Aces on Bridge — Daily Columns

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, October 2nd, 2018

He who shall teach the child to doubt The rotting grave shall ne’er get out.

William Blake


S North
None ♠ 9 7 2
 Q 9 3
 A K Q
♣ Q 10 8 6
West East
♠ Q 8 5
 A
 J 7 6 5 4 3
♣ 7 5 4
♠ J 10 6 4
 10 7 5 2
 10 9 8 2
♣ J
South
♠ A K 3
 K J 8 6 4
 —
♣ A K 9 3 2
South West North East
1 Pass 2 ♣ Pass
3 ♣ Pass 4 Pass
6 All pass    

Aha!

It is easy to pay lip service to the idea that juniors are the future of the game, but over the last few decades we have rarely seen our organizations putting their money where their mouths are.

Getting bridge teachers into schools is one very important way to introduce children to the game. Getting them to learn the rules of bidding may take second place to allowing them to play cards and get a feel for the game. Once that starts to happen, who knows where it may take them?

I’m pleased to say that today’s deal, sent to me by Suleyman Kolata, comes from a junior event: a Swiss teams tournament at the 20th Iskenderun Bridge Festival in Hatay, Turkey. Sitting West was Tuana Altun, age 8, playing with her brother Toygar Tuncay Altun. Tuana heard the auction as shown, to six hearts. What would you have led?

Tuana found the killing club lead for an 11 IMP gain, since her teammates had played in game rather than slam. Consequently, this victory helped them win the under-16 teams. When her father asked Tuana about her lead and continuation of a club after winning the heart ace, Tuana said that the bidding had told her that the opponents held a big club fit. She felt confident that if her partner could not ruff at the first trick, her trump control would give her a second chance.

For the record, 23 out of 31 tables made the heart slam here.



After your initial pass, your partner will assume that you have fewer than 6 high-card points. But do you have enough to compete to two spades now? I say yes, but I’d understand anyone who would pass, feeling that the singleton club, combined with holding only four trumps, argues for defending, not declaring.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ J 10 6 4
 10 7 5 2
 10 9 8 2
♣ J
South West North East
    1 ♣ Dbl.
Pass 1 Dbl. 2
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, October 1st, 2018

The devil watches all opportunities.

William Congreve


S North
Both ♠ 10 4
 K Q 9 7 5
 A 9 5
♣ 5 3 2
West East
♠ 8 7 2
 10 6
 Q 10 6 2
♣ J 10 7 4
♠ 6 5
 A J 8 2
 J 8 7 4
♣ Q 9 8
South
♠ A K Q J 9 3
 4 3
 K 3
♣ A K 6
South West North East
2 ♣ Pass 2 Pass
2 ♠ Pass 2 NT Pass
3 ♠ Pass 4 Pass
4 NT Pass 5 Pass
6 ♠ All pass    

♣J

Follow the play in today’s deal carefully — there will be a question at the end of the report. South first forced to game, then took control and used Blackwood to drive to six spades. When dummy came down, South saw that he had two possible losers; but the best plan to avoid a club loser would be to establish dummy’s long hearts.

So South won the club lead, led a heart to the king and ace, won the diamond return and drew one round of trumps with the ace.

Declarer now cashed dummy’s remaining top heart and ruffed a third heart with a high trump. When hearts split 4-2, declarer led his small trump to dummy’s 10, putting the lead in dummy to allow him to ruff hearts for a second time.

The second ruff established dummy’s last heart; only now could South could afford to draw West’s last trump. South now led a diamond to dummy’s ace and cashed dummy’s last heart, pitching his remaining club loser.

South had his 12 tricks; could he or the defense have done differently — or better? First, West had a blind lead, but a diamond would have worked out better in disrupting the entries to dummy. Second, and key to the defense, was that West needed to give count in hearts at trick two, letting East duck his ace. That has the effect of preventing the establishment of the hearts. If you don’t believe me, try it for yourself!



