September 2nd, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
|
If the opposition overcalls our side’s no-trump opening bid, what combination of takeout and penalty doubles would you advocate?
Wellington Boot, Orlando, Fla.
First of all, simplest is best. How about this agreement: If double is the first action from either side (other than one or more passes) after the no-trump call, then the double is takeout. As soon as your side makes a positive call, most doubles are penalty. If you transfer and then double any opposition intervention, that shows values rather than being a trump stack; most other doubles show trump length.
We were playing against strong opponents. My LHO opened four hearts, doubled by my partner to show cards. I had 12 points and six spades to the A-Q-J with a singleton heart. What would you suggest, knowing your partner is conservative by temperament?
John Stuart Mill, North Bay, Ontario
If you don’t simply jump to slam, a five-spade call here could just be a better hand than one that would bid four spades. Some might believe that bidding four no-trump (which is typically two-suited for the minors), followed by correcting partner’s response to five spades, shows a heart control. If so, the jump to five spades might be a slam try, typically with no heart control.
My question is about which card to lead on the second round of a suit. In this instance, my partner led a low card against three no-trump and found a singleton in dummy, while I had Q-10-5-4. Declarer captured my queen with his ace and lost a finesse to me. Should I now lead back the four or the 10?
Rube Goldberg, Holland, Mich.
Either play may be right, though some critical factors are which spot partner led (does he have four or five cards?) and whether you need to cash out to set the game. The 10 is probably only essential if you need to cash three tricks in the suit on the go. Regardless, there is no definitively right answer, but the four is the right count card if that is what is important to partner.
|
I find it very hard to know when, as first, second or third hand, I should play the higher from touching honors and when the lower. Also, when discarding, the same point applies. Is there a simple rule?
Follow my Leader, Albuquerque, N.M.
This is a potential minefield, as my answer will show. As third hand, you try to win the trick by following with the lower of touching honors; however, when dropping an honor under partner’s ace or king lead, you play the higher from touching honors. When declarer leads a suit and you are second to play with two touching honors, I suggest you play the lower one, but you should play the top from a sequence of three honors. As long as your partnership has an agreement — any agreement — it is better than nothing.
In one of your deals a month or two ago, the dealer held ♠ A-Q-6-2, ♥ K-5-4, ♦ A-10-5-3-2, ♣ 2, and opened one diamond. He then had a rebid problem over a game-forcing response of two clubs. How would you evaluate the possibilities — and would you do the same if opener’s diamond 10 were the queen?
Second Chances, Washington, D.C.
A rebid of two no-trump shows a balanced hand, not an unbalanced hand like this. It may contain a four-card major, but it denies as much shape as this. Since I don’t believe in rebidding a five-card diamond suit just to show I have one, I am happy to bid two spades with both hands. However, if you feel that call would systematically promise extras — then a two-diamond rebid, planning to raise spades or bid no-trump next, is also acceptable.
|
September 1st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
Virtue is the fount whence honor springs.
Christopher Marlowe
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ J 9 8
♥ A Q 10
♦ K 6 2
♣ A J 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 7 3 2
♥ 6 5 3 2
♦ 8 3
♣ Q 7 6 5 |
♠ 6 4
♥ K J 8
♦ J 10 7 5
♣ K 9 8 3 |
| South |
♠ A K Q 10 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ A Q 9 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♣ |
Pass |
| 2 ♦ |
Pass |
3 NT * |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
6 ♠ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
*15-17 balanced
♥2
Your concentrated honors mean that you have just enough to risk a call of two diamonds. This makes it harder for your opponents to get to clubs. If you have a seven-card fit in either spades or diamonds, it should play well enough.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K Q 10 5
♥ 9 7 4
♦ A Q 9 4
♣ 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
Pass |
Dbl. |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 31st, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
The worst day at the beach is better than the best day at work.
Unknown
| E |
North |
| E-W |
♠ 9 8 7 5 4
♥ 7
♦ 10 6 2
♣ K 10 9 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 3
♥ K 9 6 5 3
♦ 5
♣ Q 8 5 2 |
♠ A K Q 6 2
♥ Q J 4
♦ A 9
♣ J 7 6 |
| South |
♠ —
♥ A 10 8 2
♦ K Q J 8 7 4 3
♣ A 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| 3 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| All pass |
|
|
|
♦5
Are you happy jumping to four spades here? You should be, since the call is basically pre-emptive rather than a strong call. With a better hand, such as the spade ace instead of the four, one can use a jump to three no-trump to show a raise to four with some defense. I prefer that meaning for the call rather than having it show a balanced 13-15.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 9 8 7 5 4
♥ 7
♦ 10 6 2
♣ K 10 9 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 30th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
An expert is someone who knows more and more about less and less.
