May 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
When there is no peril in the fight, there is no glory in the triumph.
Pierre Corneille
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 7
♥ A J 7 4 3
♦ K Q 7
♣ K 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 5 2
♥ Q 9
♦ 10 4
♣ Q 7 5 2 |
♠ A J 9
♥ K 8 6 2
♦ J 9 8 5 3
♣ 6 |
| South |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 10 5
♦ A 6 2
♣ A J 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠5
When in doubt, leading the unbid suit is where you should start in your analysis on opening lead. I would lead the diamond queen, assuming that a club lead would be no more passive, but that we might negotiate a ruff or over-ruff this way.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 5 4
♥ 9 5 3
♦ Q 7
♣ J 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
May 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
I know you are fan a of opener raising his partner’s one-level response with three trumps rather than introducing a second suit or making a flawed one-no-trump rebid. How does responder diagnose the 4-3 fit? And why not rebid one no-trump with only three trumps if the hand is almost balanced?
Butterfingers, Cartersville, Ga.
I believe raising partner is the best way to get to game when you do have a fit — and to stay low when you know you don’t. Hands with a small doubleton and three reasonable trumps often offer as much trump support as balanced hands with four trumps. If responder needs to know, one way is to ask with Spiral Scan. This is a relay of two no-trump after the raise. The four step responses show three trumps (minimum), three trumps (maximum), four trumps (minimum) and four trumps (maximum), respectively.
I assume that you would be comfortable in responding one spade to one heart with this hand: ♠ A-Q-9-6-4, ♥ 4, ♦ J-7-5-2, ♣ 10-8-6. When partner rebids two diamonds, are you supposed to raise or pass? If you would let sleeping dogs lie here, how much more would you need before you raise?
Jump Street Jimmy, Salinas, Calif.
I would pass, expecting there was a fair chance that if game could make, partner would have done more at his second turn. But change the diamond jack to the queen, and I’d dredge up a raise to three diamonds. Even at teams, going plus is more important than stretching for what would surely be a thin game.
I play rubber bridge every week with the same group of women. One of the players seems to get all the cards. Over the years, would you not expect the cards to average out?
Calendar Girl, Springfield, Ill.
The Dyspeptics Club stories are based on a real player (now dead) who used to say: “It’s not the cards; it is how much I get out of them.” But, of course, he was the luckiest player you ever saw in your life. I don’t know any other player who would admit to having had his fair share of the cards at rubber, but the laws of probability have not been seriously impeached in the last 400 years.
|
I opened one heart, holding ♠ A-Q-2, ♥ A-J-7-3-2, ♦ Q-10-3-2, ♣ Q, and when my partner bid a game-forcing two clubs, I had a comfortable bid of two diamonds. Now my partner bid three clubs, and since we were in a game-force, I bid three no-trump. My partner said that this action was premature — what do you think?
Sausages, Dover, Del.
With weaker spades or more values, I might probe for three no-trump, since I would not be prepared to end the auction by bidding it myself. I agree that if your partner has seven good clubs plus a couple of working aces and kings, you might make 12 tricks; singleton honors in partner’s suit are always hard to evaluate. Even so, I think a bid of three no-trump is your only practical call here.
You recently answered a letter about splinters, suggesting that immediate splinters might be limited in strength by the failure to use a Jacoby two-no-trump call. What about splinters by opener at his second turn? How much do they promise in the way of extras?
Strawberry Shortcake, Panama City, Fla.
A splinter by opener after a response at the one-level shows 17-20 in high cards, give or take. You do not have to make such a call when facing a passed hand, in that you may jump to game with low slam potential. A splinter facing a game-forcing two-level response should be better than minimum, but it doesn’t guarantee real extras.
|
May 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, May 4th, 2019
The artist, like the God of the creation, remains within or behind or beyond or above his handiwork.
James Joyce
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 3
♥ Q 8 3
♦ A K Q 8
♣ 10 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 5
♥ —
♦ J 9 7 6 5
♣ K Q J 9 3 |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ J 10 9 5 2
♦ 10 4 3
♣ 8 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 7
♥ A K 7 6 4
♦ 2
♣ A 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ * |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Checkback Stayman
♣K
Without the overcall, you would have bid two no-trump, of course. As it is, you cannot bid two no-trump now, but if you play support doubles to show three spades, that would be ideal. Without that gadget, I would jump to three spades, since a cue-bid should be a game force and the hand is not worth that.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 3
♥ Q 8 3
♦ A K Q 8
♣ 10 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
My expectations were reduced to zero when I was 21. Everything since then has been a bonus.
