March 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
If you open one club and your partner raises to two clubs in competition, how much shape do you need to re-raise to three clubs? If you have four or five clubs in a relatively balanced hand, what should be the deciding factor?
Mork from Ork, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
When your partner raises clubs, you hope he will have five but expect him to have additional shape or values if he has only four; you also expect more values than from a pre-emptive raise. Accordingly, possession of four clubs, together with any additional side-suit shape, should suffice. With five trumps, I would always bid on to the three-level.
I was last to speak and had ♠ J-6-3, ♥ 10-2, ♦ A-Q-10-9, ♣ K-J-7-2. I heard one spade from my partner, and when I responded one no-trump, planning to rebid two no-trump, he jumped to three diamonds. I assume this is game-forcing, so a raise to four diamonds could not be passed; but what might my other options be?
Catch a Falling Star, Albany, Ga,
A bid of four diamonds isn’t necessarily stronger than a jump to five, but the latter suggests good trumps and nothing else. You could argue that a cue-bid of four clubs will probably lead your partner to use Blackwood and so should be safe, but maybe a call of four no-trump here should be diamond fit and nothing to cue-bid. Don’t try that without discussion!
I help instruct beginning bridge players and hear some unusual questions. One idea proposed last week was dismissed as ludicrous. But on second thought, I’m not sure of the correct answer. Can a player open the bidding at any of the four positions with a double? While sounding crazy, it could add another descriptive bid to one’s arsenal.
Odds Bodkins, Danville, Ill.
The rules do not permit this action, but I like it as a non-bridge variant. An opening double shows a balanced 11-14, so partner can pass with a weak hand. Meanwhile doubling partner’s suit would show scattered values and no long suit. Some day in a special holiday event, perhaps? (The reason you can’t double as the initial action is that, per Law 19, a double must be of a preceding bid by an opponent.)
|
After our side missed a game, following the opponents’ takeout double of my partner’s one-heart opener, it was recommended to me that a bid called BROMAD might have saved the day. This sounds like an indigestion tablet or remedy against flu. What is it really?
Spoonful of Sugar, Baltimore, Md.
Bergen Raises Over the Double of a Major allow you to differentiate weak and strong raises after the double of a major. Jump raises remain pre-emptive, but with 8-10 and three trumps, you begin by bidding two clubs — an artificial call to show precisely this hand. More and more people play either transfers or something artificial here (and also when an overcall of a major is doubled). See www.larryco.com/bridge-articles/ interference-after-our-1-of-a-major.
My right-hand opponent dealt and opened one heart, and I held ♠ Q-4, ♥ K-6, ♦ K-10-7-6-5, ♣ A-J-8-3. What is correct in theory and in practice? Would your call be affected by the vulnerability?
All Shook Up, Staten Island, N.Y.
You have a feeble suit without intermediates and not enough values to insist on coming in right now. I’d need an extra diamond honor for a two-level overcall. Move the queen from spades into diamonds, and an overcall is acceptable; but under no circumstances should you double or bid two no-trump at your first turn to speak.
|
March 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Give the lady what she wants!
Marshall Field
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 10 9 6 2
♥ 6 4
♦ 4
♣ A J 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 7 4
♥ 10 9 5 2
♦ 7 5
♣ K 6 4 |
♠ 8 5
♥ J
♦ Q J 10 9 6 2
♣ 10 9 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 3
♥ A K Q 8 7 3
♦ A K 8 3
♣ Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♦* |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Asking for the trump queen
♥2
My answer here depends on vulnerability and partnership style. I would almost never open this hand two diamonds, but at favorable vulnerability (or with both sides non-vulnerable and a partnership agreement), I don’t mind a three-diamond call. There are, after all, two opponents and only one partner. I’d be equally aggressive in third seat, but not second.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ J
♦ Q J 10 9 6 2
♣ 10 9 7 5 |
March 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Every public action which is not customary, either is wrong, or if it right, is a dangerous precedent. It follows that nothing should ever be done for the first time.
F.M. Cornford
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 9 3
♥ A Q 3
♦ Q 6
♣ J 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8
♥ K J 6 2
♦ A K 8 4 3
♣ K 9 3 |
♠ A
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ J 9 7 5 2
♣ Q 8 4 |
| South |
♠ K 10 7 6 5 4 2
♥ 8 7
♦ 10
♣ A 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Another thorny problem! Does a takeout double of two spades focus on the minors (because you’d bid hearts if you had them)? I think so, but I’d expect my partner to bid three clubs if he has both minors, at which point my correction to three diamonds must show hearts and diamonds — since I would have bid three diamonds the round before with just that suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ 10 9 5 4
♦ J 9 7 5 2
♣ Q 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Let us leave our old friend in one of those moments of unmixed happiness which, if we seek them, there are ever some, to cheer our transitory existence here. There are dark shadows on the earth, but its lights are stronger in the contrast.
