June 19th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 2 Comments
Cowardice, as distinguished from panic, is almost always simply a lack of ability to suspend the functioning of the imagination.
Ernest Hemingway
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ A K 4 3
♥ A 7 4
♦ 10 4
♣ 7 5 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 7
♥ K J 8 5 3
♦ —
♣ A K Q 9 |
♠ 6 5 2
♥ 10 9 6
♦ Q J 9 8
♣ 10 6 4 |
| South |
♠ J 9
♥ Q 2
♦ A K 7 6 5 3 2
♣ J 8 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♦ |
Dbl. |
Rdbl. |
1 NT |
| 2 ♦ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
| 3 ♦ |
All pass |
|
|
♣K
There is no correct answer to the question of whether a new suit by advancer, the partner of the overcaller, should guarantee five cards, or of whether it should be forcing by an unpassed hand. I argue that it is better for constructive bidding to play it as “intended as forcing.” And even if it should be a five-card suit, what else can you do here but bid one spade?
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 4 3
♥ A 7 4
♦ 10 4
♣ 7 5 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 18th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
Now, it is true that the nature of society is to create, among its citizens, an illusion of safety; but it is also absolutely true that the safety is always necessarily an illusion. Artists are here to disturb the peace.
James Baldwin
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ K 5
♥ 8 7 4 3
♦ K 10 9 6 5
♣ 6 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ Q 10 8 4 3
♥ J 2
♦ 8 3
♣ K 10 7 4 |
♠ 9 7 6 2
♥ Q 10 9 6
♦ J 7 4 2
♣ J |
| South |
♠ A J
♥ A K 5
♦ A Q
♣ A Q 9 8 5 3 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♣ |
Pass |
2 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 ♣ |
Pass |
3 ♦ |
Pass |
| 3 NT |
All pass |
|
|
♠4
On an auction of this sort, your partner will not have club length, so he surely has a balanced 12-14, and there is no reason that anyone but declarer will have a long suit. Since your side has half the deck, you might look for a lead that gives away the least. All things considered, a top heart seems less likely to do damage than either black suit, so I would lead the heart jack.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ K 9 5
♥ J 10 4
♦ J 9 2
♣ Q 10 8 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
| 2 ♣ |
2 ♠ |
All pass |
|
June 17th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 1 Comment
|
I have come across the idea that an opening lead of a low card means that you would like that suit led back to you; while a high spot-card opening lead means that you would not like that suit led back to you. Do you agree with that guideline — and should it apply in suit contracts as well as no-trump?
Lorna Doone, Fort Walton Beach, Fla.
At suits, I think a strict fourth-highest or third-and-fifth approach is best. From four or five cards at no-trump, second-highest from a suit with no honors may make sense. In the mid-hand, shifting to a high card from a bad suit makes equally good sense. But remember to play only those spot cards you can afford! And try to avoid leading the middle card from three; lead either top or bottom of three small.
I was in fourth seat and heard my LHO open one diamond. My partner doubled, and I jumped to two spades with ♠ A-Q-3-2, ♥ K-5-3, ♦ J-10, ♣ J-9-4-2. Now my LHO bid three diamonds, and my partner bid four diamonds. What would you recommend?
Acrophobic, Ketchikan, Alaska.
The four-diamond call should show a diamond control with spade fit, and a slam-try. You have enough to bid four hearts now; but if your partner signs off in four spades, it isn’t clear to me that you have enough to bid on. Your trumps are good, but you do have only four.
When your partner bids one diamond and you hold ♠ 8-4, ♥ K-7-3-2, ♦ Q-6, ♣ A-Q-9-6-4, would you respond one heart or two clubs? What factors are at issue?
Sound Bites, Dallas, Texas
This is very close. I’d normally bid one heart to avoid missing the fit in a major. I think if two clubs is absolutely game-forcing, I’d bid one heart. With game-forcing values, I’d bid two clubs and then introduce hearts later. It is a good rule to bid your longest suit first when you plan to force to game.
|
I can’t find any consistency in the literature as to which suit the “transfer suit” is. Many refer to it as the suit the transferee bids, while some others say it is the suit transferred to. What is your opinion?
Champion the Wonder Horse, Boston, Mass.