Which heart should you lead? It looks like declarer has four spades and no real extra shape in the minors, so if anyone is short in hearts, it will be dummy. If dummy is short in hearts, leading the king then working out whether to shift to clubs or continue hearts seems like a good idea.

LEAD WITH THE ACES

♠ J 5 3
 K 8 4 2
 7 6 2
♣ J 7 3
South West North East
  1 1 Dbl.
2 3 Pass 3 ♠
Pass 4 ♠ All pass  

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 30th, 2018

Recently, I opened a strong no-trump, and my partner held ♠ A-9,  A-10-8-4-2,  9-5, ♣ 10-7-3-2. He responded two diamonds as a transfer, and I dutifully answered two hearts. What should his next bid have been? Would your answer be different if he were a passed hand?

Vantage Point, Janesville, Wis.

At pairs, passing two hearts seems sensible enough, since you probably only want to be in game facing a maximum hand with a fit, in which case your partner might already have broken the transfer. If you bid on, a call of two no-trump may be best; you limit your hand nicely, at the cost of an overbid of no more than the heart nine. Some might use Stayman and then follow up with two no-trump to invite game.

When my partner opened one heart in third seat, I had no idea what to do, holding ♠ K-J-9-7-2,  A-J-2,  Q-2, ♣ 9-7-3. Should I raise to three and risk that he has a weak opener, or underbid with a raise to two — or even temporize with spades? Do you agree with the initial pass?

Coming a Cropper, San Antonio, Texas

Passing when vulnerable is fine. I might open one spade if I could pass a one-no-trump response. As a passed hand, I’d advocate that a regular partnership use Drury, a two-club response to a major-suit opening. It shows a maximum pass and three or more trumps. Opener can sign off with a minimum, bid game with a maximum or develop the hand naturally with a game- or slam-try. Failing that, I’d respond one spade, then jump to three hearts or make a fit-jump to two spades.

When (if ever) would you lead a high as opposed to a low card from Q-J-3-2 or K-Q-3-2 after the opponents have reached three no-trump on a brief auction where this is an unbid suit?

Heavens to Betsy, Portland, Ore.

This is only a personal view, but I tend to lead an honor from the queen-jack if my right-hand opponent has shown a strong no-trump or better (and thus the other honors are likely to be on my right). The king-queen holding is more awkward, since you may turn two tricks into one; in that case, I’d lead an honor only if I felt it necessary to try to cash out. Add in as little as the nine, and an honor lead becomes more attractive.

Holding ♠ A-Q-J,  9-4-3,  Q-7, ♣ Q-7-6-5-2, my left-hand opponent opened two hearts, which my partner doubled. When the next player passed, what would you advocate, and why?

Crock Pot, Richmond, Va.

I referred in an earlier answer this month to the idea that an extension of the Lebensohl convention uses two no-trump as a puppet to three clubs to show a weak hand with a minor, while a call in either minor is natural and invitational. That being the case here, I’d bid three clubs and hope we didn’t miss game if partner passed.

Please explain to me what happens when you have a bidding box accident? When are you allowed to take back a bid made using bidding boxes, and when are you not permitted to do so?

Klumsy Karp, Horn Lake, Miss.

Let’s say you open one no-trump, and as your partner I bid two hearts. If I meant to bid two diamonds as a transfer to hearts, I can change my bid; mechanical errors can be corrected with no penalties. If I meant to bid hearts, forgetting we were playing transfers, and only remembered later that we play transfers, then I may NOT change the bid. You may correct only a physical error, not a mental one.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 29th, 2018

I held it truth, with him who sings
To one clear harp in divers tones,
That men may rise on steppingstones
Of their dead selves to higher things.

