October 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
A straw vote only shows which way the hot air blows.
O. Henry
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 7 5 2
♥ Q J 10
♦ A Q J 5
♣ K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ 9 8 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
♠ Q J 10 8 6
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ K 8
♦ K 10 7
♣ Q J 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
If you were in direct seat, you would bid one no-trump, of course. But in balancing seat, this hand looks too strong for a call where the range is traditionally played as 10-15. Start by doubling, planning to rebid one no-trump over your partner’s cheap response in a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 4
♥ K 8
♦ K 10 7
♣ Q J 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Dost thou laugh to see how fools are vexed To add to golden numbers, golden numbers?
Thomas Dekker
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K J 3
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ K 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 3
♥ Q 9 7 6
♦ J 8 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
♠ 10 8 7 6
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 9 7 5
♣ J 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 5 2
♥ A 10 5
♦ A Q 10
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
The only person who has actually shown clubs at this table is East, not your partner. Your partner may have three or four clubs, but leading a club is more likely to cost a trick than gain one, in my opinion. The spade jack looks like a relatively safe lead to me.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 5
♥ J 5 3
♦ J 8 3 2
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
October 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Does the way to deal with rebidding a balanced 18-19 count after opening at the one-level differ, depending on whether your partner responds at the one- or two-level?
Falling Flat, Wilmington, N.C.
The answer depends a little on whether you play two-over-one game-forcing. If so, a sequence such as one heart – two clubs – two no-trump suggests 1214, but can also be made with a balanced 18 points or more, and even with club support, planning to bid on over partner’s raise to three no-trump. If your partner responds at the one-level, be it with a suit or a call of one no-trump, you typically rebid two no-trump.
Holding ♠ A-3, ♥ K-9-8, ♦ J-9-2, ♣ Q-10-8-6-4, I passed over a onediamond opener to my right. Now I heard one no-trump to my left and a double from my partner. Since I know my Left Hand Opponent had clubs, should I bid that suit now?
Butter Ball, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
Your partner won’t just have the majors — he has a Michaels two-diamond call available to show 5-5 in the majors (or even 5-4 in a pinch). So he ought to have at least three clubs. Rightly or wrongly, I’d jump to three clubs, hoping partner can bid a major or try for three no-trump if he has real extras.
Assuming your agreement is that opening two of a major in fourth seat is an intermediate hand, what should constitute an intermediate hand?
Hospital Pass, Calgary, Alberta
The first requirement is a good suit, intermediate perhaps meaning 10-13 points or so if the opening is in a red suit, a fraction less in spades. With a poor suit, you would open at the one-level or pass, depending on your controls and where you were within that range.
|
In your commentary on a recent lead problem, you advocated leading an unbid suit of Q-10-2 against no-trump. You did not say, however, which card you would lead. My thought on the matter would be to lead the queen to try to unblock the suit for later play. It might also trap the king in my left-hand opponent’s hand. If I led the two, wouldn’t it suggest to my partner that I held four?
Honest Abe, Atlantic City, N.J.
I’m not a big fan of leading the honor from a three-card suit, even when partner has bid them, either against no-trump or against suits. In this precise position, you may build declarer a second stop if he started with A-J-x or K-J-x. What your partner would believe you would normally do is to lead low from honor-third. And even if he might expect you to have four cards in this suit, it is unlikely that much harm will come to you – assuming that you have hit on the right suit to lead.
I picked up ♠ Q-10-2, ♥ A-8-7-2, ♦ 9-6-3, ♣ A-J-5 and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one no-trump. I doubled for penalty, and my right-hand opponent ran to two clubs. Was I justified in doubling, or is it better to pass and let partner act with extra shape himself?
Lowering the Boom, Pueblo, Colo.
