June 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To do a great and important work, two things are necessary: a definite plan, and not quite enough time.
Anonymous
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ K 9 3
♣ 9 3 2 |
West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K Q J 9 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ 10 5 4
♣ J 8 |
South |
♠ K J 6 5 3
♥ 3
♦ A Q J 8
♣ A K 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥* |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠** |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
7 ♦ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
*Limit raise or better in spades
**Two key-cards and the trump queen
♥K
There is a simple choice between bidding one spade and one no-trump here. In favor of bidding the four-card major is that you might miss the fit if you don’t. Against it is that when partner responds one diamond, he probably does not have a major suit unless he has enough values to bid again over one no-trump. I would prefer to have real clubs before introducing spades in this auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ K 9 3
♣ 9 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
You touch on a disheartening truth. People never want to be told anything they do not believe already.
James Branch Cabell
E |
North |
None |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ K 8 7
♦ K J 6
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 5 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ 10 9 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ Q 6 4
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ Q 7 3 |
South |
♠ A 7
♥ A J 10 9 5
♦ 4 2
♣ A K J 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
Partner did not double the two-spade cue-bid, so there is an argument that he is not loaded for bear in spades. I would lead a heart, since dummy surely doesn’t have length there, or he might have bid two hearts rather than two spades, and declarer didn’t make a negative double. Thus, you have a decent chance to find your partner with heart length or an honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ A J 7 6 4
♦ 9 8 3
♣ J 10 6 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
In duplicate bridge, when should third hand (the partner of the opening leader) break the rule of third hand high? Is there a simple set of guidelines to follow?
Gasoline Alley, Grand Forks, N.D.
You must try to avoid finessing against partner unnecessarily, so when dummy has nothing, third hand must almost always play high to keep declarer from scoring a cheap trick. But say, for example, in a suit contract, dummy has J-7-2 in the suit partner leads and you have K-9-3 or Q-9-3. When dummy plays a small card, you should surely follow with the nine (which is the right play whenever partner has the 10). Of course, if your holding were Q-10-2 or K-10-2, you’d insert the 10 without needing to think about it.
I was dealt ♠ K-10-9-7-2 , ♥ K-J-5-3, ♦ A-8, ♣ 9-4, and my partner opened one diamond, which was doubled on my right. I redoubled to show 10 HCP, thinking that I could bid my suits later on, but my LHO jumped to three clubs, meaning it as pre-emptive. I could still bid my spades, but we never got hearts into play. What are your thoughts on our bidding?
Quick Fix, Syracuse, N.Y.
It is a good rule to bid out a one-suiter after a double, regardless of strength. Only redouble when you can handle all likely actions by your LHO in response to the double. Having said that, I do have sympathy with redoubling here, since the opponents tend to bid the majors after this start.
In a suit contract, what factors should I consider when faced with the choice of leading the top of a small doubleton or leading from four to an honor?
Just the Fax, Bay City, Mich.
I tend to be slightly more in favor than most of leading from the doubleton here, regardless of my trump holding, if I think passive defense is called for. Four to an unsupported honor is less appealing, but give me a suit headed by a two-card sequence, and I tend to go for that instead. Of course, a ruff may be counter-effective if I surrender a trump trick, or trump control, in the process.
|
I was in third seat when my partner opened one heart. The next hand bid two hearts to show spades and a minor, and I had ♠ K-5-4, ♥ A-K-10-9-2, ♦ 8-5, ♣ 10-8-3. What were my bidding options?
Rocking Rooster, Phoenix, Ariz.
The logic here is that a bid of three hearts is competitive, not a limit raise. This means that you have to use the cue-bid of two spades to show a good hand with hearts. Double by you shows a good hand, typically without real fit, but that wouldn’t be suitable in this case. The real issue is whether you will stay out of game if partner signs off over your cue-bid. I’m on the fence!
My partner explained to me that all jump bids by opener at his second turn are forcing to game. If the bid is a jump-shift, then I can understand it being forcing to game; but if the jump is in a bid suit, I don’t believe that rule applies. Do you? Also, is the jump shift in a new suit forcing for one round or game forcing?
Truly Scrumptious, Shreveport, La.
A jump-shift shows a game force. But as opener, it is important to distinguish such a thing from jump rebids either in your own suit or in support of partner’s suit, neither of which is forcing. Once responder has shown limit-plus values, perhaps by something like a two-level response, these auctions do become forcing. One further caveat: In response to a negative double, jumps in a new suit show extras, but are not forcing. A cue-bid sets up the game force.
|
June 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
All things that can be known have number; for it is not possible that without number anything can be either conceived or known.
