October 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To know is nothing at all; to imagine is everything.
Anatole France
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 2
♥ Q J 10 5 3
♦ K 10 3
♣ 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ 9
♦ 6 2
♣ A K J 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 7
♥ 6
♦ Q J 9 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣* |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*16 or more high-card points
♣5
This may be an unpopular answer, but facing a pre-empt in first seat (especially a non-vulnerable one), I think it is right to pass and try to go plus there. Yes, there are hands where game will make, but even if partner holds ace-kingseventh of clubs, you still haven’t made four hearts or five clubs. Vulnerable at teams, you might persuade me to bid three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
William Blake
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ Q J 9 7
♦ K 9 5
♣ K Q 10 |
♠ 7 4
♥ A 4
♦ J 10 8 3 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 9 6 2
♥ K 8
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
Your double suggested values; your partner’s four no-trump call suggests two places to play. It makes sense to bid five clubs now; if your partner corrects that to five diamonds, you can bid five hearts, since the 5-4 fit rates to play better than diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In the perfect chess combination, as in a first-rate short story, the whole plot and counter-plot should lead up to a striking finale, the interest not being allayed until the very last moment.— Frederic Yates and William
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 5 4
♥ 10 8 2
♦ 4 3 2
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 7 6
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ 6 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ K Q 4
♦ A Q J 5
♣ K 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Stronger than passing
♦10
This hand is on the cusp of passing, trying to settle for a plus score, or bidding three clubs to show your 5-5 pattern and non-forcing extras. I’d take the latter route — if for no other reason than that three clubs may be easier to make than two hearts if your partner has two hearts and three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Henceforth I ask not good fortune, I choose good fortune.
Walt Whitman
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ Q J 8 4 3
♣ 9 7 |
♠ 10 8
♥ J 10 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 6
♣ K Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*transfer to spades
♦Q
North is unlikely to have even as much as the doubleton ace in spades. Since he did not rebid his clubs initially, he might have given preference to spades at his third turn if he could. You have a choice of forcing calls in the red suits to probe: Three diamonds looks best. You can revert to five clubs if partner raises, but you do not want to suggest half a heart stopper, as a call of three hearts might do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Shallow brooks murmur most, deep silent slide away.
Sir Philip Sidney
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 8 4
♥ J 3
♦ A K J 6 5
♣ 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ K 10 7 6
♦ 4 3
♣ J 9 8 2 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 7 6 5
♥ A 8
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two key-cards, no trump queen
♣2
Do you go active or passive here? I do not like a diamond lead, which can give up a trick in so many different ways while really not having much upside. Since the heart spots also spell danger in terms of conceding a trick unnecessarily, I will go with a low spade (the four, not the seven!).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 9 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
October 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
In a teams game, I picked up ♠ 7, ♥ Q-10-8-6-4, ♦ A-J-10-2, ♣ K-J-10 and passed in second chair. Do you agree? When I heard a spade to my left and a one-no-trump call to my right, should I have acted? If so, with what call?
Wimpy Kid, Riverside, Calif.
Because you can bid your two suits in comfortable order and you have decent controls and useful builders in your intermediates, this hand represents a minimum but respectable opening of one heart. If you do pass, you should double one no-trump for take-out and let your partner play in clubs if he selects that suit.
I am trying to work out how to combine a quantitative bid of four no-trump with Blackwood, while also using four no-trump as regressive. I know you cannot combine all possibilities in a short answer, but what are the basic principles from which we should build?
Low-Key Loki, Cartersville, Ga.
A simple rule is that if your last call in any auction was three no-trump and your partner bids a minor, four no-trump is regressive. If the previous call was in no-trump, then four no-trump is quantitative. Four no-trump may also be quantitative if you have an artificial way to agree the major (after Stayman finds one, for example, or after partner completes a transfer), but instead you jump to four no-trump. In most other sequences, use four no-trump as Blackwood — unless you agree that it isn’t.
I picked up ♠ K-9-4, ♥ A-Q-9, ♦ K-10-8-7-4, ♣ K-3, and when I heard my right-hand opponent open one club, I elected to double rather than bid one diamond or one no-trump. My thinking was that I wanted to get the majors into play, but three no-trump was actually a reasonable spot. Any comments?
Chop Suey, Winston-Salem, N.C.
These days, not only does an opening bid of one club not promise clubs, but the partner of the opening bidder will furthermore not be sure if opener has a balanced hand or a real club suit. Bidding one no-trump over one club is not without risk, but it does describe your assets well. Remember: You probably will find a 5-3 major fit if you have one this way, but do you really want to find a 4-3 major? I’m not sure you do.
|
In one of your columns, you mentioned Ogust responses to a weak two. Please expand on the details of this scheme and the reasoning behind it.
