Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, February 18th, 2019

The noblest prospect which a Scotchman ever sees is the high-road that leads him to England.

Samuel Johnson


E North
E-W ♠ K 7 4
 J 7 6 2
 Q J 10 2
♣ K 9
West East
♠ 5 3
 Q 10
 A 9 6 4 3
♣ 8 7 6 3
♠ Q J 10 9 6
 9 8 4 3
 K 5
♣ A 5
South
♠ A 8 2
 A K 5
 8 7
♣ Q J 10 4 2
South West North East
      Pass
1 NT Pass 2 ♣ Pass
2 Pass 3 NT All pass
       

4

This week’s deals all come from the Gold Coast tournament in Brisbane. This is one of the most enjoyable events on the calendar, with sun, sea and sand all augmenting a venue packed with cheap accommodations and excellent restaurants. The bridge is of an excellent standard, too.

Michael Rosenberg and Ross Harper, two expatriate Scots, constantly threatened to break into the top three in the main pairs event, eventually finishing second. Here they benefited from some careless declarer play.

Harper led a diamond against three no-trump by South, reached after that player had upgraded his hand into a 15-17 no-trump — a perfectly reasonable call.

Rosenberg took the king and shifted to the spade queen. We should all be familiar with the idea of ducking the first round of the suit when we hold the ace facing king, but is this the time to put that notion into effect?

That play might be necessary at trick two to try to neutralize the defender’s spades if the suit breaks 5-2. But since West appears to have the diamond ace, it may be safe enough to win the lead and play on clubs at once. At the table, though, declarer won in hand and guessed very badly when he led a diamond, maybe thinking West would duck. Harper was having none of that; he took his ace and played back a spade, and now Rosenberg had the entry to run spades when he got in. That was two down, and all the matchpoints.

Note that if you do duck trick two, then on a heart shift you may well find yourself forced to guess the ending well.



I can see a case for leading a deceptive diamond seven, simulating shortness in diamonds. Similarly, if declarer is really short in diamonds, we must cash our black-suit winners at once. I’d argue for leading clubs rather than the doubleton spade, since partner had the chance to bid spades and didn’t take it.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 10
 6 4 3
 Q 7 6 5 3
♣ K J 3
South West North East
  1 Pass 1
Pass 2 Pass 2
All pass      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 17th, 2019

If I am in third seat with ♠ A-Q-8-4-3,  A-9-7,  Q-7-3, ♣ 10-3, and the bidding starts with a weak two diamonds from my partner, should I pass, raise diamonds or introduce my spades?

Prince of Tides, Atlanta, Ga.

The high-cards seem evenly divided here, and we have the best fit (diamonds) and the boss suit, spades. I’d raise to three diamonds, expecting partner to make it at least four times out of five, while maybe giving the opponents space to do something foolish. If they bid game, I will double.

Playing rubber bridge, I held ♠ J-4-2,  K-J-7-5-3,  J-7-3, ♣ Q-10. My left-hand opponent opened four spades, my partner doubled, and I was in the hot seat. Where on the spectrum of take-out to penalty should we play this double, and what would you do here?

Colonel Mustard, Fort Knox, Ky.

My preference for the double leans toward take-out; partner removes with shape or values, but can pass with a flat weak hand. What category does this hand fall into? I don’t know! My partner and I have agreed that we remove to a contract we think we can make, but does this hand have enough to bid five hearts? Whether to sit for the double or bid five hearts might depend on who is on my left.

Where do you stand on the question of doubling a minor suit without perfect shape? Assuming you have 12-16 points, what flaws are considered acceptable for the double?

Roman Way, San Francisco, Calif.

The Italians always doubled when they were broadly suitable for play in both majors, especially loose minor-suit opening bids. When short in one major, your choice is between a pass, hoping to double that major for take-out at the next turn, and an overcall in a four-card suit at the one-level. That call normally requires full values and a chunky suit.

