make it down two; that is 500, and the number goes above the line — hopefully on your side.
In a duplicate pairs event, as dealer I held ♠ A-J, ♥ K-9-8-6-2, ♦ A-Q-4-3, ♣ A-J and opened one heart. My LHO overcalled one spade, and my partner doubled. When I jumped to three diamonds, thinking it was forcing, we played there and missed a game. Should I have bid no-trump on the second round? Was my sequence invitational?
Missing Parson, Waterbury, Conn.
A jump in a new suit to three diamonds in a noncompetitive auction would clearly be natural and forcing. But once your partner suggests the minors, the jump is invitational (your actual hand if the spade ace were the two), since you are essentially raising him, not bidding a new suit. Cue-bid two spades, then bid three diamonds to set up the force. When you can get directly to a spot or go through a cue-bid, fourth suit or the new minor, the latter tends to be forcing, the former invitational.
|
Holding ♠ J, ♥ Q-7-4-2, ♦ A-9-7-3-2, ♣ A-Q-4, I opened one diamond and rebid one no-trump, over my partner’s one-spade response. It seemed wrong to me to repeat my diamonds, but my partner said that a response of one no-trump guaranteed a balanced hand and denied a singleton spade. What are your views here?
One for the Road, Mason City, Iowa
Your choice was a practical one: Two hearts would be a reverse because it would force preference at the three-level and promise extras. Since repeating diamonds would overstate your suit, your only choice is to bid one no-trump unless you feel like fabricating a club suit. When strong, partner should have the New Minor Relay available to find out whether you like spades before committing the hand to play in that suit.
I recently opened one heart, and when my partner responded two clubs, I opted not to make a splinter-raise of my partner’s suit with a minimum hand and a singleton ace in a side-suit. As I understand it, one should not normally make such a call when the suit is a singleton top honor. Is that approach correct?
Leapy Lee, Portland, Maine
I’m not averse to splintering with such holdings, but only if the hand contains full value for my action. A simple rule is to down-value the hand by two points, and if the hand is still worth a splinter, make it. This applies especially in auctions that are not game-forcing, when responder has bid at the one-level.
|
August 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
You can never plan the future by the past.
Edmund Burke
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ A 8 3 2
♥ 6
♦ 7 2
♣ A 8 6 5 4 2 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K J 9 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 4
♣ Q 10 9 7 |
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ K J 9 3
♣ J |
South |
♠ K Q 10 9 6
♥ Q 10 5
♦ A 6 5
♣ K 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT * |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*9-12 HCP; raise in spades with unspecified shortness
♦4
The answer here may be more about style than judgment. I would respond one heart, hoping to find a major-suit fit. I tend to use the one-diamond response as natural but tending to deny a major unless in a game-forcing hand. So in response to one diamond as opener, I would tend to bypass rebidding a major if balanced. Thus, the one-heart response helps us find our side’s fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ K 10 9 3
♣ J |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
People under pressure don’t work better; they just work faster.
Tom DeMarco
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ A Q 6 2
♥ A 5 3
♦ 4 3 2
♣ K 10 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ Q J 10 8 6 4 2
♦ J 8
♣ 8 5 2 |
♠ J 10 8 5 3
♥ —
♦ Q 10 9 7 5
♣ 9 7 3 |
South |
♠ K 7 4
♥ K 9 7
♦ A K 6
♣ A Q J 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
You are torn between your desire to get out of hearts and your lack of values, suggesting that you should not encourage your partner to go any higher. With a minor club honor, I might risk two no-trump; as it is, I think passing is the safer approach.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8 5 3
♥ —
♦ Q 10 9 7 5
♣ 9 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The face is the mirror of the mind, and eyes without speaking confess the secrets of the heart.
