December 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I held ♠ A-Q-9-6-3, ♥ Q, ♦ Q-7-3, ♣ J-10-8-4 and opened one spade in third seat; I heard an overcall of two hearts to my left. When this came back to me, I had to decide whether to pass or double for take-out. I decided to pass, but we could have set the part-score 800 if I had doubled. Was I a wimp?
Egg On My Face, Saint John, New Brunswick
You got a little unlucky, I think. Reopening would have been clear-cut if your heart queen had been, say, the club king. As it was, you could either argue that pushing the opponent into a silly spot had earned you a good result, or you could put the pedal to the metal and go all out for the penalty. In the end, this comes down to a question of temperament.
What is the best way to respond to partner’s penalty double of one no-trump? Obviously, one tends to pass with values; but with a weak hand, should one play a conventional scheme of response or just play natural?
Needing a Nudge, Palm Springs, Calif.
Running to your longest suit with fewer than 5 points is perfectly playable. Similarly, transfers in response to partner’s penalty double of a weak no-trump allow you to bid out your good hands, rather than sitting for the double and not getting your suits into play. In effect, after a penalty double of a strong no-trump, you pretend your partner has opened one no-trump, with Stayman and transfers.
What supplement, if any, do you use to the Milton Work 4-3-2-1 high-card point count? For instance, should one count each card over four in any suit as worth a point? Or is there only a specific set of sequences where such evaluation is appropriate?
Count von Count, Duluth, Minn.
I do use this scale of valuation when deciding whether to respond to a one no-trump opener. Add on a point for any five-card suit headed by at least one top honor plus decent intermediates. It is also useful when deciding whether to open a weak two. If I have a six-card suit, I add on 2 points; with a four-card side suit, I add on 1 more point for that. If I get to 13, I open at the one-level if I have a trick and a half on defense.
|
I held ♠ Q-J-7-3, ♥ Q-9-4, ♦ 7-6-3, ♣ A-Q-4 and heard one club from my partner, then two diamonds on my right. I doubled — did I have a sensible alternative? When my partner rebid two hearts, I still had no idea what to do. What would you suggest?
Mistletoe, Union City, N.J.
Doubling an overcall, then bidding a new suit tends to show a hand too weak to make that call directly. So you cannot correct two hearts to two spades — that would suggest five or more spades and 8-10 points, perhaps. Your actual hand offers an impossible rebid, so maybe pass two hearts and hope it won’t be too silly. Correcting to three clubs will get you to spades if partner has four, but you might also end up playing a 3-3 fit facing a 3-4-3-3 pattern!
When my right-hand opponent opens, I need some guidance as to when to double and when to overcall with a single-suited hand and upward of 15 high-card points. Does it matter what they opened or where my long suit is?
Picking a Path, West Palm Beach, Fla.
Typically, if they opened one spade, it may be best to overcall and come again, or you risk being pre-empted. Anytime you can start with a two-level overcall, you should consider that action, since you have already shown a good hand and good suit. When the choice is to double or bid at the one-level, 16-17 points is the cusp. Especially when you have spades, you may hope to double and bid the suit more economically than when you have a red suit.
|
December 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
When you ain’t got nothing, you got nothing to lose. You’re invisible now, you got no secrets to conceal.
Bob Dylan
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 7 5
♥ J 10 6
♦ J 8 3
♣ Q 10 9 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 8 7 2
♦ 6 5 2
♣ A K J 7 5 2 |
♠ A J
♥ K Q 9 5 3
♦ K 10 9 4
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 9 8 6 4 2
♥ A 4
♦ A Q 7
♣ 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♣K
Does this hand meet the minimum requirement for a call of two diamonds? My instinct is that acting here, while technically very dangerous, is something that you will tend to get away with more often than not. If you are going to bid, do it confidently! Who is to say you don’t have an ace or extra card more than you actually have? I might be more cautious when vulnerable at teams, though.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J
♥ K Q 9 5 3
♦ K 10 9 4
♣ 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The laws of God, the laws of man, He may keep that will and can.
A.E. Housman
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10 9 2
♥ 6 5 4 2
♦ Q 9 8 2
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ K 7 5 3
♥ Q 10 7
♦ 10 3
♣ 10 7 6 3 |
♠ 6
♥ K J 9 8 3
♦ K J 4
♣ Q 9 5 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 4
♥ A
♦ A 7 6 5
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥7
I would start by redoubling, rather than bidding my suits, planning to double them if they escape to a minor. If my partner doubles the opponents’ escape to two hearts, I would sit for it. If two hearts comes around to me, I suppose I will bid three diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q J 8 4
♥ A
♦ A 7 6 5
♣ K 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Thursday, November 22nd, 2018
The things we know best are those we have not learned.
