July 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I often find I have trouble judging an 11-count facing a minimum balanced opener. I assume you would respond one spade to one club, holding ♠ A-J-3-2, ♥ K-J-4, ♦ Q-6-3, ♣ 10-6-2. When your partner rebids one no-trump, should you invite game? If not, how much more would you need to bid on?
Lucky Luke, Vancouver, British Columbia
Your lack of intermediates argues that you don’t have enough for an invitation at pairs, where going plus is your primary objective. Make the spade two the 10 (or give me a 4-4 pattern), and you may tempt me to invite game. Yes, game might make facing your actual hand: but probably less than half the time.
Has the overall standard of bridge in the U.S. dropped? If not, why do so many foreigners win our major teams events? What is going on in these events?
Home Groan, Provo, Utah
The explanation is simple. Twenty-five years ago, no one but North Americans came to our major events, but as bridge professionalism has grown around the world, more foreign teams are attending. They have raised the standards to make our major competitions the equivalent of world championships. Not surprisingly, it takes a world-class team to win them, and while more U.S. teams than foreigners still win, the ratio has shifted dramatically.
If you play Crawling Stayman, using a two-heart bid by responder after Stayman for a weak hand with both majors, then how should you play the equivalent calls after Stayman over a two no-trump opener?
Blue Leaves, West Palm Beach, Fla.
This is a trap for the unwary: The two auctions are not parallel. The two parallel auctions are Stayman followed by three of a major over one no-trump, and Stayman followed by three of a major over two no-trump. In both cases, responder is showing both majors, with four cards in the bid suit and at least five in the other suit. This is called Smolen, and it allows the strong hand to be declarer if there is a 5-3 fit.
|
I held ♠ A-J , ♥ A-K-J-3 , ♦ K-Q-J-4, ♣ Q-6-4 and heard my RHO open one spade in third seat. I doubled and heard a response of two clubs from my partner, and I was not sure how to advance the auction. What are your ideas?
Lumpfish, Troy, N.Y.
I agree with the double, and I would hope to know more by my second turn. The two-club response doesn’t help me at all. A call of two no-trump would be a very mild underbid, while a call of three no-trump would be a wild gamble. So that leaves only a two-spade cue-bid, but you may be none the wiser after partner’s next call — especially if that call is three clubs.
What is your preferred form of tournament: pairs or teams? In teams, do you prefer knockout matches or Swiss?
Yule Log, Detroit, Mich.
I find this hard to answer. There was a time when I loved pairs because of the idea of every trick counting. These days, the fact that there is such an element of randomness about the game means that I am happy to play teams and be able to relax from time to time without working quite so hard. So Swiss teams and knockout works equally well for me.
|
July 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
There is suffering in life, and there are defeats. No one can avoid them. But it’s better to lose some of the battles in the struggles for your dreams than to be defeated without ever knowing what you’re fighting for.
Paolo Coelho
| E |
North |
| Both |
♠ A Q 7 5
♥ J 9 4
♦ 8 5 3
♣ A Q 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ J
♥ K Q 10 8 7 5
♦ 4
♣ K 7 6 5 2 |
♠ K 8 2
♥ 3
♦ K Q J 10 9 6 2
♣ 4 3 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 6 4 3
♥ A 6 2
♦ A 7
♣ J 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
3 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦4
There is no right answer here, and your action may depend on the vulnerability, but my preference would be to go high rather than low. If non-vulnerable, I might throw caution to the wind and open three or even four hearts. Vulnerable, a call of two hearts seems sufficient.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J
♥ K Q 10 8 7 5
♦ 4
♣ K 7 6 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
There exists in the world a single path along which no one can go except you: Whither does it lead? Do not ask; go along it.
Friedrich Nietzsche
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 7 4 3
♥ 8
♦ K J 5 4
♣ 7 6 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 2
♥ K Q J 9 5
♦ 9 6 3
♣ K 10 |
♠ 6
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ A 10 8 2
♣ Q J 9 5 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 8 5
♥ A 7 2
♦ Q 7
♣ A 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
3 ♠ * |
4 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Pre-emptive
♥K
Your partner appears to be short in hearts, so your cards, such as they are, must be working. Your partner surely has four spades and at least four diamonds, so I would not be surprised if your side has good play for three diamonds, even in a 4-4 fit. Therefore, I would bid three diamonds now.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6
♥ 10 6 4 3
♦ A 10 8 2
♣ Q J 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 1 ♥ |
1 NT |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
So many of our dreams at first seem impossible, then they seem improbable, and then, when we summon the will, they soon become inevitable.
