September 21st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
Knowledge may give weight, but accomplishments give luster, and many more people see than weigh.
Lord Chesterton
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ A K Q 7 6 5
♥ K 10 6
♦ 9 8
♣ 8 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 8 4 2
♥ 8 7 2
♦ K J 6
♣ K J 6 3 |
♠ 3
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 4 2 |
| South |
♠ J 10 9
♥ A Q J
♦ A Q 10 3
♣ A Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♣ |
Pass |
5 NT |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Texas for spades
♠2
You don’t want to pass and hear partner run to one spade, which he might do with, for example, a 4-3-3-3 shape; so it seems right to bid either one diamond or one heart. I would start by bidding one diamond, and if the opponents doubled enthusiastically, I’d run to one heart.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ 9 5 4 3
♦ 7 5 4 2
♣ 10 9 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 20th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
If Little Timmy had just had more meatloaf, he might not have grown up to fill chest freezers with Cub Scout parts.
Anthony Bourdain
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 8 3 2
♥ A J 8 6
♦ A 7 2
♣ A K 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 7 6 5
♥ 4
♦ Q 8 3
♣ 9 3 2 |
♠ J 9
♥ Q 7 5
♦ 10 9 4
♣ Q J 10 5 4 |
| South |
♠ Q 4
♥ K 10 9 3 2
♦ K J 6 5
♣ 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ * |
Pass |
4 ♥ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Constructive
♠K
At matchpoints, you might consider playing hearts rather than diamonds. But at IMPs, you simply want to go plus by making your natural call: raise diamonds. If the opponents compete in a black suit, you can bid on to three diamonds, which will most likely end the auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 4
♥ K J 10 3 2
♦ K J 6 5
♣ 8 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ Comments Off on The Aces on Bridge: Wednesday, September 5th, 2018
We think so because other people all think so, Or because — or because — after all we do think so, Or because we were told so.
Henry Sidgwick
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 7 5
♥ J 3
♦ A K 7 6 5
♣ K 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 2
♥ 8 7 4
♦ Q 8 2
♣ 8 7 6 2 |
♠ 6 3
♥ A K Q 10 2
♦ 10 9 3
♣ A J 10 |
| South |
♠ A K J 9 4
♥ 9 6 5
♦ J 4
♣ Q 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥4
If North were an unpassed hand, his one-heart call would be forcing. You would bid one no-trump now, both to try to improve the strain and to avoid missing out on game. Facing a passed partner, I might pass one heart if the call guaranteed a five-card suit, but I’m not sure it does. I’d still bid one no-trump here, though less happily.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 5
♥ J 3
♦ A K 7 6 5
♣ K 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
Pass |
1 ♣ |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Zeus does not bring all men’s plans to fulfilment.
Homer
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 9 5
♥ K 10 4
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ 10 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ A K 10 8 6
♥ 8 3
♦ K 10 9 4
♣ Q 5 |
♠ Q 7 3
♥ 7 6 2
♦ 6 5 2
♣ J 9 6 3 |
| South |
♠ 4 2
♥ A Q J 9 5
♦ A 3
♣ A K 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
| Dbl. |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♠K
This is basically the same auction as in today’s deal; however, the take-out doubler is in direct seat, not balancing seat, so his call guarantees a better hand than in that auction. (A balancing double starts a king lower in protective seat than in direct seat.) So you should drive to game now; either cue-bid two spades or just jump to four hearts.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 9 5
♥ K 10 4
♦ Q J 8 7
♣ 10 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing.
Helen Keller
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ A 6 3
♥ A 10 9
♦ Q 9 4 3
♣ A Q 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 5
♥ J 8 7 6
♦ J 6
♣ K 10 6 2 |
♠ Q 9 7 4
♥ 5 4 2
♦ 10 8 7 5 2
♣ 7 |
| South |
♠ K 8 2
♥ K Q 3
♦ A K
♣ J 9 8 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠J
With a choice of majors, it seems logical to lead your better suit, since you need less from your partner this way. It is not as if the spade lead is exactly safe either. The other attraction of the heart lead is that your partner is slightly more likely to have hearts and not overcall than he is to have spades.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 4 2
♥ J 8 7
♦ A 10 8 4 2
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
| Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT |
| All pass |
|
|
|
September 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
|
Holding ♠ K-J-8-2, ♥ 7-6-3-2, ♦ J-9-2, ♣ A-9, I heard my partner open one club. I responded one heart, and my partner bid two no-trump. What is the best way to explore for a major-suit fit by showing my spades without promising five hearts?
Giving Me Fits, Rockford, Ill.
There are many ways, varying from simple to complex. The simplest is to play that all bids force to game, and either three clubs or the other minor as looking for three-card support or the other major. Some play transfers here, in which case you can transfer to hearts, then bid spades to show 5-4. Thus a direct transfer to spades to shows 4-4 in the majors.
I’ve been having problems with Blackwood when we have a minor suit as trump. What are your thoughts on using the Minorwood convention, where four of a known minor agrees that suit and asks for aces?
Anna in the Ark, Naples, Fla.
I can’t say I’m a huge fan (I vote for simple over complex), but I can say this: If you have set a minor as trump, I think it is much better to use one over the trump suit as ace-asking — Redwood, not Minorwood. This allows you to choose between temporizing by bidding the trump suit and taking control with an ace ask, whereas Minorwood forces you to take a positive action as opposed to making a neutral call.
I play rubber bridge with my friends and am sometimes surprised to see you recommend treatments relating to duplicate — pre-emptive raises and so forth. Given that we are playing for real money, would you suggest we learn this approach too? I’m not afraid to use these bids, but I’m not sure they will pay off in the long run.
Easy Street, Kennebunkport, Maine.