Alfred, Lord Tennyson


S North
N-S ♠ 5 2
 7 6 5 2
 Q 7 6 4
♣ 6 4 2
West East
♠ 7 4
 A Q J 9 8 3
 10 9 8 5
♣ 9
♠ 10 8 6 3
 10 4
 3 2
♣ J 10 8 7 3
South
♠ A K Q J 9
 K
 A K J
♣ A K Q 5
South West North East
2 ♣ 2 Dbl.* Pass
2 ♠ Pass 3 Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 ♠ Pass
6 ♠ All pass    

*Weak, 0-5 high-card points

10

The elegantly named steppingstone squeeze makes an appearance in today’s deal. South refused to stop short of six spades, and West led the diamond 10 against the slam.

Declarer won with the ace, drew trumps in four rounds and tested the clubs, West showing out on the second round. All would have been well had diamonds been 3-3, since declarer could have overtaken on the third round. But if West held four diamonds alongside the heart ace, South realized that he might come under pressure on the last trump.

If West threw a diamond, declarer would be able to overtake his jack with the queen, scoring his 12th trick with dummy’s fourth diamond.

If, instead, West threw the heart queen, declarer would cash his remaining top diamond and throw West on lead with a heart to the ace, to force him to lead to dummy’s diamond queen. West’s only other option would be to pitch the heart ace. This would beat the contract if East held the heart king, but as the cards lay it would allow South to score his heart king.

Oddly enough, if East had held four diamonds and four clubs, declarer could have caught him in the stepping-stone squeeze instead! The fifth round of trumps would have forced him to throw his last heart, retaining four diamonds and his club guard. South could then have cashed the diamond K-J and thrown East in with the fourth round of clubs to give dummy the diamond queen. Yes, in that instance, a simple minor-suit squeeze would work as well.


Normally one responds in a major when partner opens a minor, but with a hand this weak, the last thing you want to do is to encourage your partner to soar to the stratosphere. So respond one diamond to try to slow partner down; he should be less likely to jump in support of a minor than a major. This same argument might work no matter what the level of the opening club bid.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 5 2
 7 6 5 2
 Q 7 6 4
♣ 6 4 2
South West North East
  1 ♣ Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Friday, September 28th, 2018

Crocodiles are easy; they try to kill and eat you. People are harder; sometimes they pretend to be your friend first.

Steve Irwin


W North
E-W ♠ Q 8 7 6
 J 3
 K J 6 4 2
♣ 7 6
West East
♠ J 9 4
 A K 8 5
 9 8 7
♣ Q 10 4
♠ 10 5 2
 Q 10 7
 Q 10 5
♣ K J 8 5
South
♠ A K 3
 9 6 4 2
 A 3
♣ A 9 3 2
South West North East
  Pass Pass Pass
1 NT All pass    

A

In the first session of the Yokohama Open Pairs last February, this deal presented an interesting problem for both declarer and the defenders.

West’s heart lead let the defenders cash out that suit; playing standard signals, East could encourage with the 10 under the ace to simultaneously unblock the suit. It would be much easier on a low heart lead, but I prefer the top heart.

Dummy had to find two discards and let go a diamond and a club, while East pitched a suit-preference spade two. East’s accurate shift to a low club went to the king and ace.

Declarer Dawei Chen now ran four rounds of spades, East discarding the club eight and the club five, and West the diamond seven. Chen diagnosed that the diamond queen had to be guarded and offside, and that East had reduced to a four-card ending where he had all three diamonds and the club jack left. Chen then crossed to his diamond ace and led a sneaky low club from hand.

To defeat the contract, West had to rise with the club queen (the right play whether South or East had the jack) to exit with a diamond and ensure a diamond trick for his partner. When West failed to imitate the crocodile and swallow up partner’s jack, East had to overtake his partner’s club 10 and was endplayed to concede the rest.

Incidentally, for all of us inclined to cast the first stone and blame West, notice that East could have discarded the club jack at his previous turn to help partner get it right.


Responding one diamond here is not wrong, but my preference is to respond one spade with any hand where I do not intend to take a second call facing a minimum rebid from my partner. When I respond one diamond, I’m usually denying a major unless I have at least invitational values. So opener tends to rebid one no-trump over one diamond on any balanced hand (even with a four-card major in a 4-3-3-3 hand).

