November 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
One cannot continually disappoint a continent.
James Whistler
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K J 9
♥ Q J 9 7
♦ Q J 10 6
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 3
♥ A 10 4
♦ 7
♣ K J 8 7 3 2 |
♠ 8 5
♥ K 5 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ Q 10 9 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 8 6
♦ A 9 8 5 3 2
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
3 ♣ |
| 3 ♦ |
4 ♣ |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
Clearly your next call will be in no-trump. To bid three clubs would show clubs and hearts and be game-forcing, but you are an ace short of that action. This hand looks like an invitation, not a game force. Yes, you have great club spots, but bid two no-trump and let partner decide whether he has a minimum or maximum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ K 5 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ Q 10 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Maybe if you didn’t try to be so clever, you wouldn’t end up looking so stupid.
Victor Mollo
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ A K 10 5
♦ A K 8 6 5
♣ K Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A J 8 7 3 |
♠ Q J 9 3
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ 10 3
♣ 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 5 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q J 2
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Zero out of three key-cards
♣A
A case could be made for responding one spade, just as you would if your right-hand opponent had passed. But here, after the double, I’m reluctant to bid a weak four-card suit when I’m close to subminimum for the action. It seems wiser to pass, planning to double my left-hand opponent’s likely oneheart response, and otherwise to stay silent.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A J 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Trickery and treachery are the practices of fools who have not wits enough to be honest.
Benjamin Franklin
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 9 7
♥ Q 10 9
♦ Q 5 4 3
♣ J 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 3 2
♥ 8 7
♦ J 10 7
♣ Q 10 9 4 |
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ K J 6
♦ A K 6
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 4
♥ A 5 4 3 2
♦ 9 8 2
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
♠2
All answers have drawbacks here. Raising hearts may get you to an awkward 4-3 fit. Rebidding one spade may make it harder to find hearts (since a heart rebid at your third turn would now show real extras). Finally, rebidding no-trump shows the hand type but may miss the best fit facing a weak hand. I prefer the last option, though, since for me a one-spade call would guarantee real clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ K J 6
♦ A K 6
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
When a dog bites a man, that is not news, because it happens so often. But if a man bites a dog, that is news.
Alfred Harmsworth
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ K 9
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 8 6 5 3
♥ —
♦ 10 6 5
♣ 8 7 3 2 |
♠ 7 4
♥ 10 7 6 4 2
♦ A 9 2
♣ A J 4 |
| South |
♠ Q
♥ A Q J 8 5 3
♦ K 8 7
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
It seems logical to bid one no-trump now rather than raising diamonds, since you can also support diamonds later in a competitive auction; whereas if you raise diamonds now, you may have an awkward decision at your next turn. Also, your partner may misjudge how much defense you have, should you raise directly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ K 9
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Now, O king, establish the decree and sign the writing that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not.
Daniel 6:8
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ A 9 7 5
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ 10 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 6
♥ K Q 10 8 4 3
♦ Q J
♣ K |
♠ A J 9 7 5 4
♥ J 6 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ 6 |
| South |
♠ 3 2
♥ —
♦ A 9 5 4
♣ A Q J 9 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| 5 ♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠K
Since this might be your only chance to lead through dummy, I suggest that a low heart is more likely to be successful than a club. Partner rates to have exactly four cards on this auction, and while the jack might work to take three tricks quickly, you could hardly blame your partner for trying to give you a ruff. In any event, you might get in with the club king again for a second heart play, if necessary.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8
♥ J 9 2
♦ J 8 6 5 4
♣ K 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
November 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
What is the best use of Stayman, followed by three of a minor? Should this be natural and weak, invitational, or some kind of forcing call?
Tim the Trumpeter, Arlington, Texas
Common expert opinion is that Stayman, followed by three of either minor, is game-forcing with at least five cards in that minor and an unbid major of four cards (typically the unbid major if partner shows one at his second turn). To sign off in a minor, transfer to that suit and pass the response. On invitational hands with a minor and a four-card major, use Stayman, then raise the response or bid two no-trump as appropriate. The same basic structure applies over a two-no-trump opener.
Recently, my partner passed in first seat, and I opened one spade. After a double from the next hand, she jumped to three clubs. I thought this would be a maximum pass with clubs, but she was sure she had shown a pre-emptive bid. I had always assumed that a pre-emptive bid must be made at your first turn to speak. Who is right?
Jumping Bean, Spokane, Wash.
I would certainly not expect my partner to have a good hand with just clubs. With such a hand, she should bid two clubs or redouble rather than jump. But I also don’t play this call as pre-emptive. (If you can’t open three clubs, what about your hand lets you pre-empt later, other than an initial sorting error?) I suggest you play all passed-hand jumps facing an opener or overcall as fit jumps. See www.bridgeguys.com/Conventions/flower_bids.html.
We recently had a problem when I picked up a balanced 13-count and opened one heart, my five-card major. My partner had a balanced 17-count with only three hearts and four spades. He bid one spade. After I responded one no-trump, how was my partner supposed to explore for slam, given that there was no “unbid” minor?