Stephen Hawking
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q J 5
♥ 9 6
♦ K 9 6 3
♣ K Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7
♥ Q J 10 3 2
♦ 7
♣ 9 7 5 2 |
♠ 6 2
♥ K 8 5 4
♦ Q 10 5 4
♣ 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ A 7
♦ A J 8 2
♣ A 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Balanced slam try for spades
♥Q
Unless playing with an extremely conservative partner, I would advocate passing here. When you doubled two hearts in direct seat, you showed a shape-suitable opening bid at the very least. Partner had ways to invite game and chose not to. With bad breaks on the horizon and the defenders’ high cards in the minors likely to be over your aces, is it really worth another try? I don’t think so.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 4 3
♥ A 7
♦ A J 8 2
♣ A 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 16th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Laugh, and the world laughs with you; Weep, and you weep alone.
Ella Wheeler Wilcox
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 8 5 3
♥ Q J
♦ 9 3
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4
♥ 10 9 8 7 5 4 3
♦ A
♣ A 10 8 |
♠ —
♥ 6 2
♦ K J 8 7 6 5 4 2
♣ J 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A K 9 7 6 2
♥ A K
♦ Q 10
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦A
You may not have a great hand, but you already denied any real values when you bid only three spades at your first turn. That said, do you trust your partner enough to play him for the slam-try he has already shown? If you do, then I think you must bid more than four spades now. Inventing a four-heart cue-bid or jumping to five spades might be best now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8 5 3
♥ Q J
♦ 9 3
♣ Q 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 15th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 23 Comments
I’ll bet my money on the bobtail nag Somebody bet on the bay.
Stephen Foster
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8
♥ 8 6 2
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ 9 7 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 3
♥ A K Q 5 3
♦ K 5 4
♣ 10 3 |
♠ 7 5 4 2
♥ J 10 9 4
♦ Q 9 6
♣ A 5 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 6
♥ 7
♦ A J 10
♣ K Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 NT * |
3 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Puppet to three clubs
♥K
I can see the attraction of heading for six clubs, but with so many holes to fill, this hand seems more about game than slam. Four spades may be considerably easier to make than five clubs, so I would simply bid four spades now. For slam to make, you would need partner to have an ace and either long clubs or the diamond king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q J 6
♥ 7
♦ A J 10
♣ K Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, April 30th, 2019
There is always inequity in life. Some men are killed in a war, and some men are wounded, and some men never leave the country. … Life is unfair.
John F. Kennedy
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 10 9 4
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ Q
♣ A Q 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ K Q 2
♦ A 10 9 8 7 5
♣ J 7 3 |
♠ Q J 8 2
♥ 9 7 5
♦ J 2
♣ 10 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A 7 6 3
♥ A J 8
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
I am torn here between bidding no-trump and raising clubs; if the latter, I wonder what level to raise to. The problem is that if North is short in hearts, we might make game in clubs (and would go down in three no-trump), but my partner will not know his cards are fitting. Still, a raise to three clubs is the value bid, and with no side-suit aces, part-score is likely to be the limit if partner holds a minimum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 9 4
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ Q
♣ A Q 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
It is characteristic of mankind to make as little adjustment as possible in customary ways in the face of new conditions.
Robert and Helen Lynd
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 9 4
♥ J 7 5
♦ J 9 3 2
♣ J 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 6 2
♥ 9 3
♦ K 6 4
♣ 10 7 3 2 |
♠ K 5 3
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ 7 5
♣ A K 6 5 |
| South |
♠ Q J 7
♥ A K Q 6
♦ A Q 10 8
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Unless they are extremely subtle and devious, your opponents have conducted an auction that suggests they have a heart weakness. As long as you have no reason to suspect them of being confidence tricksters, lead the heart king and try to hit declarer’s soft underbelly.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 8 6 4
♥ K 5
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
|
May 12th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
|
When a deal is passed out on the first round of a duplicate, are we allowed to re-deal the hand without asking the director for permission?
Thrown for a Loop, Naples, Fla.
While the paying customer has one fewer deal to play because of the throw-in, that would be missing the point. Say I or my partner had passed a hand others might open. Should we not get the good or bad result from that decision? Also, you can be confident that on most pass-outs, someone, somewhere, will find a reason to bid, no matter how flimsy the pretext.