Anonymous
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ J 5 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ K Q 10 9 5
♣ 10 6 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 9 7
♥ J 10 9 4 3
♦ 7 4 3
♣ A J |
♠ 8 6 3 2
♥ 7
♦ A J 6
♣ 9 8 5 3 2 |
| South |
♠ A K 10
♥ K Q 8 5
♦ 8 2
♣ K Q 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♥J
Had East not bid, you might have produced a constructive heart raise if playing forcing no-trump (where weak raises go through one no-trump). That doesn’t apply in competition; the real choice now is whether to bid two hearts and compete again, or bid two diamonds first, then raise hearts to suggest invitational values. I prefer the latter approach, but if you took away the diamond 10, I’d go the other way.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 5 4
♥ A 6 2
♦ K Q 10 9 5
♣ 10 6 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 29th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Death never takes the wise man by surprise; he is always ready to go.
Jean de la Fontaine
| N |
North |
| Both |
♠ 5
♥ K Q J 3
♦ 6 4
♣ A J 6 5 4 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ Q 9 |
♠ K 6 4
♥ 8 7 6 2
♦ 7 2
♣ K 10 8 7 |
| South |
♠ A 8 7 3
♥ A 9 5
♦ A K J 10 9
♣ 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
Pass |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
Pass |
4 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♠Q
On this auction, calls in the minors should be natural, not an artificial relay. With forcing or even invitational values, you might have redoubled initially. In any event, with this hand I’d be tempted to repeat my spades — this is a suit that looks like it should be trump.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q J 10 9 2
♥ 10 4
♦ Q 8 5 3
♣ Q 9 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 28th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
The lesson here is that it is insufficient to protect ourselves with laws; we need to protect ourselves with mathematics.
Bruce Schneier
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ 9 7 4
♥ K Q 9 8 4 3
♦ A 10 4
♣ 3 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ 10
♦ 8 7 3 2
♣ A K 5 2 |
♠ K 8 3
♥ J 7 6 2
♦ Q 9
♣ J 10 7 6 |
| South |
♠ A Q 2
♥ A 5
♦ K J 6 5
♣ Q 9 8 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 NT |
Pass |
4 ♦ * |
Pass |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
*Texas transfer
♣K
It is tempting to move to two no-trump, hoping to find a better spot, with an outside chance of making game. I’d prefer to pass, even when vulnerable at teams. Unless partner has a seventh heart, or six solid hearts, game seems somewhat unlikely to make. Ensuring the plus score is an underrated art.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ J 10 6 5
♥ 10
♦ Q 8 7 2
♣ A K 5 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
1 ♥ |
Pass |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
2 ♥ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 27th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 12 Comments
Opinion is ultimately determined by the feelings, and not by the intellect.
Herbert Spencer
| E |
North |
| N-S |
♠ 10 9 6 2
♥ 4
♦ 8 3
♣ A J 10 7 5 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ J
♥ 9 8 6 5 2
♦ 10 6 5
♣ K 8 3 2 |
♠ Q 7 5 3
♥ 7
♦ K Q J 9 4
♣ Q 9 6 |
| South |
♠ A K 8 4
♥ A K Q J 10 3
♦ A 7 2
♣ — |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
Pass |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
3 ♣ |
Pass |
| 3 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| 5 ♥ |
Pass |
5 ♠ |
Pass |
| 6 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♦5
With no attractive side suit to lead from (since both diamond and heart leads could easily cost a trick), I’d reluctantly lead a club. Yes, the suit has been bid, but it has not really been shown yet. A fourth-highest club four is as likely as anything not to cost me, and partner won’t necessarily think I have shortness.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ J 2
♥ A Q 6 5 3
♦ Q 2
♣ 10 7 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
4 ♠ |
| All pass |
|
|
|
August 26th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 10 Comments
|
Holding ♠ J-2, ♥ 9-2, ♦ Q-5-3-2, ♣ A-Q-J-3-2, I assume you would pass in first chair. When you hear a weak two-heart call on your left, passed back to you, would you reopen, and if so, with what call?
F Troop, Great Falls, Mont.
Your spade holding is exceedingly unsuitable for a balancing double even though it’s a maximum for your initial pass. As a passed hand, you could bid three clubs, but I’d prefer a bid of two no-trump to show the minors rather than showing a balanced hand. Note that a balancing call of one no-trump over an opening bid would be 10-11 balanced.
A hand in a recent column confused me, though it did not affect the final outcome. After South opened one diamond and West overcalled one heart, why didn’t North make a negative double to best describe a hand with five spades and scattered values?
Skinny Marie, San Juan, Puerto Rico
The negative double tends to show exactly four spades rather than five or more. This is a useful distinction in competition. After a one-spade overcall, by contrast, a two-heart call shows five cards, but 10 or more HCP. So a negative double suggests five or more hearts and a minimum, or any hand with precisely four hearts and at least 7 HCP.
My understanding is that if declarer leads from the wrong hand and the opponents notice this, declarer must now lead the same suit from the correct hand. Is this so, and what happens if a defender commits the same infraction?