Christopher Reeve
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A Q J 10 7
♥ K 8 7 6 5
♦ A J 4
♣ — |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 5 3
♥ Q 2
♦ 10 8 3
♣ Q 10 7 4 2 |
♠ 6 2
♥ A
♦ K 9 2
♣ A K 9 8 6 5 3 |
| South |
♠ K 8 4
♥ J 10 9 4 3
♦ Q 7 6 5
♣ J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠3
It may not be very scientific, but I’d jump to three no-trump at once, expecting my RHO not to have full values for his opening bid. Your partner’s redouble suggests club tolerance and maximum values, so your chances of having nine tricks to run are pretty good.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 6 2
♥ A
♦ K 9 2
♣ A K 9 8 6 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| 2 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2 ♥ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Baldrick: Have you got a plan, my lord? Prince Edmund: Yes, I have — and it’s so cunning, you could brush your teeth with it!
“Blackadder”
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 7 6 4
♥ A K 6
♦ K J 10 5
♣ 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 3
♥ Q 10 9 4 3
♦ 8
♣ 9 6 2 |
♠ A 10 5
♥ J 8 5
♦ 6 4 3
♣ K Q 10 8 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ 7 2
♦ A Q 9 7 2
♣ A J 7 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♣ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♥ |
Pass |
| 6 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
*Singleton club, agreeing diamonds
♦8
Your partner’s jump to three hearts suggests real extra values, and your combination of the fifth trump and singleton are just enough to bid game — if you trust your partner. There are many people who would bid this way without too much in the way of extras; is your partner one of them?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 8 3
♥ Q 10 9 4 3
♦ 8
♣ 9 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Fairy tales are more than true — not because they tell us dragons exist, but because they tell us dragons can be beaten.
Neil Gaiman
| N |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8
♥ J 8 6 2
♦ A K J 10 9 6
♣ A J |
| West |
East |
♠ 9 6 2
♥ A Q 9 7
♦ 7
♣ Q 9 6 3 2 |
♠ Q 10 7 5 4 3
♥ K 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 10 |
| South |
♠ A K J
♥ 10 5 4
♦ 8 5 2
♣ 8 7 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
| 1 NT |
2 ♠ |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠2
Despite your sixth spade, you essentially have a run-of-the-mill overcall with no extra values or shape. The question is whether to rebid two spades or pass the auction to your partner to describe his hand. It feels right to pass to me; but give me the spade jack instead of a small spade, and I’d rebid two spades. If the redouble shows two spades, bidding two spades now seems reasonable.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10 7 5 4 3
♥ K 3
♦ Q 4 3
♣ K 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
2 ♣ |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 23rd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Monday, July 9th, 2018
Technique in a pianist never impressed me. I never in my life heard a pianist whom I liked just because of his technique. The moment they start to play very fast I want to go home.
Vladimir Horowitz on Heinrich Neuhaus
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 7
♥ 7 5 3
♦ Q J 7
♣ K J 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 6 4 3
♥ Q 8 6 2
♦ 10 9 6
♣ 4 |
♠ Q 5 2
♥ 9
♦ A 3 2
♣ Q 10 8 6 3 2 |
| South |
♠ 10 9 8
♥ A K J 10 4
♦ K 8 5 4
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠K
We’ll see later this week what works here. You’d expect dummy to have big trump support plus maybe a club void and a source of tricks. The choice seems to be between spades and diamonds, and my instincts are that dummy is more likely to have long spades than diamonds, making a diamond lead more attractive. (It would have been the winner today.)
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 5 3
♥ Q 2
♦ 10 8 3
♣ Q 10 7 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♥ |
| Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
|
July 22nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
I understand that opener’s jump shift at his second turn is forcing to game. Is there a way for responder to hit the brakes after this start to a sequence?
Trapper John, Atlantic City, N.J.
Some people use the same basic idea that they employ over a reverse, a call that is forcing for one round but not to game. They play that responder’s only weak action is the cheaper of fourth suit and two no-trump. So after opener opens one club and jumps to two spades over a one-diamond response, responder’s two no-trump call is artificial and weak. Over opener’s jump to two hearts, a call of two spades would similarly be weak.
In a recent article, you described dealing and picking up a hand of ♠ K-J-9-8-3, ♥ A-9, ♦ J-6, ♣ Q-7-4-2. Passing worked well with this hand, but I must admit I would have opened the bidding with one spade. What are the precise criteria for bidding or passing here?
Fishhooks Miami, Fla.