There is no simple answer here; my instincts are that double shows four trumps or a maximum defensive hand with three. Admittedly, this way you let them off the hook sometimes, but I think it is better to use double as “the goods,” not as a speculative attempt to take a penalty. This hand just about qualifies, and as long as you make the call in tempo, partner can remove with a really unsuitable hand.
|
October 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Where a technique tells you ‘how’ and a philosophy tells you ‘what,’ a methodology will contain elements of both ‘what’ and ‘how.’
Peter Checkland
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ Q 10 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 9 8 7 4
♦ 10 9 8 5 2
♣ 2 |
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ 6 3
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ K J 6
♦ K Q J
♣ A K J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT * |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Quantitative
♦10
While this may look like a dead minimum for a jump to two spades, that is clearly the right call. Your hand improved dramatically when your partner suggested relative shortness in clubs, meaning that all your honors are working overtime. Had your Left Hand Opponent opened a red-suit, it would be less clear that jumping to two spades is the right call — though you might do it anyway.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ Q 10 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To know is nothing at all; to imagine is everything.
Anatole France
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 2
♥ Q J 10 5 3
♦ K 10 3
♣ 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ 9
♦ 6 2
♣ A K J 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 7
♥ 6
♦ Q J 9 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣* |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*16 or more high-card points
♣5
This may be an unpopular answer, but facing a pre-empt in first seat (especially a non-vulnerable one), I think it is right to pass and try to go plus there. Yes, there are hands where game will make, but even if partner holds ace-kingseventh of clubs, you still haven’t made four hearts or five clubs. Vulnerable at teams, you might persuade me to bid three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
William Blake
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ Q J 9 7
♦ K 9 5
♣ K Q 10 |
♠ 7 4
♥ A 4
♦ J 10 8 3 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 9 6 2
♥ K 8
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
Your double suggested values; your partner’s four no-trump call suggests two places to play. It makes sense to bid five clubs now; if your partner corrects that to five diamonds, you can bid five hearts, since the 5-4 fit rates to play better than diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In the perfect chess combination, as in a first-rate short story, the whole plot and counter-plot should lead up to a striking finale, the interest not being allayed until the very last moment.— Frederic Yates and William
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 5 4
♥ 10 8 2
♦ 4 3 2
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 7 6
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ 6 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ K Q 4
♦ A Q J 5
♣ K 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Stronger than passing
♦10
This hand is on the cusp of passing, trying to settle for a plus score, or bidding three clubs to show your 5-5 pattern and non-forcing extras. I’d take the latter route — if for no other reason than that three clubs may be easier to make than two hearts if your partner has two hearts and three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Henceforth I ask not good fortune, I choose good fortune.
Walt Whitman
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ Q J 8 4 3
♣ 9 7 |
♠ 10 8
♥ J 10 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 6
♣ K Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*transfer to spades
♦Q
North is unlikely to have even as much as the doubleton ace in spades. Since he did not rebid his clubs initially, he might have given preference to spades at his third turn if he could. You have a choice of forcing calls in the red suits to probe: Three diamonds looks best. You can revert to five clubs if partner raises, but you do not want to suggest half a heart stopper, as a call of three hearts might do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Shallow brooks murmur most, deep silent slide away.
Sir Philip Sidney
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 8 4
♥ J 3
♦ A K J 6 5
♣ 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ K 10 7 6
♦ 4 3
♣ J 9 8 2 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 7 6 5
♥ A 8
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two key-cards, no trump queen
♣2
Do you go active or passive here? I do not like a diamond lead, which can give up a trick in so many different ways while really not having much upside. Since the heart spots also spell danger in terms of conceding a trick unnecessarily, I will go with a low spade (the four, not the seven!).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 9 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
October 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
In a teams game, I picked up ♠ 7, ♥ Q-10-8-6-4, ♦ A-J-10-2, ♣ K-J-10 and passed in second chair. Do you agree? When I heard a spade to my left and a one-no-trump call to my right, should I have acted? If so, with what call?
Wimpy Kid, Riverside, Calif.
