July 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I borrow to pay my honest debts and not to squander foolishly. What’s more, I confine my borrowing to those who can well afford it. I don’t go around sponging on widows and orphans unless they have plenty.
Will Cuppy
E |
North |
N-S |
♠ A 10 7
♥ Q 10 7 5 2
♦ J 5 3 2
♣ 4 |
West |
East |
♠ J 9 6 3
♥ K 6 4 3
♦ K 9
♣ K 5 2 |
♠ K 8 4 2
♥ A J 9
♦ Q 10 8 6
♣ J 3 |
South |
♠ Q 5
♥ 8
♦ A 7 4
♣ A Q 10 9 8 7 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
To have a shot to beat this, when we know that partner has short spades but hasn’t balanced, we probably need the opponents to be in a 4-3 fit. To kill dummy’s ruffing values (since we have clubs under control), I would lead a trump. An incidental upside of this defense is that declarer will occasionally guess wrongly who has the trump length (or the queen).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 4
♥ J 7 3
♦ Q 5
♣ Q J 9 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
July 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, June 17th, 2018
I am trying to break my partner of what I consider the bad habit of opening three no-trump in fourth seat with a strong, balanced opening hand. He claims the contract is more likely to make if he doesn’t give away information. Can you persuade him against this approach?
Shot in the Dark, Staten Island, N.Y.
I’d never take a random gamble with a strong, balanced hand and a range that I could describe in some other way. An opening bid of three no-trump can be used for 25-26, though one can also show that hand after opening two clubs. The alternative, of using the call to show a long minor in a good hand, is certainly possible. In third or fourth seat, you would typically have guards in at least two of the three side suits.
Can you still claim honors even if you do not make your contract? Recently I went one down in my contract of five diamonds with 100 honors in the suit. The other players said I could not claim the honor points. Who is right?
Robbery with Violins, Charleston, S.C.
You were absolutely right, and your opponents (and partner) were entirely wrong. The points for honors do not depend on the success or failure of the contract, and, incidentally, they can be claimed by the defenders, too!
I held a balanced nine-count when my partner opened one diamond. The next hand bid one spade, so I raised to two diamonds. When my RHO balanced with two spades, I elected to pass, but would it have been an error to raise to three diamonds with ♠ 6-2, ♥ Q-4-3, ♦ A-K-9-2, ♣ 10-9-3-2?
Movin’ on Up, Jackson, Tenn.
This re-raise should be all about trumps or tricks. A raise should be five trumps or unusual offense with four trumps. A hand with something like a 2=2=4=5 pattern might qualify, I suppose, with all the values in the minors, but bear in mind that your partner could easily have a 4=4=3=2 shape.
|
When you use Stayman and find a fit, how do you explore for slam? Is a call of four no-trump Blackwood?
Black Cap, Bremerton, Wash.
After Stayman, a jump to four no-trump should be quantitative, not Blackwood. A simple scheme here with a slam-try is to play a call of three of the other major (three spades over two hearts, three hearts over two spades) as setting partner’s major with an unspecified shortness. By contrast, a jump to four clubs would be Gerber for the major, while four diamonds is a balanced slam try with four-card trump support. This is sometimes called Baze.
If you open one heart in third seat with ♠ A-2, ♥ Q-9-8-5-4, ♦ K-10-7-3, ♣ Q-2 and hear a one no-trump response, should you pass or bid two diamonds? What is the rational behind the decision?
Digging a Hole, Wausau, Wis.
I tend not to pass one no-trump with an economical four-card suit to bid. If my partner does bid two no-trump or raise diamonds, we might make our contract; but if I pass and we miss a diamond fit, I don’t think we are favored to make our part-score.
|
June 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
‘The high tide!’ King Alfred cried. ‘The high tide and the turn!’
G.K. Chesterton
N |
North |
Both |
♠ Q 8
♥ 8 7 4 3
♦ A K 10 8 7 2
♣ A |
West |
East |
♠ J 6 2
♥ 10
♦ J 9 6 5 3
♣ Q 10 8 4 |
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ A Q J 9 6
♦ 4
♣ J 9 6 |
South |
♠ A 10 7 5
♥ K 5 2
♦ Q
♣ K 7 5 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥10
While you have a very minimum opening bid, are you supposed to pass out one spade or raise to two as a sort of two-way shot, in case you can make game, or need to keep the opponents out of the fray? I’d raise to two spades and wouldn’t worry too much about what comes next.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ A Q J 9 6
♦ 4
♣ J 9 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me.