This hand is a marginal opening bid. While opening would not be out of line, the possibly awkward rebid over a response of two diamonds or two hearts argue against bidding. With a side suit of hearts or even possibly diamonds, the rebid problem looks less awkward. Non-vulnerable at pairs, I might open, but I would surely pass if vulnerable.
Please discuss how modern experts use a jump to five no-trump these days. Has the grand slam force gone the way of the landline telephone?
Old-fashioned, Newport News, Va.
The use of Key-card Blackwood among many experts has led many top players to use the call of five no-trump as a maneuver to try to locate the right strain, a “choice-of-slam” request. This helps the partnership identify strong or long suits when there is some ambiguity about the best fit.
|
Is there a role for asking bids, as opposed to cue-bids, these days?
Filet Mignon, Washington, D.C.
Asking bids fit well into a strong club base, but (with the exception of some Danish experts) top players tend to use a cue-bidding style instead. The closest thing to asking bids in common usage might be fourthsuit calls to look for a stopper, not a control.
When you play two-over-one and a semi-forcing no-trump with ♠ A-K-7-3, ♥ K-J-4-3-2, ♦ Q-6-4, ♣ 9, you would open one heart, I assume. But if you hear a one-no-trump response, do you pass or rebid two diamonds, two hearts or two spades?
Blinky Bill, Selma, Ala.
Clearly, a two-spade rebid is out; that shows at least an ace more than your current hand. Rebidding two hearts with a weak suit is unattractive, so the choice is to pass (which I would do if the diamond four were the club four) or bid two diamonds, which suggests but does not guarantee four. I prefer to bid two diamonds, but on the actual hand I’d be more likely to pass if my partner were a passed hand, since I won’t be facing a limit raise in hearts. And since a response of two clubs would be artificial (Drury), that means he is more likely to have length in clubs than any other suit.
|
July 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
That wild-goose chase of yours is going to lay an egg.— Lou Costello in “The Wistful
Wagon Gap”
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 10 8 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 6 4
♥ J 10 4 3
♦ 10 9 6
♣ 9 4 2 |
♠ A Q J 10 7 5
♥ K
♦ A 8 7 5
♣ 7 5 |
| South |
♠ 9
♥ Q 9 8 7 6
♦ K 3
♣ A K J 6 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
This hand is not really worth a drive to game. The choice is whether to cue-bid two clubs en route to two no-trump, or just to jump directly to two no-trump. I prefer the latter route, since the first sequence might suggest a four-card major. I only want to play a major if my partner can introduce it voluntarily, suggesting a five-card suit.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 3 2
♥ A 5 2
♦ Q J 4 2
♣ Q 10 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
As distrust, in some sense, is the mother of safety, so security is the gate of danger. A man had need to fear this most of all, that he fears not at all.
Thomas Brooks
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 7 6
♥ A 4
♦ A K 8 7 6 5 3
♣ 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 2
♥ K J 6 2
♦ 2
♣ A 9 8 4 |
♠ 3
♥ Q 9 7 5
♦ J 9 4
♣ K Q J 10 5 |
| South |
♠ A Q 10 5 4
♥ 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦2
Illogical as it might seem, this hand is closer to driving to three no-trump than it is to a pass of two spades. Your intermediates, especially the spade 10, suggest that you might make game on very few values altogether if you can set up spades. I would bid two no-trump, but would have sympathy for a jump to three no-trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 10 5 4
♥ 10 8 3
♦ Q 10
♣ 7 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Today’s deal is from one of my more prolific correspondents, Tim Bourke of Australia. His partner had played a prosaic three diamonds here, down one. But in the other room, his North teammate found a balancing action, leaving South to declare four spades.
The diamond four was led to the nine and ace. Declarer tried a spade to the jack, queen and king. Back came the heart three, a clear singleton. Put yourself in declarer’s position and take it from there.
You must win the heart ace, draw the rest of the trumps, eliminate the clubs by taking the finesse, and then lead a diamond. East can do nothing but take two diamond winners, and South discards a heart on the third diamond rather than ruffing in. The next diamond concedes a ruff-and-discard as well as the contract, since declarer can discard his last heart loser.
Is that all there is to the deal? Not exactly! Let’s say East wins the spade king and, instead of leading a heart, plays the diamond king followed by the diamond queen. South ruffs the third diamond high, draws trumps and leads the club jack.
Assuming West covers, then declarer takes the club ace, cashes the queen and plays his last trump. West comes down to three hearts and one club, and declarer crosses to hand in clubs and leads a low heart toward the jack. Now West gets just one heart trick.
However, if in this version West ducks the club jack, the entries to achieve this position are no longer in place.