Philolaus
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 7
♦ K 8 6 3
♣ K J 8 4 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q 10 9 6
♥ J 9 6 4 3
♦ A Q
♣ 2 |
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ 8
♦ 7 5 4
♣ 9 7 6 5 3 |
South |
♠ A 7
♥ K 10 5 2
♦ J 10 9 2
♣ A Q 10 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♦ |
2 ♦* |
2 ♠ |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Majors
♠K
When the opponents intervene and you can see the possibility that they will raise their suit, it is a good idea to support your partner, assuming you have the option to do so. Here, I prefer to cue-bid two spades to show a club raise rather than bidding diamonds. The latter would be natural and forcing, but would not promise support.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 3
♥ A Q 7
♦ K 8 6 3
♣ K J 8 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
? |
|
|
|
June 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
I’ve been in office and I’ve been out of office. And if I were to choose, I’d rather be in office.
Jerry Brown
S |
North |
N-S |
♠ K 9 7 3
♥ A K 8
♦ K J 10 2
♣ 10 8 |
West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ J 9 6 4
♦ A Q 9 7 5 3
♣ 5 2 |
♠ Q 10 8 6
♥ 10 5
♦ 8 6
♣ K Q J 7 4 |
South |
♠ A J 4 2
♥ Q 7 3 2
♦ 4
♣ A 9 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥* |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♥6
You may have a dead-minimum hand, but you do have extra shape, and your partner has volunteered a call, so he won’t have a complete bust. Even if you are outgunned on high cards, you may still make a surprising number of tricks, since you have aces, and you may be able to engineer a cross-ruff. So raise to two spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 4 2
♥ Q 7 3 2
♦ 4
♣ A 9 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
? |
|
|
|
June 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Evil communication corrupts good manners. I hope to live to hear that good communication corrects bad manners.
Benjamin Banneker
E |
North |
None |
♠ 3
♥ J 5 4 2
♦ A K 7
♣ A Q J 6 3 |
West |
East |
♠ K 7
♥ 10 9 3
♦ 9 4 3
♣ K 10 9 7 5 |
♠ A 10 9 8 5 4 2
♥ A K
♦ 10 5 2
♣ 8 |
South |
♠ Q J 6
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q J 8 6
♣ 4 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
♠K
Your double of four spades is card-showing, not penalty. Your partner’s four-no-trump call suggests two places to play; and when he corrects five clubs to five diamonds, he is showing the red suits. You should bid five hearts now, to play the longer, if not necessarily stronger, trump suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ J 5 4 2
♦ A K 7
♣ A Q J 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
If the waiter in the restaurant stumbles and spills a gill of coffee down the back of your neck, he says, ‘For lagniappe, sir,’ and gets you another cup without extra charge.
Mark Twain
E |
North |
Both |
♠ 10 8 3 2
♥ Q 8 7
♦ A K 6
♣ A K J |
West |
East |
♠ Q 7
♥ 6
♦ 9 8 5 3
♣ 10 8 7 5 4 2 |
♠ 6
♥ K J 10 9 5 4
♦ Q J 10 7
♣ Q 9 |
South |
♠ A K J 9 5 4
♥ A 3 2
♦ 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
♥6
You already denied four hearts when you bid two spades over two diamonds. (Yes, you could be 7-4, but in practical terms, you would surely never bypass even a moderate four-card major when in a game force). So you can bid three hearts to temporize and let partner support spades or try for three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K J 9 5 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ 4 2
♣ 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Greed is all right, by the way. I think greed is healthy. You can be greedy and still feel good about yourself.
Ivan Boesky
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ A J 5
♥ 9 7
♦ A J 10 8 6 5
♣ 8 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4 2
♥ K 8 3
♦ 3
♣ Q 10 9 4 2 |
♠ K 7 6 3
♥ Q J 10 6 4
♦ K 7 4
♣ 7 |
South |
♠ Q 9
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q 9 2
♣ A K J 5 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
♠2
Whether or not you think this hand is too good for a two-diamond opener (I could go either way), over your partner’s forcing two-heart call you should bid two spades now. This is natural in principle, suggesting either a four-card suit or a holding like this one.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 5
♥ 9 7
♦ A J 10 8 6 5
♣ 8 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
June 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
If one man can be allowed to determine for himself what is law, every man can. That means first chaos, then tyranny. Legal process is an essential part of the democratic process.