When you open a minor with 4-3 in the majors and partner responds one heart, when do you prefer to raise with three, when do you bid one spade, and when do you bid one no-trump? Does it affect your decision if the next hand has doubled?

Skedaddled, Tupelo, Miss.

Bid spades, then support hearts anytime you possess extra values in high cards or shape. Bid spades, planning to pass one no-trump if you are looking at a balanced minimum with good spades and a decent doubleton in the unbid minor; with bad spades, you might prefer a call of one no-trump. Bid one no-trump immediately with a 4-3-3-3 pattern. If they have doubled your opening bid, you might be more tempted to raise the major when in doubt; partner might not have introduced a weak four-carder, after all.

I recently heard my left-hand opponent open the bidding and my partner overcall at the one-level, after which the next player jumped to two spades to show a weak hand and a long suit. I wanted to double to show cards, but I wasn’t sure if this might be penalty. What say you?

Frozen Solid, White Plains, N.Y.

Your double sounds like take-out to me. (Most players believe you can’t double any lowlevel suit bid for penalty at your first turn.) These doubles may be referred to as Snapdragon, Competitive or fourth-suit doubles, and they show the fourth suit and values, generally with at least tolerance for partner.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 16th, 2019

The world is content with setting right the surface of things.

Cardinal Newman


S North
None ♠ K 10 3
 10 5 4
 K J 8 2
♣ Q 10 6
West East
♠ Q J 6 5 2
 K
 9 7 6 3
♣ J 8 2
♠ A 9 8 4
 Q J 7
 10 4
♣ K 9 5 3
South
♠ 7
 A 9 8 6 3 2
 A Q 5
♣ A 7 4
South West North East
1 Pass 2 Pass
3 ♣ Pass 4 All pass
       

♠Q

When North, playing the forcing no-trump, produces a constructive raise of hearts, South makes a help-suit game try of three clubs, asking North to decide whether what he has is right for game. North’s two builders in clubs make up for his bad trump holding, so he takes a shot at the heart game.

When West leads the spade queen, declarer must duck, or else East would win and continue the suit, leaving declarer with four losers when trumps did not behave. It is often incorrect to cover when declarer wants to keep East off lead, but here ducking the lead prevents either defender from continuing spades without surrendering a trick.

West has a difficult play now, but accurately shifts to the diamond seven. Declarer wins the ace in hand, then takes the heart ace; the sight of the king persuades him to try for an endplay if trumps do not break, by cashing the diamond queen and leading a second trump.

If trumps break, declarer is home; when they do not, East wins his two hearts, but now South’s small extra chance kicks in, since East has no third diamond left to lead and must open up one black suit or the other. Either way, declarer’s two clubs will disappear on dummy’s winners.

If declarer leads a third diamond instead of the second heart, East discards on this trick and the fourth diamond. Declarer can do no better than play a trump. East cashes his hearts and exits with his spade ace, leaving South with an eventual club loser.



Many partnerships play calls of both two clubs and two diamonds as artificial here. But even if a bid of two clubs were natural, I suspect I’d pass rather than bidding two spades or risking ending up in a 3-3 club fit. With the spade 10 or even the nine instead of the two, you could tempt me to rebid two spades, but not here.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q J 6 5 2
 K
 9 7 6 3
♣ J 8 2
South West North East
    1 ♣ Pass
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, February 15th, 2019

A little more than a little is by much too much.

William Shakespeare


S North
None ♠ J 10 3 2
 A 8
 A Q 4
♣ 8 7 5 2
West East
♠ 9 8 7 6
 J 10 5 4 3
 J 5
♣ K 9
♠ Q 5 4
 K Q 9 7
 8 7 6 3 2
♣ 6
South
♠ A K
 6 2
 K 10 9
♣ A Q J 10 4 3
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 3 ♣ Pass
4 ♣ Pass 6 ♣ All pass
       

J

South has a tricky call at his second turn, and rather than rebid two no-trump with two small in an unbid suit, he invents a diamond suit to show his extras through a reverse. Yes, a simple rebid of three clubs would not be that much of an underbid.