I wish I had a firm opinion to offer you. My instinct is that when there is a response of two diamonds to one no-trump, hearts is the transfer suit. Therefore, a call of two diamonds is the suit named or called, and hearts is the transfer suit or suit shown or promised. I hope that helps!
My partner opened one club, and the next hand bid two diamonds. I was looking at ♠ J-9, ♥ A-Q-3-2, ♦ Q-5-3-2, ♣ K-10-4, and didn’t want to make a negative double for fear of hearing spade bids. If I jumped in no-trump, I was worried that spades might be a problem. What would you have done here? I chose to bid hearts, and this did not work well.
Lost in Space, Casper, Wyo.
A call of two no-trump is possible here, since your partner can explore below three no-trump if he is short in diamonds. Even if he makes a non-forcing three-club call, you might be able to bid on (with a call of three diamonds or three hearts, perhaps). A heart call shows five cards. Incidentally, a negative double with 9 or more HCP and one major plus support for partner’s minor may work out. And double may be the least lie when you have five spades but not enough to invite game, say 8-10.
|
June 16th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 3 Comments
What is the answer? … In that case, what is the question?
Gertrude Stein’s last words
| S |
North |
| None |
♠ Q 7 6 4
♥ K 7 3
♦ K 5
♣ Q 10 9 5 |
| West |
East |
♠ A J 3
♥ J 5
♦ A 8 6 2
♣ K J 8 4 |
♠ —
♥ Q 10 9 8 2
♦ Q J 9 7 4
♣ A 7 3 |
| South |
♠ K 10 9 8 5 2
♥ A 6 4
♦ 10 3
♣ 6 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| 3 ♥* |
Pass |
3 ♠ |
All pass |
*Feature
♣8
Your partner has suggested a good hand with short spades, or he could not back into an auction where he was unable to overcall at the one-level. He must surely also have club length.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 7 6 4
♥ K 7 3
♦ K 5
♣ Q 10 9 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 15th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 6 Comments
One of the greatest pains to human nature is the pain of a new idea.
Walter Bagehot
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A K 8 6 3 2
♥ K 8
♦ K Q
♣ K 7 4 |
| West |
East |
♠ 4
♥ 6 3 2
♦ 10 9 5 2
♣ Q 10 9 6 2 |
♠ Q J 10 5
♥ 7 5
♦ A J 6
♣ J 8 5 3 |
| South |
♠ 9 7
♥ A Q J 10 9 4
♦ 8 7 4 3
♣ A |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♥ |
Pass |
1 ♠ |
Pass |
| 2 ♥ |
Pass |
4 NT |
Pass |
| 5 ♠* |
Pass |
6 ♥ |
All pass |
*Two key-cards and the trump queen
♠4
It is tempting to force to game, but you don’t know which game you want to play. However, if you invite game in spades or no-trump, you are somewhat misrepresenting your assets. I suspect the least lie is to raise to two no-trump to show a balanced 18-count. This may lead to your missing a spade contract, but it still looks sensible enough. My second choice might be to invent a force to three clubs.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A K 8 6 3 2
♥ K 8
♦ K Q
♣ K 7 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
Pass |
1 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 14th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all — in which case, you fail by default.
J.K. Rowling
| S |
North |
| Both |
♠ Q 10
♥ 8 6
♦ K 9 7 6 2
♣ A 8 7 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 2
♥ K J 10 5 4
♦ Q 10 5
♣ J 9 3 |
♠ 8 7 6 4
♥ Q 9 7 3 2
♦ J 8 3
♣ Q |
| South |
♠ A J 9 5 3
♥ A
♦ A 4
♣ K 10 6 5 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
2 ♠ |
4 ♥ |
| 4 ♠ |
All pass |
|
|
♥J
It may be a little bit of a push, but you are just about worth a jump to three diamonds. You have high offense, and it is easy to imagine coming to nine tricks in no-trump or 11 in a minor if partner has any extras in shape or high cards. Make the diamond king the queen, and two diamonds would certainly be enough.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ Q 10
♥ 8 6
♦ K 9 7 6 2
♣ A 8 7 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♥ |
Dbl. |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 13th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 15 Comments
Fortunate people seldom mend their ways, for when good luck crowns their misdeeds with success, they think it is because they are right.
