April 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, March 20th, 2019
Misled by fancy’s meteor ray.
Robert Burns
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 7 6 4
♥ A Q
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A J 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5
♥ 5 3 2
♦ A Q 5 3
♣ Q 9 7 2 |
♠ K J 10 8 3 2
♥ K J 8 6
♦ 2
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ K J 10 9 8
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ * |
2 ♠ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Invitational values, either in clubs or balanced
♠9
There may appear to be three conceivable actions here (bidding either red suit or no-trump), but in practice, one of these actions is verboten. To bid two hearts — a higher suit than your opening bid, at the two-level — shows real extras; this is defined as a reverse. Since a two-diamond rebid typically shows six trumps, the rebid of one no-trump is comfortably the best option, to show a balanced 12-14 points.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q
♥ 10 9 7 4
♦ K J 10 9 8
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
A lifetime of happiness! No man alive could bear it: It would be hell on earth.
George Bernard Shaw
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q J 9 5
♥ Q 9 5 2
♦ 6 4
♣ Q 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 6 4 3
♥ —
♦ K Q J 10 7 5 3
♣ A 6 |
♠ K 10 8
♥ K 10 4 3
♦ A 9 8 2
♣ J 5 |
| South |
♠ A 2
♥ A J 8 7 6
♦ —
♣ K 10 9 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♥ |
3 NT |
| 4 ♣ |
4 ♦ |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦K
You have a relatively simple decision here. Your partner has clubs and spades and has indirectly limited his hand by his failure to jump to two spades. But he could certainly have 17 high-card points and a 5-4 pattern, for example. Does that mean you should pass? With three working honors in the black suits, I think the hand is just worth a raise to two spades. If partner had opened one diamond, I might pass now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 9 5
♥ Q 9 5 2
♦ 6 4
♣ Q 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
When I consider life, ‘tis all a cheat.
John Dryden
| N |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 5
♥ 10 8 7 6 3
♦ K 7 4
♣ J 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 9 8 7 4
♥ J 9 5
♦ J 2
♣ 4 3 |
♠ 6
♥ A K 4 2
♦ 8 3
♣ K Q 8 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q 3 2
♥ Q
♦ A Q 10 9 6 5
♣ A 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♥ * |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spades
♣4
Your goal here should be to keep declarer from scoring cheap tricks with his small clubs. Lead the diamond jack in an attempt to build discards for yourself, so you can pitch spades and overruff your right-hand opponent. (Even if partner had opened one heart rather than one spade, I would lead the diamond jack.)
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 3
♥ K 7 4
♦ J 10
♣ K Q 10 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
All Pass |
March 31st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I’m considering taking up inverted minors. The textbooks present different approaches; would you recommend they be played as constructive, forcing for one round or forcing to game?
Weird Science, Sioux Falls, S.D.
Inverted minors apply only in non-competitive auctions, but they are in play for either passed or unpassed hands. They are forcing for one round if made by an unpassed hand. I suggest that if either opener or responder limits their hand with a rebid of two no-trump or three of the agreed minor at their next turn, that can be passed; otherwise, the partnership is in a game-forcing auction.
A recent deal included an opponent making a Michaels cue-bid, allowing the opponents to find the right line to make a grand slam. What are your thoughts regarding the proper kind of hand for the cue-bid? I wonder whether a hand with K-J-10 in the red suits is enough to bid two spades over one spade. The opponents have the boss suit, so your hearts and diamonds will probably be outbid in any case.
Junebug, Midland, Mich.
Terence Reese was scathing in his criticism of using two-suited calls on weak hands. (He said it was drawing a roadmap for the declarer.) I do not mind acting when non-vulnerable with skimpy suits, as long as you have offense, not defense. Vulnerable, you need chunky suits, and what you most want to avoid is getting on offense when you should be defending. But I suspect I would have bid here too!