The continuation over a reverse in an uncontested auction is one that is the subject of much controversy. In the past, everything that sounded non-forcing would have been construed as such. But a more popular style these days would be to use a call of two no-trump (or even two hearts) as artificial and setting up non-forcing auctions. Thus, North’s call of three clubs shows a game-forcing hand with support, and when South re-raises himself to four clubs, North decides to take a shot at slam.

After a heart lead, South wins the ace and is faced with a possible loser in trump and an immediate loser in hearts. Instead of taking an immediate club finesse, South follows a line to give himself an extra chance with almost no risk. He wins the heart ace, cashes his top spades, then leads a diamond to dummy and plays a third spade. Whether or not he should let this run if a small spade appears from East on the third round of the suit, the sight of East’s queen is enough to gladden declarer’s heart. He ruffs with the ten, cashes the club ace, and leads a diamond to dummy to play the winning spade, pitching his heart, and losing only to the club king.

Note: six clubs is easier to make than three no-trump!



A singleton in partner’s help-suit is all well and good, but with only three trumps, you may need to find him short in diamonds to make game good. You can consult your partner here by bidding three hearts, and he will know that if he has heart length, it will be helpful to the cause.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 5 4
 K Q 9 7
 8 7 6 3 2
♣ 6
South West North East
    1 ♠ Pass
2 ♠ Pass 3 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, February 14th, 2019

No disorders have employed so many quacks, as those that have no cure; and no sciences have exercised so many quills, as those that have no certainty.

Charles Colton


S North
None ♠ 7 4
 10 7 2
 Q J 10 8
♣ A 7 4 3
West East
♠ A 9 5
 K Q J 6 5 3
 9 5
♣ K 10
♠ 8 3
 9 4
 A 6 4 3 2
♣ J 9 8 5
South
♠ K Q J 10 6 2
 A 8
 K 7
♣ Q 6 2
South West North East
1 ♠ 2 Dbl. Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

K

When West overcalls two hearts over one spade, North has just enough for a negative double. South is close between an invitational jump to three spades and bidding game, and his 100 honors in spades persuade him to go high.

West has a natural lead of the heart king, and South wins with the ace, since he can see no reason to duck. Declarer will need to find a way to bring the diamonds into play, but it may be best to disguise his intentions initially by playing the spade queen. When West ducks, the queen scores, and declarer craftily continues with the 10. This time, West decides to win and cash the heart queen. When everyone follows, West knows that to have any chance to defeat the contract, East must hold precisely the diamond ace — since if declarer has both top diamond honors and has played sensibly, the contract will be cold.

Furthermore, East needs a minor club honor, and now desperate measures are called for because declarer is threatening to take five spades, three diamonds and two aces. The desperate measures in question are to shift to the club king at trick four. If declarer ducks, the diamond ace will be the defenders’ fourth trick. If dummy wins the club ace, East can simply duck the first diamond, and the defenders will eventually come to a trick in each minor.

For the record, if South plays on diamonds at trick two, he should still be defeated with accurate defense.



You don’t need to bid more than three spades now; the three-club call creates a game force. This auction suggests three spades, so it also implies six decent hearts; with three decent spades and six uninspiring hearts, it would have been reasonable to raise spades on the previous round. You can let your partner decide which suit to play in, but I would not leave him in three no-trump, as diamonds sound like the danger suit.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 9 5
 K Q J 6 5 3
 9 5
♣ K 10
South West North East
1 Pass 1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 3 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, February 13th, 2019

So much one man can do,
That does both act and know.