Charles Dickens
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ K 6 4
♦ A 6 4
♣ A Q 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 9 7 5
♥ 8
♦ Q 9 8 5 2
♣ 8 4 |
♠ 6 3
♥ Q J 10 9 3
♦ J 10
♣ K J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q
♥ A 7 5 2
♦ K 7 3
♣ 10 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠J
When deciding how high to bid, do not just look at your honor cards. Your intermediates are outstanding, and though you don’t expect to find a singleton spade opposite, a minimum three-suited hand opposite would offer decent play for game. So jump to three hearts, which may make the opponents’ task of finding a fit in spades a little harder, and should get you to game if you can make it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 3
♥ Q J 10 9 3
♦ J 10
♣ K J 9 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Curiouser and curiouser.
Lewis Carroll
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 9 7 3
♥ K J 7
♦ 10 3
♣ K Q 8 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ 10 5 4
♦ 8 7 6
♣ A 7 3 |
♠ K 8 4
♥ Q 9
♦ K Q 5 2
♣ J 9 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A 8 6 3 2
♦ A J 9 4
♣ 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
With weak trumps and no guarantee your soft cards are working properly, a simple raise to two spades is better than a cue-bid raise. You wouldn’t need a dramatic improvement, however, to upgrade it to a cuebid. Making the heart jack the queen would be enough for me.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 3
♥ K J 7
♦ 10 3
♣ K Q 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 25 Comments
No need that sort of king should ever die.
Robert Browning
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 6 3
♥ A J 9 4
♦ A 6
♣ K 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ 6 3
♦ 8 7 5 3 2
♣ Q J 10 9 |
♠ J 10 8 2
♥ 8 7
♦ K Q 10 9
♣ A 5 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 7 5
♥ K Q 10 5 2
♦ J 4
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣Q
Your partner has suggested limited values and heart tolerance. Your fifth heart strongly suggests competing to two hearts to make it harder for the opponents to get together. The Law of Total Tricks makes it clear you have an eight-card fit, so you must contract for at least eight tricks rather than sell out.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5
♥ K Q 10 5 2
♦ J 4
♣ 8 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Just because you’re paranoid, doesn’t mean someone isn’t watching you.
Anonymous
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 5
♥ 7 4
♦ K Q 8 6 4
♣ 9 8 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 2
♥ Q 10 8 5 2
♦ J 10 9 3
♣ 3 |
♠ Q 9 8 4
♥ J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ Q J 10 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 6 3
♥ A K 6
♦ A 5 2
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
|
♥5
When you have a weak hand, leading partner’s suit gives you at least a reasonable chance that you might be able to set that suit up. None of your other holdings are appealing, so you might as well play for your partner’s hand. Thus, a spade lead stands out as the safest and most attractive shot.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ Q 7 4
♦ J 6 4 3
♣ J 9 8 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
I have tried hard to explain to my bridge class how the Monty Hall problem works and how it applies to bridge in the form of the principle of restricted choice. I’m not sure I’ve convinced them yet. Do you have a patented method?
Razor’s Edge, Tupelo, Miss.
Imagine you are missing the queen, jack, five and four of trumps. You lead to the ace, and your left-hand opponent produces one of the honors. Should you finesse next or play for the drop? Well, a singleton honor is almost twice as likely as the queen-jack doubleton, even though any specific singleton is slightly less likely than a specific doubleton. With queen-jack doubleton, the player has a choice of cards to play; with a singleton honor, he has no choice.
In second seat vulnerable, you hold ♠ 2, ♥ K-9-4, ♦ A-K-10-4-3, ♣ K-J-5-4. After a four-spade bid on your right, I assume you would double to show a good hand. Partner now bids four no-trump. What does that call mean, and what should I do next?
Mumbles, Wausau, Wis.
Partner’s call suggests a two-suiter, to which you respond by bidding your better minor at the five-level — unless your hand is so strong that you want to drive to slam. Be aware, though, that your partner might have hearts and clubs, planning to correct five diamonds to five hearts. The wisest bid here is five clubs, to ensure finding a good fit, if not the best.
