July 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The need for mystery is greater than the need for an answer.
Ken Kesey
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ Q 6
♥ A 8 5 4
♦ 10 6 4
♣ K 7 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 8 5 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ A 9 3 |
♠ 7
♥ 10 6
♦ Q J 9 5 3 2
♣ J 10 8 4 |
| South |
♠ A J 10 9 2
♥ Q 7 2
♦ A K 8
♣ Q 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
2 ♣ * |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*Majors
♠4
Although your heart honors are well placed, you can see that you have no real fit for partner’s suits, so no source of tricks. It looks logical here to bid two no-trump, the value of your hand, rather than jump to the no-trump game. If partner passes, I’d expect you to struggle to come to eight tricks.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 8 5 4 3
♥ K J 9 3
♦ 7
♣ A 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♦ |
1 ♥ |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Never wrestle with a pig. You’ll both get dirty, but the pig will like it.
Irish proverb
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ K Q J 10
♥ J 2
♦ 10 7 5 2
♣ Q 8 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 10 9 7
♦ Q J 8 4
♣ K 9 5 |
♠ 9 8 6 4
♥ 8 6 5 3
♦ 6
♣ J 10 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 5
♥ A K Q 4
♦ A K 9 3
♣ A 7 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 NT * |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 NT |
All pass |
|
|
*Pick a slam
♥10
Facing what you hope is a maximum pass, you should try to compete in a major suit. It looks sensible to try to make partner declarer to protect his tenaces, and you want to try to find a 4-4 major-suit fit. The easiest way here is to cue-bid two diamonds to get your partner to pick a major.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K Q J 10
♥ 10 7 5 2
♦ J 2
♣ Q 8 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
1 NT |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 24 Comments
Science has taught us how to put the atom to work. But to make it work for good instead of for evil lies in the domain dealing with the principles of human duty. We are now facing a problem more of ethics than physics.
Bernard Baruch
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A Q J |
| West |
East |
♠ 9
♥ A K Q J 7
♦ K J 6
♣ 9 6 4 3 |
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 9 6
♦ 10 5 4
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
| South |
♠ A Q J 8 5
♥ 10 8 4 2
♦ A Q
♣ K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥K
Your partner has a minimum take-out double, and you have a hand with no clear direction, but your trumps are too weak to consider defending. I’d bid two no-trump, which is not to play (though if partner forgets, you won’t mind too much!), but suggests partner bid a minor. You surely have longer diamonds than clubs, or you would bid three clubs yourself.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 4 3
♥ 5 3
♦ 9 8 7 3 2
♣ A Q J |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
The fundamental principles and indispensable postulates of every genuinely productive science are not based on pure logic but rather on the metaphysical hypothesis — which no rules of logic can refute — that there exists an outer world which is entirely independent of ourselves.
Max Planck
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 6 2
♥ Q 8 2
♦ Q 10 8 7 6 2
♣ J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 8 7 4 3
♥ A 6 5
♦ 5
♣ K 10 9 5 |
♠ J 5
♥ K 10 7 3
♦ A J 3
♣ Q 8 6 2 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 9
♥ J 9 4
♦ K 9 4
♣ A 4 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
While you might engineer a trump promotion by leading hearts, that’s likely to set up discards for declarer. It is simpler and more logical to lead the diamond jack to try to set up tricks or force declarer to trump. If in doubt, assume that when you have been dealt a sequence, you should lead it, hoping that your problem will come at trick two, not trick one.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 10 7 6 2
♥ 9 6
♦ J 10 4
♣ 10 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
July 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 7 Comments
|
I held ♠ K-9-4-3, ♥ 10-5-3, ♦ Q-10-4-2, ♣ J-4 and raised my partner’s opening bid of one spade to two. What is the right continuation over a call of three diamonds from my partner?
Phoenix Rising, Grenada, Miss.
My partnership style is to use new suits here as a game try. Typically, the call is based on length, with a holding of three or four cards to an honor, so your hand has two big plusses: one based on your decent long trumps, and the other your useful diamond holding, which rates to cover some of your partner’s losers. So I would bid game. By the way, with the club ace instead of the jack, I would raise to four diamonds or cuebid four clubs, in case partner has a slam try.
