October 31st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, October 17th, 2018
Logic: The art of thinking and reasoning in strict accordance with the limitations and incapacities of the human misunderstanding.
Ambrose Bierce
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 7
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ K 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 4 2
♥ 9 5
♦ A K Q 8
♣ 10 6 4 3 |
♠ 8
♥ Q 7 2
♦ 10 9 6 3
♣ J 9 8 7 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 6 5 3
♥ 8 6 4
♦ J 5
♣ A Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
Jumps by a passed hand facing an overcall should be played as fit. Your partner can’t have only spades, or he would have overcalled or bid one spade at his second turn. I’d expect a hand with good spades and heart support. This hand has enough extras to jump straight to four hearts now to protect the club king.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 7
♥ A K J 10 3
♦ 7 4 2
♣ K 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
A straw vote only shows which way the hot air blows.
O. Henry
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 7 5 2
♥ Q J 10
♦ A Q J 5
♣ K 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ 3
♥ 7 5 4 2
♦ 9 8 3 2
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
♠ Q J 10 8 6
♥ A 9 6 3
♦ 6 4
♣ A 10 |
| South |
♠ A K 4
♥ K 8
♦ K 10 7
♣ Q J 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
If you were in direct seat, you would bid one no-trump, of course. But in balancing seat, this hand looks too strong for a call where the range is traditionally played as 10-15. Start by doubling, planning to rebid one no-trump over your partner’s cheap response in a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 4
♥ K 8
♦ K 10 7
♣ Q J 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
Dost thou laugh to see how fools are vexed To add to golden numbers, golden numbers?
Thomas Dekker
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 9 4
♥ K J 3
♦ K 6 4 3
♣ K 9 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 3
♥ Q 9 7 6
♦ J 8 2
♣ 10 8 7 6 |
♠ 10 8 7 6
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 9 7 5
♣ J 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A J 5 2
♥ A 10 5
♦ A Q 10
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♣ |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣8
The only person who has actually shown clubs at this table is East, not your partner. Your partner may have three or four clubs, but leading a club is more likely to cost a trick than gain one, in my opinion. The spade jack looks like a relatively safe lead to me.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 5
♥ J 5 3
♦ J 8 3 2
♣ Q 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 NT |
All pass |
|
October 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
Does the way to deal with rebidding a balanced 18-19 count after opening at the one-level differ, depending on whether your partner responds at the one- or two-level?
Falling Flat, Wilmington, N.C.
The answer depends a little on whether you play two-over-one game-forcing. If so, a sequence such as one heart – two clubs – two no-trump suggests 1214, but can also be made with a balanced 18 points or more, and even with club support, planning to bid on over partner’s raise to three no-trump. If your partner responds at the one-level, be it with a suit or a call of one no-trump, you typically rebid two no-trump.
Holding ♠ A-3, ♥ K-9-8, ♦ J-9-2, ♣ Q-10-8-6-4, I passed over a onediamond opener to my right. Now I heard one no-trump to my left and a double from my partner. Since I know my Left Hand Opponent had clubs, should I bid that suit now?
Butter Ball, New Smyrna Beach, Fla.
Your partner won’t just have the majors — he has a Michaels two-diamond call available to show 5-5 in the majors (or even 5-4 in a pinch). So he ought to have at least three clubs. Rightly or wrongly, I’d jump to three clubs, hoping partner can bid a major or try for three no-trump if he has real extras.
Assuming your agreement is that opening two of a major in fourth seat is an intermediate hand, what should constitute an intermediate hand?
Hospital Pass, Calgary, Alberta
The first requirement is a good suit, intermediate perhaps meaning 10-13 points or so if the opening is in a red suit, a fraction less in spades. With a poor suit, you would open at the one-level or pass, depending on your controls and where you were within that range.
|
In your commentary on a recent lead problem, you advocated leading an unbid suit of Q-10-2 against no-trump. You did not say, however, which card you would lead. My thought on the matter would be to lead the queen to try to unblock the suit for later play. It might also trap the king in my left-hand opponent’s hand. If I led the two, wouldn’t it suggest to my partner that I held four?
Honest Abe, Atlantic City, N.J.
I’m not a big fan of leading the honor from a three-card suit, even when partner has bid them, either against no-trump or against suits. In this precise position, you may build declarer a second stop if he started with A-J-x or K-J-x. What your partner would believe you would normally do is to lead low from honor-third. And even if he might expect you to have four cards in this suit, it is unlikely that much harm will come to you – assuming that you have hit on the right suit to lead.
I picked up ♠ Q-10-2, ♥ A-8-7-2, ♦ 9-6-3, ♣ A-J-5 and heard my partner open one diamond and the next hand overcall one no-trump. I doubled for penalty, and my right-hand opponent ran to two clubs. Was I justified in doubling, or is it better to pass and let partner act with extra shape himself?
Lowering the Boom, Pueblo, Colo.
There is no simple answer here; my instincts are that double shows four trumps or a maximum defensive hand with three. Admittedly, this way you let them off the hook sometimes, but I think it is better to use double as “the goods,” not as a speculative attempt to take a penalty. This hand just about qualifies, and as long as you make the call in tempo, partner can remove with a really unsuitable hand.
|
October 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Where a technique tells you ‘how’ and a philosophy tells you ‘what,’ a methodology will contain elements of both ‘what’ and ‘how.’