Abraham Lincoln
S |
North |
Both |
♠ 10 6 4 2
♥ K 10 9 5 3
♦ 5 4
♣ 6 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K 8 5
♥ J 6 4
♦ J 9 2
♣ Q 10 9 2 |
♠ 7
♥ A Q 8 7 2
♦ Q 8 3
♣ K J 8 5 |
South |
♠ A Q J 9 3
♥ —
♦ A K 10 7 6
♣ A 7 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠* |
Dbl. |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥4
*Weak
Your partner’s two-spade call shows extras and sets up a game force. It feels right to me to bid clubs, then raise diamonds at your next turn if your partner rebids three no-trump. While a direct diamond raise doesn’t guarantee four, if you can bid your suits in economical order, you should probably do so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7
♥ A Q 8 7 2
♦ Q 8 3
♣ K J 8 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Whoever is careless with truth in small matters cannot be trusted in important affairs.
Albert Einstein
S |
North |
Both |
♠ Q 10 6 5
♥ A K 7 6
♦ A Q J 9 2
♣ — |
West |
East |
♠ K 7 4 2
♥ Q 9 4
♦ 3
♣ K 9 6 3 2 |
♠ 9
♥ 10 8 5 3
♦ 7 6 5 4
♣ J 10 8 4 |
South |
♠ A J 8 3
♥ J 2
♦ K 10 8
♣ A Q 7 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♣* |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
*Exclusion Blackwood
♦3
A jump to four clubs now would show four-card spade support and serious extra values with a singleton or void in clubs, typically the former. The hand is certainly worth this call, so the question is whether you should bid on if partner signs off; I think not. Partner won’t have the diamond king, and if he had both top trumps and any sort of extra values, he would not sign off now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 6 5
♥ A K 7 6
♦ A Q J 9 2
♣ — |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
How did I respect you when you dared to speak the truth to me! Men don’t know women or they would be harder to them.
Anthony Trollope
W |
North |
Both |
♠ A 9 8
♥ 10 9 8 5
♦ 5
♣ K Q J 9 3 |
West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ A Q 7 6 4 2
♦ J 7 6
♣ 5 4 2 |
♠ 10 7 5 2
♥ K J
♦ A K 9 8
♣ A 7 6 |
South |
♠ K Q J 6 4
♥ 3
♦ Q 10 4 3 2
♣ 10 8 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
|
♦6
You doubled to show a good hand, typically with the unbid suits, and your partner reverted to two spades. This doesn’t guarantee a sixth spade, but does suggest a minimum hand with no clear fit for clubs or hearts. You are certainly close to a pass, and I might do that at pairs; but at teams and vulnerable, I’d stretch to raise to three.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 8
♥ 10 9 8 5
♦ 5
♣ K Q J 9 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I speak Spanish to God, Italian to women, French to men and German to my horse.
Charles V
W |
North |
N-S |
♠ A Q 9 7 6 3
♥ Q 2
♦ Q
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 8 5 2
♥ A 3
♦ K J 6 4 3 2
♣ 8 |
♠ 10 4
♥ K J 7
♦ 10 8 7 5
♣ J 9 6 4 |
South |
♠ J
♥ 10 9 8 6 5 4
♦ A 9
♣ A K Q 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
I don’t think there is any reason to do anything unusual. If the opponents had not bid, you would have introduced clubs rather than rebid hearts, and there should be even less reason now to do anything else. Bidding clubs shows nine of your 13 cards, whereas repeating hearts would show six of them.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J
♥ 10 9 8 6 5 4
♦ A 9
♣ A K Q 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 17 Comments
Everyone has got to realize you can’t hold on to the past if you want any future. Each second should lead to the next one.
Joe Strummer
N |
North |
Both |
♠ A 9 3
♥ 5 4 3 2
♦ Q J 6 5
♣ J 10 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 7 2
♥ A Q
♦ 4
♣ K 5 4 3 |
♠ 6 5 4
♥ 9 8 7
♦ 8 3
♣ 9 8 7 6 2 |
South |
♠ 8
♥ K J 10 6
♦ A K 10 9 7 2
♣ A Q |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠K
There are two plausible lines of defense here. Without the double, you probably would have led a spade (though a case can be made for a diamond, I suppose), so you shouldn’t lead a spade now. Do you play for the club ruff, or do you try to let partner cash the diamond ace-king? I think the club play is right, but I could be persuaded otherwise.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 2
♥ 9 4 3
♦ 9 3 2
♣ J 9 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
June 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Can the dummy revoke, with the consequence of the opponents subsequently receiving one or two tricks? I would have thought that since everyone can see the dummy, there can be no revoke penalty. If declarer attempts not to follow suit in dummy, what can dummy do about that?
Right or Wrong, Bellevue, Wash.