My partner suggested to me that we play fit jumps, which I am happy with. He also suggested that new suits in response to pre-empts be based on fit, not a single-suited hand. I’m not sure I buy into that. Do you?
Assister Sledge, Chicago, Ill.
I will say that as a passed hand (which has therefore almost denied a decent onesuiter), a new suit in response to a pre-empt ought to be lead-directing. By an unpassed hand, especially if your RHO has passed, I think a new suit should be natural and forcing.
I held: ♠ K-4, ♥ A-9-8-3-2, ♦ 9, ♣ A-Q-7-5-4 and opened one heart, then rebid two clubs over a one-spade response. Now I heard my partner rebid two no-trump, and I was not sure whether to bid or pass. If I did bid, what call would describe my hand best?
Flower Power, Atlanta, Ga.
I wouldn’t pass, but I believe that three clubs should show a minimum hand with 5-5 shape, a non-forcing call. So I would either raise to three no-trump or, if feeling scientific, I might experiment with a call of three diamonds, which I believe should be reserved for a forcing hand with 5-5 shape. A rebid of three hearts here shows a 6-4 pattern, and would also be forcing.
|
What is the right approach to playing the combination of four small cards facing A-J-9-x-x in dummy, assuming you have plenty of entries back and forth? I can see three sensible ways of playing the suit: starting with the ace, leading to the jack or leading to the nine. Which is the odds-on play?
Math Observation, Little Rock, Ark.
Cashing the ace loses to a void or singleton small card to your left. Low to the jack loses to a void or singleton honor to your left. Low to the nine and finessing a second time loses to the singleton 10 or K-Q doubleton on your left, but not to the 4-0 break, so it is the right play.
Do you prefer to play jump raises of partner’s opening bid or overcall as weak, mixed or invitational? Does it matter whether the opponents have bid (either to your left or right)? And is the vulnerability critical?
Razor Sharp, San Luis Obispo, Calif.
In non-competitive auctions, a raise to three seems best as a limit raise (though playing it as mixed is acceptable). I don’t like a pre-emptive raise with silent opponents. After partner opens and you hear a double or an overcall, I can understand having the raise as pre-emptive — as long as you have a way to show a mixed raise. If partner overcalls, using the raise as pre-emptive makes sense.
|
July 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
My strength is as the strength of ten Because my heart is pure.
Alfred, Lord Tennyson
| W |
North |
| None |
♠ 8 6 2
♥ 8 3
♦ J 10 8
♣ A K 4 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q
♥ J 10 6
♦ A K Q 9 7 6 4 3
♣ 10 |
♠ K J 9 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ 5
♣ Q J 8 6 5 |
| South |
♠ A 10 7 4 3
♥ A K Q 5 2
♦ 2
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
3 ♠ * |
Pass |
4 ♣** |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Solid minor suit
** Pass or correct to 4♦ with diamonds
♦K
If you were to bid three hearts now, it would be natural and non-forcing (this hand without the heart queen, perhaps). You have enough to go to game, with the options being to raise to three no-trump, to bid four hearts or temporize with three clubs (normally a three-card suit) to try to extract a three-heart call from your partner. I’d go for the last of these, with the jump to four hearts as my second choice.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 10 7 4 3
♥ A K Q 5 2
♦ 2
♣ 9 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday.
Don Marquis
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 10 7 6
♥ 8 5 3
♦ K 10 8 4
♣ J 9 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 5
♥ A J 10 7 4 2
♦ 5
♣ Q 8 6 3 |
♠ 3 2
♥ K Q 6
♦ A Q J 7
♣ 10 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 9 8 4
♥ 9
♦ 9 6 3 2
♣ A K 7 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦5
Although you have an opening bid of sorts, this feels like a hand on which to go low, not high. You have no fit for partner and no real stopper in the opponents’ suit, so I would counsel a call of one no-trump rather than looking higher in no-trump or advancing with a cuebid. This hand just doesn’t seem worthy of a real invitation to game.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 3 2
♥ K Q 6
♦ A Q J 7
♣ 10 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 13 Comments
Mathematics is not a careful march down a well-cleared highway, but a journey into a strange wilderness, where the explorers often get lost.
