March 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Chance is the pseudonym of God when he did not want to sign his name.
Theophile Gautier
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K 8 7 4
♦ K 5 3
♣ A J 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 5 3
♥ Q 10 9 5 2
♦ —
♣ 10 7 |
♠ 9 4 2
♥ 6
♦ Q J 8
♣ Q 9 8 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A
♥ A J 3
♦ A 10 9 7 6 4 2
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
2 ♦ * |
Dbl. |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*5-5 or more in the majors
♠K
Redoubling used to be mandatory, since all bids denied invitational values or better. Nowadays, new suits at the one-level by unpassed hands are played as forcing. Redouble is still acceptable here — though if the opponents bid spades or clubs, we may not be able to define our heart length precisely. Thus, the choice is a close one; I’d certainly redouble if my spades and diamonds were switched.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6
♥ K 9 7 4
♦ K 5 3
♣ A J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 13th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Most editors are failed writers — but so are most writers.
T.S. Eliot
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 8 2
♥ A 10 9
♦ 10 8 7
♣ A 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 4
♥ K 7 6 5 4
♦ A K 5 4
♣ K 5 |
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 3
♦ Q J 9 3
♣ Q 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 10 6 3
♥ J 8 2
♦ 6 2
♣ J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT * |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Forcing
♦K
Your partner’s double is take-out, suggesting opening values or so. It seems obvious to bid three diamonds, since you prefer that suit over hearts, but your partner might easily be three-suited with more clubs than diamonds. It would therefore be more prudent to bid two no-trump as take-out for the minors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7
♥ Q 3
♦ Q J 9 3
♣ Q 10 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
It doesn’t much signify whom one marries, for one is sure to find next morning that it was someone else.
Samuel Rogers
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 7
♥ A Q 8 7 3
♦ A K J 9
♣ J 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 2
♥ 9 6 4 2
♦ 10 8 6 3
♣ 3 |
♠ Q 6 5 4 3
♥ K J
♦ Q
♣ 10 8 7 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10
♥ 10 5
♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ A K Q 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠2
I’m prepared to jump to four heats, gambling on finding a top card in a black suit opposite, since West is very likely to be short in diamonds and to lead that suit. If he does, I’d be optimistic about having nine top tricks in the red suits and finding another trick somewhere else.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7
♥ A Q 8 7 3
♦ A K J 9
♣ J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
On the Plains of Hesitation bleach the bones of countless millions who, at the Dawn of Victory, sat down to wait, and waiting — died!
George W. Cecil
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ A Q 8 5 2
♣ K J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 9 8 3
♥ 10 7 6
♦ 10 3
♣ 6 5 4 |
♠ 6 5 4 2
♥ A Q J 2
♦ K J 9
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 7
♥ K 8
♦ 7 6 4
♣ A Q 10 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
This is a tough one! Should you double hearts, then bid spades? I think so, since even if your right-hand opponent has length in hearts, that might be your best suit. Double hearts for penalty and then bid spades if the opponents find a fit in a minor suit. Whether you should bid spades or jump in that suit may depend on just how the bidding develops.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 5 4 2
♥ A Q J 2
♦ K J 9
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 10th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
|
My partner opened a strong two clubs, and I gave the neutral response of two diamonds. After a rebid of two no-trump, can I use Stayman and Jacoby Transfers, just as if my partner had opened the bidding with a no-trump call? What is the best use for a bid of three spades here?
Movers and Shakers, Albuquerque, N.M.
You play exactly the same as over a two no-trump opening bid. (The same applies when you overcall a weak two-bid with a natural two no-trump call.) Use the three-spade call in one of two ways: either as Minor Suit Stayman or as a puppet to three no-trump. After that, responder can show one or both minors in various ways. Some possibilities are listed at bit.ly/AoB2NTresponses.
When declaring, I can generally keep track of the trumps. But following the spots in more than two suits is a challenge. What would you recommend as a way forward?
Losing the Thread, Detroit, Mich.
I do not recommend trying to count all the suits. Focus on the ones that seem most likely to matter to you after dummy comes down. Try to focus only on trump (just count the missing ones in the opponents’ hands) and one other suit. As you get more skilled at the task, maybe you can expand your repertoire.
Would you consider it appropriate to open with a pre-empt in third seat, holding ♠ 4-3, ♥ K-Q-8-7-3, ♦ A-7-3-2, ♣ 10-3? I assume you might pass at some vulnerabilities, but if you bid, do you prefer one or two hearts?
Risking it All, Panama City, Fla.
You are right that I would probably pass at unfavorable vulnerability, though the heart 10 might tempt me to act. Non-vulnerable, I might mix it up with a call of two hearts, but a simple opening of one heart with both sides vulnerable is perfectly reasonable and mixes aggression with some degree of safety.
|
Recently, I was declaring three spades, and when I led the trump king, one opponent revoked. I asked her if she had any spades, and she corrected the revoke by playing her trump ace at once. What is the consequence of this? If I make three spades with an overtrick thanks to the revoke, would that be game?
Portia’s Pa, Lake Oswego, Ore.
For a revoke to be established, the offending side must have played to the next trick, unless a claim has been made. So here, the revoke is not established and the player can correct the revoke, with the card played in error a penalty card. In this case, it must be led to the next trick — but penalty cards are not always so simple if someone else wins the key trick! In any event, revoke penalties serve as under- or overtricks and can never turn a part-score contract into a game.
Would you ever compare the safety play in bridge to a gambit in chess or a sacrifice in baseball? Are there other games, such as poker, that serve as more apt comparisons to bridge?