After opponents have opened one no-trump, does the meaning of their double of a transfer bid depend on the range of the no-trump, and on whether yours is a passed or unpassed hand? Should it promise a good suit, a good hand or both?
Coming Up for Air, Newport News, Va.
Yes, the range of the no-trump and whether yours is a passed hand are both critical here. Double by an unpassed hand after the opponents have opened anything but a strong no-trump shows a good hand but not necessarily a great holding in the suit doubled. Any other double should be lead-directing, showing a good suit but not necessarily guaranteeing a good hand.
|
Please recommend some books that might help me master the percentages in order to gain a basic knowledge of the essentials in bridge?
Captain Crunch, Albany, N.Y.
Kelsey and Glauert wrote informatively on this subject, but for the truly devoted expert, there are highly complex books by Borel and Roudinesco. The normal player, however, can get by with only a few basic rules. Learn the normal splits missing three, four, five or six cards, and you really don’t need much else. The ACBL’s most recent version of the Encyclopedia of Bridge certainly covers those basics.
Recently, I held ♠ Q-J-4-2, ♥ 10-7, ♦ 10-9-8-6, ♣ J-8-3, and my opponents bid unopposed one club – one no-trump – two no-trump three no-trump. What would you have led here? (The winning lead was a heart, since partner had five decent hearts and an entry.)
Right Said Fred, Harrisburg, Pa.
Dummy probably has a balanced 18 with some club length, while declarer has no major and is therefore 4-4 or so in the minors. Partner needs to have 10-11 points to give you a chance, but he didn’t bid. I would guess partner’s shape to be 3-4-3-3 (again, give or take a card), and I’d lead a diamond, hoping dummy has a doubleton queen or jack. I’d never expect my partner to refrain from bidding with values and five hearts.
|
March 16th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity.
W.B. Yeats
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 8 6 3
♥ 3
♦ A K J
♣ Q J 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ A 10 8 7 4 2
♦ 9 3
♣ 10 9 6 4 |
♠ A J 10 7 2
♥ J 6
♦ 8 7 5
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K Q 9 5
♦ Q 10 6 4 2
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♦ * |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
3 ♥ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Weak two in either major
♥7
You could settle for a penalty here: If your partner has a singleton diamond and the other three aces, you might expect to take about seven tricks on defense. Or you could look for game in either hearts or no-trump. Since a 4-3 heart fit might be awkward to play, I would start by cue-bidding, then convert a three-spade response to three no-trump, hoping partner could bid on with real extras.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K Q 9 5
♦ Q 10 6 4 2
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
If you carry this resolution … you will send a British Foreign Secretary, whoever he may be, naked into the conference chamber.
Aneurin Bevan
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ A 10 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ 10 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 8
♥ J 7 6 4
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 8 4 2 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 8 5
♦ 10 9 8 5
♣ Q 9 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ J 9 5 4 2
♥ K 9 3
♦ A J 6
♣ A J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game forcing with spade support
♠A
Hands like this emphasize the necessity for Checkback Stayman, using the other minor as a forcing relay to learn whether your side has a 5-3 spade fit. If it does, you surely want to play in four spades; if not, three no-trump. So, bid two clubs and act accordingly over the response.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 6 3
♥ A 10 2
♦ K 7 2
♣ 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The decline in the number of entries in women’s events has me wondering how the women of today would match up against the American teams from 50 years ago. After all, it was only in the ‘70s that the Venice Cup — the most prestigious of women’s events — came into being.
As a small piece of evidence that the women back then could really play, I adduce into evidence this deal from a Spingold knockout match from that period.
Mary-Jane Farrell was playing with Marylin Johnson, and she declared six hearts on the lead of a low trump. She decided to play the diamond ace and take a diamond ruff, then the spade ace and a spade ruff followed by top trumps. If hearts had broken, she would have had 12 tricks, but she needed some more luck when trumps failed to behave.
She played her remaining top heart and exited with a heart, throwing two spades and a club from table. Nancy Gruver as West now made a nice play when she produced the club king to prevent declarer from taking three easy club tricks. Farrell won the club ace and simultaneously unblocked the club queen from hand to leave a four-card ending where dummy had two spades and two clubs, while she retained a trump, a club and two diamonds.
When she ruffed a spade to hand, she would have been home if the king had fallen, but even as it was, since East had sole control of diamonds and clubs, the spade ruff squeezed her into conceding the 12th trick.