April 26th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Where there is charity and wisdom there is neither fear nor ignorance.
Saint Francis of Assisi
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A Q 5
♥ K 9 3
♦ A 9 4 3
♣ K Q 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 3
♥ 10 7 4 2
♦ Q
♣ J 10 9 8 7 |
♠ K 8 7
♥ Q J 6 5
♦ 10 8 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
♠ J 10 4 2
♥ A 8
♦ K J 7 6
♣ A 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Forcing diamond raise
♣J
You may hate this hand and regret that you responded, but now is not the time to breach discipline by passing out a forcing bid. Give support to three diamonds and hope that you can come to a stop in game in spades, hearts, diamonds or no-trump. What partner does next should help you decide?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 7
♥ Q J 6 5
♦ 10 8 5 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 25th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Even brute beasts and wandering birds do not fall into the same traps or nets twice.
Saint Jerome
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 8
♥ K 10 9 4 2
♦ A J 8
♣ A 10 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 4 3 2
♥ J 3
♦ 9 6
♣ Q 8 6 |
♠ 9 6 5
♥ 8 5
♦ Q 10 7 5
♣ J 7 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7
♥ A Q 7 6
♦ K 4 3 2
♣ K 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Hearts
♠Q
The two-no-trump rebid suggests a balanced 12-14 high-card points (or, very rarely, 18-19 balanced, planning to bid on over a signoff). It is extremely hard to imagine slam making here with no apparent eight-card major fit, so it seems right to sign off in three no-trump, despite your extra values.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8
♥ K 10 9 4 2
♦ A J 8
♣ A 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 24th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The investigation of difficult things by the method of analysis ought ever to precede the method of composition.
Isaac Newton
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 4
♥ A J 4 2
♦ Q 8 5
♣ A 7 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 8 7
♥ 10 8 6 5
♦ A 10 2
♣ 10 8 5 |
♠ K J 10 2
♥ Q 9
♦ K 9 6 3
♣ J 9 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 6 5 3
♥ K 7 3
♦ J 7 4
♣ K Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT * |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*11-14
♠9
If you play a forcing no-trump, you might take a pessimistic view and respond one no-trump then jump to three hearts to invite game while showing three trumps. Even if one no-trump is only semi-forcing (so that partner passes only with a balanced minimum), you might want to follow this route. Facing a one-spade opener, your fourth trump would persuade you to jump directly to three spades, of course.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 5 3
♥ K 7 3
♦ J 7 4
♣ K Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 23rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 17 Comments
A sharp tongue is the only edged tool that grows keener with constant use.
Washington Irving
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 10
♥ A J
♦ A K J 10 6 5
♣ A 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6 4
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ 9 5 4 |
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ 9 8 5 2
♦ 7
♣ J 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 5 3
♥ K Q 7 6 3
♦ 9 4
♣ K Q 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ * |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 ♣ |
Pass |
7 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Hearts
♣4
Clearly, you have a hand worth raising spades — but to what level? A jump to four spades shows three or four trumps, tending to deny a high-card control such as an ace or king. With three third-round controls, you might choose to raise to three spades rather than four, but this seems just a little too much to me. With as little as an additional jack in diamonds or spades, I might feel differently.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 9 6 4
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 22nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 14 Comments
Our ship of state, which recent storms have threatened to destroy, has come safely to harbor at last.
Sophocles
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q J 8 3
♥ Q 2
♦ A 2
♣ A 9 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ J 8 6
♦ 10 9 7
♣ Q 10 7 5 |
♠ 10 7 5
♥ K 9 7 5
♦ Q 8 6 4 3
♣ 8 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ A 10 4 3
♦ K J 5
♣ K J 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ * |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Two key-cards, no trump queen
♦10
When declarer is likely to have four cards in the suit you lead, as would be the case for an attack on clubs here, a low card is better than leading from a sequence. Imagine partner with the doubleton ace of clubs and declarer with the guarded king, for example.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ 10 4
♦ K 7 5
♣ Q J 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
April 21st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
I’m thinking of acceding to my partner’s request that we take up third-and-lowest leads since he tells me they are more helpful in counting the hand than fourth-highest. But how do we know if the lead is from a bad suit — can we play second—highest as well?
Spuds McKenzie, Atlanta, Ga.
It is absolutely impossible to use third-and-lowest leads together with second from three or four small cards. Imagine the five missing cards are Q-8-7-4-3; if you combine the two methods, the seven and four are unreadable. You can, however, lead top from three or four small in a suit you have supported, where a doubleton is not a possible holding.
I have been taught that, facing an opening bid of one no-trump, Stayman always promises invitational or better values. My new partner likes to play Stayman followed by a minimum call in any suit as weak. Which is the better way?
Follow the Money, Raleigh, N.C.
It is relatively common (and sensible) to use the sequence of Stayman followed by a rebid of two hearts over two diamonds as weak with both majors, not invitational. All other sequences after Stayman do indeed tend to promise at least invitational values. A call of two spades can be played in many different ways, though it is often as an invitational hand of sorts. Calls in the minors are typically natural and game-forcing with a four-card major on the side.
Say you were third to speak, holding ♠ Q-7-4-3, ♥ K-8-4, ♦ A-3, ♣ J-7-4-2. Do you have a strong opinion about whether to open this hand, and does the vulnerability matter?
Testing the Water, Salt Lake City, Utah
I would not open this hand at any vulnerability, since I really do not know that I want a club lead (or a spade lead if I open that suit). It wouldn’t take much to change my mind. Non-vulnerable, switch the diamond ace and club two, and now opening ace-jack-fourth doesn’t strike me as unreasonable. I recognize that my answer may be showing my age a little.
|
When my partner opened one heart, I heard a double to my right. With ♠ 10-6-2, ♥ Q-4, ♦ K-Q-J-5, ♣ Q-10-8-4, I thought it looked natural to bid one no-trump. Then came two hearts from my partner and two spades to my right. What should I do now?
