August 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Opinion is ultimately determined by the feelings, and not by the intellect.
Herbert Spencer
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 9 6 2
♥ 4
♦ 8 3
♣ A J 10 7 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J
♥ 9 8 6 5 2
♦ 10 6 5
♣ K 8 3 2 |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ 7
♦ K Q J 9 4
♣ Q 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 4
♥ A K Q J 10 3
♦ A 7 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
With no attractive side suit to lead from (since both diamond and heart leads could easily cost a trick), I’d reluctantly lead a club. Yes, the suit has been bid, but it has not really been shown yet. A fourth-highest club four is as likely as anything not to cost me, and partner won’t necessarily think I have shortness.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 2
♥ A Q 6 5 3
♦ Q 2
♣ 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
Holding ♠ J-2, ♥ 9-2, ♦ Q-5-3-2, ♣ A-Q-J-3-2, I assume you would pass in first chair. When you hear a weak two-heart call on your left, passed back to you, would you reopen, and if so, with what call?
F Troop, Great Falls, Mont.
Your spade holding is exceedingly unsuitable for a balancing double even though it’s a maximum for your initial pass. As a passed hand, you could bid three clubs, but I’d prefer a bid of two no-trump to show the minors rather than showing a balanced hand. Note that a balancing call of one no-trump over an opening bid would be 10-11 balanced.
A hand in a recent column confused me, though it did not affect the final outcome. After South opened one diamond and West overcalled one heart, why didn’t North make a negative double to best describe a hand with five spades and scattered values?
Skinny Marie, San Juan, Puerto Rico
The negative double tends to show exactly four spades rather than five or more. This is a useful distinction in competition. After a one-spade overcall, by contrast, a two-heart call shows five cards, but 10 or more HCP. So a negative double suggests five or more hearts and a minimum, or any hand with precisely four hearts and at least 7 HCP.
My understanding is that if declarer leads from the wrong hand and the opponents notice this, declarer must now lead the same suit from the correct hand. Is this so, and what happens if a defender commits the same infraction?
Thane of Cawdor, Houston, Texas
For declarer, the next player can accept that lead. Or declarer can be asked to lead from the correct hand, when he can lead anything he likes. When a defender offends, declarer can accept the lead; if he does not, he can either bar that lead, allowing the offender to retain the lead, or ask for the lead of this suit by the correct hand. Either way, the card originally played is picked up. Or you can make the card a penalty card, in which case the correct defender can lead anything.
|
When looking for slam and asking for aces, I’ve seen it stated that if no-trump has already been bid, then to avoid confusion one can use the Gerber convention. How exactly should this work, and when, if ever, do you advise playing Gerber?
Blackwoodsman, Olympia, Wash.
I’m happy with the idea that a jump to four clubs over a rebid of one or two no-trump should be played as Gerber, but only if clubs have not been bid. A call of four no-trump would then be quantitative and invitational. In such auctions, though, when clubs have been bid naturally, it is less easy to say whether delayed club jumps are Gerber or natural. Otherwise, you should play four clubs as natural or a cue-bid, not Gerber.
In a competitive auction, when you have opened or overcalled, say your partner cue-bids and the next hand doubles. What is the normal action to show the weakest possible hand? Does a pass show more interest than reverting to the trump suit at the level you have been forced to already?
Fish Fingers, Anchorage, Alaska
I’d emphasize that this is primarily a matter of partnership agreement. The simplest method is that reversion to the trump suit is the weakest possible action, with pass showing some extras, and redouble simply a good hand (maybe setting up a forcing auction). In cue-bidding auctions, redouble and pass can be used to show first- and second-round control, respectively, with other actions denying a control.
|
August 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Who is the happy warrior! … Who, with a natural instinct to discern What knowledge can perform, is diligent to learn.
William Wordsworth
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8 6 5
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ J 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3 2
♥ 9 5
♦ J 10 9
♣ K 6 5 3 |
♠ 9 4
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q J
♥ A K Q J
♦ A K 8
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦J
Your partner’s double is take-out, more about high cards than extra shape, perhaps because he can always bid hearts or clubs naturally at his second turn. Your hand looks more like a rebid of one no-trump than a two-diamond call, though both bids are acceptable. With this hand, I’d say seven tricks in no-trump may be easier than eight in diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 6 5
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Paranoia is infectious. It’s also an incredibly useful tool. If you can make people afraid enough, uncertain enough, they will simply stop moving.