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 8 7 6
 J 3
 K J 6 4 2
♣ 7 6
South West North East
    1 ♣ Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, September 27th, 2018

Nothing is more indisputable than the existence of our senses.

Jean d’Alembert


N North
None ♠ K J 5
 Q 9 4
 K 6 4
♣ A 10 7 4
West East
♠ 10 6 4 2
 7 5 2
 Q 10 5 2
♣ 9 5
♠ 7
 K J 10 8 6 3
 9 7
♣ J 8 3 2
South
♠ A Q 9 8 3
 A
 A J 8 3
♣ K Q 6
South West North East
    1 ♣ 2
2 ♠ Pass 3 ♠ Pass
4 ♣ Pass 4 Pass
4 NT Pass 5 * Pass
6 ♠ All pass    

*Two key-cards no trump queen

2

Upon hearing East’s weak jump overcall in hearts and learning of North’s spade support, South drove to slam in spades after using Key-card Blackwood.

West led a third-highest heart two, confirming that hearts were indeed 3=6. After winning his ace, declarer drew four rounds of trumps, throwing a low heart from table. Meanwhile, East also discarded hearts. Next, declarer cashed the club king and queen, then led a club toward the table. West had to throw a heart, or else declarer would simply set up a long diamond for his 12th trick.

At this point, declarer could count West for an original 4=3=4=2 shape, with one heart and four diamonds remaining. So he ruffed a heart, then played a diamond to the king and a low diamond toward his hand, intending to cover East’s card cheaply. When East produced the nine, South inserted the jack. West took this with the queen but then had to lead from the diamond 10 into declarer’s ace-eight tenace.

Note that if West had followed to the first three clubs, with the jack not having put in an appearance, declarer would have risen with the ace. If East had produced the club jack, declarer would have cashed the 10, then taken the diamond finesse for the overtrick. If West turned up with jack-fourth of clubs, then his original distribution would have been 4=3=2=4. Now declarer would ensure three diamond tricks by cashing the ace and king before leading a low diamond toward his jack-eight.


The question is whether to blast three no-trump here or take a slower route. With no four-card major and a positional diamond stopper, I would bid three no-trump directly. That gets my values across, and while it doesn’t prevent partner from bidding on, he will only do so with real extras or unusual shape.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ K J 5
 Q 9 4
 K 6 4
♣ A 10 7 4
South West North East
  2 Dbl. Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 26th, 2018

It has long been an axiom of mine that the little things are infinitely the most important.

Sherlock Holmes


S North
Both ♠ 9 8 3 2
 K 9 8 4
 K
♣ A 6 3 2
West East
♠ K Q 10
 Q 6 3
 A J 10 7 4 2
♣ 10
♠ J 7 6 5
 7
 8 6 3
♣ Q J 9 7 4
South
♠ A 4
 A J 10 5 2
 Q 9 5
♣ K 8 5
South West North East
1 2 3 Pass
4 All pass    

♠K

In most suit contracts, declarer hastens to draw trumps, to keep his winners from being ruffed away. But there are many exceptions to the rule: a crossruff, for example. Today’s deal shows another reason for delaying play in the trump suit.

On this deal from the 1997 Venice Cup, Tobi Sokolow counted out her opponents’ hands by testing the plain suits in order to work out how to tackle trump correctly.

Sokolow ended up in four hearts after West had overcalled in diamonds. West led a top spade; Sokolow ducked, then won the continuation, noting East’s high-low to show encouragement in the suit. A diamond toward the king lost to the ace. Ruffing the spade return, declarer cashed the diamond queen and trumped her last diamond with the eight as East followed suit.