There is no formal penalty for a revoke by dummy, but the director can restore equity by reversing the effect of the revoke. This is one area where dummy may speak, as well as being allowed to prevent declarer from leading out of the wrong hand. Additionally, at the end of the hand, he may draw attention to other irregularities.
You recently ran a deal in “Bid with The Aces” where you raised an opening bid of one heart to two, holding ♠ J-4, ♥ Q-7-4, ♦ A-9-4-3, ♣ Q-10-6-4. After your raise to two hearts, what would it mean if you doubled East’s balancing two-spade bid instead of passing? Would it suggest to your partner that you have some values in the minors and perhaps not the right point count or shape to bid three hearts, but you don’t want to give up the fight?
King of the Hill, Laredo, Texas
I think not. I’d expect, once we die in two hearts, that a double should be penalty-oriented. That doesn’t necessarily mean a vast trump stack — maybe Q-10-x-x and a trick-and-a-half on the side would suffice.
I have a question about Standard American opening style. I say that we should not open a four-card major (unless absolutely no other bid makes sense, typically in third seat). If you rebid a major, it should guarantee six cards or a very strong five. My friends say that you can open a four-card major, and a rebid shows five. Who is right?
Seconds Out, Lorain, Ohio
This is a question of system, not right or wrong. Opening a four-card major is not standard in ACBL. Opening a major normally shows five, and rebidding it generally shows six. Even if playing four-card majors, you try hard to avoid repeating a five-carder over a one-level response. In sharp distinction though, after a two-level response, rebidding a strong five-card major is perfectly fine if your hand is unsuitable for a bid of two no-trump.
|
After my partner opened one no-trump, the next hand overcalled two spades. Holding ♠ J, ♥ 10-8-7-5-3, ♦ K-10-4, ♣ A-J-4-2, I didn’t feel that I had enough to force to game in hearts. So I went through Lebensohl (by bidding two no-trump to puppet three clubs) and then bid hearts. But we missed a game when my partner had a maximum hand. What do you think of our bidding?
Walk-away Renee, Newark, N.J.
When the opponents prevent you from inviting game, you sometimes have to decide with invitational values to go high or low. With 9 HCP, I’d drive to game (expecting not to be alone in this decision). I’d bid three hearts; the choice of starting with a take-out double isn’t terrible, but here you might miss the 5-3 heart fit.
Yesterday we had a sequence in which my partner opened one diamond and the next hand overcalled one no-trump. I had a flat hand with two hearts and 11 points, so I doubled, and now my LHO escaped by transferring to two hearts. If I pass that call, is my partner forced to bid again?
Armed Forces, Pittsburgh, Pa.
A simple agreement is to play that the double of one no-trump sets up a forcing pass through two of your suit, but not higher. So in the sequence shown here, a pass would not be forcing. If your partner had opened one spade, your pass would be forcing.
|
June 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
The valiant knight of Triermain Rung forth his challenge-blast again, But answer came there none.
Sir Walter Scott
N |
North |
Both |
♠ Q
♥ 8 7 2
♦ Q 9 7 3
♣ Q J 10 7 3 |
West |
East |
♠ A 8 5 4 2
♥ A 10 9 6 3
♦ J 4
♣ 5 |
♠ K 9 3
♥ 5 4
♦ 10 8 6 5
♣ A 9 6 2 |
South |
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 2
♣ K 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 NT |
2 ♣* |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 NT** |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
**Minors
♥A
Given that two diamonds is a transfer to hearts, should you simply complete the transfer or do more? If you play a call of two no-trump here as a maximum hand with three good hearts headed by two top honors or better, that call would be ideal. I recommend it as simple and easily remembered; it might get you to three no-trump facing the right balanced 7- or 8-count.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ K Q J
♦ A K 2
♣ K 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal is a theme that dates back to an early Culbertson match — though it was not untypical that a deal played by one of Culbertson’s opponents was attributed in print to Ely himself!
East may be best advised to pass on the first round, though as a passed hand, it would also be reasonable to double for take-out. However, when the call of two clubs comes around to him, he should reopen the bidding with a take-out double. It would be practical for South to re-compete to three clubs, in the hope of preventing his opponents from getting together. West should not take any part in the auction now, since his partner did not double on the first round and must therefore be limited in shape or high cards, or both.
A red-suit lead would defeat the contract, but when West leads a low spade, it gives declarer some extra chances. He follows with the seven from dummy, and when East contributes the king, South can see that he surely has to lose one spade, one heart, two diamonds and at least one club. His only chance of avoiding one of these losers is to pick up a second trick in spades by throwing his queen under the king and subsequently taking a finesse against the jack. When the finesse succeeds, a diamond can be discarded on the spade ace, and the lie of the trumps is such that with the lead coming from dummy, whether declarer finesses the queen or the 10, only one club trick should be lost.