Thane of Cawdor, Houston, Texas
For declarer, the next player can accept that lead. Or declarer can be asked to lead from the correct hand, when he can lead anything he likes. When a defender offends, declarer can accept the lead; if he does not, he can either bar that lead, allowing the offender to retain the lead, or ask for the lead of this suit by the correct hand. Either way, the card originally played is picked up. Or you can make the card a penalty card, in which case the correct defender can lead anything.
|
When looking for slam and asking for aces, I’ve seen it stated that if no-trump has already been bid, then to avoid confusion one can use the Gerber convention. How exactly should this work, and when, if ever, do you advise playing Gerber?
Blackwoodsman, Olympia, Wash.
I’m happy with the idea that a jump to four clubs over a rebid of one or two no-trump should be played as Gerber, but only if clubs have not been bid. A call of four no-trump would then be quantitative and invitational. In such auctions, though, when clubs have been bid naturally, it is less easy to say whether delayed club jumps are Gerber or natural. Otherwise, you should play four clubs as natural or a cue-bid, not Gerber.
In a competitive auction, when you have opened or overcalled, say your partner cue-bids and the next hand doubles. What is the normal action to show the weakest possible hand? Does a pass show more interest than reverting to the trump suit at the level you have been forced to already?
Fish Fingers, Anchorage, Alaska
I’d emphasize that this is primarily a matter of partnership agreement. The simplest method is that reversion to the trump suit is the weakest possible action, with pass showing some extras, and redouble simply a good hand (maybe setting up a forcing auction). In cue-bidding auctions, redouble and pass can be used to show first- and second-round control, respectively, with other actions denying a control.
|
August 25th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
Who is the happy warrior! … Who, with a natural instinct to discern What knowledge can perform, is diligent to learn.
William Wordsworth
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A 8 6 5
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ J 8 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ 10 7 3 2
♥ 9 5
♦ J 10 9
♣ K 6 5 3 |
♠ 9 4
♥ 10 7 6 3
♦ Q 5 3 2
♣ 10 9 7 |
| South |
♠ K Q J
♥ A K Q J
♦ A K 8
♣ A Q 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♦J
Your partner’s double is take-out, more about high cards than extra shape, perhaps because he can always bid hearts or clubs naturally at his second turn. Your hand looks more like a rebid of one no-trump than a two-diamond call, though both bids are acceptable. With this hand, I’d say seven tricks in no-trump may be easier than eight in diamonds.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A 8 6 5
♥ 8 4 2
♦ 7 6 4
♣ J 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| Pass |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
| Pass |
1 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
August 24th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 8 Comments
Paranoia is infectious. It’s also an incredibly useful tool. If you can make people afraid enough, uncertain enough, they will simply stop moving.
C.L. Anderson
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A 8 7
♥ A J 10 9 4 3
♦ —
♣ K J 10 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K J 10 4 3
♥ 6
♦ A Q 7 4
♣ 8 7 3 |
♠ Q 9 6 5
♥ Q 8 7 5
♦ J 9 8
♣ 9 5 |
| South |
♠ 2
♥ K 2
♦ K 10 6 5 3 2
♣ A Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
6 ♣ |
All pass |
| |
|
|
|
♣7
An expert colleague of mine in discussing this sort of situation asked, “Would you rather rebid two clubs and show nine of your cards, or two diamonds and show six?” When put in those terms, the rebid of two clubs looks clear, and I would still make that call if the clubs were slightly weaker and the diamonds stronger.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 2
♥ K 2
♦ K 10 6 5 3 2
♣ A Q 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
|
The Principle of Fast Arrival in game-forcing auctions proposes that instead of exploring carefully, you jump to game (wasting at least a full round of bidding) to make your partner guess what to do when he has extras. This is not my favorite convention.
By contrast, here North’s jump to three no-trump shows about 15-17 with two or three spades. With less, or more, North would bid two no-trump. When South produces a quantitative four no-trump, North reveals his spade support, and West leads the heart two against six spades, to the queen and king. Back comes a trump to the eight; can you identify declarer’s best line now?
Instead of relying on the red suits to behave, South cashes the club ace, ruffs a club high in hand, gets to dummy with a trump and discovers they split. (If they didn’t, declarer would instead finesse hearts, then test diamonds, hoping, if they didn’t break, that the same hand was long in both spades and diamonds.)
When spades divide, South ruffs another club high, takes the diamond ace, then re-enters dummy with a diamond to ruff dummy’s last club. He goes back to dummy with the heart ace and draws trumps, discarding his losing heart.
In the two-card ending, dummy has the heart 10 and a diamond, while declarer has the diamond Q-9 in hand. Even if diamonds cannot be brought in, declarer has the additional chance (as here) that the hand with long diamonds also has the heart jack and is thus squeezed in the red suits.