Speaking as someone who has taken his fair share of sacrifices at rubber bridge, yes, I would say that bidding as high as you can with a fit is a good idea. While sacrificing at rubber is not as much fun as at pairs, bidding to the maximum with a fit does not always result in minus scores.
|
Please comment on the quality of a suit required for a direct overcall at the one-level, and contrast that with what is required for a two-level overcall.
Mumblety-Peg, Nashville, Tenn.
With a good hand and a five-card suit, you should not be constrained in acting at the one-level just because your five-card suit is weak. Of course, on some hands that include a weak suit, you might prefer to double when you are relatively short in the opponents’ suit. With a two-level overcall, you guarantee a good suit. If you have only five, you must have extra values or extra sidesuit shape. A minimum opening bid with an average five-card suit emphatically does not qualify for this action.
I am not a fan of Flannery, but I came to understand how useful it can be when I opened one heart with ♠ K-9-7-4, ♥ Q-8-4-3-2, ♦ A-9, ♣ K-4, and heard my partner respond with a forcing no-trump. What is the least lie now?
Stuck Firm, Sioux Falls, S.D.
I prefer to play the no-trump as non-forcing, even when playing two-over-one. In that scenario, I can pass one no-trump happily enough. But if you change the heart queen into the ace, so that there is a risk we might miss game facing a balanced 11-count or so, then I invent a two-club call and hope to survive this round of the bidding.
|
September 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Let us consider the reason of the case. For nothing is not law that is not reason.
Sir John Powell
| N |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 7
♥ K Q J 4 3
♦ A 6
♣ A 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10
♥ 10 6 5 2
♦ J 10 8
♣ K Q 10 5 |
♠ Q 9 5
♥ 9 8 7
♦ K 5 4 3
♣ J 9 6 |
| South |
♠ 8 6 4 3 2
♥ A
♦ Q 9 7 2
♣ 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♦ |
Pass |
5 ♥ * |
Pass |
| 5 ♠ |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Asking for the spade queen
♣K
It looks straightforward to bid three no-trump here, but your partner might have a singleton spade, in which case slam in clubs might make while three no-trump goes down. Temporize with three diamonds and find out more about your partner’s hand.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 6 4 3 2
♥ A
♦ Q 9 7 2
♣ 8 7 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
War is God’s way of teaching Americans geography.
Ambrose Bierce
| W |
North |
| N-S |
♠ J 4 3
♥ A 9 6 4
♦ 9 8
♣ A 9 7 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 9 6 2
♥ —
♦ A K Q 7
♣ K J 4 3 |
♠ K 7 5
♥ 10 7 2
♦ 6 5 4 2
♣ 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A 8
♥ K Q J 8 5 3
♦ J 10 3
♣ Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♥ |
Dbl. |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦K
A simple raise to four hearts looks right here, given your weak spades, but a four-club call as a cue-bid agreeing one of partner’s suits is not unreasonable. If partner is interested in slam, he can always ask for aces.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 4 3
♥ A 9 6 4
♦ 9 8
♣ A 9 7 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
When we last gathered roses in the garden, I found my wits; but truly you lost yours.
John Ford
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q J 3
♥ 7 2
♦ J 6
♣ A Q J 9 5 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8
♥ K 6
♦ A K 10 9 5 4 3
♣ 6 4 |
♠ 10 9 5
♥ 10 9 8 3
♦ Q 8 2
♣ K 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A 7 6 4 2
♥ A Q J 5 4
♦ 7
♣ 10 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦K
One of the areas in which I may find myself at odds with my readers and other experts is that I believe, with hands like this, it is best to raise to two spades directly, not rebid clubs. Three trumps plus ruffing values constitutes enough support for my partner; and if we have a game, it rates to be in spades, not clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 3
♥ 7 2
♦ J 6
♣ A Q J 9 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
September 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
Was it a vision or a waking dream? Fled is that music: — Do I wake or sleep?
John Keats
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ K 10 8
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ —
♣ A K Q 6 4 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 6 5
♥ A 7 3
♦ J 10 9 4
♣ J 10 3 |
♠ 2
♥ Q 10 2
♦ A K Q 7 6 3 2
♣ 8 5 |
| South |
♠ Q J 9 7 4 3
♥ K 6 4
♦ 8 5
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 ♣ * |
3 ♦ |
| Pass |
4 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
*Precision style
♦J
This is a tricky bid. You have a minimum in terms of high cards, but a lot of tricks if your side has a club fit. I would gamble with an invitational call of three clubs, hoping partner can find another call if he has a maximum. (He could easily have up to 10 high-card points.) A bold call of three no-trump might also work!
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 8
♥ J 9 8 5
♦ —
♣ A K Q 6 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
After North’s Texas transfer response followed by Roman Key-card Blackwood, West knew to go passive on opening lead, so he put a trump on the table. Declarer counted 11 top tricks and saw that if trumps broke, he could arrange an elimination play. He would draw trumps, cash the hearts and play a diamond to the queen; if that lost, West would be endplayed.
South won the lead and drew a second round, realizing his hypothetical elimination play would now not work. So he drew the last trump and was about to go after diamonds when he realized that he might as well cash his hearts first. He took the three top hearts, then led a diamond to the queen.
West won his king but had no heart to lead. Since declarer was marked with the club queen, he could do no better than exit with the diamond jack, hoping his partner would produce the 10. But declarer could win his ace and throw a club on his good diamond 10: He ended up with six trumps, three hearts, two diamonds and a club to make his contract.
Notice that if declarer had failed to cash the hearts, the contract would have failed, since West would then have had a safe exit in hearts. As the play actually went, if West had had the fourth heart to lead after winning his diamond trick, declarer would ruff, then play the diamond ace and ruff a diamond. If the diamond jack had not fallen, he would have taken the club finesse as his last chance.