Law-Abiding Citizen, San Francisco, Calif.
You have some extras and nothing wasted in spades, plus good trumps in context. I’d bid three hearts, expecting to make it. I don’t think game is favored our way, but you can imagine that if partner has short spades, we might come close to 10 tricks. So maybe three diamonds should be a heart raise with diamond cards, since I have already implicitly denied long diamonds at my first turn.
I note that you often attribute deals from actual play. Of the remaining deals, which are from your own imagination (or others’)?
Yellow Pager, Mexico City, Mexico
In all cases where a player or location has been specified, I’ll try to leave the spot-cards unchanged, except to eliminate unnecessary complications or duplicate solutions (sometimes called “cooks”). For others, I tend to use real deals, sometimes modified, sometimes concealing the protagonists if they have erred. The rest are creations or variations on a genuine theme. The advent of the Common Game is a boon because I get to use deals the readers may already have played, but put my own spin on them.
|
April 20th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. I find out what the world needs. Then, I go ahead and invent it.
Thomas Edison
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 6 3 2
♥ 10 9 6 4
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 4
♥ K Q J 8 5 3 2
♦ 9
♣ 8 6 5 |
♠ A J 10 8
♥ 7
♦ K 10 8 6
♣ 10 9 3 2 |
| South |
♠ K 7 5
♥ A
♦ A 7 5 2
♣ K Q J 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♥K
There is no reason to redouble, after which it may be difficult to get all your suits into play. Similarly, raising diamonds might lead to your losing a major suit fit. The simplest way forward is to bid hearts, hoping to hear partner raise or bid spades; but if not, you will raise diamonds at your next turn. When in doubt, bid suits rather than redoubling.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 6 3 2
♥ 10 9 6 4
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 19th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
The world, dear Agnes, is a strange affair.
Moliere
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q J 9
♥ A K J 7
♦ —
♣ K Q 9 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ A J 4 3
♣ A 7 6 3 |
♠ 8
♥ 10 9 4
♦ Q 10 9 7 6 5
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
♠ A 10 6 5 4 3 2
♥ Q 8
♦ K 8 2
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♦ |
| Pass |
5 ♦ |
5 NT * |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Takeout
♦A
There is nothing wrong with a jump to four diamonds, a splinter-raise showing a hand of this general strength with heart support and diamond shortage. An alternative route is to jump to two spades, planning a call of four hearts next. That gets the three-suiter across very nicely and keeps all three in play as possible trump suits, since hearts may turn out not to be the best.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 9
♥ A K J 7
♦ —
♣ K Q 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 18th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Home of lost causes, and forsaken beliefs, and unpopular names, and impossible loyalties!
Matthew Arnold, on Oxford
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K Q 10 8
♥ 5
♦ J 10 9 6 2
♣ J 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ 9 7 3
♦ K 7 3
♣ A Q 9 8 7 6 3 |
♠ 9 7 6 2
♥ A Q 6 2
♦ A 8 5 4
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ A J 5 4 3
♥ K J 10 8 4
♦ Q
♣ K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣A
To raise or not to raise? Your trump support is excellent, but your values are soft, and a singleton in partner’s suit is not really an asset. You could certainly persuade me to raise if the spade king were the ace, As it is, though, the fact that partner didn’t bid three diamonds would tilt me to passing now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 10 8
♥ 5
♦ J 10 9 6 2
♣ J 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
April 17th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, April 3rd, 2019
In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self-purification; and direct action.
Martin Luther King Jr.
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 5
♥ 6 5
♦ A 8 6 3 2
♣ K 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K J 10 9 8 3
♦ Q J 10
♣ J 9 5 2 |
♠ 10 8 7 6 2
♥ 7
♦ 9 7 5 4
♣ 10 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 4 3
♥ A Q 4 2
♦ K
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
* |
| Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
| Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
*Three-card spade support
♦Q
It is hard to know what constitutes a life mission, but as far as I am concerned, if I can prevent players from overcalling two diamonds with these cards, I’ll have accomplished something. Doubling one heart is fine, or bidding one diamond over one club on a different day. But two-level overcalls promise good suits and normally six cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 5
♥ 6 5
♦ A 8 6 3 2
♣ K 8 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Bridge writers occasionally introduce a deal as taking place in a local competition or in a knock-out match; this seems to be a way to add a touch of verisimilitude to an otherwise bald and unconvincing narrative. Be that as it may, today’s deal really did crop up in a knockout match, I swear on the bones of Saint Francis de Sales, the patron saint of journalism.
Both declarers missed the point of this deal — though one earned a consolation prize for envisioning the problem, even if he didn’t quite put the defenders under maximum pressure.
Each South reached slam after North had forced in diamonds then invited slam in four no-trump. In one room, South won the club lead in dummy and played a diamond to the jack, and now lost two diamonds and a spade.
In the other room, declarer won the heart lead and passed the spade jack. East thoughtfully ducked, confident declarer had four spades from his partner’s low spot-card on that trick.
Now declarer safety-played the diamonds by laying down the king, trying to protect against a 4-1 diamond break, and eventually lost a diamond and a spade. If East had taken his spade king, South might have guessed to start diamonds by playing the ace, after which he could have finessed against East’s remaining spots. (Without the diamond seven, leading low to the jack on the first round is the right play for no losers.)
But would East have ducked the first spade if declarer had first led low to the queen? I doubt it!