Peter Checkland
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ Q 10 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4 3
♥ 9 8 7 4
♦ 10 9 8 5 2
♣ 2 |
♠ J 8 7 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ 6 3
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q
♥ K J 6
♦ K Q J
♣ A K J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT * |
Pass |
| 6 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Quantitative
♦10
While this may look like a dead minimum for a jump to two spades, that is clearly the right call. Your hand improved dramatically when your partner suggested relative shortness in clubs, meaning that all your honors are working overtime. Had your Left Hand Opponent opened a red-suit, it would be less clear that jumping to two spades is the right call — though you might do it anyway.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 9 5
♥ Q 10 3
♦ A 7 4
♣ 9 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To know is nothing at all; to imagine is everything.
Anatole France
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 2
♥ Q J 10 5 3
♦ K 10 3
♣ 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 3
♥ 9
♦ 6 2
♣ A K J 10 7 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 7
♥ 6
♦ Q J 9 5 4
♣ Q 9 6 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣* |
3 ♣ |
| Pass |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*16 or more high-card points
♣5
This may be an unpopular answer, but facing a pre-empt in first seat (especially a non-vulnerable one), I think it is right to pass and try to go plus there. Yes, there are hands where game will make, but even if partner holds ace-kingseventh of clubs, you still haven’t made four hearts or five clubs. Vulnerable at teams, you might persuade me to bid three hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 5 4
♥ A K 8 7 4 2
♦ A 8 7
♣ 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
William Blake
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 3
♥ Q J 9 7
♦ K 9 5
♣ K Q 10 |
♠ 7 4
♥ A 4
♦ J 10 8 3 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A K J 10 9 6 2
♥ K 8
♦ Q 7 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣K
Your double suggested values; your partner’s four no-trump call suggests two places to play. It makes sense to bid five clubs now; if your partner corrects that to five diamonds, you can bid five hearts, since the 5-4 fit rates to play better than diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ 10 6 5 3 2
♦ A 6
♣ A 9 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
4 ♠ |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
In the perfect chess combination, as in a first-rate short story, the whole plot and counter-plot should lead up to a striking finale, the interest not being allayed until the very last moment.— Frederic Yates and William
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 5 4
♥ 10 8 2
♦ 4 3 2
♣ 10 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 7 6
♥ 6 3
♦ 10 9 8 6
♣ 6 3 2 |
♠ 9 8 3
♥ K Q 4
♦ A Q J 5
♣ K 8 7 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
3 ♦ |
3 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Stronger than passing
♦10
This hand is on the cusp of passing, trying to settle for a plus score, or bidding three clubs to show your 5-5 pattern and non-forcing extras. I’d take the latter route — if for no other reason than that three clubs may be easier to make than two hearts if your partner has two hearts and three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ A J 9 7 5
♦ K 7
♣ A Q J 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Henceforth I ask not good fortune, I choose good fortune.
Walt Whitman
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 4
♥ K 9 8 6
♦ Q J 8 4 3
♣ 9 7 |
♠ 10 8
♥ J 10 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ J 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A J 9 2
♥ A Q 3
♦ 10 6
♣ K Q 10 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
2 ♥* |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*transfer to spades
♦Q
North is unlikely to have even as much as the doubleton ace in spades. Since he did not rebid his clubs initially, he might have given preference to spades at his third turn if he could. You have a choice of forcing calls in the red suits to probe: Three diamonds looks best. You can revert to five clubs if partner raises, but you do not want to suggest half a heart stopper, as a call of three hearts might do.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q 7 5 3
♥ 5 4 2
♦ K 5
♣ A 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Shallow brooks murmur most, deep silent slide away.
Sir Philip Sidney
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 8 4
♥ J 3
♦ A K J 6 5
♣ 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ K 10 7 6
♦ 4 3
♣ J 9 8 2 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 7 6 5
♥ A 8
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two key-cards, no trump queen
♣2
Do you go active or passive here? I do not like a diamond lead, which can give up a trick in so many different ways while really not having much upside. Since the heart spots also spell danger in terms of conceding a trick unnecessarily, I will go with a low spade (the four, not the seven!).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 9 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
|
Most truisms possess a kernel of truth, but one would be unwise to put too much trust in them. That is certainly the case with the advice: “Eight ever, nine never.”
With eight cards between the two hands when you are missing the queen, it might usually be right to take the finesse; but not always. Similarly, with nine cards, you will, in abstract, play for the queen to drop. But circumstances alter cases — another cliché — as in today’s deal.
After North had made an intelligent raise of spades at his second turn, West led three rounds of diamonds against four spades. South ruffed away the queen, cashed the spade ace, then led a spade to the king, East showing out. Declarer now took his slight extra chance in hearts by cashing the ace to protect against the queen being singleton offside, but then could do no better than finesse the heart jack for down one.
That was admittedly slightly unlucky; however, South had missed out on a chance to break the rules. After ruffing the third round of diamonds, cashing the spade ace was fine. But declarer should next lead a heart to dummy, followed by both top clubs, ending in hand. Only now should South play a second round of trump.
If West plays low, declarer should insert the 10. If this loses to the doubleton queen in East, that player will be forced to lead a heart into dummy’s tenace, or give a ruff-sluff with a club. That would be trumped in dummy while South’s losing heart could be discarded.