September 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
|
How many extras does an overcaller need to double for take-out, then double again? One of our opponents followed this sequence with perfect 4-4-4-1 shape, but just three aces and a queen. His partner passed with queen-jack-fourth of trump and a king, but couldn’t defeat our contract. Does the second double promise more cards than this, even if it is still for take-out?
Reopen for Business, Edmonton, Calgary
When a hand that has doubled for takeout bids again, it shows extras. The second double is still for takeout, though this one may come close to being played as optional, depending on the level of the action, say a double of a game contract. In such situations, sometimes responder passes from weakness if balanced, and hopes for the best.
I enjoy your bridge column and tend to go along with most of your views on bridge. But recently, you featured an opening bid in third seat when holding ♠ Q-J-9-2, ♥ A-9-2, ♦ J-6-4, ♣ K-3-2. I do not enjoy opening one club with this hand; I’d rather open one spade and plan to pass any non-forcing response. Where do you stand here?
Trumpet Voluntary, Palm Springs, Calif.
I agree with you that a one-club opening bid does not accomplish much. Passing is perfectly reasonable, and when I do open a minor in third seat, I tend to have either a good suit or a reasonable hand. This hand does not qualify as either. A one-spade opener is more pre-emptive and lead-directing, so that would be my choice.
You recently discussed the Principle of Restricted Choice. Please explain how the concept works and when it applies.
Monkey Wrench, Newport News, Va.
Occam’s Razor basically says when you have to weigh up two outcomes, go for the simplest. So, when you have to compare the chance that a player has a doubleton consisting of two equal cards (generally the queen-jack) or that they started with a bare honor, the latter is more likely. The doubleton is more likely than each individual singleton, but the chance that the queen will appear from the doubleton holding is actually only half that, because half the time the player would contribute the jack from queen-jack. See details of “The Monty Hall problem” online.
|
What should persuade responder to upgrade a constructive raise of a major to a limit raise? For example, if you hold ♠ Q-9-2, ♥ K-7-3-2, ♦ J-6-4, ♣ A-3-2 and hear your partner open a major, would you make a simple raise or a limit raise of one heart or one spade?
Shark Tank, Key West, Fla.
You have a 10-count, but it is too balanced to make a limit raise of one spade. Make the club ace the diamond ace, and you might consider the limit raise; but since partner typically has a balanced 12-14, do you really need to be in game facing that? I’d simply raise to two spades. By contrast, the fourth trump would persuade me to make a reluctant limit raise of hearts, even if I’m not convinced the hand is really worth it.
You recently featured a deal where someone in second seat overcalled one heart over one diamond with a six-count, when holding ♠ 6-3, ♥ Q-J-10-8-4, ♦ Q-J-9-2, ♣ 6-3. I have seen this sort of action several times, both at the table and in your column, and I wonder where you stand on it.
Hot Drinks, Indio, Calif.
To clarify my position; I was just reporting the facts. This hand is not exactly worth an overcall. If I had to put a point-count limit on one-level overcalls, it would be a decent suit in a hand of 8-9 points. In the example hand, I would happily overcall if one of the queens were an ace.
|
September 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 16 Comments
Three o’clock is always too late or too early for what you want to do.
Jean-Paul Sartre
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 9 8
♥ J 8 5 4
♦ A 8 5 4
♣ K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 5 3
♥ 9 2
♦ K 10 9 2
♣ Q 8 7 4 |
♠ 10 6
♥ A 10 7
♦ 7 6 3
♣ A J 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ K J 7 4 2
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ Q J
♣ 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Game-forcing, might be short
♦10
Your cue-bid sets up a force until a suit has been agreed. You could now invite game by bidding only three hearts, but isn’t this hand a force to game? Even though your diamond honors may be worthless, game is surely going to be no worse than the spade finesse. I would bid four hearts, but make the spade two a club, and I bid only three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K J 7 4 2
♥ K Q 6 3
♦ Q J
♣ 10 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The place where optimism flourishes most is the lunatic asylum.
Havelock Ellis
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 5 4 2
♥ 4 2
♦ K 10 8 2
♣ A Q 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ A
♥ A J 10 8 3
♦ 9 7 5
♣ J 9 5 2 |
♠ 10 9 7
♥ K 9 7
♦ Q J 6 3
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 8 6 3
♥ Q 6 5
♦ A 4
♣ 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| 3 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Spade raise
♦5
I’d be inclined to bid two diamonds now, mainly to try to keep the auction open in case partner has a good hand or can produce delayed heart support. I’d guess the 5-2 heart fit might be our most likely game, but if partner has a singleton heart, two diamonds feels like the safest part-score.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A
♥ A J 10 8 3
♦ 9 7 5
♣ J 9 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Cleverness is not wisdom. And not to think mortal thoughts is to see few days.
