March 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Take note, take note, O world! To be direct and honest is not safe.
William Shakespeare
W |
North |
Both |
♠ K J 6 5 2
♥ 5
♦ Q 10 9 5 4
♣ J 2 |
West |
East |
♠ A 9 7 4
♥ J 9
♦ J 6 3 2
♣ 7 5 4 |
♠ Q 10 8
♥ Q 10 8 6 4 2
♦ 8 7
♣ Q 9 |
South |
♠ 3
♥ A K 7 3
♦ A K
♣ A K 10 8 6 3 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
Even though declarer rates to be relatively long in clubs, it still feels logical to lead that suit, since partner can hardly have a decent five-card major without having overcalled. Partner’s failure to act means that the best bet to set the game may be to find dummy with both majors, relatively short in clubs.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ J 5 3
♦ J 10 6 2
♣ Q 10 5 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
March 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Now that we have been granted the right to open one no-trump with a singleton, does that require us to make some changes in our styles to respond to one no-trump? One example might be not using a Texas transfer with six weak trumps, and generally not jumping to game in a major, since you do not know if opener has a singleton in your six-card major. What do you suggest in such cases?
Keeping Count, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Generally, a singleton honor facing a reasonable six-card suit won’t be too bad. So no changes are really necessary, except maybe to treat six small cards as a five-card suit. But my advice regarding singleton honors and no-trump openers coincides with Punch’s advice to men considering marriage: “Don’t!”
Holding ♠ Q-10-7-3-2, ♥ A-4, ♦ K-7-4, ♣ 10-9-3, I passed initially and responded one spade to my partner’s one-heart bid. When he raised to two spades, was I supposed to make a game-try? I passed, and although my partner had only three spades, he had a singleton club, so four spades would have been easy to make.
Hindsight, Monterey, Calif.
You certainly had an awkward decision. Your partner will quite often raise one spade to two (even facing a passed hand) with three trumps in an unbalanced or semi-balanced hand. I think you are close to a three-diamond game try, and if vulnerable at teams, I would indeed bid on. At pairs, I suspect I’m supposed to be trying to ensure the plus score here, so I would pass.
Please explain my ethical obligations when my LHO opens with a pre-empt and I judge that my partner has been thinking of acting. When the auction comes back to me and I have either a clear action or a marginal one, what should I do?
Straight and Narrow, Springfield, Mass.
If you judge that your partner’s demeanor or tempo points you in a specific direction, you are not supposed to take that action — unless you believe there are no logical alternatives to that action. Hence, in your example, bid if you have a clear action, but pass with any action you deem marginal. If you have a choice of calls, take the action that you consider counterindicated by your partner’s tempo.
|
With neither side vulnerable, my partner in a teams game decided to open one diamond rather than one no-trump, holding ♠ K-Q, ♥ K-9, ♦ K-9-7-4-3, ♣ K-Q-10-4. Do you agree? I responded one spade, and she rebid two clubs, at which point I raised to three clubs. Is it better to pass or bid now, and if the latter, what call is most appropriate?
Movin’ on Up, Sedona, Ariz.
The auction is fine as far as it goes, though no one could argue against a no-trump opener. But your partner is missing four aces and the minor trump honors, which argues for caution, not aggression. You must surely have two aces, so how could game be much worse than a finesse in a red suit? With the heart king protected, I might gamble on five clubs rather than three no-trump.
You often recommend books on bridge play and bidding. I’m about to order my first. Which do you recommend? I’m playing duplicate now, and I want to improve.
Vampire Slayer, Texarkana, Texas
For an early duplicate book, I suggest Norman Kay’s “The Complete Book of Duplicate Bridge.” Mike Lawrence’s books on play, bidding and competitive auctions are also excellent. You have read Watson’s “Play of the Hand,” I assume? That is one of the best books written on bridge, more than 80 years ago.
|
March 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, March 10th, 2018
Out of the crooked timber of humanity, no straight thing was ever made.
Immanuel Kant
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ A
♥ 10 9 8 6 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 8 6 2
♥ 5
♦ 9
♣ J 6 5 2 |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ 7 4 2
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ 9 8 3 |
South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A K Q J
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ A K 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♣* |
3 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
*16 or more
♠K
While it is perfectly possible that nine tricks are the limit of the hand in spades, you certainly have enough to move on to game. The question is which game to attempt. I think four spades will play better facing any hand that has a singleton — be it in hearts, diamonds or clubs. So I would bid four spades, not three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ 10 9 8 6 3
♦ A 10 5 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Made it, Ma! Top of the world!