Mock Turtle, Henderson, Nev.
The Ogust scheme of responses to a two no-trump inquiry after a weak two opening accepts that weak two-bids may be based on only a moderate suit. The responses to the inquiry let opener bid three clubs or three diamonds with a bad hand (the latter showing a good suit), and three hearts or three spades with a good hand, promising a minimum and maximum suit, respectively. Using this scheme allows you to be slightly more flexible in pre-empting.
In fourth chair facing a passed partner, I elected not to overcall one heart over one diamond because of the poor quality of my long suit, with ♠ Q-2, ♥ J-7-5-3-2, ♦ A-K-J, ♣ Q-7-3. Would you have acted here? If so, how much worse a hand would you need before you passed instead of overcalling?
Care Bear, Huntington, W. Va.
An overcall should promise either a reasonable hand or a suit you cannot afford to keep silent about. In this case, you have a full opener and no reason to assume bidding will work to your disadvantage. Turn the diamond king into a small diamond and I would pass, reluctantly.
|
October 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.
Douglas Adams
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 10 6
♣ K 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 9 8 2
♥ K 5 3
♦ Q 8 2
♣ 4 3 |
♠ 6 3
♥ A 8 6
♦ J 7 5 3
♣ 10 9 7 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 4
♥ Q 9 4
♦ A 9 4
♣ A Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
Since your partner has guaranteed six clubs on this auction (which wouldn’t be absolutely guaranteed over a one-spade response, by the way), you can see you have a good chance of running nine quick tricks facing little more than six clubs to the ace-queen and the diamond ace. Rather than risk missing game, I would simply bid three no-trump now without consulting my partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 10 6
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
I always voted at my party’s call And I never thought of thinking for myself at all.
W.S. Gilbert
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ 8 6
♦ 8 7 3
♣ A Q 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ J 10
♣ J 7 5 3 2 |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ Q 6 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 3
♥ A K 4 2
♦ A K 9
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT* |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Waiting
♥J
Some people play Equal Level Conversion, meaning that correcting two clubs to two diamonds here does not show any extra values. I’m not a fan of that approach, so I can bid two no-trump without feeling I’m stepping too far out of line. My diamond builders are working overtime, so I have enough to invite game, even though I still don’t have a great hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ J 10
♣ J 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king.
Queen Elizabeth I
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 9 8 5
♦ K Q 10 6 5 4
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ 4
♦ J 8 7 3
♣ 10 9 8 2 |
♠ J 8 4
♥ A K 10 6 2
♦ 9
♣ A Q 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ Q J 7 3
♦ A 2
♣ K J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Your partner’s call suggests extras in high cards or playing strength, and you certainly have something in hand for your first call. It seems logical to advance with a bid of three spades. You might be able to make game in diamonds, spades or no-trump; let partner know where you live.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ 9 8 5
♦ K Q 10 6 5 4
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Dream on, but don’t imagine they’ll all come true. When will you realize Vienna waits for you?
Billy Joel
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A Q 10 8 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 4
♥ K J 5 3
♦ 3
♣ K J 6 4 2 |
♠ J 9 5 3
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 9 7 6 2
♣ A 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 6
♥ A 7 6
♦ K J 5
♣ Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
You seem to have just enough to balance with two diamonds. Since you did not act directly at your first turn, there has to be a limit to your suit and high cards. You could also make a case for a call of two spades, but I’d prefer a slightly better doubleton. Also, the suggested sequence might help partner judge what to lead and whether to compete further.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A Q 10 8 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When the two Chinese teams met at the Hua Yuan World Women’s Elite Bridge Tournament, the match featured eight world champions, six of whom had won the Venice Cup a few months previously.
Both Easts pre-empted here to three clubs, and both Norths reopened with three hearts, rejecting what would have been a sizeable penalty from three clubs doubled. Both Wests obediently led the singleton club, and when East guessed poorly by putting in the 10, it lost to declarer’s queen.
In the open room, one declarer advanced the diamond queen, holding the trick. She then cashed the top hearts to find the bad news. She could now have made her contract if she had played the ace and another diamond to endplay West into cashing out her red suits. After that, West would have had to lead a spade and concede the balance. Instead, though, she tried a spade to the queen and king. When West won and played another spade, the game went three down.
In our featured room, Wang Ping played a heart at the second trick. After two rounds of hearts, she played a diamond to her queen, won by West. (Ducking would have led to her being endplayed in that suit.)
Now West could not cash out her hearts without setting up declarer’s ninth winner, and a spade would give South the game-going trick with the queen. So, she exited with the diamond 10. Wang won with dummy’s ace, cashed the diamond eight, then exited in hearts. She eventually reached her hand with the spade queen for her ninth trick.