January 9th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 19 Comments
When success is essential to keeping a family together, there is nothing a man won’t do. Nothing.
Jason Street, “Friday Night Lights”
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ J
♦ K 10
♣ K Q 9 8 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6
♥ Q 9 2
♦ Q J 9 4 3
♣ J 2 |
♠ K 7 2
♥ A 8 7 5 3
♦ 8 7 5 2
♣ 10 |
| South |
♠ J 10 8
♥ K 10 6 4
♦ A 6
♣ A 7 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
| Dbl.* |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All Pass |
*Showing three spades
♦Q
You may have a minimum hand, but I think it is just worth a try for game. Your best bet is to bid three clubs, suggesting this general shape. Your partner is almost guaranteed to have four-card trump support. What you need from him is aces or trump honors — and he will know those are good cards.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4 3
♥ J
♦ K 10
♣ K Q 9 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 8th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Great Britain is a republic with a hereditary president, while the United States is a monarchy with an elective king.
Knoxville Journal
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A J 9 8 5
♥ K 4 2
♦ Q
♣ 8 7 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 8 7 4 3
♣ K J 10 9 |
♠ Q 10 6 2
♥ Q 7 5
♦ K J 5 2
♣ A 3 |
| South |
♠ K 4
♥ A J 10 9 8
♦ A 9 6
♣ Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Does it seem outrageous to bid a second time with a 10-count, including a singleton queen? I don’t think so. Partner is marked with moderate values, and just because he doesn’t fit spades doesn’t mean you can’t make a part-score somewhere or push the opponents up a level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 8 5
♥ K 4 2
♦ Q
♣ 8 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 7th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
There is never time in the future in which we will work out our salvation. The challenge is in the moment; the time is always now.
James Baldwin
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 8 7 4
♥ A 5 3
♦ A Q 9
♣ A 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 6 2
♥ 2
♦ 8 7 5
♣ 8 6 5 4 2 |
♠ 9
♥ Q J 10 9 8 7
♦ 4 3 2
♣ Q 10 7 |
| South |
♠ A J 5 3
♥ K 6 4
♦ K J 10 6
♣ K J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♥ |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
If your partner has a four-card major, you probably won’t beat one no-trump, since partner did not act over the double, and he would surely have bid a decent suit. I guess I’d lead my long suit, and there is no reason to lead any card but the fourth-highest spot card.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 6 2
♥ J 7 5
♦ K J 5 4 2
♣ A 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
January 6th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I have been taught never to lead or underlead an ace or king against a slam. But after reading yet again about a slam that would have been set if an ace had been led and the suit continued, I wonder how often it is fatally wrong to cash an ace against a slam, as opposed to that being the necessary defense.
Look Back in Anger, Horne Lake, Miss
My policy is not to lead an ace unless the auction tells me there is a side-suit on which my tricks may go away. To be sure, passive leads against small slams are not always right. When I have a sequence, I normally lead that instead of an ace. Leading away from kings is active, but not necessarily wrong.
When my partner opened one heart, I held ♠ 9-8-7-5, ♥ Q-8-7, ♦ K-Q, ♣ A-Q-J-7. What is the right way to show my hand, and how should I plan the bidding?
Bumble-Bee, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Assuming you play a style where a two-club response is forcing to game, I would do that, planning subsequently to raise hearts and take it from there. I do not like a response of two no-trump here (whether you intend it as balanced or trump support). For me, bidding good suits and setting up a game force has a lot going for it. I don’t see how spades can ever be the right trump suit here unless partner bids it.
I found myself in third seat with an experienced and relatively aggressive partner, holding ♠ Q-8-4-3, ♥ A-8-6-3, ♦ Q-10-4, ♣ 10-3. The bidding started with a weak two spades from my partner and a double on my right. Would you pass or raise spades? If the latter, to what level should you bid?
Mischief Maker, Durango, Colo.