Cody Jarrett, in “White Heat”
E |
North |
N-S |
♠ J 9
♥ A K Q J 9 8 3
♦ 7 4
♣ 9 5 |
West |
East |
♠ 10 6 5 3
♥ 7
♦ 10 9 8 6 5 2
♣ K 8 |
♠ Q 8 2
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A K J 3
♣ 7 6 4 |
South |
♠ A K 7 4
♥ 4 2
♦ Q
♣ A Q J 10 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦* |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Strong heart single-suiter
♦10
Should you simply drive to three no-trump here and rely on finding a club stopper opposite? The wiser call of three clubs will ask your partner to bid three no-trump if he can, since the opponents have announced clubs as the danger suit. Incidentally, it makes sense here to play that the no-trump opener should pass the double without a club stopper, then describe his hand if his partner redoubles.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 8 2
♥ 10 6 5
♦ A K J 3
♣ 7 6 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
For evil news rides post, while good news baits.
John Milton
S |
North |
None |
♠ 8 6 4 3 2
♥ A 10 5
♦ 10 2
♣ Q 6 4 |
West |
East |
♠ 7
♥ Q J 8 7 2
♦ K 8 4 3
♣ 9 7 3 |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K 3
♦ J 9 6 5
♣ J 10 8 2 |
South |
♠ A K J 9
♥ 9 6 4
♦ A Q 7
♣ A K 5 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
2 NT |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
|
|
♥Q
You could make a sensible case for bidding one no-trump here to try to make it more difficult for the opponents to compete. On the other hand, if they do bid two of a major, will you or your partner know whether to bid on to three diamonds? This is a strong argument for raising to two diamonds at once, and letting partner raise if the opponents compete in a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K 3
♦ J 9 6 5
♣ J 10 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
? |
|
|
|
March 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Democracy destroys itself because it abuses its right to freedom and equality. Because it teaches its citizens to consider audacity as a right, lawlessness as a freedom, abrasive speech as equality, and anarchy as progress.
Paraphrased from Isocrates
W |
North |
None |
♠ 9 6 3
♥ K J 8 6
♦ K Q
♣ A Q 9 7 |
West |
East |
♠ K Q J 7 4 2
♥ Q 4
♦ J 4
♣ 5 3 2 |
♠ 8
♥ 3 2
♦ A 9 8 7 6 3
♣ K J 8 6 |
South |
♠ A 10 5
♥ A 10 9 7 5
♦ 10 5 2
♣ 10 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
3 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
It never does any harm to cover the basics from time to time. When the opponents bid and raise a suit after your side has doubled, your side’s next double is take-out rather than for penalty. That applies whether you or your partner makes the second double. So you should bid three hearts now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 6 3
♥ K J 8 6
♦ K Q
♣ A Q 9 7 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible.
Stanislaw Lee
S |
North |
E-W |
♠ J 8 5 3
♥ 9 7
♦ K Q J 3
♣ 10 7 6 |
West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ K Q 10 3
♦ 9 5 4 2
♣ Q J 8 |
♠ A 4
♥ A J 8 5 2
♦ 8
♣ 9 5 4 3 2 |
South |
♠ K Q 10 9 6
♥ 6 4
♦ A 10 7 6
♣ A K |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
The range for a balancing call of one no-trump is approximately 11-14, so this sequence shows a slightly better hand. Your partner has suggested approximately a strong no-trump. Since your side doesn’t have much of a fit and the opponents’ high cards are located over the strong hand, you should pass now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 5 3
♥ 9 7
♦ K Q J 3
♣ 10 7 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
March 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Protection is not a principle, but an expedient.
Benjamin Disraeli
N |
North |
E-W |
♠ 9 4 2
♥ K J 9 6
♦ K 8 5 4
♣ 9 3 |
West |
East |
♠ A 7 6 3
♥ 5 4
♦ J 7 6
♣ Q J 10 5 |
♠ Q J 10 8
♥ 7 2
♦ Q 9 3
♣ K 8 7 2 |
South |
♠ K 5
♥ A Q 10 8 3
♦ A 10 2
♣ A 6 4 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣Q
You seem to have four tricks in your own hand, and if your partner has an ace, you rate to defeat this contract easily enough. So you need to assume he doesn’t, and still find a way to set the hand. To my mind, the choice is between a passive spade or a top club; the chance of finding a diamond ruff here is extremely low. I would lead a trump, rather than a club, but it is close.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 3
♥ K J 2
♦ A K 4
♣ K Q 9 3 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥ |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
March 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
I recently had two five-card majors and opening values opposite a two-no-trump opener twice in one week — after never having had this problem before in my life. I was not really sure how to bid it, in terms of looking for the best slam or a grand slam.
Kite Flyer, Durham, N.C.
A simple approach is to transfer to spades, then jump to six hearts. Or you could transfer to hearts and bid spades to keep the auction low, find a fit (or not), then follow up with Key-card Blackwood, or with five no-trump as a choice of slams.
