November 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Nature reaches its culmination in humans, but human consciousness has not its essence in itself or nature.
Carl Linnaeus
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ A 8 7 6 3
♦ K
♣ A 9 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 5
♥ J 9
♦ 10 9 8 7 4 3
♣ Q 5 3 |
♠ A Q J 10
♥ Q 10 5 4
♦ Q J 2
♣ 7 4 |
| South |
♠ K 7 4 2
♥ K 2
♦ A 6 5
♣ K J 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
There is no reason to be overly complicated here. You have invitational values, and a call of two no-trump shows these values with hearts and clubs, allowing partner to pick a final contract. This hand is just too good for a one-trump rebid and is certainly not worth a force to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 3
♥ A 8 7 6 3
♦ K
♣ A 9 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 9th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
One cannot continually disappoint a continent.
James Whistler
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K J 9
♥ Q J 9 7
♦ Q J 10 6
♣ A |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 3
♥ A 10 4
♦ 7
♣ K J 8 7 3 2 |
♠ 8 5
♥ K 5 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ Q 10 9 5 4 |
| South |
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 8 6
♦ A 9 8 5 3 2
♣ 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
1 ♥ |
| 2 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
3 ♣ |
| 3 ♦ |
4 ♣ |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
Clearly your next call will be in no-trump. To bid three clubs would show clubs and hearts and be game-forcing, but you are an ace short of that action. This hand looks like an invitation, not a game force. Yes, you have great club spots, but bid two no-trump and let partner decide whether he has a minimum or maximum.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 5
♥ K 5 3 2
♦ K 4
♣ Q 10 9 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 8th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Maybe if you didn’t try to be so clever, you wouldn’t end up looking so stupid.
Victor Mollo
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ A K 10 5
♦ A K 8 6 5
♣ K Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 6 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A J 8 7 3 |
♠ Q J 9 3
♥ J 4 3 2
♦ 10 3
♣ 9 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K 5 4
♥ Q 8 7 6
♦ Q J 2
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Zero out of three key-cards
♣A
A case could be made for responding one spade, just as you would if your right-hand opponent had passed. But here, after the double, I’m reluctant to bid a weak four-card suit when I’m close to subminimum for the action. It seems wiser to pass, planning to double my left-hand opponent’s likely oneheart response, and otherwise to stay silent.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 7 6 2
♥ 9
♦ 9 7 4
♣ A J 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 7th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Trickery and treachery are the practices of fools who have not wits enough to be honest.
Benjamin Franklin
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ K 9 7
♥ Q 10 9
♦ Q 5 4 3
♣ J 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 3 2
♥ 8 7
♦ J 10 7
♣ Q 10 9 4 |
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ K J 6
♦ A K 6
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A 4
♥ A 5 4 3 2
♦ 9 8 2
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
♠2
All answers have drawbacks here. Raising hearts may get you to an awkward 4-3 fit. Rebidding one spade may make it harder to find hearts (since a heart rebid at your third turn would now show real extras). Finally, rebidding no-trump shows the hand type but may miss the best fit facing a weak hand. I prefer the last option, though, since for me a one-spade call would guarantee real clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ K J 6
♦ A K 6
♣ 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 6th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
When a dog bites a man, that is not news, because it happens so often. But if a man bites a dog, that is news.
Alfred Harmsworth
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ K 9
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 8 6 5 3
♥ —
♦ 10 6 5
♣ 8 7 3 2 |
♠ 7 4
♥ 10 7 6 4 2
♦ A 9 2
♣ A J 4 |
| South |
♠ Q
♥ A Q J 8 5 3
♦ K 8 7
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
It seems logical to bid one no-trump now rather than raising diamonds, since you can also support diamonds later in a competitive auction; whereas if you raise diamonds now, you may have an awkward decision at your next turn. Also, your partner may misjudge how much defense you have, should you raise directly.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 9 2
♥ K 9
♦ Q J 4 3
♣ Q 10 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 5th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Now, O king, establish the decree and sign the writing that it be not changed, according to the law of the Medes and Persians, which altereth not.
Daniel 6:8
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 10
♥ A 9 7 5
♦ 10 8 7 3
♣ 10 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q 8 6
♥ K Q 10 8 4 3
♦ Q J
♣ K |
♠ A J 9 7 5 4
♥ J 6 2
♦ K 6 2
♣ 6 |
| South |
♠ 3 2
♥ —
♦ A 9 5 4
♣ A Q J 9 8 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
2 ♠ |
| 5 ♣ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
♠K
Since this might be your only chance to lead through dummy, I suggest that a low heart is more likely to be successful than a club. Partner rates to have exactly four cards on this auction, and while the jack might work to take three tricks quickly, you could hardly blame your partner for trying to give you a ruff. In any event, you might get in with the club king again for a second heart play, if necessary.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 8
♥ J 9 2
♦ J 8 6 5 4
♣ K 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
November 4th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
|
What is the best use of Stayman, followed by three of a minor? Should this be natural and weak, invitational, or some kind of forcing call?
Tim the Trumpeter, Arlington, Texas
Common expert opinion is that Stayman, followed by three of either minor, is game-forcing with at least five cards in that minor and an unbid major of four cards (typically the unbid major if partner shows one at his second turn). To sign off in a minor, transfer to that suit and pass the response. On invitational hands with a minor and a four-card major, use Stayman, then raise the response or bid two no-trump as appropriate. The same basic structure applies over a two-no-trump opener.
Recently, my partner passed in first seat, and I opened one spade. After a double from the next hand, she jumped to three clubs. I thought this would be a maximum pass with clubs, but she was sure she had shown a pre-emptive bid. I had always assumed that a pre-emptive bid must be made at your first turn to speak. Who is right?