Saint Jerome
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ K Q 10 9 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ Q 9 4
♣ A K |
West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ Q 8 4
♦ 7 5 3 2
♣ J 10 9 7 5 |
♠ 4 3
♥ J 10 5 2
♦ K 10 6
♣ 8 6 4 3 |
South |
♠ A J 8 6 5
♥ A 9 3
♦ A J 8
♣ Q 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
♣J
In this auction, the range for the one-no-trump response is wider than it would be if your LHO had passed over one spade. The point is that your partner would probably pass rather than bid one no-trump with scattered values, such as a balanced 5- or 6-point hand. I would look favorably on my spade spots and bid three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 9 2
♥ K 7 6
♦ Q 9 4
♣ A K |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
If a man looks sharply and attentively, he shall see Fortune; for though she is blind, she is not invisible.
Francis Bacon
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ Q 5 3
♥ K 8 2
♦ 8 3
♣ A K Q 5 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ Q 6
♦ Q 10 9 4
♣ 10 8 6 4 |
♠ K J 10 4 2
♥ J 10 9 7
♦ 7 2
♣ J 7 |
South |
♠ A 9
♥ A 5 4 3
♦ A K J 6 5
♣ 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♠8
Your extra values require you to reopen. One option is to bid three diamonds (which might lose hearts); the second is to make a second double. If you do double and your partner bids two no-trump, that will show two places to play, while his call of three clubs would show a single-suited hand. Of course, that doesn’t answer the question of whether you should then pass or correct to three diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9
♥ A 5 4 3
♦ A K J 6 5
♣ 9 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful.
George P. Box
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ K 7 2
♦ J 5
♣ A 8 5 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 5 2
♥ J 8 3
♦ A Q 10 6
♣ J 10 9 2 |
♠ 6 3
♥ Q 10 9 4
♦ 9 8 7 2
♣ K Q 7 |
South |
♠ A J 10 9 7
♥ A 6 5
♦ K 4 3
♣ 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game forcing with spade support
♣J
In situations of this sort, there is some risk in reopening with a take-out double. But you cannot afford to pass and sell out, only to find your side has missed a game or a sizeable penalty. If your RHO were strong, he probably would have acted, so you must play the percentages and double now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 8 4
♥ K 7 2
♦ J 5
♣ A 8 5 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
August 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 18 Comments
We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other reason than only freedom can make security more secure.
Karl Popper
N |
North |
Both |
♠ 10 7 5 4
♥ A K
♦ K 8
♣ Q J 9 7 6 |
West |
East |
♠ J 3
♥ 10 8 5 4
♦ J 4 3 2
♣ K 8 3 |
♠ A Q 9 8 2
♥ 9 7 6
♦ Q 9 6 5
♣ 4 |
South |
♠ K 6
♥ Q J 3 2
♦ A 10 7
♣ A 10 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
Your partner rates to have four spades and four hearts, perhaps with a 4=4=2=3 pattern. So I can see the logic in leading a heart to try to set up tricks there. If you need to set up a slow spade winner, there may still be time, but this might be your last chance to lead hearts through declarer.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 8 4
♥ 8 5 4
♦ Q 7 3 2
♣ J 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
August 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
What are your favorite cities for the national and regional tournaments in the U.S.? I have decided to try to play seriously, but am not sure where to get my feet wet.
Pizza Man, Bristol, Va.
You just missed out on Philadelphia, a great venue and a city my wife loves. Hawaii this fall is an atypical venue, but a great locale nonetheless. Seattle and Vancouver for West Coast fans are certainly worth considering. And New Orleans (if not in midsummer) has much to recommend it because of the food and music.
I always have assumed that when a card becomes visible to the whole table, you have to play it. Is that right for both declarer and defenders?
Penang Lawyer, Corpus Christi, Texas
The defenders are held to higher standards than declarer because their partner may receive unauthorized information from a half-played card. If your partner could see the card, it must be played. Declarer’s card will be deemed played when declarer deliberately plays a card that either touches or nearly touches the table. There may be some ambiguity if a card is detached but the play of the card is not complete.
