|
Holding ♠ J-2, ♥ 9-2, ♦ Q-5-3-2, ♣ A-Q-J-3-2, I assume you would pass in first chair. When you hear a weak two-heart call on your left, passed back to you, would you reopen, and if so, with what call?
F Troop, Great Falls, Mont.
Your spade holding is exceedingly unsuitable for a balancing double even though it’s a maximum for your initial pass. As a passed hand, you could bid three clubs, but I’d prefer a bid of two no-trump to show the minors rather than showing a balanced hand. Note that a balancing call of one no-trump over an opening bid would be 10-11 balanced.
A hand in a recent column confused me, though it did not affect the final outcome. After South opened one diamond and West overcalled one heart, why didn’t North make a negative double to best describe a hand with five spades and scattered values?
Skinny Marie, San Juan, Puerto Rico
The negative double tends to show exactly four spades rather than five or more. This is a useful distinction in competition. After a one-spade overcall, by contrast, a two-heart call shows five cards, but 10 or more HCP. So a negative double suggests five or more hearts and a minimum, or any hand with precisely four hearts and at least 7 HCP.
My understanding is that if declarer leads from the wrong hand and the opponents notice this, declarer must now lead the same suit from the correct hand. Is this so, and what happens if a defender commits the same infraction?
Thane of Cawdor, Houston, Texas
For declarer, the next player can accept that lead. Or declarer can be asked to lead from the correct hand, when he can lead anything he likes. When a defender offends, declarer can accept the lead; if he does not, he can either bar that lead, allowing the offender to retain the lead, or ask for the lead of this suit by the correct hand. Either way, the card originally played is picked up. Or you can make the card a penalty card, in which case the correct defender can lead anything.
|
When looking for slam and asking for aces, I’ve seen it stated that if no-trump has already been bid, then to avoid confusion one can use the Gerber convention. How exactly should this work, and when, if ever, do you advise playing Gerber?
Blackwoodsman, Olympia, Wash.
I’m happy with the idea that a jump to four clubs over a rebid of one or two no-trump should be played as Gerber, but only if clubs have not been bid. A call of four no-trump would then be quantitative and invitational. In such auctions, though, when clubs have been bid naturally, it is less easy to say whether delayed club jumps are Gerber or natural. Otherwise, you should play four clubs as natural or a cue-bid, not Gerber.
In a competitive auction, when you have opened or overcalled, say your partner cue-bids and the next hand doubles. What is the normal action to show the weakest possible hand? Does a pass show more interest than reverting to the trump suit at the level you have been forced to already?
Fish Fingers, Anchorage, Alaska
I’d emphasize that this is primarily a matter of partnership agreement. The simplest method is that reversion to the trump suit is the weakest possible action, with pass showing some extras, and redouble simply a good hand (maybe setting up a forcing auction). In cue-bidding auctions, redouble and pass can be used to show first- and second-round control, respectively, with other actions denying a control.
|
In America, bridge tournaments focus on the bridge. The target is to play two sessions, and at least 50 deals a day. In France, even at the major regional events, players tend to compete in only one long session per day, and that leaves room for the beach in the morning and an extended dinner at night. Cannes and Biarritz are the models for these tournaments, and today’s deal comes from the latter event.
Pierre Saporta was declarer here, on a deal where most of the field had brought home five diamonds painlessly, after a spade lead allowed declarer to get three ruffs in dummy. But against Saporta’s contract of five diamonds doubled, West irritatingly found the best defense of a trump lead. East won the ace and continued the suit; put yourself in declarer’s position and take it from there.
Saporta drew the correct inference that East’s rebid suggested extra values, probably with a 5-3-3-2 pattern. So he won the second round of trumps with dummy’s 10 and immediately led and passed the club 10. West took that with the queen, but there was no further chance for the defense. Declarer could ruff the spade continuation, cash the club and heart aces, then ruff one loser heart in dummy and discard his remaining hearts on dummy’s club winners.
Had East covered the club 10, might South have assumed that East had queen-jack-third of clubs? Then he might have led a club back to the ace to try to ruff out the remaining club honor.