Euripides
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A K 9 5
♥ J 5 2
♦ K Q J 10 8
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ 6
♥ K 8 7
♦ 9 5
♣ K Q 10 9 7 5 2 |
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ Q 10 4
♦ A 4 3
♣ 8 4 3 |
| South |
♠ Q 10 7 3
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ 7 6 2
♣ J 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
3 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
You have a little too much to pass here. It feels as if a double should be card-showing, and you will be happy to play in whatever strain your partner chooses (or to defend if your partner has a balanced hand with three clubs). There is no need to rebid the spades; partner knows you have at least four of them.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 8 4 2
♥ Q 10 4
♦ A 4 3
♣ 8 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
What is merit? The opinion one man entertains of another.
Lord Palmerston
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ A K 5
♥ 5 4
♦ J 9 7 6
♣ A 8 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 2
♥ J 9 2
♦ A 5 3
♣ K 9 5 3 |
♠ 10
♥ K 8 7 6 3
♦ Q 10 4 2
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
♠ J 8 7 6 4 3
♥ A Q 10
♦ K 8
♣ J 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥2
Having found a heart fit, are you going to play in two hearts, drive to game or invite game? Of the three positions, the invitation seems like the middle-of-the-road action. It looks logical because one of your minor-suit queens will surely be wasted. Partner will be short in one suit or the other. Give me an ace in a minor instead of the queens, and I’d bid game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ K 8 7 6 3
♦ Q 10 4 2
♣ Q 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
Work consists of whatever a body is obliged to do. … Play consists of whatever a body is not obliged to do.
Mark Twain
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ Q J 7
♥ A K
♦ A 6 5 2
♣ A J 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 4 2
♥ 10 7 4 2
♦ J 10 8 3
♣ 2 |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 9 8 6 5 3
♦ 9 4
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 6 3
♥ J
♦ K Q 7
♣ K 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
2 ♦ * |
Dbl. |
4 ♥ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Weak, both majors
♥2
You have enough to issue a game invitation, and a simple raise of diamonds ignores other possible strains. (The hand could play better in spades, clubs or no-trump.) Cue-bid two hearts to show a good hand and await partner’s rebid to help you decide whether to whether to play game or partscore.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 9 6 3
♥ J
♦ K Q 7
♣ K 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
The studies preliminary to the construction of a great theory should be at least as deliberate and thorough as those that are preliminary to the building of a dwelling-house.
Charles Sanders Pierce
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 3
♥ K Q J 4
♦ 10 7 6 3
♣ A 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5 2
♥ 9 7 6
♦ K J 9 8 5 2
♣ 9 |
♠ J 10 9
♥ 10 8 5 3 2
♦ A
♣ 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 7 6 4
♥ A
♦ Q 4
♣ K Q J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
All pass |
♦8
I cannot see any reason not to lead the unbid suit. In situations like this, I’m torn between leading a high card to deny an honor and a low one so that my partner can work out the count. I’d choose the two here, thinking that my partner may be able to see most of the high honors in his own hand and dummy.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 4 2
♥ K 3
♦ 6 5 2
♣ K 10 9 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
|
In third seat I held ♠ 9-7-4, ♥ J-6-2, ♦ Q-8-3-2, ♣ A-J-9. I heard one club from my partner and a double on my right. Would you respond one diamond, one no-trump or something else (like passing and backing in or even raising clubs)?
Lincoln Green, Willoughby, Ohio
My choice is to bid one no-trump, suggesting a balanced 7-10 — you should pass here with less than a good 7 high-card points. The logic is that there is little reason to bid with sub-minimum misfits. I prefer the one-no-trump response to a one-diamond call because it makes it harder for the opponents to come in, and you also let partner know your values and possible club fit if he wants to compete further.
Please explain to me what should happen if my RHO makes an insufficient bid and I then make a call without seeing that it was insufficient. Does the auction get rewound to the point where the insufficient call was made, and what happens next?
Misty Chances, Fayetteville, Ark.
