October 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Shallow brooks murmur most, deep silent slide away.
Sir Philip Sidney
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 8 4
♥ J 3
♦ A K J 6 5
♣ 10 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 3 2
♥ K 10 7 6
♦ 4 3
♣ J 9 8 2 |
♠ 10
♥ Q 9 5 4 2
♦ Q 10 9 7
♣ A 6 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 7 6 5
♥ A 8
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Two key-cards, no trump queen
♣2
Do you go active or passive here? I do not like a diamond lead, which can give up a trick in so many different ways while really not having much upside. Since the heart spots also spell danger in terms of conceding a trick unnecessarily, I will go with a low spade (the four, not the seven!).
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 7 4
♥ J 9 7
♦ A 9 7 2
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
October 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
In a teams game, I picked up ♠ 7, ♥ Q-10-8-6-4, ♦ A-J-10-2, ♣ K-J-10 and passed in second chair. Do you agree? When I heard a spade to my left and a one-no-trump call to my right, should I have acted? If so, with what call?
Wimpy Kid, Riverside, Calif.
Because you can bid your two suits in comfortable order and you have decent controls and useful builders in your intermediates, this hand represents a minimum but respectable opening of one heart. If you do pass, you should double one no-trump for take-out and let your partner play in clubs if he selects that suit.
I am trying to work out how to combine a quantitative bid of four no-trump with Blackwood, while also using four no-trump as regressive. I know you cannot combine all possibilities in a short answer, but what are the basic principles from which we should build?
Low-Key Loki, Cartersville, Ga.
A simple rule is that if your last call in any auction was three no-trump and your partner bids a minor, four no-trump is regressive. If the previous call was in no-trump, then four no-trump is quantitative. Four no-trump may also be quantitative if you have an artificial way to agree the major (after Stayman finds one, for example, or after partner completes a transfer), but instead you jump to four no-trump. In most other sequences, use four no-trump as Blackwood — unless you agree that it isn’t.
I picked up ♠ K-9-4, ♥ A-Q-9, ♦ K-10-8-7-4, ♣ K-3, and when I heard my right-hand opponent open one club, I elected to double rather than bid one diamond or one no-trump. My thinking was that I wanted to get the majors into play, but three no-trump was actually a reasonable spot. Any comments?
Chop Suey, Winston-Salem, N.C.
These days, not only does an opening bid of one club not promise clubs, but the partner of the opening bidder will furthermore not be sure if opener has a balanced hand or a real club suit. Bidding one no-trump over one club is not without risk, but it does describe your assets well. Remember: You probably will find a 5-3 major fit if you have one this way, but do you really want to find a 4-3 major? I’m not sure you do.
|
In one of your columns, you mentioned Ogust responses to a weak two. Please expand on the details of this scheme and the reasoning behind it.
Mock Turtle, Henderson, Nev.
The Ogust scheme of responses to a two no-trump inquiry after a weak two opening accepts that weak two-bids may be based on only a moderate suit. The responses to the inquiry let opener bid three clubs or three diamonds with a bad hand (the latter showing a good suit), and three hearts or three spades with a good hand, promising a minimum and maximum suit, respectively. Using this scheme allows you to be slightly more flexible in pre-empting.
In fourth chair facing a passed partner, I elected not to overcall one heart over one diamond because of the poor quality of my long suit, with ♠ Q-2, ♥ J-7-5-3-2, ♦ A-K-J, ♣ Q-7-3. Would you have acted here? If so, how much worse a hand would you need before you passed instead of overcalling?
Care Bear, Huntington, W. Va.
An overcall should promise either a reasonable hand or a suit you cannot afford to keep silent about. In this case, you have a full opener and no reason to assume bidding will work to your disadvantage. Turn the diamond king into a small diamond and I would pass, reluctantly.
|
October 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, we have at least to consider the possibility that we have a small aquatic bird of the family Anatidae on our hands.
Douglas Adams
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 10 6
♣ K 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 10 9 8 2
♥ K 5 3
♦ Q 8 2
♣ 4 3 |
♠ 6 3
♥ A 8 6
♦ J 7 5 3
♣ 10 9 7 2 |
| South |
♠ Q J 4
♥ Q 9 4
♦ A 9 4
♣ A Q J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠10
Since your partner has guaranteed six clubs on this auction (which wouldn’t be absolutely guaranteed over a one-spade response, by the way), you can see you have a good chance of running nine quick tricks facing little more than six clubs to the ace-queen and the diamond ace. Rather than risk missing game, I would simply bid three no-trump now without consulting my partner.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 7 5
♥ J 10 7 2
♦ K 10 6
♣ K 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
I always voted at my party’s call And I never thought of thinking for myself at all.