Andrew Marvell


N North
N-S ♠ 5 3
 A 7 5
 Q 8 5 4 2
♣ A K 9
West East
♠ A 10 9 8 4
 J 8 6 2
 7 6
♣ 7 4
♠ Q 6 2
 K 10 4
 K 10 3
♣ J 10 8 3
South
♠ K J 7
 Q 9 3
 A J 9
♣ Q 6 5 2
South West North East
    1 Pass
2 NT Pass 3 NT All pass
       

♠10

The contract of three no-trump seems perfectly normal, but when the lead of the spade 10 from West goes to the queen and king, the contract may need careful handling. South must develop the diamonds to make his game, but the play to trick one strongly suggests that West may have well led from a suit headed by A-10-9. If East is allowed to lead a spade later, West will be able to run the rest of the spades. This may defeat the contract.

Establishing the diamonds safely is simple: South must cross to dummy, with a club rather than a heart, of course, and must lead the diamond queen, planning to duck the trick around to West. However, when East covers (as he surely will), declarer wins and goes back to dummy, again with a club, to take another diamond finesse, this time leading to the nine. When both opponents follow and the nine wins, declarer can cash out for at least 10 tricks, with five diamonds, three clubs and two major-suit winners.

There is no danger if West wins the first or second diamond trick and leads another spade, as long as diamonds are breaking. Likewise, if West is able to score his diamond 10 and continue the attack on clubs, declarer can unscramble his nine tricks in peace and quiet.

One problem may arise if West can take the second diamond and play a heart: Declarer will have to hope the heart king is with West, since otherwise the blockage in diamonds prevents declarer from running that suit.



The world splits into two groups here. One half says double is penalty, with diamond length and at least a strong no-trump in high cards. The other group argues that it should be takeout — but if so, why didn’t you bid the first time? I side with the penalty crowd, and I will choose a spade or diamond lead if this is the final contract.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 10 9 8 4
 J 8 6 2
 7 6
♣ 7 4
South West North East
  1 Pass 1 NT
Pass Pass Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, February 12th, 2019

His honor rooted in dishonor stood,
And faith unfaithful kept him falsely true.

Alfred Lord Tennyson


S North
N-S ♠ K J 10
 A K Q J
 J 7 6
♣ 5 4 3
West East
♠ 9 8 7
 10 8 2
 Q 10 3
♣ J 10 7 6
♠ A 6 5 4 2
 9 4 3
 9 8 5
♣ 9 2
South
♠ Q 3
 7 6 5
 A K 4 2
♣ A K Q 8
South West North East
1 ♣ Pass 1 Pass
2 NT Pass 6 NT All pass
       

♠9

Today’s deal came up in a teams game, where both tables reached the perfectly reasonable spot of six no-trump. In the first room, when the player sitting East saw his partner lead the spade nine, he won his ace and shifted to a club in an attempt to break up any pressure on his partner. A nice try — but not good enough; South won the ace, cashed the ace and king of diamonds, then ran all his major-suit winners ending in dummy. The three-card ending saw dummy with the diamond jack and two clubs, while South had the K-Q-8 of clubs in hand. West had to abandon control of clubs, and the club eight took trick 13.

When the teams scored up, South from the other room proudly announced plus 1440 as if expecting a swing in. When asked why, South explained how the defense had gone at his table, on the same lead. East had ducked both the first and second spade, so now South ran four rounds of hearts, pitching a diamond from hand, and forcing West to consider his last seven cards. He had to keep three diamonds and four clubs, so he let go of his remaining spade. Declarer cashed his clubs and threw West in with the fourth club, discarding a spade from the board, to force a diamond lead away from the queen for the 12th trick.

“Was that how the play went in your room?’ asked South. “For all intents and purposes,” responded his teammate, demonstrating once again that truth is very much in the eye of the beholder.