Jumping Bean, Spokane, Wash.
I would certainly not expect my partner to have a good hand with just clubs. With such a hand, she should bid two clubs or redouble rather than jump. But I also don’t play this call as pre-emptive. (If you can’t open three clubs, what about your hand lets you pre-empt later, other than an initial sorting error?) I suggest you play all passed-hand jumps facing an opener or overcall as fit jumps. See www.bridgeguys.com/Conventions/flower_bids.html.
We recently had a problem when I picked up a balanced 13-count and opened one heart, my five-card major. My partner had a balanced 17-count with only three hearts and four spades. He bid one spade. After I responded one no-trump, how was my partner supposed to explore for slam, given that there was no “unbid” minor?
Scott Free, Pleasanton, Calif.
I’d recommend you use two clubs in this auction as the equivalent of New Minor. For the uninitiated, the call simply sets up a game forcing auction and says nothing about clubs. Your partner can bid hearts at his next turn, and you will either cooperate toward slam with a suitable hand or sign off if minimum. Two diamonds can be natural and non-forcing here.
|
When defending against a suit contract, what are your thoughts on underleading aces or leading them out in bid and supported suits?
Bamboozler, Toledo, Ohio
Even if my partner raises a suit I have opened or overcalled in, I hate to lead out an unsupported ace unless everything else is worse. I’m more likely to do it in a suit my partner introduced first. If I’m defending a contract that was doubled by my partner, it is even less attractive to lead an ace, since the auction has suggested we are not stacked in our long suit. Underleading would be limited to cases where my left-hand opponent has shown (or implied) stoppers in that suit.
Say you are in fourth seat, and an opening bid to your left is passed around to you. How much do you need before you can balance over a minor suit? If the answer is less than is needed for direct action, how does your partner know when to pull in a notch?
Protective Coloring, Pierre, S.D.
When in balancing seat, mentally add a king to your high cards and bid appropriately, while responder should take a king off. So if I had 14 points and did balance with a suit call, I would consider moving over a simple raise from my partner (for which the range is approximately 8-10 points, not 5-7 points). If I double, I might raise a simple response from my partner with support and 15-17 points.
|
November 3rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
No battle plan ever survives contact with the enemy.
Helmuth von Moltke
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 10 4
♥ 4
♦ A 6 3
♣ A K Q 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 6 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ 4 |
♠ —
♥ A Q J 10 8 3 2
♦ J 8 5 4
♣ 10 7 |
| South |
♠ J 7 5 2
♥ 7 6
♦ K 7
♣ J 9 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
3 ♥ |
| Pass |
4 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥5
Normally, a 5-4 hand should seriously consider reverting to the major, but here, the fact that you are short in partner’s suit and your major is weak argues for passing. For the record, if your majors were switched, you might rebid your suit, more confident that your partner will not have a singleton in that suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 6 3
♥ K 9 5
♦ Q 10 9 2
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Friday, October 19th, 2018
Life without industry is guilt, industry without art is brutality.
John Ruskin
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 3
♥ A 10 8 4 2
♦ J 10 9 7 6 5
♣ 10 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 5 2
♥ K 9 5
♦ A K
♣ 7 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ J
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q 9 2 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ Q 7 6 3
♦ 4
♣ A J 8 6 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ * |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| Pass |
Pass |
4 NT * * |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 5 ♥ |
Dbl. |
All pass |
|
*Clubs, 10-15 points
**Two places to play
♠K
The three-heart call is forcing. Once you bid voluntarily, your partner showed real extras, so you must bid again. This hand doesn’t feel right for a bid of three no-trump, so the choice is to bid clubs or raise hearts. I think a four-club call is more flexible. If partner bids four diamonds, you can bid four hearts and maybe get back to hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ J
♦ Q 8 3 2
♣ K Q 9 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
2 ♦ |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
November 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
We view things not only from different sides, but with different eyes; we have no wish to find them alike.
Blaise Pascal
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 6 4
♥ A 8 5 4
♦ 8 5 4
♣ 8 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 10 9 7 |
♠ 10 7
♥ 10 7 6 2
♦ J 7 3 2
♣ Q 6 3 |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ K Q J 9 3
♦ A K Q
♣ A K 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
A simple one here. Diamonds will surely play better than no-trump, so you can bid a non-forcing three diamonds, hoping desperately that your partner can give delayed preference to spades with a doubleton, whereupon you can bid four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 8 5 3 2
♥ —
♦ 10 9 6
♣ J 10 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
At the 1998 Cap Gemini World Pairs Invitational, Tony Forrester and Zia Mahmood’s once-huge lead was down to single digits as the final board hit the table.
The Italian pair in second place had also reached three no-trump here, but Tor Helness, West at that table, led the heart jack, in response to his partner’s opening bid. Declarer won with the king and guessed poorly on the clubs. Back came the heart nine, ducked all around, then a diamond to the king. That disrupted declarer’s communications; he now had no way to generate a ninth trick.
At the critical table, though, on the auction shown, Forrester reached three no-trump after the opponents’ nebulous club and negative response. West, Krzysztof Martens, led the diamond 10 to the king, East unblocking the queen. Forrester cashed the club ace and played another club to the jack. He continued in diamonds, throwing a heart from dummy and leaving Marek Szymanowski, East, on play. He made the natural-looking lead of the spade queen (he needed to shift to a heart to set the game), and Forrester put up the king.
He then took the diamond ace, discarding another heart, and cashed his clubs. Szymanowski had to keep three hearts, thus only two spades. Forrester was able to lead a spade, win the heart return with the ace and play another spade. The heart king and his long spade represented his eighth and ninth tricks.
Had the swing on this board gone the other way, it would have reversed the final positions.