Because you can bid your two suits in comfortable order and you have decent controls and useful builders in your intermediates, this hand represents a minimum but respectable opening of one heart. If you do pass, you should double one no-trump for take-out and let your partner play in clubs if he selects that suit.
I am trying to work out how to combine a quantitative bid of four no-trump with Blackwood, while also using four no-trump as regressive. I know you cannot combine all possibilities in a short answer, but what are the basic principles from which we should build?
Low-Key Loki, Cartersville, Ga.
A simple rule is that if your last call in any auction was three no-trump and your partner bids a minor, four no-trump is regressive. If the previous call was in no-trump, then four no-trump is quantitative. Four no-trump may also be quantitative if you have an artificial way to agree the major (after Stayman finds one, for example, or after partner completes a transfer), but instead you jump to four no-trump. In most other sequences, use four no-trump as Blackwood — unless you agree that it isn’t.
I picked up ♠ K-9-4, ♥ A-Q-9, ♦ K-10-8-7-4, ♣ K-3, and when I heard my right-hand opponent open one club, I elected to double rather than bid one diamond or one no-trump. My thinking was that I wanted to get the majors into play, but three no-trump was actually a reasonable spot. Any comments?
Chop Suey, Winston-Salem, N.C.
These days, not only does an opening bid of one club not promise clubs, but the partner of the opening bidder will furthermore not be sure if opener has a balanced hand or a real club suit. Bidding one no-trump over one club is not without risk, but it does describe your assets well. Remember: You probably will find a 5-3 major fit if you have one this way, but do you really want to find a 4-3 major? I’m not sure you do.
|
In one of your columns, you mentioned Ogust responses to a weak two. Please expand on the details of this scheme and the reasoning behind it.
Mock Turtle, Henderson, Nev.
The Ogust scheme of responses to a two no-trump inquiry after a weak two opening accepts that weak two-bids may be based on only a moderate suit. The responses to the inquiry let opener bid three clubs or three diamonds with a bad hand (the latter showing a good suit), and three hearts or three spades with a good hand, promising a minimum and maximum suit, respectively. Using this scheme allows you to be slightly more flexible in pre-empting.
In fourth chair facing a passed partner, I elected not to overcall one heart over one diamond because of the poor quality of my long suit, with ♠ Q-2, ♥ J-7-5-3-2, ♦ A-K-J, ♣ Q-7-3. Would you have acted here? If so, how much worse a hand would you need before you passed instead of overcalling?
Care Bear, Huntington, W. Va.
An overcall should promise either a reasonable hand or a suit you cannot afford to keep silent about. In this case, you have a full opener and no reason to assume bidding will work to your disadvantage. Turn the diamond king into a small diamond and I would pass, reluctantly.
|
|
In this three no-trump contract, it might seem that declarer will likely come to either eight or 10 tricks, depending on how the clubs behave, since the defenders will be able to set up and cash spades if they can get in twice more.
After winning the first or second spade, leading a club to the king will need that suit to break 3-3, which happens only slightly more than a third of the time. Better odds are to lead to the nine — that succeeds whenever West has the club 10.
But here, South knows from the bidding that East has all the missing honors, and he can exploit this fact to give East an insoluble problem. After winning the spade lead in hand, he leads a low diamond to dummy’s jack and advances the club nine.
If East rises with the ace (probably his best move in abstract), he establishes the clubs for declarer, as long as the latter holds the queen-jack. Even if South has only four clubs, three club tricks would see South home. Conversely, if East covers the nine with the 10, then South’s queen wins. Now declarer abandons clubs and knocks out the heart ace as his route to nine tricks.
The Morton’s Fork position is named after King Henry VII’s Lord Chancellor, John Morton. His novel approach to fundraising was based on the hospitality his potential victims offered him. Should the fare be uninspiring, his host must have salted some money away and must therefore be able to spare some for the king. If his host was generous, he clearly must be wealthy enough to pay his taxes.