At this point, you have no rights. Once the insufficient bid is condoned by a bid, double or pass, the auction continues as if the insufficient bid were legal. There are no penalties to the opponents.
I held ♠ A-8-7-3, ♥ J-4, ♦ Q-J-7-3-2, ♣ 10-3 and responded one spade to one club. My partner then showed reversing values with a call of two diamonds. What would you do now?
Mad Monk, Taos, N.M.
A raise to three diamonds should be forcing (as should a call of three clubs, incidentally). However, if you play that way, your partnership should have the agreement that either two no-trump or two hearts in this sequence (using the cheaper of fourth suit and two no-trump as a negative) lets you out short of game. This is an application of the Lebensohl convention.
|
You recently showed a hand where the opening bid of one diamond was made with ♠ K-J, ♥ K-9-2, ♦ A-10-7-4-3, ♣ 8-7-3. What are the merits and drawbacks of that action? Would you do that yourself?
Beverly’s Sister, Fayetteville, N.C.
In general, 5-3-3-2 11-counts are not upgraded to an opening bid unless you have extra shape or great intermediates. You might open, for example, a 4-2-5-2 11-count, but you would open our example hand for tactical reasons only, not because it is “worth” an opening bid when playing standard methods. Again, though, a six-card suit is worth at least an extra point.
How high should you go in support of spades with ♠ A-7-6-3, ♥ K-Q-4-3-2, ♦ J-4-3, ♣ 8 when you respond one heart to one club and hear your partner rebid one spade? I can imagine raising to two, three or even four spades.
On my Uppers, Vancouver, Wash.
You could not criticize a call of three spades, which is really the value bid. However, depending on the form of scoring, one could make a case for a bid of four spades, since your partner’s club holding will be critical if he has a minimum hand. He might make game if he has no club wastage, or be down in top tricks in three spades.
|
September 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Saturday, September 8th, 2018
Drop the question of what tomorrow may bring, and count as profit every day that Fate allows you.
Horace
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ A K 8 3
♦ A 5
♣ 10 9 8 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 8 4 3
♥ 10 2
♦ J 10 4
♣ K Q 5 4 |
♠ K 9 7 2
♥ Q J 7 5
♦ K 8 6
♣ J 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 6
♥ 9 6 4
♦ Q 9 7 3 2
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠3
Do you bid two spades or three spades? (Go to the back of the class if you did more.) Your partner normally has a balanced 12-14, relatively short in hearts, so your honors in that suit won’t be working. On that basis, it seems clear that you should make a simple raise to two spades. Anytime partner has extras, he will be unbalanced and will bid on, so you ought to be able to reach game whenever it is making.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 7 2
♥ Q J 7 5
♦ K 8 6
♣ J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments give luster, and many more people see than weigh.
Lord Chesterton
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A K Q 7 6 5
♥ K 10 6
♦ 9 8
♣ 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ 8 7 2
♦ K J 6
♣ K J 6 3 |
♠ 3
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 4 2 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9
♥ A Q J
♦ A Q 10 3
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Texas for spades
♠2
You don’t want to pass and hear partner run to one spade, which he might do with, for example, a 4-3-3-3 shape; so it seems right to bid either one diamond or one heart. I would start by bidding one diamond, and if the opponents doubled enthusiastically, I’d run to one heart.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
In reporting on this deal in the Daily Bulletin from the Yeh Bros Cup in 2017, the editors spoke just a little too soon when they indicated that declarer might need second sight to bring home his game.
As Geir Helgemo showed, basic numeracy might suffice in the right circumstances. A total of 10 declarers brought home four spades — though twice it was declared from the North seat, when the club tenace was protected and declarer had significant extra chances.
The play in four hearts in the match between Sweden and Monaco saw the Monaco West lead a diamond rather than a club. The Swedish declarer missed his chance when, after winning cheaply in hand, he knocked out the heart ace. He won the next diamond, then completed drawing trumps and led out the spade king. At this point, he realized the avoidance play of a low spade to the nine would fail if East won and played a third diamond, leaving the spades blocked. So, he played the spade ace and a third spade. West could win and play a club through to doom the contract.
In the other room, the defenders did lead clubs. East cashed his ace and led a low club. After the defenders played on trump, declarer found East, a passed hand, with two aces and, inferentially, the club jack (or West would have led the club queen to trick one). West was likely to hold the spade queen, or East might have opened. So Helgemo advanced the spade jack from his hand, and could now play the spade suit for no loser.