Can you give me a general approach to responding to a strong no-trump with an 8-count and zero, one or two majors? Should you invite game — and does it matter whether you use Stayman or raise to two no-trump?
High Heels, Torrance, Calif.
I try to avoid using Stayman to invite game without a major. It gives so much information to the hand on lead that I tend to pass with 8 and drive to game with a decent 9-count. With both majors, using Stayman has three upsides: finding a fit in either suit or reaching game facing a maximum. With only one major, especially at pairs, I tend to pass unless short in clubs. In that case, I could pass and play diamonds or the 4-3 fit in the other major.
|
What is your view on opening two diamonds, holding: ♠ 10-8, ♥ Q-7-4-2, ♦ A-J-9-5-3-2, ♣ 4? Does your opinion change depending on whether you are in first, second or third seat, and does the vulnerability matter?
Silent Speaker, Twin Falls, Idaho
My arbitrary cut-off point for opening a weak two with a side four-card major is Q-10-3-2. I would not want to lose a fit with a side suit that good, but if I did conceal the major, my minor suit would have to be a good one. That means either two top honors or one honor with great intermediates. This applies in any seat or at any vulnerability, but the expected high-card point count in second seat, or vulnerable, is slightly higher.
I’m confused by responsive doubles, when the opponents have bid and raised a suit around a double from my partner. What does the call say about bid and unbid majors? I’m especially flummoxed by what happens when the opponents bid and raise spades.
Muddling Through, Lakeland, Fla.
After a minor is bid and raised, you play natural methods, and that includes two no-trump. After hearts are bid and raised, double typically shows both majors, all calls including two no-trump are natural. After spades are bid and raised, bid hearts if you have them, using a direct call of three hearts as a mild invitation, and double for the minors (or a purely competitive hand with hearts). You can, if you want, consider using two no-trump as artificial when the majors are bid and raised. This would be an extension of the Lebensohl concept. I’ll go into that next month.
|
August 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
There will always be a part, and always a very large part of every community, that have no care but for themselves, and whose care for themselves reaches little further than impatience of immediate pain, and eagerness for the nearest good.
Samuel Johnson
N |
North |
None |
♠ K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ A J 10 4
♣ J 10 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6
♥ Q 6 4
♦ K 9 7 2
♣ 6 2 |
♠ A 10 5 2
♥ J 9
♦ Q 6
♣ K Q 9 8 7 |
South |
♠ —
♥ A K 10 8 7 2
♦ 8 5 3
♣ A 5 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦7
Just because East has shown spades doesn’t mean you cannot develop your hand straightforwardly by bidding your spade suit. Your partner knows you are a passed hand, so he won’t be playing you for a spectacular suit if you bid one spade. But this way, you get to show your values and suit lengths.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ A J 10 4
♣ J 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
|
When West leads the spade king against four hearts, South can see the danger of losing two spades and two clubs. There are only nine top winners, but diamonds offer an additional source of tricks.
South wins the spade ace at trick one and draws trumps, pitching spades from dummy. Then he leads his diamond queen to dummy’s ace and returns the diamond jack for a ruffing finesse. Beware! If South trumps in when East plays the king, West may be able to get in and run spades, since declarer will be out of trumps. Instead, South pitches a spade and will now make it home if either spades are 6-1 or East has the club ace.
If West had held the diamond king, South would have run the diamond jack, pitching a spade, and would have lost the trick to him. However, the contract would still have had play at that point. West could have taken the diamond king but would retain only one additional spade to cash. Declarer would still come home when the club ace was offside, since East could not prevent him from reaching dummy eventually to cash out the diamonds.
As the cards lie, the diamond king is in a favorable position, and when East is allowed to win the trick with that card, he can play a spade. West can take one trick there, but declarer will eventually force an entry in clubs to dummy’s winners.
Note: Had declarer taken a straightforward losing diamond finesse, he would go down when the club ace was onside, or when spades were 5-2. West would have an entry to cash out enough spade winners to set the game.