Returning to hand with the club king, she followed with a second club toward dummy’s ace, on which West showed out. Sokolow now decided that West held three spades rather than four, based on the play in the suit thus far. West was known to have a singleton club and was likely to have six diamonds rather than five; otherwise, her vulnerable overcall, missing the king and queen, would have been extremely sporting. East’s carding in diamonds had also suggested an odd number. Since West had three spades, six diamonds and one club, that strongly suggested three hearts in West’s hand.

So Sokolow cashed her heart ace, then successfully finessed West for the queen to bring home her contract.


It’s time for a little science: You do not have enough to drive to slam, and a splinter jump to five diamonds is misleading. I suggest that after Stayman finds a fit, you bid the other major as an artificial call, setting the shown major (hearts) as trump and indicating slam interest. Let partner take it from there.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ 9 8 3 2
 K 9 8 4
 K
♣ A 6 3 2
South West North East
    2 NT Pass
3 ♣ Pass 3 Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Tuesday, September 25th, 2018

Men might be better if we better deemed
Of them. The worst way to improve the world
Is to condemn it.

Philip James Bailey


S North
E-W ♠ K 5 3
 J 10 7 6 5
 A 6 5
♣ 10 5
West East
♠ Q 10 7
 K 9 8 4
 Q J 2
♣ K J 6
♠ 4
 Q 3
 10 8 7 4
♣ Q 9 8 7 4 2
South
♠ A J 9 8 6 2
 A 2
 K 9 3
♣ A 3
South West North East
1 ♠ Pass 2 ♠ Pass
4 ♠ All pass    

Q

Today’s deal is from a knockout match with very similar auctions in both rooms, both reaching a final contract of four spades by South on the lead of the diamond queen. At the first table, declarer took the lead in hand and went after trumps at once, leading to the spade king, followed by a second spade. When East showed out, South had no way to avoid losing a trick in each suit, for one down.

The second declarer noticed the possibility that he might survive the loss of a trump trick if he was careful, thanks to the strength of his heart spots. At this table, he also won the diamond lead in hand and cashed the trump ace. However, when both opponents followed with small cards, he continued with the heart ace then two. West followed small, and South carefully ducked, confident West did not have both top heart honors and playing for this precise position — if the suit is 3-3, the play is irrelevant, while if East has four cards, you cannot ruff out the suit in one round.

When East won with the queen and returned a club (a diamond would have been no better), declarer hopped up with the ace, then crossed to the spade king to lead the heart jack, on which he discarded his losing club.

On taking the heart king, West tried to cash a club. South ruffed, then crossed to dummy’s diamond ace. Declarer could now throw his remaining diamond loser on the heart 10 and lose just one trump trick and two hearts.


I would rarely suggest passing a 12-count, but if ever such a hand has come along, this would be it. No aces, a 4-3-3-3 pattern and no good suit to open — these all combine to make a pass the sensible action. Move the heart king into the diamond suit, and at least you get to open your long and strong suit.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 10 7
 K 9 8 4
 Q J 2
♣ K J 6
South West North East
      Pass
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Monday, September 24th, 2018

Art hath an enemy called Ignorance.

Ben Jonson


N North
None ♠ Q 7 5 4 2
 K 9 4 3
 K
♣ A 5 4
West East
♠ K 10
 5
 9 8 6 5 3
♣ Q J 10 8 6
♠ A 9 8 6
 10 8 7
 Q 10 4 2
♣ K 9
South
♠ J 3
 A Q J 6 2
 A J 7
♣ 7 3 2
South West North East
    1 ♠ Pass
2 Pass 4 All pass
       

♣Q

When North opens one spade and hears a two-heart response, he has three possible continuations. He could raise to three hearts or four hearts, or he could make a splinter raise to four diamonds. Does this last route show extras? The combination of North having a dead minimum and the “wrong” splinter — an ace or small card is much better than the king — persuades him to go low. South has no reason to continue over the four-heart call.

After West leads the club queen, it might seem that South has four quick black-suit losers. But declarer has a top diamond in hand to cope with the slow club losers. South wins the first trick with dummy’s club ace and unblocks dummy’s diamond king. He then gets back to his hand by way of the trump ace and cashes the diamond ace to discard one of dummy’s losing clubs.

