July 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I understand that opener’s jump shift at his second turn is forcing to game. Is there a way for responder to hit the brakes after this start to a sequence?
Trapper John, Atlantic City, N.J.
Some people use the same basic idea that they employ over a reverse, a call that is forcing for one round but not to game. They play that responder’s only weak action is the cheaper of fourth suit and two no-trump. So after opener opens one club and jumps to two spades over a one-diamond response, responder’s two no-trump call is artificial and weak. Over opener’s jump to two hearts, a call of two spades would similarly be weak.
In a recent article, you described dealing and picking up a hand of ♠ K-J-9-8-3, ♥ A-9, ♦ J-6, ♣ Q-7-4-2. Passing worked well with this hand, but I must admit I would have opened the bidding with one spade. What are the precise criteria for bidding or passing here?
Fishhooks Miami, Fla.
This hand is a marginal opening bid. While opening would not be out of line, the possibly awkward rebid over a response of two diamonds or two hearts argue against bidding. With a side suit of hearts or even possibly diamonds, the rebid problem looks less awkward. Non-vulnerable at pairs, I might open, but I would surely pass if vulnerable.
Please discuss how modern experts use a jump to five no-trump these days. Has the grand slam force gone the way of the landline telephone?
Old-fashioned, Newport News, Va.
The use of Key-card Blackwood among many experts has led many top players to use the call of five no-trump as a maneuver to try to locate the right strain, a “choice-of-slam” request. This helps the partnership identify strong or long suits when there is some ambiguity about the best fit.
|
Is there a role for asking bids, as opposed to cue-bids, these days?
Filet Mignon, Washington, D.C.
Asking bids fit well into a strong club base, but (with the exception of some Danish experts) top players tend to use a cue-bidding style instead. The closest thing to asking bids in common usage might be fourthsuit calls to look for a stopper, not a control.
When you play two-over-one and a semi-forcing no-trump with ♠ A-K-7-3, ♥ K-J-4-3-2, ♦ Q-6-4, ♣ 9, you would open one heart, I assume. But if you hear a one-no-trump response, do you pass or rebid two diamonds, two hearts or two spades?
Blinky Bill, Selma, Ala.
Clearly, a two-spade rebid is out; that shows at least an ace more than your current hand. Rebidding two hearts with a weak suit is unattractive, so the choice is to pass (which I would do if the diamond four were the club four) or bid two diamonds, which suggests but does not guarantee four. I prefer to bid two diamonds, but on the actual hand I’d be more likely to pass if my partner were a passed hand, since I won’t be facing a limit raise in hearts. And since a response of two clubs would be artificial (Drury), that means he is more likely to have length in clubs than any other suit.
|
July 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
That wild-goose chase of yours is going to lay an egg.— Lou Costello in “The Wistful
Wagon Gap”
S |
North |
Both |
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 10 8 |
West |
East |
♠ 8 6 4
♥ J 10 4 3
♦ 10 9 6
♣ 9 4 2 |
♠ A Q J 10 7 5
♥ K
♦ A 8 7 5
♣ 7 5 |
South |
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 8 7 6
♦ K 3
♣ A K J 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
This hand is not really worth a drive to game. The choice is whether to cue-bid two clubs en route to two no-trump, or just to jump directly to two no-trump. I prefer the latter route, since the first sequence might suggest a four-card major. I only want to play a major if my partner can introduce it voluntarily, suggesting a five-card suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 10 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
July 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.
Thomas Brooks
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ K 7 6
♥ A 4
♦ A K 8 7 6 5 3
♣ 6 |
West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ K J 6 2
♦ 2
♣ A 9 8 4 |
♠ 3
♥ Q 9 7 5
♦ J 9 4
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
South |
♠ A Q 10 5 4
♥ 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
Illogical as it might seem, this hand is closer to driving to three no-trump than it is to a pass of two spades. Your intermediates, especially the spade 10, suggest that you might make game on very few values altogether if you can set up spades. I would bid two no-trump, but would have sympathy for a jump to three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 5 4
♥ 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
July 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The need for mystery is greater than the need for an answer.
