March 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
The noblest prospect which a Scotchman ever sees is the high-road that leads him to England.
Samuel Johnson
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 7 6 2
♦ Q J 10 2
♣ K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5 3
♥ Q 10
♦ A 9 6 4 3
♣ 8 7 6 3 |
♠ Q J 10 9 6
♥ 9 8 4 3
♦ K 5
♣ A 5 |
| South |
♠ A 8 2
♥ A K 5
♦ 8 7
♣ Q J 10 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦4
I can see a case for leading a deceptive diamond seven, simulating shortness in diamonds. Similarly, if declarer is really short in diamonds, we must cash our black-suit winners at once. I’d argue for leading clubs rather than the doubleton spade, since partner had the chance to bid spades and didn’t take it.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ 6 4 3
♦ Q 7 6 5 3
♣ K J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
March 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
If I am in third seat with ♠ A-Q-8-4-3, ♥ A-9-7, ♦ Q-7-3, ♣ 10-3, and the bidding starts with a weak two diamonds from my partner, should I pass, raise diamonds or introduce my spades?
Prince of Tides, Atlanta, Ga.
The high-cards seem evenly divided here, and we have the best fit (diamonds) and the boss suit, spades. I’d raise to three diamonds, expecting partner to make it at least four times out of five, while maybe giving the opponents space to do something foolish. If they bid game, I will double.
Playing rubber bridge, I held ♠ J-4-2, ♥ K-J-7-5-3, ♦ J-7-3, ♣ Q-10. My left-hand opponent opened four spades, my partner doubled, and I was in the hot seat. Where on the spectrum of take-out to penalty should we play this double, and what would you do here?
Colonel Mustard, Fort Knox, Ky.
My preference for the double leans toward take-out; partner removes with shape or values, but can pass with a flat weak hand. What category does this hand fall into? I don’t know! My partner and I have agreed that we remove to a contract we think we can make, but does this hand have enough to bid five hearts? Whether to sit for the double or bid five hearts might depend on who is on my left.
Where do you stand on the question of doubling a minor suit without perfect shape? Assuming you have 12-16 points, what flaws are considered acceptable for the double?
Roman Way, San Francisco, Calif.
The Italians always doubled when they were broadly suitable for play in both majors, especially loose minor-suit opening bids. When short in one major, your choice is between a pass, hoping to double that major for take-out at the next turn, and an overcall in a four-card suit at the one-level. That call normally requires full values and a chunky suit.
|
When you open a minor with 4-3 in the majors and partner responds one heart, when do you prefer to raise with three, when do you bid one spade, and when do you bid one no-trump? Does it affect your decision if the next hand has doubled?
Skedaddled, Tupelo, Miss.
Bid spades, then support hearts anytime you possess extra values in high cards or shape. Bid spades, planning to pass one no-trump if you are looking at a balanced minimum with good spades and a decent doubleton in the unbid minor; with bad spades, you might prefer a call of one no-trump. Bid one no-trump immediately with a 4-3-3-3 pattern. If they have doubled your opening bid, you might be more tempted to raise the major when in doubt; partner might not have introduced a weak four-carder, after all.
I recently heard my left-hand opponent open the bidding and my partner overcall at the one-level, after which the next player jumped to two spades to show a weak hand and a long suit. I wanted to double to show cards, but I wasn’t sure if this might be penalty. What say you?
Frozen Solid, White Plains, N.Y.
Your double sounds like take-out to me. (Most players believe you can’t double any lowlevel suit bid for penalty at your first turn.) These doubles may be referred to as Snapdragon, Competitive or fourth-suit doubles, and they show the fourth suit and values, generally with at least tolerance for partner.
|
March 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The world is content with setting right the surface of things.
Cardinal Newman
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 3
♥ 10 5 4
♦ K J 8 2
♣ Q 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 6 5 2
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6 3
♣ J 8 2 |
♠ A 9 8 4
♥ Q J 7
♦ 10 4
♣ K 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 7
♥ A 9 8 6 3 2
♦ A Q 5
♣ A 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
Many partnerships play calls of both two clubs and two diamonds as artificial here. But even if a bid of two clubs were natural, I suspect I’d pass rather than bidding two spades or risking ending up in a 3-3 club fit. With the spade 10 or even the nine instead of the two, you could tempt me to rebid two spades, but not here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 6 5 2
♥ K
♦ 9 7 6 3
♣ J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
March 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
A little more than a little is by much too much.