If a defender shows his card, when may he be excused from playing that card, assuming it has not actually been put on the table? I thought I was allowed to change my mind here.
Faulty Towers, Wilmington, N.C.
There are different rules for declarer and the defenders. For declarer, a card has to be played — or the equivalent of played — rather than accidentally dropped. (Declarer doesn’t have a partner who might benefit from unauthorized information.) For the defenders, a card is played if it is actually or potentially in view. Thus, a partly or wholly visible card is normally treated as played.
I picked up ♠ 9-4, ♥ 7-4-2, ♦ A-Q-7-5-3, ♣ K-3-2 and heard one club from my partner, then one spade on my right. Is this hand suitable for a negative double? I thought not, so I passed, and now a raise to two spades was passed back to me. What would be appropriate now?
Lurking Warbeck, Dodge City, Kan.
You were right not to double or bid two diamonds, though you might take the latter action as a passed hand. Here, I’d bid two no-trump at my second turn if I trusted my partner to be fully present. A call of two no-trump is logically take-out for the minors, not natural. It denies four clubs, since I would already have raised if I had that hand. Something like this hand would therefore be perfect for the call.
|
Is there a simple way to learn the rules for the percentages as they apply to calculating how the opponents’ missing cards might divide?
Life’s a Bore(l), Honolulu, Hawaii
In broad terms, two missing cards will probably split, but in all other cases, an even number of missing cards will probably not divide evenly. The odds of them splitting exactly are slightly more than 1 in 3 in most cases, while a one-from-even split is a 50-50 shot. An odd number of cards split as close to evenly as possible, with odds about 2 in 3 for that. Start from those numbers; for other cases, the more normal the split, the more likely it is.
I was second to speak, with ♠ A-8, ♥ A-Q-7-3-2, ♦ J-4-3-2, ♣ A-4, and I opened one heart. The next hand doubled, and my partner jumped to three hearts. I passed, and we missed a game. Afterward, he said there was no way to show less than a limit raise but more than a pre-empt. He mentioned the concept of a mixed raise. Have you heard of this call?
Mixed Nuts, Detroit, Mich.
A mixed raise is a jump cue-bid in competition, facing an overcall, to show a four-card raise with 6-9 points or so. It is mixed, as it has the shape for a pre-emptive raise and the values for a single raise. Since this call has no other useful meaning, it makes good sense to play this convention — as long as your partnership has agreed. One could also use the jump in the unbid major after a major suit is doubled to show precisely this hand; so here, a call of two spades would show this.
|
May 11th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
If the doors of perception were cleansed, everything would appear to man as it is: infinite.
William Blake
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K
♥ Q J 10 5
♦ K 9 6 3
♣ A 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 8 6
♥ 7 6
♦ J 10 5
♣ 7 6 3 2 |
♠ 10 7 5 4
♥ 4 3
♦ A Q 8 4
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 2
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦J
It is worth emphasizing why your response maybe be different after a balancing double than after a direct-seat double. A direct double shows opening values or more; a balancing double may be as much as a king less than that. So, responder to the balancing double bids as if he has transferred a king to his partner. Here, responder jumps to two hearts; he would not do so facing a balancing double.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 3 2
♥ A K 9 8 2
♦ 7 2
♣ J 9 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal is an unusual example of a hand where both opponents are potentially the danger hand, so that either may need to be kept off lead. If that sounds paradoxical, the play to trick one will determine which opponent you are going to need to beware of.
In the auction, North might use New Minor at his second turn to look for an eight-card heart fit. Then again, if his partner has three small hearts, locating a 5-3 heart fit might lead him to the only game that goes down.
Be that as it may, all routes lead to three no-trump, and after a low spade lead from West, South must plan the play carefully. Which spade should he play from dummy? He should put up the queen; if it holds, then East is the danger hand — declarer must keep him off play, or a spade through South’s king could be fatal. In that case declarer would play the king of clubs, then the 10, and let it run. That way, he can set up four club tricks in safety.
When East instead wins the spade ace at trick one and continues with the spade jack, South must hold up the spade king and win the third round. Then he leads the club nine and passes it, willing to lose to East, the safe hand. What declarer cannot afford to do is concede a club to West and see him cash two more spade winners.
Of course, if spades are 4-4, declarer may lose three spade tricks, but he will still make his game even if he does lose a club trick.