C.L. Anderson
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 8 7
♥ A J 10 9 4 3
♦ —
♣ K J 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 4 3
♥ 6
♦ A Q 7 4
♣ 8 7 3 |
♠ Q 9 6 5
♥ Q 8 7 5
♦ J 9 8
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ K 2
♦ K 10 6 5 3 2
♣ A Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣7
An expert colleague of mine in discussing this sort of situation asked, “Would you rather rebid two clubs and show nine of your cards, or two diamonds and show six?” When put in those terms, the rebid of two clubs looks clear, and I would still make that call if the clubs were slightly weaker and the diamonds stronger.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ K 2
♦ K 10 6 5 3 2
♣ A Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Love is most nearly itself When here and now cease to matter.
T.S. Eliot
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 9 4
♥ A J 8 3
♦ 8 6 5 3 2
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 7 2
♥ 4
♦ K Q J 9 4
♣ K J 7 |
♠ 10 8 6
♥ 5
♦ 10 7
♣ Q 10 9 5 4 3 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 5 3
♥ K Q 10 9 7 6 2
♦ A
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
4 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Short clubs and heart support
♦K
The three-spade call is forcing here (the only non-forcing action is to pass three hearts). Your hand looks suitable for slam, but your partner hasn’t promised a good hand yet. Cue-bid four clubs and be prepared to give up over a sign-off in four spades.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 5 3
♥ K Q 10 9 7 6 2
♦ A
♣ A 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
They (the people of Uxbridge) will steal the very teeth out of your mouth as you walk the streets. I know it from experience.
William Arabin
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 10 5
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ 8 7
♣ K Q 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 6
♥ 4
♦ Q 10 6 4 3
♣ J 9 8 3 |
♠ J 9 3
♥ 3
♦ K J 9 5 2
♣ 10 6 4 2 |
| South |
♠ Q 7 4 2
♥ A K Q J 10 9 8
♦ A
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
7 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
Hearts cannot be the right place to play here, but should you bid three spades and try to maneuver partner into three no-trump, or just revert to four clubs? I think the former action is more flexible, though it may be easier for partner to bid three no-trump than to make it.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 9 5
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ 8 7
♣ K Q 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
We are drowning in information, while starving for wisdom. The world henceforth will be run by synthesizers, people able to put together the right information at the right time, think critically about it, and make important choices wisely.
E.O. Wilson
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 4
♥ 7 4 3 2
♦ A K J 8
♣ 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 7 5 2
♥ Q 9 8
♦ 7
♣ A K Q J 4 |
♠ 6 3
♥ J 10 6
♦ 9 6 5 3 2
♣ 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 9
♥ A K 5
♦ Q 10 4
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
I can certainly see the logic in concealing the hearts and raising diamonds here; I might do that with a very minimum response (change the diamond king to the two, perhaps). Here, however, I have the values to think that this will be our hand, so my plan is to bid hearts then raise diamonds. Yes I’d rather have a better suit, but quantity often outranks quality.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 4
♥ 7 4 3 2
♦ A K J 8
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
Now for good luck, cast an old shoe after me.
John Heywood
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 3 2
♥ 5 4
♦ A J 10 9 4
♣ K Q 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K Q J 10 4
♥ 10 6
♦ 8 3 2
♣ J 8 7 |
♠ 8 7
♥ 9 8 7 3
♦ K 7 6 5
♣ A 10 9 |
| South |
♠ 9 6 5
♥ A K Q J 2
♦ Q
♣ 6 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All Pass |
|
|
♠K
With a choice of suits to lead on a blind auction, it’s common to lead from a five-card holding or from a sequence of honors. When you don’t have that choice and are confronted by two four-card majors, try not to give up a trick if you can. That makes a spade lead far more attractive than a heart; I’d lead the seven, not the three (second from four small, top from three small), but either card is acceptable.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ A Q 9 4
♦ J 4
♣ Q 10 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 11 Comments
|
I’m a long-time party bridge player (Chicago scoring), and I’m beginning to play duplicate, but I’m struggling. I know there are some differences in the two philosophies, for example, in sacrificing at duplicate. Can you recommend a book to help me to get into playing duplicate?
Heartless Hal, Dallas, Texas
I like “The Complete Book of Duplicate Bridge” by Kay, Silodor and Karpin, and “Duplicate Bridge: How to Play, How to Win” by Edgar Kaplan. Both books cover the basics well. Anything by Mike Lawrence or Reese, Kelsey and Kantar is worth reading. For modern bidding techniques, Larry Cohen has written a lot about the Law of Total Tricks.
If declarer has revoked in a doubled vulnerable contract and is set one trick, which becomes two after the penalty, how much will that cost him? Are both undertricks calculated based on the double? In addition, if the doubled contract had been made, how would the revoke trick penalty be handled?