William Shakespeare
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 3 2
♥ A 8
♦ A Q 4
♣ 8 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7 6
♥ J 10 5 4 3
♦ J 5
♣ K 9 |
♠ Q 5 4
♥ K Q 9 7
♦ 8 7 6 3 2
♣ 6 |
| South |
♠ A K
♥ 6 2
♦ K 10 9
♣ A Q J 10 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
A singleton in partner’s help-suit is all well and good, but with only three trumps, you may need to find him short in diamonds to make game good. You can consult your partner here by bidding three hearts, and he will know that if he has heart length, it will be helpful to the cause.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 4
♥ K Q 9 7
♦ 8 7 6 3 2
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 28th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
No disorders have employed so many quacks, as those that have no cure; and no sciences have exercised so many quills, as those that have no certainty.
Charles Colton
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 7 4
♥ 10 7 2
♦ Q J 10 8
♣ A 7 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 9 5
♥ K Q J 6 5 3
♦ 9 5
♣ K 10 |
♠ 8 3
♥ 9 4
♦ A 6 4 3 2
♣ J 9 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 6 2
♥ A 8
♦ K 7
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
You don’t need to bid more than three spades now; the three-club call creates a game force. This auction suggests three spades, so it also implies six decent hearts; with three decent spades and six uninspiring hearts, it would have been reasonable to raise spades on the previous round. You can let your partner decide which suit to play in, but I would not leave him in three no-trump, as diamonds sound like the danger suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 5
♥ K Q J 6 5 3
♦ 9 5
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 27th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
So much one man can do, That does both act and know.
Andrew Marvell
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 5 3
♥ A 7 5
♦ Q 8 5 4 2
♣ A K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 9 8 4
♥ J 8 6 2
♦ 7 6
♣ 7 4 |
♠ Q 6 2
♥ K 10 4
♦ K 10 3
♣ J 10 8 3 |
| South |
♠ K J 7
♥ Q 9 3
♦ A J 9
♣ Q 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
The world splits into two groups here. One half says double is penalty, with diamond length and at least a strong no-trump in high cards. The other group argues that it should be takeout — but if so, why didn’t you bid the first time? I side with the penalty crowd, and I will choose a spade or diamond lead if this is the final contract.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 9 8 4
♥ J 8 6 2
♦ 7 6
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
His honor rooted in dishonor stood, And faith unfaithful kept him falsely true.
Alfred Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K J 10
♥ A K Q J
♦ J 7 6
♣ 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ 10 8 2
♦ Q 10 3
♣ J 10 7 6 |
♠ A 6 5 4 2
♥ 9 4 3
♦ 9 8 5
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 3
♥ 7 6 5
♦ A K 4 2
♣ A K Q 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠9
I’d normally compete to two spades, with the fifth trump telling me that our side has at least eight trumps between us. Against that approach are the three small hearts and the fact that my partner would always bid two spades with four trumps unless his hand were extraordinarily unsuitable for that call. He would double two diamonds with extras and three trumps. Still, I’d bid and let my opponents make the last mistake.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 6 5 4 2
♥ 9 4 3
♦ 9 8 5
♣ 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
February 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Oh, order! Material order, intellectual order, moral order! … To know where we are going and what we want; that is order. To keep one’s word, to do the right thing, and at the right time: more order.
Henri Amiel
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K J 7 5
♥ A Q 8 4
♦ 6 4 3
♣ Q 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4 3
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ J 10 9 8
♣ K 6 5 |
♠ 6
♥ K J 9 6
♦ Q 7 5
♣ J 10 9 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 9 8 2
♥ 3
♦ A K 2
♣ A 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT * |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ * * |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Game-forcing spade raise
**Short hearts
♦J
Your partner did not compete to three clubs himself, so presumably he has a doubleton spade and no more than five clubs. My best bet to beat the contract might be to lead a trump and kill the club ruffs in dummy, in the hope that neither hearts nor diamonds will be easy for declarer to establish. The diamond king is too committal an opening lead for my taste.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 4 3 2
♥ Q 8 5
♦ K 2
♣ Q 9 8 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
February 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
My partner held ♠ 9-8-7-5, ♥ A-Q-10-8-7, ♦ K-Q, ♣ Q-7, and opened one heart. In response, holding 12 points with three hearts and four very small clubs, I had available one no-trump as semi-forcing, with new suits at the two-level being game-forcing. What is the right way to show my hand, and how should our bidding go?
Enough Said, Saint John’s, Newfoundland
If you decide you don’t have a game force, you might respond one no-trump, which your partner may decide to pass. That means you might stay out of game, but facing something like ace-third of spades, king-third of hearts, and ace-jack third of diamonds with the aforementioned four-small clubs, you do have four top losers in four hearts, even if three no-trump is quite playable. Driving your hand to game with a call of two clubs is certainly reasonable if playing sound openers — few do, though.