As dealer, I picked up this hand: ♣ A-4, ♥ 8-7-6-5-3-2, ♦ A-7, ♣ K-10-6, and because of the outside honors, I reluctantly opened one heart. When my partner showed game-forcing values and a fit with a jump to two no-trump, I signed off at game and actually made six. Was one heart the right opening bid, or was I just lucky that my partner had so much help?
Quality Street, Elmira, N.Y.
It is generally more important to have trump length than strength. Your opening bid was impeccable, and the sixth trump is a great asset in any slam sequence. Things are very different when considering pre-empting, by the way. For the record, give me the club ace instead of the king, and I might rebid three of my major to show extras. This hand has great slam potential once you have 10 or more trumps.
Under what circumstances would you lead a card other than fourth-highest against no-trump, assuming you do not have a sequence? When do you lead second-highest?
Great Expectations, Helena, Mont.
I like to lead low or top from three small, not the middle card — and I would lead the top card only when I thought it was unambiguous from the bidding. From four cards, I lead small or second-highest (as long as the top two cards are not touching). But I often lead fourth-highest, even then, because the count is frequently as important as the honor position to my partner.
|
Holding ♠ J-2, ♥ 9-7-6, ♦ Q-8-4, ♣ A-Q-10-7-3, I’m sure you would not overcall two clubs over one heart, but how much more would you need to act? Say you pass and hear one no-trump to your left, and partner bids two diamonds. What should you do now over a two-heart bid on your right?
Donnie Darko, Hartford, Conn.
I’d overcall if the club three were the king; also, you could persuade me to act if the diamond four were the ace. A two-level overcall should be six cards or a really good five with opening values, but sometimes I fall from grace. On the auction you give, a call of three diamonds is pessimistic; a bid of three clubs (if played as lead-directing, with diamond fit) makes good sense.
Please discuss the correct way to go about bidding hands that fall into the two-no-trump range, with three four-card suits and a singleton? Is it ever acceptable to open two no-trump with such hands? If not, what are the options?
Warp Factor Five, Albany, Ga.
With 20 HCP and this pattern, I’d try to avoid opening two no-trump. Paradoxically, it can be easier to reach slam or game by opening at the one-level and finding a fit cheaply. (Having said that, you may also find yourself in one of a minor and go down, with a making game elsewhere — that happens when partner has a bust with five or six cards in a suit that you have length in). With 21 or 22 and a singleton honor, a call of two no-trump might be the least lie, but I do try to avoid that if I can.
|
March 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
It is a very sad thing that nowadays there is so little useless information.
Oscar Wilde
E-W |
North |
N |
♠ 8 2
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 10 8 2 |
West |
East |
♠ Q 7 6 4 3
♥ K J 7 2
♦ 7 6 3
♣ 7 |
♠ 9 5
♥ 9
♦ A J 10 9 5
♣ K 9 5 4 3 |
South |
♠ A K J 10
♥ Q 10 5 3
♦ K Q 2
♣ J 6 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
Pass |
2 NT* |
Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
Dbl.** |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Minors, 8-12 HCP
**Responsive
♦3
Partner has bid out his shape, suggesting short hearts. Rather than bid three no-trump, it feels logical to me to temporize with three hearts now. I would raise a call of three spades or four clubs to game and pass a three no-trump bid. If partner jumps to five clubs, I will surely bid slam.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 2
♥ A 8 6 4
♦ 8 4
♣ A Q 10 8 2 |
South |
West |
North |
East |
|
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
? |
|
|
|
|
At the Spring Nationals in Kansas City, Missouri, last spring, Mel Colchamiro showed the bulletin this nice defense. It was found by longtime tournament director Mike Flader, who was playing with Barry Purrington.
On this deal from the second final session of the Baldwin North American Pairs, Flight A, Colchamiro was playing with Alex Ornstein. The South hand offers an insoluble problem when the opponents pre-empt. Colchamiro guessed to double, then bid what he thought he could make once his partner showed values.
There is certainly a reasonable case to be made for a trump lead against six clubs, but Flader dutifully led the heart jack. Colchamiro then inferred that if West had the spade ace, surely East would have the club queen. If West had both those cards, he would probably have led the spade ace. So Colchamiro decided to rely on the diamond break, or that the hand with short diamonds would have short clubs.
He won the heart ace, cashed the diamond ace-king, ruffed a heart and led the diamond queen, which was ruffed with the club queen and over-ruffed. Now Colchamiro took a second heart ruff, and in the seven-card ending he led the spade king from dummy, trying to force an entry back to his own hand. Had he been able to do so, he would have drawn trumps and claimed the rest.
However, Flader won his ace and led the diamond jack. Purrington ruffed his partner’s winner with the club nine, over-ruffed by declarer’s 10, and now Flader’s club seven was promoted to the setting trick!