I’d normally compete to two spades, with the fifth trump telling me that our side has at least eight trumps between us. Against that approach are the three small hearts and the fact that my partner would always bid two spades with four trumps unless his hand were extraordinarily unsuitable for that call. He would double two diamonds with extras and three trumps. Still, I’d bid and let my opponents make the last mistake.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ A 6 5 4 2
 9 4 3
 9 8 5
♣ 9 2
South West North East
  1 Dbl. 1
1 ♠ 2 Pass Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, February 11th, 2019

Oh, order! Material order, intellectual order, moral order! … To know where we are going and what we want; that is order. To keep one’s word, to do the right thing, and at the right time: more order.

Henri Amiel


S North
N-S ♠ K J 7 5
 A Q 8 4
 6 4 3
♣ Q 2
West East
♠ 4 3
 10 7 5 2
 J 10 9 8
♣ K 6 5
♠ 6
 K J 9 6
 Q 7 5
♣ J 10 9 4 3
South
♠ A Q 10 9 8 2
 3
 A K 2
♣ A 8 7
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 NT * Pass
3 * * Pass 4 ♠ Pass
6 ♠ All pass    

*Game-forcing spade raise

**Short hearts

J

Today’s deal sees North stretch just a fraction to treat his hand as a game-forcing spade raise, then sign off upon finding short hearts opposite. South has more than enough to drive to slam (though pessimists could use Blackwood first if they prefer), since even facing the most unsuitable hand, there will probably be play for slam on most leads.

West is fortunate to have been dealt a sequence on lead, and that gives declarer no help. How should he play to combine his chances for 12 tricks? He has two slow losers (in clubs and diamonds) and two queens whose value he can exploit if he uses them efficiently. He can take a heart finesse and discard his diamond loser from hand, or he can lead to the club queen: If he finds West with the king, he can pitch his diamond loser from dummy on his top club.

It looks logical to win the diamond lead and draw trumps ending in hand, but then declarer has to commit himself, and the order of his plays is critical. He must play West for the club king by leading toward the club queen. If this fails, he still has time to take the heart finesse. Conversely, if he finesses in hearts first and loses, there is no second chance. He cannot avoid a club loser.

As the cards lie, West will take his king and return a diamond, but declarer can win and unblock clubs, then ruff a heart to hand to pitch the diamond loser from the North hand on the club ace.



Your partner did not compete to three clubs himself, so presumably he has a doubleton spade and no more than five clubs. My best bet to beat the contract might be to lead a trump and kill the club ruffs in dummy, in the hope that neither hearts nor diamonds will be easy for declarer to establish. The diamond king is too committal an opening lead for my taste.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ 4 3 2
 Q 8 5
 K 2
♣ Q 9 8 4 2
South West North East
    1 ♣ 1 ♠
2 ♣ 2 ♠ Pass Pass
3 ♣ 3 ♠ All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, February 10th, 2019

My partner held ♠ 9-8-7-5,  A-Q-10-8-7,  K-Q, ♣ Q-7, and opened one heart. In response, holding 12 points with three hearts and four very small clubs, I had available one no-trump as semi-forcing, with new suits at the two-level being game-forcing. What is the right way to show my hand, and how should our bidding go?

Enough Said, Saint John’s, Newfoundland

If you decide you don’t have a game force, you might respond one no-trump, which your partner may decide to pass. That means you might stay out of game, but facing something like ace-third of spades, king-third of hearts, and ace-jack third of diamonds with the aforementioned four-small clubs, you do have four top losers in four hearts, even if three no-trump is quite playable. Driving your hand to game with a call of two clubs is certainly reasonable if playing sound openers — few do, though.

Please explain the difference between the minimum number of cards promised by opener rebidding his suit (be it a major or minor) over a one- or two-level response by responder, and the number of cards promised by responder for rebidding his suit?

Pistol Pete, Kenosha, Wis.

Responder’s rebid of his own suit shows six, except that occasionally he will rebid a very chunky five-card suit — typically over a one-no-trump response from his partner. Similarly, opener’s suit rebid facing a one-level response promises six — though occasionally the rebid of a minor facing a one-spade response may be forced with five when unsuitable for a reverse or one-no-trump response. By contrast, opener’s rebid facing a two-level response is often a decent five-carder.