W.S. Gilbert
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 7 4 2
♥ 8 6
♦ 8 7 3
♣ A Q 8 6 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ J 10
♣ J 7 5 3 2 |
♠ 8 5
♥ Q 7 5 3
♦ Q 6 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 10 3
♥ A K 4 2
♦ A K 9
♣ K |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 NT* |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Waiting
♥J
Some people play Equal Level Conversion, meaning that correcting two clubs to two diamonds here does not show any extra values. I’m not a fan of that approach, so I can bid two no-trump without feeling I’m stepping too far out of line. My diamond builders are working overtime, so I have enough to invite game, even though I still don’t have a great hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 6
♥ J 10 9
♦ J 10
♣ J 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
I know I have the body of a weak and feeble woman, but I have the heart and stomach of a king.
Queen Elizabeth I
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 6
♥ 9 8 5
♦ K Q 10 6 5 4
♣ 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 5 2
♥ 4
♦ J 8 7 3
♣ 10 9 8 2 |
♠ J 8 4
♥ A K 10 6 2
♦ 9
♣ A Q 4 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7 3
♥ Q J 7 3
♦ A 2
♣ K J 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Your partner’s call suggests extras in high cards or playing strength, and you certainly have something in hand for your first call. It seems logical to advance with a bid of three spades. You might be able to make game in diamonds, spades or no-trump; let partner know where you live.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ 9 8 5
♦ K Q 10 6 5 4
♣ 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Dream on, but don’t imagine they’ll all come true. When will you realize Vienna waits for you?
Billy Joel
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A Q 10 8 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 4
♥ K J 5 3
♦ 3
♣ K J 6 4 2 |
♠ J 9 5 3
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 9 7 6 2
♣ A 3 |
| South |
♠ A Q 7 6
♥ A 7 6
♦ K J 5
♣ Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♣4
You seem to have just enough to balance with two diamonds. Since you did not act directly at your first turn, there has to be a limit to your suit and high cards. You could also make a case for a call of two spades, but I’d prefer a slightly better doubleton. Also, the suggested sequence might help partner judge what to lead and whether to compete further.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 2
♥ Q 10 9
♦ A Q 10 8 4
♣ 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
He who shall teach the child to doubt The rotting grave shall ne’er get out.
William Blake
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7 2
♥ Q 9 3
♦ A K Q
♣ Q 10 8 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 8 5
♥ A
♦ J 7 6 5 4 3
♣ 7 5 4 |
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ 10 9 8 2
♣ J |
| South |
♠ A K 3
♥ K J 8 6 4
♦ —
♣ A K 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
Aha!
After your initial pass, your partner will assume that you have fewer than 6 high-card points. But do you have enough to compete to two spades now? I say yes, but I’d understand anyone who would pass, feeling that the singleton club, combined with holding only four trumps, argues for defending, not declaring.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 4
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ 10 9 8 2
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
October 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
The devil watches all opportunities.
William Congreve
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 10 4
♥ K Q 9 7 5
♦ A 9 5
♣ 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 7 2
♥ 10 6
♦ Q 10 6 2
♣ J 10 7 4 |
♠ 6 5
♥ A J 8 2
♦ J 8 7 4
♣ Q 9 8 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9 3
♥ 4 3
♦ K 3
♣ A K 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♣J
Which heart should you lead? It looks like declarer has four spades and no real extra shape in the minors, so if anyone is short in hearts, it will be dummy. If dummy is short in hearts, leading the king then working out whether to shift to clubs or continue hearts seems like a good idea.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 3
♥ K 8 4 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ J 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| 2 ♥ |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
| Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
October 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
Recently, I opened a strong no-trump, and my partner held ♠ A-9, ♥ A-10-8-4-2, ♦ 9-5, ♣ 10-7-3-2. He responded two diamonds as a transfer, and I dutifully answered two hearts. What should his next bid have been? Would your answer be different if he were a passed hand?
Vantage Point, Janesville, Wis.
At pairs, passing two hearts seems sensible enough, since you probably only want to be in game facing a maximum hand with a fit, in which case your partner might already have broken the transfer. If you bid on, a call of two no-trump may be best; you limit your hand nicely, at the cost of an overbid of no more than the heart nine. Some might use Stayman and then follow up with two no-trump to invite game.