Marquis de Vauvenargues
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 9 5 2
♥ A J 10 2
♦ 8 7 5 3
♣ 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 4
♥ 7 5
♦ Q J
♣ 9 7 6 4 3 2 |
♠ J 7 3
♥ 3
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ A Q J 8 5 |
| South |
♠ K 8 6
♥ K Q 9 8 6 4
♦ K 9 4
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
3 ♣ |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣7
Despite holding a minimum opening bid, you must reopen with a double here. This shows short hearts and lets partner describe his hand accurately. I expect partner has a penalty double of one heart — don’t you? Yes, the opponents might have missed a game, but that isn’t terribly likely.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 3
♥ 3
♦ A 10 6 2
♣ A Q J 8 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Don’t ever become a pessimist … a pessimist is correct oftener than an optimist, but an optimist has more fun, and neither can stop the march of events.
Robert Heinlein
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ K 5
♦ 10 9 8 7 2
♣ J 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 5
♥ J 10 9 7 4
♦ K J 6 3
♣ K Q 5 |
♠ 4 2
♥ Q 8 6 3 2
♦ 5 4
♣ 9 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 7 3
♥ A
♦ A Q
♣ A 10 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT * |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Promising a king
♥J
I cannot guarantee that your side can make game here. But the combination of your singleton spade and weak hearts facing likely shortage (partner did not make a support double) means that your values appear to be working well and your spade shortage will surely prove useful. I would jump to three spades as a splinter agreeing clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ J 10 9 7 4
♦ K J 6 3
♣ K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
‘It’s always best on these occasions to do what the mob do.’ ‘But suppose there are two mobs?’ suggested Mr. Snodgrass. ‘Shout with the largest,’ replied Mr. Pickwick.
Charles Dickens
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5 4
♥ A Q 7
♦ Q 8 6 2
♣ J 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ J 10 3
♣ 9 5 4 |
♠ K J 8 6 2
♥ 9 6 5
♦ A 9
♣ K Q 10 |
| South |
♠ A Q 3
♥ K J 3
♦ K 7 5 4
♣ A 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠10
Facing a partner you can trust, the most likely problem you have here is whether to compete beyond three clubs if the opponents find a heart or spade fit at the three-level. Your choice is between a simple raise to three clubs and a two-heart cue-bid to show about a limit raise. I would take the cautious position and let partner take it from there. To do more, I’d need maybe a red king in place of one of the queens.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 4
♥ A Q 7
♦ Q 8 6 2
♣ J 8 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
December 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
A prince … must imitate the fox and the lion, for the lion cannot defend himself from snares, and the fox cannot defend himself from wolves. One must therefore be a fox to recognize snares and a lion to frighten wolves.
Niccolo Machiavelli
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5 3 2
♥ 7 6 2
♦ 9 2
♣ A K Q 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 7
♥ 9 5 3
♦ K 8 7 5
♣ 8 |
♠ K 4
♥ Q J 10 8
♦ Q J 6 3
♣ J 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A 8 6
♥ A K 4
♦ A 10 4
♣ 10 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
I do not think this auction demands a heart lead, but it does suggest some kind of heart stack, and it further indicates that declarer cannot run that suit as his main source of tricks. I have no reason to assume that I know which of a spade or club lead will work better. So, I will lead the heart six and hope the sight of dummy will let partner work out what to do.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ 6 2
♦ 9 5 4
♣ K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
Dbl. |
All Pass |
December 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
As declarer, when trying to locate the trump queen, might you expect to find that card in the hand on lead, simply because one sometimes leads a trump from a series of small cards, but very rarely away from the queen?
Finding the Lady, Bellevue, Wash.
This makes sense if there are no other clues available, but the argument doesn’t always apply; you’d never get a trump lead from someone who has an ace-king in a side-suit, for example, regardless of his trump values. Conversely, if he has led away from a vulnerable honor, you could certainly speculate on whether his trump holding might be even less attractive.
I was on lead against four spades, holding ♠ 10-7-3, ♥ J-10-3-2, ♦ 8-5-3-2, ♣ A-4. My left-hand opponent had opened and rebid clubs, and my right-hand opponent had bid spades, then diamonds. Would you lead a club and look for ruffs, or would you lead the unbid suit — in which case, would you lead high or low?
Rumble Fish, Texarkana, Texas
The club ace does not appeal to me, though a singleton club ace would be an entirely different matter. Here, if you do lead hearts, you should lead the jack. Against no-trump, you sometimes lead fourth-highest, but the most likely downside of a heart honor lead is that it might set up a slow discard for declarer. Against suits, that is a far less significant concern, from my perspective.