Last week when we went to the wrong table, we started playing a board before the error was corrected. When we began it at a new table, we got a top — but the director said that because the opening bid was different by our opponents, the result would be canceled. Was this legally correct?
Chain of Fools, Richmond, Va.
While the director will try to let a partially played deal be tackled by the proper pairs, here it sounds like your second opponents might not have had a fair crack at the board. That is because you knew extra information from the two opening bids you heard, so it is at the director’s discretion as to whether the result should stand.
|
I picked up ♠ Q-J-9-4, ♥ K-6, ♦ A-9-3, ♣ Q-J-4-2 and opened one club. Over my left-hand opponent’s overcall of one diamond, my partner doubled to show both majors. Naturally I bid one spade, eventually ending up in two spades. We had 24 high-card points between us, and we made game easily enough. Should I have bid two spades at my second turn, as my partner suggested?
Punk Rocker, Fort Worth, Texas
This is a complex issue. A jump to two spades suggests four spades, in response to the known four-card suit; you might have to bid one heart or one spade with a three-card suit if you don’t have a diamond stopper. In the same way, when you open a minor and hear your partner double one heart, you jump to two spades with four trumps in anything but a dead-minimum balanced hand.
I opened one diamond with ♠ Q-8-2, ♥ A-Q-6, ♦ A-9-4-2, ♣ Q-9-3 and heard my left-hand opponent overcall one heart. Now my partner bid two clubs, and my right-hand opponent bid two spades. It feels like I have some extras and fit, but should I pass, raise or bid no-trump now?
Musical Chair, Jackson, Tenn.
Two no-trump suggests a non-minimum hand and reasonable stoppers in the majors. Unless your left-hand opponent has good spades (in which case partner may be short and might not raise to three no-trump), I like the idea of getting no-trump in now. But change the club queen to the jack, and I might pass.
|
March 30th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
For want of a nail the shoe was lost.
Benjamin Franklin
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8 4
♥ A Q 2
♦ J 7 4
♣ J 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 5 3
♥ 9 6 3
♦ K 9 5
♣ 10 8 3 |
♠ A Q 7
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 10 8 6 3
♣ A Q 9 |
| South |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ K J 8 7 5
♦ A 2
♣ K 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
When is it right to open light in third seat? Normally, with an obstructive call or a lead-directing suit, you can step out of line — either a little or a lot, depending on your temperament. For me, this hand meets neither requirement, since I don’t really want clubs to be led, and such a call hardly gets in my opponents’ way. So I’d pass here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 4
♥ A Q 2
♦ J 7 4
♣ J 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 29th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, March 15th, 2019
(The atomic bomb) looks terrible but in fact it isn’t. … All reactionaries are paper tigers.
Mao Zedong
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 7 4
♥ A J 2
♦ K 5
♣ K J 8 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 9 6 3
♥ 10 8 4 3
♦ 2
♣ A 9 4 |
♠ 10 8 5
♥ K 9 6
♦ J 10 8 7 6
♣ 10 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 2
♥ Q 7 5
♦ A Q 9 4 3
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥3
You did not have enough to break the transfer over two diamonds, but now, just in case your partner has close to slam values, you can bid four clubs. This suggests a source of tricks in clubs and your excellent trumps and controls warrant this try to pique partner’s interest.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 4
♥ A J 2
♦ K 5
♣ K J 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 28th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
I don’t demand that a theory correspond to reality because I don’t know what it is. Reality is not a quality you can test with litmus paper.
Stephen Hawking
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 6 2
♦ K Q 3
♣ A J 10 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 4 2
♥ A J 8 7 3
♦ 9 6 2
♣ 6 |
♠ 10 9 8 3
♥ 9 5
♦ J 8 4
♣ Q 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ J 6 5
♥ K Q 4
♦ A 10 7 5
♣ K 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT * |
2 ♣ * * |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*12-14
**Majors
♠A
If this were non-forcing, you would pass; but how can it be? Your partner would have raised two clubs to three clubs if that were so (since he isn’t looking to play four spades, apparently). If you have to bid now, showing your values in diamonds with a call of three diamonds is a fairly accurate description of your hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 6 2
♦ K Q 3
♣ A J 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Morality is a private and costly luxury.