When my partner opened one heart in third seat, I had no idea what to do, holding ♠ K-J-9-7-2, ♥ A-J-2, ♦ Q-2, ♣ 9-7-3. Should I raise to three and risk that he has a weak opener, or underbid with a raise to two — or even temporize with spades? Do you agree with the initial pass?
Coming a Cropper, San Antonio, Texas
Passing when vulnerable is fine. I might open one spade if I could pass a one-no-trump response. As a passed hand, I’d advocate that a regular partnership use Drury, a two-club response to a major-suit opening. It shows a maximum pass and three or more trumps. Opener can sign off with a minimum, bid game with a maximum or develop the hand naturally with a game- or slam-try. Failing that, I’d respond one spade, then jump to three hearts or make a fit-jump to two spades.
When (if ever) would you lead a high as opposed to a low card from Q-J-3-2 or K-Q-3-2 after the opponents have reached three no-trump on a brief auction where this is an unbid suit?
Heavens to Betsy, Portland, Ore.
This is only a personal view, but I tend to lead an honor from the queen-jack if my right-hand opponent has shown a strong no-trump or better (and thus the other honors are likely to be on my right). The king-queen holding is more awkward, since you may turn two tricks into one; in that case, I’d lead an honor only if I felt it necessary to try to cash out. Add in as little as the nine, and an honor lead becomes more attractive.
|
Holding ♠ A-Q-J, ♥ 9-4-3, ♦ Q-7, ♣ Q-7-6-5-2, my left-hand opponent opened two hearts, which my partner doubled. When the next player passed, what would you advocate, and why?
Crock Pot, Richmond, Va.
I referred in an earlier answer this month to the idea that an extension of the Lebensohl convention uses two no-trump as a puppet to three clubs to show a weak hand with a minor, while a call in either minor is natural and invitational. That being the case here, I’d bid three clubs and hope we didn’t miss game if partner passed.
Please explain to me what happens when you have a bidding box accident? When are you allowed to take back a bid made using bidding boxes, and when are you not permitted to do so?
Klumsy Karp, Horn Lake, Miss.
Let’s say you open one no-trump, and as your partner I bid two hearts. If I meant to bid two diamonds as a transfer to hearts, I can change my bid; mechanical errors can be corrected with no penalties. If I meant to bid hearts, forgetting we were playing transfers, and only remembered later that we play transfers, then I may NOT change the bid. You may correct only a physical error, not a mental one.
|
October 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
I held it truth, with him who sings To one clear harp in divers tones, That men may rise on steppingstones Of their dead selves to higher things.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 5 2
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4
♥ A Q J 9 8 3
♦ 10 9 8 5
♣ 9 |
♠ 10 8 6 3
♥ 10 4
♦ 3 2
♣ J 10 8 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q J 9
♥ K
♦ A K J
♣ A K Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl.* |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♣ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Weak, 0-5 high-card points
♦10
Normally one responds in a major when partner opens a minor, but with a hand this weak, the last thing you want to do is to encourage your partner to soar to the stratosphere. So respond one diamond to try to slow partner down; he should be less likely to jump in support of a minor than a major. This same argument might work no matter what the level of the opening club bid.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5 2
♥ 7 6 5 2
♦ Q 7 6 4
♣ 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
When North opens one diamond and immediately raises spades, an optimistic sequence leads South to declare a slam that would be impossible to bring home on a heart lead.
However, when West opts to lead a fourth-highest club, East wins and can do no better than continue the suit. South wins and must now go after diamonds to establish that suit for a heart discard.
Cashing the top diamonds and ruffing a diamond will establish the suit if it is 3-3 or an opponent has a doubleton queen. Then dummy’s trumps will serve as the entries for the good diamonds.
But what if diamonds break 4-2? Declarer will need two trump entries to the board. It is logical to cash one top trump at trick three, and see East follow with the 10. Then declarer plays the diamond ace-king and ruffs a diamond high. When the suit breaks 4-2, as feared, how should declarer plan the play thereafter? Declarer needs two entries to dummy: one to establish diamonds and one to cash them.
Is it better to play spades to be 2-2 or 3-1? The fall of a high spade from East makes it more likely he started with a singleton than with the 10-9 doubleton. So, lead a spade to the eight rather than to the king, then ruff another diamond high. You can draw the last trump with the king and cash the 13th diamond to pitch your heart loser.
For the record: On an initial diamond lead, declarer must play a club himself at trick two in order to come to 12 tricks.