Scott Free, Pleasanton, Calif.
I’d recommend you use two clubs in this auction as the equivalent of New Minor. For the uninitiated, the call simply sets up a game forcing auction and says nothing about clubs. Your partner can bid hearts at his next turn, and you will either cooperate toward slam with a suitable hand or sign off if minimum. Two diamonds can be natural and non-forcing here.
|
When defending against a suit contract, what are your thoughts on underleading aces or leading them out in bid and supported suits?
Bamboozler, Toledo, Ohio
Even if my partner raises a suit I have opened or overcalled in, I hate to lead out an unsupported ace unless everything else is worse. I’m more likely to do it in a suit my partner introduced first. If I’m defending a contract that was doubled by my partner, it is even less attractive to lead an ace, since the auction has suggested we are not stacked in our long suit. Underleading would be limited to cases where my left-hand opponent has shown (or implied) stoppers in that suit.
Say you are in fourth seat, and an opening bid to your left is passed around to you. How much do you need before you can balance over a minor suit? If the answer is less than is needed for direct action, how does your partner know when to pull in a notch?
Protective Coloring, Pierre, S.D.
When in balancing seat, mentally add a king to your high cards and bid appropriately, while responder should take a king off. So if I had 14 points and did balance with a suit call, I would consider moving over a simple raise from my partner (for which the range is approximately 8-10 points, not 5-7 points). If I double, I might raise a simple response from my partner with support and 15-17 points.
|
November 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
No battle plan ever survives contact with the enemy.
Helmuth von Moltke
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 10 4
♥ 4
♦ A 6 3
♣ A K Q 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 6 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ 4 |
♠ —
♥ A Q J 10 8 3 2
♦ J 8 5 4
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
♠ J 7 5 2
♥ 7 6
♦ K 7
♣ J 9 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
| Pass |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
Normally, a 5-4 hand should seriously consider reverting to the major, but here, the fact that you are short in partner’s suit and your major is weak argues for passing. For the record, if your majors were switched, you might rebid your suit, more confident that your partner will not have a singleton in that suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 6 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 19th, 2018
Life without industry is guilt, industry without art is brutality.
John Ruskin
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 3
♥ A 10 8 4 2
♦ J 10 9 7 6 5
♣ 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 5 2
♥ K 9 5
♦ A K
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ J
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ Q 7 6 3
♦ 4
♣ A J 8 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ * |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT * * |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 5 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Clubs, 10-15 points
**Two places to play
♠K
The three-heart call is forcing. Once you bid voluntarily, your partner showed real extras, so you must bid again. This hand doesn’t feel right for a bid of three no-trump, so the choice is to bid clubs or raise hearts. I think a four-club call is more flexible. If partner bids four diamonds, you can bid four hearts and maybe get back to hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ J
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
We view things not only from different sides, but with different eyes; we have no wish to find them alike.
Blaise Pascal
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ A 8 5 4
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 10 9 7 |
♠ 10 7
♥ 10 7 6 2
♦ J 7 3 2
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ K Q J 9 3
♦ A K Q
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
A simple one here. Diamonds will surely play better than no-trump, so you can bid a non-forcing three diamonds, hoping desperately that your partner can give delayed preference to spades with a doubleton, whereupon you can bid four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 31st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 17th, 2018
Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.
Ambrose Bierce
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 7
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 2
♥ 9 5
♦ A K Q 8
♣ 10 6 4 3 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 7 2
♦ 10 9 6 3
♣ J 9 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 6 5 3
♥ 8 6 4
♦ J 5
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Jumps by a passed hand facing an overcall should be played as fit. Your partner can’t have only spades, or he would have overcalled or bid one spade at his second turn. I’d expect a hand with good spades and heart support. This hand has enough extras to jump straight to four hearts now to protect the club king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
After four matches in the 1998 Cap Gemini World Pairs Invitational, the local supporters were delighted to see Piet Jansen and Jan Westerhof of the Netherlands atop the table. Then they met Tor Helness and Geir Helgemo on Vugraph and lost out, mainly because of the following hand.
It looks as if North-South had done well in the auction, since the diamond game appeared to depend simply on the winning diamond finesse. But there was more to it than that. Helgemo found the diabolical lead of the heart four! When Westerhof played low from dummy, Helness had no trouble in putting up the heart king. (He knew his partner’s larcenous tendencies and could see that if declarer had the heart ace, the game would surely be laydown).
Helness now did very well when he switched to the diamond four before declarer could discover the deception in the heart suit. Had he not done so, declarer might have played a second heart himself and exposed the ruse.
From this defense, Westerhof reasonably deduced that East was likely to hold the ace and king of hearts. Accordingly, his only chance would be finding the bare diamond king with West, since otherwise there would not be enough high cards to justify an opening bid. So he tried to drop the singleton king of trumps and failed in his contract.
After that point, the Dutch pair headed south in the field, while Helness-Helgemo went on to take third place.