Ken Kesey
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ Q 6
♥ A 8 5 4
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 7 6 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 8 5 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ A 9 3 |
♠ 7
♥ 10 6
♦ Q J 9 5 3 2
♣ J 10 8 4 |
South |
♠ A J 10 9 2
♥ Q 7 2
♦ A K 8
♣ Q 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*Majors
♠4
Although your heart honors are well placed, you can see that you have no real fit for partner’s suits, so no source of tricks. It looks logical here to bid two no-trump, the value of your hand, rather than jump to the no-trump game. If partner passes, I’d expect you to struggle to come to eight tricks.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ A 9 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
July 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Never wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will like it.
Irish proverb
S |
North |
Both |
♠ K Q J 10
♥ J 2
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ Q 8 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 10 9 7
♦ Q J 8 4
♣ K 9 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ 8 6 5 3
♦ 6
♣ J 10 4 2 |
South |
♠ A 5
♥ A K Q 4
♦ A K 9 3
♣ A 7 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 NT * |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♥10
Facing what you hope is a maximum pass, you should try to compete in a major suit. It looks sensible to try to make partner declarer to protect his tenaces, and you want to try to find a 4-4 major-suit fit. The easiest way here is to cue-bid two diamonds to get your partner to pick a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 10
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ J 2
♣ Q 8 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
? |
|
|
|
July 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 24 Comments
Science has taught us how to put the atom to work. But to make it work for good instead of for evil lies in the domain dealing with the principles of human duty. We are now facing a problem more of ethics than physics.
Bernard Baruch
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A Q J |
West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ A K Q J 7
♦ K J 6
♣ 9 6 4 3 |
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 9 6
♦ 10 5 4
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
South |
♠ A Q J 8 5
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ A Q
♣ K 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♥K
Your partner has a minimum take-out double, and you have a hand with no clear direction, but your trumps are too weak to consider defending. I’d bid two no-trump, which is not to play (though if partner forgets, you won’t mind too much!), but suggests partner bid a minor. You surely have longer diamonds than clubs, or you would bid three clubs yourself.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A Q J |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
July 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The fundamental principles and indispensable postulates of every genuinely productive science are not based on pure logic but rather on the metaphysical hypothesis — which no rules of logic can refute — that there exists an outer world which is entirely independent of ourselves.
Max Planck
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 10 8 7 6 2
♣ J 7 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 4 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 5
♣ K 10 9 5 |
♠ J 5
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ A J 3
♣ Q 8 6 2 |
South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ J 9 4
♦ K 9 4
♣ A 4 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
While you might engineer a trump promotion by leading hearts, that’s likely to set up discards for declarer. It is simpler and more logical to lead the diamond jack to try to set up tricks or force declarer to trump. If in doubt, assume that when you have been dealt a sequence, you should lead it, hoping that your problem will come at trick two, not trick one.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 9 6
♦ J 10 4
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
July 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I held ♠ K-9-4-3, ♥ 10-5-3, ♦ Q-10-4-2, ♣ J-4 and raised my partner’s opening bid of one spade to two. What is the right continuation over a call of three diamonds from my partner?
Phoenix Rising, Grenada, Miss.
My partnership style is to use new suits here as a game try. Typically, the call is based on length, with a holding of three or four cards to an honor, so your hand has two big plusses: one based on your decent long trumps, and the other your useful diamond holding, which rates to cover some of your partner’s losers. So I would bid game. By the way, with the club ace instead of the jack, I would raise to four diamonds or cuebid four clubs, in case partner has a slam try.
My partner suggested to me that we play fit jumps, which I am happy with. He also suggested that new suits in response to pre-empts be based on fit, not a single-suited hand. I’m not sure I buy into that. Do you?
Assister Sledge, Chicago, Ill.
I will say that as a passed hand (which has therefore almost denied a decent onesuiter), a new suit in response to a pre-empt ought to be lead-directing. By an unpassed hand, especially if your RHO has passed, I think a new suit should be natural and forcing.
I held: ♠ K-4, ♥ A-9-8-3-2, ♦ 9, ♣ A-Q-7-5-4 and opened one heart, then rebid two clubs over a one-spade response. Now I heard my partner rebid two no-trump, and I was not sure whether to bid or pass. If I did bid, what call would describe my hand best?
Flower Power, Atlanta, Ga.