Boy Scout, Pleasanton, Calif.
Most safety plays in bridge definitely advance your side’s cause by guaranteeing your contract, while a sacrifice at baseball is a less-guaranteed return on investment. Maybe a better comparison would be to the suicide squeeze, safety squeeze or sacrifice fly, which all get a run in when executed well. Psyching in bridge is like bluffing in poker, while the cerebral approaches required for chess and bridge are very similar. I wish bridge players realized that they need to read in order to improve, just as chess players do!
|
March 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
The people people have for friends your common sense appall But the people people marry are the queerest folk of all.
Charlotte Perkins Gilman
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 6
♥ 8
♦ A 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A K 10 9 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 7
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ K Q 6 4
♣ Q 8 |
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 7 4
♦ J 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ A J 10 9 5 2
♦ 10
♣ 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
It seems obvious to bid or transfer into spades, doesn’t it? Indeed, the normal route with hands like this is to transfer into spades then offer no-trump. Here, however, I believe the quality of your spades should argue for playing four spades, even facing a small doubleton. I would transfer, then bid four spades — or use a Texas transfer to spades if that is in my repertoire.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 7 4
♦ J 5
♣ J 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
An act of God was defined as something which no reasonable man could have expected.
A. P. Herbert
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8
♥ A J 7 6 2
♦ 7
♣ K 6 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 9 5 4 2
♥ 4
♦ J 10 8 6 5
♣ Q |
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 8 5
♦ Q 4 3 2
♣ A J 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A 6 3
♥ K Q 9 3
♦ A K 9
♣ 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
It feels right to re-raise to three diamonds. With so little defense to the majors but a good fit for your partner, you should be able to take nine tricks, or the opponents must be able to make a partscore. For the record, the bid of a major here would show a stopper and fit for diamonds, with a maximum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7
♥ 10 8 5
♦ Q 4 3 2
♣ A J 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
They say to know oneself is to know all there is that is human. But of course no one can ever know himself. Nothing human is finally calculable; even to ourselves we are strange.
Gore Vidal
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 7 5
♥ A 3
♦ K Q J 9
♣ A 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6
♥ 9 8 6 5
♦ 10 4
♣ Q 10 8 7 6 |
♠ A Q 9
♥ Q 10 4
♦ A 7 6 5 3
♣ J 5 |
| South |
♠ J 4 3 2
♥ K J 7 2
♦ 8 2
♣ K 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 NT * |
| Pass |
2 ♠ * * |
Dbl. |
3 ♣ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*12-14
**Clubs
♦10
Your partner’s double is not penalty; he rates to have values and no clear call. (He is unlikely to have both majors, or he might have bid spades, then hearts). A typical shape would be 3-4-3-3, so you can introduce your diamonds, confident that if you do not have an eight-card fit there, hearts will be more than playable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9
♥ Q 10 4
♦ A 7 6 5 3
♣ J 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Truth is on the march, and nothing can stop it.
Emile Zola
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 10 9
♥ Q J 9 8
♦ 10 4
♣ J 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 2
♥ 7 5 4
♦ A K Q J 8 5 3
♣ Q 8 |
♠ K 7 6 5 4 3
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6
♣ K 7 6 |
| South |
♠ Q 8
♥ A 10 6 3 2
♦ 2
♣ A 9 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 NT * |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
| Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
It is tempting to bid spades at the two- or three-level now, but it might be better to give preference to two diamonds, since your spade intermediates are so terrible and your heart king isn’t pulling its full weight. You may still be able to get to spades if your partner keeps the auction alive. I’d bid two spades I suppose, but I’m conflicted.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 6 5 4 3
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6
♣ K 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Speak now, and I will answer; How shall I help you, say.
A.E. Housman
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 3 2
♥ A J 6 3
♦ Q 10 6
♣ K 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 10 9 6 5
♥ 10 4
♦ A 8 7
♣ Q J |
♠ 8 7 4
♥ 7
♦ K J 9 3 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
| South |
♠ K
♥ K Q 9 8 5 2
♦ 5 4
♣ A 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
I generally believe in introducing a four-card minor rather than rebidding a six-card major, but this hand has such weak clubs and decent hearts that it may be a sensible way to emphasize the minimum nature of the hand. If partner invites with a call of two no-trump, you can bid three clubs and describe your hand to a T.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K
♥ K Q 9 8 5 2
♦ 5 4
♣ A 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
After West showed the majors and North doubled, suggesting a defensive hand, South’s first thought was to try to reach no-trump. But when North suggested diamond support and extras, South took a shot at the slam.
He captured the lead of the spade king and was almost ready to claim his contract, but he was jolted back to reality when West failed to follow to the diamond ace.
It now seemed that he might need West to hold the club queen, or for the heart queen to fall from East. But before committing himself in hearts, declarer saw that he might achieve an endplay, as long as East’s major-suit holdings could be eliminated.
East was marked with no more than one heart, but if he also held just three spades, which would be consistent with the action, the position of the club queen might turn out to be irrelevant.
A trump to dummy’s king allowed declarer to trump a spade in hand. Then a heart to the king was followed by the ruff of dummy’s third spade. South now took the last necessary precaution of cashing his club king, then took the heart ace — just in case. Whether East ruffed with his master trump now or waited until he was endplayed with that card at the next trick, he would eventually have to play a club around to North. Either way, South’s losing heart could be discarded.
Note that if South doesn’t cash the club king before playing the third diamond, East can exit with a club, after which the clubs are blocked.