In first seat, playing a teams game, I held ♠ A-K-3, ♥ A-Q-J-10-2, ♦ A-J-7-4, ♣ 3. I opened one heart and jumped to three diamonds over my partner’s one-no-trump response. When she raised to four diamonds, should I have cue-bid four spades or simply reraised to game? It turns out that all partner’s values were in clubs with a doubleton heart, so three no-trump would have made, but five diamonds went down on a bad break.
Pressed Suit, Brooklyn, N.Y.
My first thought is that giving false preference to three hearts with only a doubleton is clearly right here. As opener, you would now bid three spades and pass the three no-trump rebid, wouldn’t you? After your jump shift, you will be aware that when partner has three hearts, they will always revert to the suit game.
|
A few weeks ago, my husband and I saw a hand in your column where North with 10 points and four hearts heard his partner open one heart and the next hand double. What was the full message intended in his two-no-trump response, as opposed to a raise to three hearts, which would have been my choice?
Lost the Thread, Elmira, N.J.
After the double of a major-suit opening (and also, in some partnerships, after a minor-suit opener) many play a jump raise as pre-emptive. It would be all about shape and trump support and not about high cards. In this style, where a redouble shows values but denies fit, you can subvert a call of two no-trump to be the limit raise or better. This convention is known as Jordan (or Truscott).
I was dealt ♠ J-7-4, ♥ A-K-9-4, ♦ 5-3, ♣ A-J-10-4 and heard my right-hand opponent open one diamond. I doubled, and when left-hand opponent raised to three diamonds, my partner doubled. I took that as responsive, suggesting both majors. I bid three hearts, and my partner converted to three spades. What does this sequence show, and was I right to pass?
Smoking Jacket, Doylestown, Pa.
I’m not sure I know precisely, but I’d expect invitational values, perhaps with spades and clubs. With fewer values or a hand oriented solely to spades, surely he would have bid the suit directly. I think the hand will play better in an eight- or nine-card fit in clubs, so I would bid four clubs now.
|
December 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I have hardly ever known a mathematician who was capable of reasoning.
Plato
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 10 5
♥ 2
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ K 10 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 6 4 3
♥ 7 5
♦ 8 4 3 2
♣ 6 3 |
♠ K 8 7
♥ Q 10 8 6 4
♦ 6
♣ J 8 4 2 |
| South |
♠ J 2
♥ A K J 9 3
♦ A K 7 5
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 7 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Trump queen and club king
♥7
Of course this is too good for a pass, so it seems obvious to raise clubs here. But this hand is still too good for a simple raise to three clubs — you would make that call if the spade ace were the jack or queen. If you trust your partner, you should bid two spades, a call that shows values like this. You cannot have spades since you bypassed the suit at your first turn.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 5
♥ 2
♦ Q J 10 9
♣ K 10 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The time was out of joint, and he was only too delighted to have been born to set it right.
Lytton Strachey
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 5
♥ 9 2
♦ A 9 4
♣ Q J 8 6 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 2
♥ K 6 4 3
♦ J 10 8
♣ K 10 7 4 |
♠ 10 4 3
♥ J 10 8 7 5
♦ Q 5 2
♣ A 9 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 8 6
♥ A Q
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ * |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Artificial and forcing
♦J
Everyone ought to have a way to support their partner’s major and set up a forcing auction. It may not be the only way to do so, but the simplest approach is to use the response of two no-trump to a major as a forcing raise. In response, opener shows shortness, jumps to game with a balanced minimum, rebids his major or three no-trump with extras, or bids a strong five-card side suit at the four level.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A J 9 8 6
♥ A Q
♦ K 7 6 3
♣ 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
After the first final session of the Mitchell Board-a-Match Teams from San Diego last year, Steve Sanborn was full of praise for his wife’s play in four spades doubled … but despite the fact that everybody was supposed to be playing the same deals, nobody else recognized the hand. Steve and Kerri were playing against Dennis Bilde and Giorgio Duboin.
The late John Lowenthal — everyone’s No. 1 choice for “Mad scientist on opening lead” — might have led a red suit at trick one. Bilde, however, looked no further than a top club for his opening salvo. At the sight of dummy, he shifted to a diamond, which went to the three, nine and queen.
Kerri played the spade 10 to the king and ace, won the spade return and ran all the trumps. She had come down to the doubleton ace in each red suit in her hand and the doubleton jack in each red suit in dummy, but what four cards was East to keep?
To keep the diamonds and hearts guarded, Duboin also had to retain two cards in each red suit. Declarer then played the heart ace and another heart; Duboin could win the latter trick, but he was then endplayed to concede the last two tricks in diamonds. Making the doubled game was good for a win on the board.
So why did no one else know the deal? It was board 28 in a 14-table section, but all the other sections had only 13 tables, so they had only played boards one through 26.