Score Keeper, Walnut Creek, Calif.
Revokes are tricky things (generally a one-trick penalty, but occasionally two), but you did not ask me that question, so I won’t answer it! First of all, calculate the result of the contract in terms of making or going down, after the revoke penalty. Then look at the score. The answer here is down one, plus a revoke penalty to make it down two; that is 500, and the number goes above the line — hopefully on your side.
In a duplicate pairs event, as dealer I held ♠ A-J, ♥ K-9-8-6-2, ♦ A-Q-4-3, ♣ A-J and opened one heart. My LHO overcalled one spade, and my partner doubled. When I jumped to three diamonds, thinking it was forcing, we played there and missed a game. Should I have bid no-trump on the second round? Was my sequence invitational?
Missing Parson, Waterbury, Conn.
A jump in a new suit to three diamonds in a noncompetitive auction would clearly be natural and forcing. But once your partner suggests the minors, the jump is invitational (your actual hand if the spade ace were the two), since you are essentially raising him, not bidding a new suit. Cue-bid two spades, then bid three diamonds to set up the force. When you can get directly to a spot or go through a cue-bid, fourth suit or the new minor, the latter tends to be forcing, the former invitational.
|
Holding ♠ J, ♥ Q-7-4-2, ♦ A-9-7-3-2, ♣ A-Q-4, I opened one diamond and rebid one no-trump, over my partner’s one-spade response. It seemed wrong to me to repeat my diamonds, but my partner said that a response of one no-trump guaranteed a balanced hand and denied a singleton spade. What are your views here?
One for the Road, Mason City, Iowa
Your choice was a practical one: Two hearts would be a reverse because it would force preference at the three-level and promise extras. Since repeating diamonds would overstate your suit, your only choice is to bid one no-trump unless you feel like fabricating a club suit. When strong, partner should have the New Minor Relay available to find out whether you like spades before committing the hand to play in that suit.
I recently opened one heart, and when my partner responded two clubs, I opted not to make a splinter-raise of my partner’s suit with a minimum hand and a singleton ace in a side-suit. As I understand it, one should not normally make such a call when the suit is a singleton top honor. Is that approach correct?
Leapy Lee, Portland, Maine
I’m not averse to splintering with such holdings, but only if the hand contains full value for my action. A simple rule is to down-value the hand by two points, and if the hand is still worth a splinter, make it. This applies especially in auctions that are not game-forcing, when responder has bid at the one-level.
|
August 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
You can never plan the future by the past.
Edmund Burke
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 8 3 2
♥ 6
♦ 7 2
♣ A 8 6 5 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K J 9 3 2
♦ Q 10 8 4
♣ Q 10 9 7 |
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ K J 9 3
♣ J |
| South |
♠ K Q 10 9 6
♥ Q 10 5
♦ A 6 5
♣ K 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 NT * |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*9-12 HCP; raise in spades with unspecified shortness
♦4
The answer here may be more about style than judgment. I would respond one heart, hoping to find a major-suit fit. I tend to use the one-diamond response as natural but tending to deny a major unless in a game-forcing hand. So in response to one diamond as opener, I would tend to bypass rebidding a major if balanced. Thus, the one-heart response helps us find our side’s fit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 7 5 4
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ K 10 9 3
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
This deal dates from a time when North was able to bid clubs naturally at his second turn. These days some would play a three-club call as showing a second negative, with two no-trump natural.
The double of the Blackwood response doesn’t affect South’s plans. In Key-card Blackwood, the first step that isn’t a signoff asks for the trump queen. When North denies it, South settles for the small slam.
South wins the opening diamond lead and plans to cash the spade ace and king, then pitch the diamond loser on the hearts. When the first round of trumps draws the jack from West, this does not have to be a true card (West might have one, two or even three trumps), but in almost all eventualities, the spades can probably wait. Declarer takes two top hearts to pitch dummy’s diamond loser, and East ruffs in.
He plays back a diamond, which declarer ruffs in dummy, then pitches his last diamond on the club ace. When he leads the spade 10 from dummy, East follows low, and declarer is faced with a guess in trump. Should he play for West to have begun with the bare spade jack or the doubleton queen-jack?
Since West appears to have three or four diamonds and five hearts, while East has five or six cards in those two suits, it feels right to me to finesse. And the percentages indicate that too (reinforced by the Principle of Restricted Choice, which I’ll discuss later this month.)
After finessing in spades, declarer can draw trumps and claim the rest.