Raising to three spades looks right to me. I’d expect game my opponents’ way to be borderline to make. Taking away one level of bidding makes it much harder for them to get their act together, and the raise exposes our side to virtually no risk, given our good fit.
|
I’ve been confronted with the problem of choosing the right card to lead from the ace-king. I have received a lot of different answers from other players, and I’m still not sure what the rule is. Please shed some light on this for me.
Caramel Candy, Kansas City, Mo.
You ask a great question — one that is more dependent on partnership agreement than a right or wrong way to do things. My (rather old-fashioned) approach is to lead the king from ace-king throughout the hand. That is by agreement; others play ace from ace-king at trick one. Regardless, in the middle of the hand, lead king for count (high-low with an even number) and ace for attitude, typically about possession of the king. This helps to cash out suits accurately.
I recently heard my partner open the bidding and my right-hand opponent jump to two spades to show a weak hand and a long suit. I doubled and heard the next hand raise to three spades. With what kind of shape and values would it be right to double three spades here?
Lying Low, Wichita Falls, Texas
Your double here sounds like takeout to me. Most players believe you can’t double any contract for take-out at your first turn and then make a second double below game for penalties if the opponents have announced a fit. I’d say about a 10-count with short spades would qualify for take-out, so anything stronger is just fine.
|
January 5th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
But lest some unlucky event should happen unfavorable to my reputation, I beg it may be remembered by every gentleman in the room that I this day declare with the utmost sincerity, I do not think myself equal to the command I am honored with.
George Washington
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 8 7 6
♥ A Q 9 6 5
♦ 10 6
♣ 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 5
♥ K 8 3 2
♦ 5 3
♣ K 8 5 3 |
♠ A K 9 4 3 2
♥ 10 7 4
♦ 4
♣ A 9 6 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ J
♦ A K Q J 9 8 7 2
♣ Q J 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| 5 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♠5
This hand feels like it will play better in hearts than in no-trump. Your partner is relatively unlikely to have a singleton heart here — for the record, that inference would not be so clear if your initial response were one spade, since partner’s rebid would be more cramped. I would therefore rebid two hearts now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 7 6
♥ A Q 9 6 5
♦ 10 6
♣ 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 4th, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Passive defense is also known as purely defensive defense or pure defense. Passive defense is actually a sham defense; active defense is the only real defense, the only defense for the purpose of counterattacking and taking the offensive.
Mao Zedong
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 7
♥ 5 4
♦ A J 9 8 2
♣ A Q 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 4 3
♥ K Q J 6 2
♦ 10
♣ 7 6 |
♠ K 10 6 2
♥ 10 9 3
♦ Q 6 4 3
♣ K 5 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A 8 7
♦ K 7 5
♣ J 10 9 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
2 ♣ * |
2 ♦ |
3 ♠ |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*5-4 or better in majors
♥K
There is no reason your partner’s last call should be based on a four-card suit, but whether it is or not, you can raise to three spades and let partner pick the game he prefers. In this auction, I believe a call of three spades should be forcing (landing on a pinhead in a part-score is just too hard here).
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6 2
♥ 10 9 3
♦ Q 6 4 3
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 3rd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
It has always been a mystery to me how men can feel themselves honored by the humiliation of their fellow beings.
Mahatma Gandhi
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 10 8 3
♥ A 4
♦ K Q J 7 2
♣ K J 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 5 4 2
♥ 9 8 3 2
♦ 10 6
♣ A 8 4 |
♠ J 7 6
♥ J 6
♦ A 9 8 5 4
♣ Q 9 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 9
♥ K Q 10 7 5
♦ 3
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
The hand may be relatively balanced, but you have no reason to assume no-trump is correct. Since only two suits have been bid, you should bid three hearts here to show heart values. Partner can bid no-trump, or three spades to express doubt about three no-trump (you will respond three no-trump) or go past three no-trump if he is short in spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8 3
♥ A 4
♦ K Q J 7 2
♣ K J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 2nd, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Folly, you have conquered, and I must yield! Against stupidity the very gods Themselves contend in vain.