The idea now is to make it possible for South to ruff his losing minor-suit cards in dummy. He trumps a diamond, then gives up a club, planning to ruff dummy’s remaining club with the heart king and draw trumps, conceding just two spade tricks.

If the defenders win the second club and play anything but a spade, that is precisely what declarer will do. If, instead, East wins the club king and plays a spade to his partner’s king, for a spade back to the ace and a third spade, declarer will ruff high, then draw trumps ending in dummy, with the spade queen as a home for his last club loser.


Over one diamond, I would probably overcall one spade, but here it feels right to double two diamonds. Since this hand is likely worth no more than one call, I want to keep both majors in play. Doubling seems like the right way to do that.

BID WITH THE ACES

♠ Q 7 5 4 2
 K 9 4 3
 K
♣ A 5 4
South West North East
      2
?      

For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].

The Aces on Bridge: Sunday, September 23rd, 2018

When would you open a weak two in fourth seat? I can understand that you would pass most hands with 8 points. What would you open, if anything, in fourth seat with ♠ J-10-7-3,  A-K-10-9-3-2,  —, ♣ Q-10-3? My view is that it should be a better hand than one in which you would open one heart and rebid two hearts.

Sally Fourth, Elkhart, Ind.

My two-bids in fourth chair start at 9 points. A two-spade opening with ace-king-jack-sixth and an additional minor honor is probably a dead minimum. Your example looks like a two-heart opener. We might belong in spades, but I’d be willing to take my chances on that.

I know Lebensohl applies as a way to compete when the opponents overcall over a strong no-trump. Are there other applications of this convention that we should be playing?

Handy Man, Pottsville, Pa.

Yes, indeed! Once you have bought into the concept, use it after reverses or when responding to the takeout double of a weak two. It can also be employed when partner opens, then balances with a double of a two-level overcall or jump overcall. Finally, you can (with some caution) use it after partner doubles a one-level opener and the opponents raise that suit. For more information, see Extended Lebensohl and Blackout.

I am returning to bridge after an extended hiatus. I suspect my methods 30 years ago (16-18 no-trump and four-card majors) are now out of date. What approach is standard these days?

Long Gone, Memphis, Tenn.

I believe almost everywhere in the world new players are taught five-card majors, and to open 12-counts rather than waiting for 13-point hands. In turn, that fits best with 15-17 for the no-trump range. I’d recommend learning from the ACBL free teaching tool.

What happens when a tournament director gives a decision at the table that appears to you to be wrong or unfair? Is there a right of appeal, or is a director’s ruling final?

Last Call, Charlottesville, Tenn.

I believe there is always a right of appeal against a director ruling, except where that ruling is a matter of law rather than interpretation. For example, you cannot appeal a penalty for a revoke, no matter how unfair or inequitable you think it is. But you should chat to your club director (or an impartial expert) before doing anything dramatic.

How should our partnership play the range of a jump in partner’s opened minor? We play a strong no-trump, and specifically I wonder when, if at all, we should consider moving on to three no-trump facing the jump raise.

Razor’s Edge, Tupelo, Miss.

I’m going to hedge a bit. I suggest that if you have a normal balanced 18-19, you do not head for three no-trump facing a non-vulnerable pre-emptive raise. In other words, the raise typically shows values of 0-5 high-card points with five or six cards in the suit raised. But facing a vulnerable raise (which tends toward showing slightly more than a purely preemptive raise), I would at least try for three no-trump, expecting partner to have closer to 4-8 high-card points.


For details of Bobby Wolff’s autobiography, The Lone Wolff, contact [email protected]. If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, please leave a comment at this blog.
Reproduced with permission of United Feature Syndicate, Inc., Copyright 2018. If you are interested in reprinting The Aces on Bridge column, contact [email protected].