W. S. Anglin
| W |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K 10 6
♥ Q 6
♦ K 10 9 8 5 3
♣ 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 4
♥ K J 10 9 2
♦ A Q 4
♣ K 8 2 |
♠ 9 8 5 3 2
♥ 5 3
♦ J 6
♣ 9 7 5 4 |
| South |
♠ A Q J
♥ A 8 7 4
♦ 7 2
♣ A Q J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
Pass |
| 2 NT * |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*18-20
♥J
Today’s feature is more about judgment than system, but if we assume this hand is (barely) worth a slam try in diamonds, we must have methods to show a diamond one-suiter and still say safely low while using transfers to the major. I recommend using three spades as a transfer to three no-trump. Following that, bids in the minors show one-suited slam tries, and bids in the majors show both minors.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ K 10 6
♥ Q 6
♦ K 10 9 8 5 3
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
The price of wisdom is above rubies.
Job 28:18
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ 8 3
♥ A K Q 7
♦ 8 6 5 4
♣ 9 6 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A 10 7 4 2
♥ 9 2
♦ K 9
♣ J 8 4 3 |
♠ J 9 5
♥ J 10 4 3
♦ Q 10 2
♣ 10 7 2 |
| South |
♠ K Q 6
♥ 8 6 5
♦ A J 7 3
♣ A K Q |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠4
This hand appears to be a simple raise of diamonds, but is that call forcing or invitational? For simplicity’s sake, I suggest that after a reverse, responder’s raise of either of opener’s suits be played as forcing. This in turn means that weak hands must do something else. You can play two no-trump as artificial and weak, or you can play the cheaper of fourth suit and two no-trump as weak; both methods work.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 8 3
♥ A K Q 7
♦ 8 6 5 4
♣ 9 6 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
July 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
Zeus does not bring all men’s plans to fulfillment.
Homer
| W |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ 9 5
♦ A 10 9 4 3
♣ A K Q 8 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 6 3 2
♥ K J
♦ Q 8 7 6
♣ 10 7 5 2 |
♠ A 7 4
♥ A Q 10 7 6 4 2
♦ J
♣ 9 6 |
| South |
♠ K Q J 10 9 8
♥ 8 3
♦ K 5 2
♣ J 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
3 ♥ |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♣ |
Pass |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥K
Some problems can be boiled down to a simple question. Here, that question is: Do you trust your partner? You showed the minors, and partner expressed a strong preference for playing spades. Do you have any reason to overrule him, other than your singleton spade? I don’t think so. Pass and (silently) blame your partner if he is wrong.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 5
♥ 9 5
♦ A 10 9 4 3
♣ A K Q 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
Wandering into the bidding over a strong one-no-trump opener and not buying the contract can prove to be an expensive exuberance. Today, West’s reasonable decision to show the majors painted a picture for declarer.
Against three no-trump, West led the spade four, and South saw he could count on eight tricks — four in spades, one in hearts, two in diamonds and one in clubs.
Declarer noticed that the likeliest source of the ninth trick lay in hearts, but he also knew that, in view of the bidding, West was almost certain to have the king. Thus, simply leading a low heart to the queen was unlikely to pay dividends.
So at trick two, when dummy’s spade queen held, he played a low heart, hoping that East might hold at least one of the four top cards in the suit. When East followed with the six, South inserted the seven and West won with the nine. (Had East played the 10, South would have covered with the queen.)
Now West guessed well to get off lead with a diamond. Taking East’s nine with the ace, South continued with the heart queen. West played the king, which was allowed to hold, the 10 dropping from East.
West exited passively in spades, and South won and drove out the spade king. When West took his king and returned a spade, South took his spade winners and successfully finessed the heart eight. He cashed the heart ace and led a club to the queen and ace to bring home nine tricks.