Please explain the difference between the minimum number of cards promised by opener rebidding his suit (be it a major or minor) over a one- or two-level response by responder, and the number of cards promised by responder for rebidding his suit?
Pistol Pete, Kenosha, Wis.
Responder’s rebid of his own suit shows six, except that occasionally he will rebid a very chunky five-card suit — typically over a one-no-trump response from his partner. Similarly, opener’s suit rebid facing a one-level response promises six — though occasionally the rebid of a minor facing a one-spade response may be forced with five when unsuitable for a reverse or one-no-trump response. By contrast, opener’s rebid facing a two-level response is often a decent five-carder.
When you open one club, then hear one heart to your left and two diamonds from partner, what should you do with ♠ Q-9-6-4, ♥ 3, ♦ 6-4, ♣ A-K-Q-10-9-8? Would a call of two spades promise extras? Should I therefore rebid three clubs?
Poor Richard, Charlottesville, Va.
If your partner had been able to respond one heart, your one-spade rebid would just show four spades and not promise extras. Similarly, a bid of two spades is natural here — it may contain extras but does not promise them. That said, the absence of a negative double from your partner means you probably don’t have a spade fit, so emphasizing your excellent clubs has a lot going for it.
|
As a relatively disciplined player, I’m curious about how the experts pre-empt in second seat these days. Does this action require a decent suit, or will the vulnerability override position?
Restraint of Trade, Jackson, Tenn.
In second seat at favorable vulnerability, I’d expect many players to take liberties. (Whether they should is another matter.) Conversely, in second seat when vulnerable, players of my vintage tend to want to have very close to the perfect hand for a pre-empt. By the way, suit quality is paramount; four small cards in a major will not influence me that much.
I play standard methods of carding, but I would welcome input on when giving suit preference should overlap with count and attitude.
A Little Learning, Honolulu, Hawaii
Your first signal on partner’s lead is attitude (unless your attitude should be clear to partner by bridge logic — and both players know that). On declarer’s lead, signal count when necessary, or else nothing at all. When the second round of a suit is led, your choice of cards may carry a suit-preference signal. This often applies when you have a sequence or a choice of irrelevant small cards to play. For example, from 7-3-2, you play the two first to discourage, but the order of the remaining cards will carry a suit-preference message. I’ll leave the discussion of how to signal when dummy has a singleton for another day.
|
February 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.
Magna Carta
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 8 5 4
♥ 2
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ A K 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A Q 10 9 2
♥ J 6
♦ Q 10 6 3
♣ 10 6 |
♠ K 3
♥ A 10 7 3
♦ J 4
♣ Q J 9 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 6
♥ K Q 9 8 5 4
♦ K 7 2
♣ 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣10
Sometimes a cigar is only a cigar, and a bid in the fourth suit is occasionally natural, not artificial. Here, a call of two clubs shows clubs and is limited by the failure to jump to three clubs (which you would do if the spade four were the king). You would certainly guess that clubs would play better than no-trump here, and since you can offer the suit to play, that seems a sensible option.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 5 4
♥ 2
♦ A 9 8 5
♣ A K 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This week’s deals all come from the Gold Coast tournament in Brisbane. This is one of the most enjoyable events on the calendar, with sun, sea and sand all augmenting a venue packed with cheap accommodations and excellent restaurants. The bridge is of an excellent standard, too.
Michael Rosenberg and Ross Harper, two expatriate Scots, constantly threatened to break into the top three in the main pairs event, eventually finishing second. Here they benefited from some careless declarer play.
Harper led a diamond against three no-trump by South, reached after that player had upgraded his hand into a 15-17 no-trump — a perfectly reasonable call.
Rosenberg took the king and shifted to the spade queen. We should all be familiar with the idea of ducking the first round of the suit when we hold the ace facing king, but is this the time to put that notion into effect?
That play might be necessary at trick two to try to neutralize the defender’s spades if the suit breaks 5-2. But since West appears to have the diamond ace, it may be safe enough to win the lead and play on clubs at once. At the table, though, declarer won in hand and guessed very badly when he led a diamond, maybe thinking West would duck. Harper was having none of that; he took his ace and played back a spade, and now Rosenberg had the entry to run spades when he got in. That was two down, and all the matchpoints.
Note that if you do duck trick two, then on a heart shift you may well find yourself forced to guess the ending well.