I wouldn’t pass, but I believe that three clubs should show a minimum hand with 5-5 shape, a non-forcing call. So I would either raise to three no-trump or, if feeling scientific, I might experiment with a call of three diamonds, which I believe should be reserved for a forcing hand with 5-5 shape. A rebid of three hearts here shows a 6-4 pattern, and would also be forcing.
|
What is the right approach to playing the combination of four small cards facing A-J-9-x-x in dummy, assuming you have plenty of entries back and forth? I can see three sensible ways of playing the suit: starting with the ace, leading to the jack or leading to the nine. Which is the odds-on play?
Math Observation, Little Rock, Ark.
Cashing the ace loses to a void or singleton small card to your left. Low to the jack loses to a void or singleton honor to your left. Low to the nine and finessing a second time loses to the singleton 10 or K-Q doubleton on your left, but not to the 4-0 break, so it is the right play.
Do you prefer to play jump raises of partner’s opening bid or overcall as weak, mixed or invitational? Does it matter whether the opponents have bid (either to your left or right)? And is the vulnerability critical?
Razor Sharp, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
In non-competitive auctions, a raise to three seems best as a limit raise (though playing it as mixed is acceptable). I don’t like a pre-emptive raise with silent opponents. After partner opens and you hear a double or an overcall, I can understand having the raise as pre-emptive — as long as you have a way to show a mixed raise. If partner overcalls, using the raise as pre-emptive makes sense.
|
July 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
My strength is as the strength of ten Because my heart is pure.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
W |
North |
None |
♠ 8 6 2
♥ 8 3
♦ J 10 8
♣ A K 4 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ J 10 6
♦ A K Q 9 7 6 4 3
♣ 10 |
♠ K J 9 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ 5
♣ Q J 8 6 5 |
South |
♠ A 10 7 4 3
♥ A K Q 5 2
♦ 2
♣ 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
4 ♣** |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Solid minor suit
** Pass or correct to 4♦ with diamonds
♦K
If you were to bid three hearts now, it would be natural and non-forcing (this hand without the heart queen, perhaps). You have enough to go to game, with the options being to raise to three no-trump, to bid four hearts or temporize with three clubs (normally a three-card suit) to try to extract a three-heart call from your partner. I’d go for the last of these, with the jump to four hearts as my second choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 7 4 3
♥ A K Q 5 2
♦ 2
♣ 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
July 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday.
Don Marquis
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ 8 5 3
♦ K 10 8 4
♣ J 9 |
West |
East |
♠ A 5
♥ A J 10 7 4 2
♦ 5
♣ Q 8 6 3 |
♠ 3 2
♥ K Q 6
♦ A Q J 7
♣ 10 5 4 2 |
South |
♠ K Q 9 8 4
♥ 9
♦ 9 6 3 2
♣ A K 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
|
♦5
Although you have an opening bid of sorts, this feels like a hand on which to go low, not high. You have no fit for partner and no real stopper in the opponents’ suit, so I would counsel a call of one no-trump rather than looking higher in no-trump or advancing with a cuebid. This hand just doesn’t seem worthy of a real invitation to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3 2
♥ K Q 6
♦ A Q J 7
♣ 10 5 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal came up at the second IOC Grand Prix, held in the Olympic Museum in Lausanne, Switzerland. The event was set up to try to help make the case for bridge as an Olympic sport.
There appear to be two inescapable losers outside the trump suit in South’s four-heart contract, suggesting that his chances of success are slim indeed. But though the contract went down each time it was played, perhaps declarer could have found a way home.
West would typically lead his partner’s suit against four hearts. When dummy plays low, East wins the spade 10 and shifts to a club. When South wins and plays a heart to the ace, dropping the king, there is no obvious reason to treat this as a false card; so the prospect of two trump losers is clearly threatening.
For South to have a chance of success, West needs to hold at least three clubs, but declarer might as well go after diamonds at once. The defenders are likely to duck the ace, win the second diamond and play a second club. Declarer wins in dummy, discards a club on the diamond queen, ruffs a spade in hand, crosses to a third club and ruffs dummy’s last spade in hand.
10 tricks have been played; one in hearts and three in each of the other suits. When South leads his last club, West is helpless. If he ruffs high, he will be endplayed to lead a trump into declarer’s tenace. If he ruffs low, dummy over-ruffs with the five and loses just one further trump trick.