Judge Felix Frankfurter
S |
North |
Both |
♠ A 7
♥ A Q 6 4 3
♦ K 6 4
♣ K 7 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 8 4 2
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 5 3
♣ J 9 6 3 |
♠ Q J 9
♥ 10 8 7 2
♦ J 8
♣ Q 10 8 2 |
South |
♠ K 6 5 3
♥ K J 9
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ A 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT* |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Quantitative
♠2
While a club is as likely to cost a trick as a diamond, I can see good logic in trying to set up clubs fast (before they go on dummy’s spades) and possibly force dummy, in an attempt to build extra trump tricks for myself. So I would lead a low club, not a diamond.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 2
♥ Q 9 6 5
♦ J 6 4
♣ K J 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
June 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
As a club director, I am occasionally faced with the problem of how to make rulings that involve pairs who may never return to the club if I rule against them! Is it acceptable to give average to one or both sides in such cases? What about late-play penalties?
Tic-Tac-Toe, Panama City, Fla.
You have to make a living, I admit, but you must weigh that need against the integrity of the event and the objective of being fair to everyone. If that means administering the occasional average minus, so be it. There is no room for negotiation in the laws on revokes, penalty cards or insufficient bids. Where you can be tactful is with unauthorized information, where you can discuss the players’ obligations after the event.
I’ve been told that when my partner opens one club and North overcalls one diamond, the bid of a major shows four; but when partner bids one club and the next hand overcalls one heart, bidding one spade shows five or more. What is the thinking behind these bidding rules?
Champion the Wonder Horse, Salinas, Calif.
The logic is based on the number of unbid majors. In the first instance, you can bid either hearts or spades with one suit but not the other, and double with either. If bidding a major showed five, you would have no way to introduce a four-card major. When one major has been bid, the double takes care of some hands with the unbid major; bidding the suit takes care of the rest. Thus, over one heart, since you double with four spades, one spade shows five.
I held ♠ Q-7-2, ♥ A-K-3, ♦ Q-8-7-5-4, ♣ 10-3, and my partner opened three spades. The next hand passed without a flicker, and I had to decide whether to raise at once or pass and reconsider if they bid four hearts. We were non-vulnerable, and my partner is relatively disciplined, by the way.
Tightly Wound, Montreal
You might easily go down three in four spades or find that game had decent play. So it is a toss-up, but since you want the opponents to have the last guess, not you, I would raise to game and give them the hardest decision I can.
|
I’ve been out of bridge for a while and need clarification on the niceties of what to do when making a jump-bid. I thought it was right to say something or use a card when jumping. And I thought it was right to pause after a skip bid whether or not you intend to bid. I’ve been told the rules have changed; is that right?
Sitting Duck, Dayton, Ohio
You are still right in some regards, even though the rules have changed for reasons that remain unclear to me. The original idea was to draw your LHO’s attention to the jump to prevent him acting prematurely, and to force him to pause whether he had an easy action or not. Now, even though the ‘stop’ card has been dispensed with, the next player should still pause for 10 seconds whether you intend to bid or not.
I held this hand: ♠ K-5, ♥ 7-2, ♦ K-Q-10-8-7-4-2, ♣ 9-7. My partner opened one spade, and I felt I did not have enough to force to game or to invite game with three diamonds. So I responded one no-trump, and since my partner had a small doubleton diamond and no spade ace, we ended up going down. But three diamonds would have been easy. What went wrong?
Fox and Grapes, Seneca, S.C.
If your partnership style is to use three-level jumps as invitational, you must bid one here. It may not be perfect, but it is hardly an overbid at all. If that tool is not in your kit, you may have to bid one no-trump and play there. Not such a great recommendation for the methods!
|
|
When South heard his partner show a limit or better spade raise, he took control with Keycard Blackwood. The response showed two key-cards and the trump queen, so South explored for the grand slam, then decided to account for diamonds playing better than spades by offering the choice at the seven-level. You can imagine that if North’s spade four were the diamond four, the grand slam in diamonds would be where you wanted to play, absent a spade ruff.
After West’s top heart lead, it might have seemed to declarer that he could claim 13 tricks. But it never does any harm to take a second or even a third and fourth look at your chances when playing a grand slam. The dangers of a 4-0 trump break were not all that significant, but South realized he could eliminate that risk by thoughtfully ruffing a heart to hand at trick two. Then he cashed the spade king, observing the bad break, and led a spade to the ace.
A second heart ruff allowed him to unblock the spade jack. Then he could lead a diamond to the king. The spade queen drew the last trump, and South was able to discard his losing club, then claim the rest with diamond and club winners. The 13 tricks came in the form of seven winners in the side suits, two heart ruffs and four spade tricks in dummy. If declarer doesn’t take his heart ruffs at once, he does not have the communications to do so later in addition to drawing trumps.