Henry Brooks Adams
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7 4
♥ A K 3
♦ Q 7 3
♣ K Q 9 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5
♥ 10 9 8 5
♦ K 10 6
♣ 10 8 3 2 |
♠ 10 3
♥ 7 6 2
♦ A J 5 2
♣ J 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 8 6 2
♥ Q J 4
♦ 9 8 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦6
This does not look like the sort of hand where you want to bid clubs at the three-level and have to ruff hearts in dummy with high trumps. Instead, settle for the relative security of spades. Bid two spades, which implicitly suggests a doubleton or a dead minimum hand with three spades. Otherwise, you would already have supported spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5
♥ 10 9 6 5
♦ K 10 6
♣ 10 8 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, March 12th, 2019
She was always attentive to the feelings of dogs, and very polite if she had to decline their advances.
George Eliot
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 7 4
♥ Q 7 5
♦ K 8
♣ A Q 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9
♥ 2
♦ 10 7 6 4 3 2
♣ J 7 4 3 |
♠ K Q 10 6 5 3
♥ 8 4 3
♦ A J 9
♣ 9 |
| South |
♠ 8 2
♥ A K J 10 9 6
♦ Q 5
♣ K 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
Hands on the borderline between pre-empts and one-level openers often pose my readers problems, but I would never pass a hand with this good a good suit. Even in a two-suiter, commit to opening at whatever level you think is right. With hands like this 10-pointer, your clumped honors are worth more than the sum of the parts. Open one spade, except in second seat vulnerable, where two spades is acceptable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 6 5 3
♥ 8 4 3
♦ A J 9
♣ 9 |
March 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Then nothing will remain of the iron age
And all these people but a thighbone or so, a poem
Stuck in the world’s thought, splinters of glass
In the rubbish dumps, a concrete dam far off in the mountain.
Robinson Jeffers
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 4
♥ 7
♦ K J 7 5 4
♣ A Q 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ A 9 6 5 3
♦ 6 2
♣ 10 8 3 |
♠ J 9 6 5
♥ Q 10 8 4
♦ Q 10 9 3
♣ 9 |
| South |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ K J 2
♦ A 8
♣ K J 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
*Shortness, agreeing clubs
♣3
You clearly don’t want a ruff here, so you should not lead the club nine unless you think the situation demands passive play. I’d prefer to set up spades if I can, before declarer gets either hearts or clubs going for discards. So, I would lead my partnershipagreed small spade, be it fourth-highest or third and low.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 5 3
♥ Q 8 4 3
♦ K Q 8
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
From the Silodor Open Pairs in Philadelphia last year, this challenge for both declarer and the defense saw Simon Cope and Peter Crouch, the eventual winners of the event, emerge on top.
In three no-trump after the spade nine lead, Crouch discouraged, perhaps suggesting he had the heart king. Declarer won the queen and decided that the right approach was to start with the club finesse. So he played the club king and a club to the jack, which held. Relieved, declarer could take the diamond finesse, thinking that if it lost to the diamond queen, he could reassess what to do.
To his pleasure, the diamond jack won as well. Declarer could now lead a heart to the ace, and rather than cashing the club ace (which would have squeezed his hand), he played a second diamond. He planned to score two spades, one heart, four diamonds and two clubs.
However, he was shocked when East showed out, and his plans collapsed; ducking the first diamond was very nice defense by Cope (West).
As usual, with the sight of all four hands, South can do much better; indeed, three no-trump is cold. Admittedly, though, you need to make the inspired move of laying down the diamond king at trick two — not obvious by any means! If the defenders win the first or second diamond, you set up diamonds using the club reentry to your hand. If they duck twice, you play on clubs and take four tricks there.