When you open one club, then hear one heart to your left and two diamonds from partner, what should you do with ♠ Q-9-6-4,  3,  6-4, ♣ A-K-Q-10-9-8? Would a call of two spades promise extras? Should I therefore rebid three clubs?

Poor Richard, Charlottesville, Va.

If your partner had been able to respond one heart, your one-spade rebid would just show four spades and not promise extras. Similarly, a bid of two spades is natural here — it may contain extras but does not promise them. That said, the absence of a negative double from your partner means you probably don’t have a spade fit, so emphasizing your excellent clubs has a lot going for it.

As a relatively disciplined player, I’m curious about how the experts pre-empt in second seat these days. Does this action require a decent suit, or will the vulnerability override position?

Restraint of Trade, Jackson, Tenn.

In second seat at favorable vulnerability, I’d expect many players to take liberties. (Whether they should is another matter.) Conversely, in second seat when vulnerable, players of my vintage tend to want to have very close to the perfect hand for a pre-empt. By the way, suit quality is paramount; four small cards in a major will not influence me that much.

I play standard methods of carding, but I would welcome input on when giving suit preference should overlap with count and attitude.

A Little Learning, Honolulu, Hawaii

Your first signal on partner’s lead is attitude (unless your attitude should be clear to partner by bridge logic — and both players know that). On declarer’s lead, signal count when necessary, or else nothing at all. When the second round of a suit is led, your choice of cards may carry a suit-preference signal. This often applies when you have a sequence or a choice of irrelevant small cards to play. For example, from 7-3-2, you play the two first to discourage, but the order of the remaining cards will carry a suit-preference message. I’ll leave the discussion of how to signal when dummy has a singleton for another day.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, February 9th, 2019

To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.

Magna Carta


S North
E-W ♠ J 8 5 4
 2
 A 9 8 5
♣ A K 8 4
West East
♠ A Q 10 9 2
 J 6
 Q 10 6 3
♣ 10 6
♠ K 3
 A 10 7 3
 J 4
♣ Q J 9 5 3
South
♠ 7 6
 K Q 9 8 5 4
 K 7 2
♣ 7 2
South West North East
2 All pass    

♣10

Today’s deal is the last of this week’s themed hands, in each of which declarer has to play a single suit to best advantage with length in one hand and a singleton in the other.

As I look through the hands, I am struck by the fact that such similar combinations have such disparate solutions. No wonder bridge players go gray so early!

In today’s deal, South opens and closes the auction with a call of two hearts. When West leads the club 10, he appears to be relatively short of clubs — the threat of trump promotions is a real one. Declarer must start to draw trumps at once, and he can afford to lose two trump tricks but not three.

He wins the club lead in dummy and leads a heart to the king. If this loses to the ace, he will regain the lead and play the queen of hearts, then the nine. But when the heart king holds, declarer must decide which trump to lead next.

If East has the bare heart ace left then, declarer must lead a low heart from hand; but there is a much better chance that one defender or the other is left with a bare jack or 10 of hearts. (Note that to give himself a chance to set the contract, West would have to duck the heart ace if he started with A-J-fourth or A-10-fourth of hearts.) By leading out his remaining top honor, he can pin the jack or 10 and remain in control, losing just two trumps and three plain-suit top cards.



Sometimes a cigar is only a cigar, and a bid in the fourth suit is occasionally natural, not artificial. Here, a call of two clubs shows clubs and is limited by the failure to jump to three clubs (which you would do if the spade four were the king). You would certainly guess that clubs would play better than no-trump here, and since you can offer the suit to play, that seems a sensible option.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 8 5 4
 2
 A 9 8 5
♣ A K 9 4
South West North East
1 Pass 1 Pass
1 ♠ Pass 1 NT Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2019. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].