Friedrich Schiller
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 10 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ J 10 5 4 3
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 5
♥ Q J 10 8 6
♦ 7 2
♣ J 6 5 |
♠ Q J 9 2
♥ K 7
♦ A K 6
♣ 10 9 7 3 |
| South |
♠ 7 4
♥ A 9 3
♦ Q 9 8
♣ A K Q 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♥Q
You should overcall one no-trump here, despite your small doubleton in a side suit. This is partly a tactical action — you want to make it harder for the opponents to locate an eight or nine-card fit in either major. Also, though, your hand has quick tricks, and you expect to have decent play for a no-trump game facing a maximum pass. If doubled, will you run? Watch this space.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 7 4
♥ A 9 3
♦ Q 9 8
♣ A K Q 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| ? |
|
|
|
January 1st, 2019 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Proof is the idol before whom the pure mathematician tortures himself.
Arthur Eddington
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 5 2
♥ 7 5 3
♦ K 10 6 2
♣ K 10 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7 6 4
♥ K 9
♦ Q
♣ J 9 7 6 5 |
♠ 10 8
♥ A Q J 6 2
♦ J 4
♣ A Q 8 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 3
♥ 10 8 4
♦ A 9 8 7 5 3
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
3 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
I’m prepared to accept the reputation of being an out-of-date fuddy-duddy. You would never see me pre-empt with this hand in any position or vulnerability, since it combines the worst possible holding for offense and the best for defense facing shortness, while being highly suitable for play in either major, coupled with loads of defense on the side. Passing is mandatory here.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 3
♥ 10 8 4
♦ A 9 8 7 5 3
♣ 3 |
December 31st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Just as the eye which constantly shifts its gaze, now turning to the right or to the left, now incessantly peering up and down, cannot see distinctly what lies before it … so too man’s mind when distracted by his countless worldly cares cannot focus itself distinctly on the truth.
Basil of Caesarea
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 10 5 4
♥ K 9 7 6
♦ A 10
♣ J 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 6
♥ J 10 8 5 3
♦ J 9 7 6
♣ K 8 |
♠ 8 3
♥ Q 4 2
♦ Q 4 3
♣ A 7 6 5 4 |
| South |
♠ K J 9 7 2
♥ A
♦ K 8 5 2
♣ Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
On lead, do you play for your own hand or partner’s when this weak? I’d lead the spade 10, which combines offense and a reasonable degree of safety, hoping not to give too much away if I’m wrong. Leading a four-card suit might let you develop a trick or two if you hit reasonable luck in partner’s hand. But the spade has a better chance of finding partner with five — and that way, you might actually beat the contract.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 4
♥ K 9 5 3
♦ J 7 3
♣ J 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
|
Bridge skill often runs in families; where one or both parents play the game well, they often produce talented offspring. Paul Hackett of the UK and his two sons (plus Justin’s wife, Barbara) would make a fearsome foursome, and the Groenkvist and Rimstedts of Sweden are each able to put forward at least four top players. But the world’s strongest family team may be the Bessis family of France. Here are the Bessis brothers on defense, from a recent Junior European Championships.
Olivier Bessis led the diamond queen against five clubs; the Greek declarer won in hand and drew trumps in two rounds. Thomas Bessis, East, could now infer that declarer’s shape was 3-4-2-4.
After “stripping off” the diamonds, declarer advanced dummy’s heart jack. Thomas ducked in tempo, and declarer, naturally enough, ran the heart to Olivier’s queen. What was he to do now?
A spade return would let declarer pick up that suit for only one loser, while a diamond would allow him to ruff in dummy and pitch a spade from hand, then ruff out spades. So Olivier carefully returned the heart nine. Declarer discarded a spade from dummy; if Thomas had risen with the ace, there would have been two more discards from dummy on the heart king and 10. But Thomas ducked again, letting declarer win the trick.
Declarer now had no choice but to try to play spades for one loser, which was not possible on accurate defense. This deal won the brothers the junior award for best play of the year.