François de la Rochefoucauld
| S |
North |
| E-W |
♠ K Q 7
♥ 8 6 3
♦ A K 5 3
♣ K J 7 |
| West |
East |
♠ J 9 8 5 2
♥ 10 9
♦ J 9 8 4
♣ 8 3 |
♠ 10
♥ Q J 7 5 4
♦ 10 2
♣ 9 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
♠ A 6 4 3
♥ A K 2
♦ Q 7 6
♣ A Q 10 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| 2 NT |
Pass |
6 NT |
All pass |
♥10
You are going to have to guess whether to play part-score or game — and which game to head for. My instincts tell me hearts must play better than no-trump, so I would transfer to hearts and play game, either using a Texas transfer or transferring and raising to game, depending on what methods are available.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ 10
♥ Q J 7 5 4
♦ 10 2
♣ 9 6 5 4 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
Pass |
2 NT |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 12th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 9 Comments
To do a great and important work, two things are necessary: a definite plan, and not quite enough time.
Anonymous
| S |
North |
| N-S |
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ K 9 3
♣ 9 3 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ —
♥ K Q J 9 2
♦ 7 6 2
♣ Q 10 7 6 4 |
♠ 10 8 7 2
♥ 10 8 7 4
♦ 10 5 4
♣ J 8 |
| South |
♠ K J 6 5 3
♥ 3
♦ A Q J 8
♣ A K 5 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♠ |
2 ♠ |
3 ♥* |
Pass |
| 4 NT |
Pass |
5 ♠** |
Pass |
| 5 NT |
Pass |
6 ♦ |
Pass |
| 7 ♦ |
Pass |
7 ♠ |
All pass |
*Limit raise or better in spades
**Two key-cards and the trump queen
♥K
There is a simple choice between bidding one spade and one no-trump here. In favor of bidding the four-card major is that you might miss the fit if you don’t. Against it is that when partner responds one diamond, he probably does not have a major suit unless he has enough values to bid again over one no-trump. I would prefer to have real clubs before introducing spades in this auction.
BID WITH THE ACES
♠ A Q 9 4
♥ A 6 5
♦ K 9 3
♣ 9 3 2 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| 1 ♣ |
Pass |
1 ♦ |
Pass |
| ? |
|
|
|
June 11th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 4 Comments
You touch on a disheartening truth. People never want to be told anything they do not believe already.
James Branch Cabell
| E |
North |
| None |
♠ 6 4 2
♥ K 8 7
♦ K J 6
♣ 8 6 5 2 |
| West |
East |
♠ K 9 8 5 3
♥ 3 2
♦ 10 9 8 3
♣ 10 9 |
♠ Q J 10
♥ Q 6 4
♦ A Q 7 5
♣ Q 7 3 |
| South |
♠ A 7
♥ A J 10 9 5
♦ 4 2
♣ A K J 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
|
|
1 ♦ |
| 1 ♥ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♥ |
Dbl. |
| 4 ♥ |
All pass |
|
|
♦10
Partner did not double the two-spade cue-bid, so there is an argument that he is not loaded for bear in spades. I would lead a heart, since dummy surely doesn’t have length there, or he might have bid two hearts rather than two spades, and declarer didn’t make a negative double. Thus, you have a decent chance to find your partner with heart length or an honor.
LEAD WITH THE ACES
♠ 3
♥ A J 7 6 4
♦ 9 8 3
♣ J 10 6 4 |
| South |
West |
North |
East |
| |
1 ♣ |
1 ♠ |
2 ♦ |
| Pass |
2 ♠ |
Pass |
2 NT |
| Pass |
3 NT |
All pass |
|
June 10th, 2018 ~ Bobby Wolff ~ 5 Comments
|
In duplicate bridge, when should third hand (the partner of the opening leader) break the rule of third hand high? Is there a simple set of guidelines to follow?
Gasoline Alley, Grand Forks, N.D.
You must try to avoid finessing against partner unnecessarily, so when dummy has nothing, third hand must almost always play high to keep declarer from scoring a cheap trick. But say, for example, in a suit contract, dummy has J-7-2 in the suit partner leads and you have K-9-3 or Q-9-3. When dummy plays a small card, you should surely follow with the nine (which is the right play whenever partner has the 10). Of course, if your holding were Q-10-2 or K-10-2, you’d insert the 10 without needing to think about it.
I was dealt ♠ K-10-9-7-2 , ♥ K-J-5-3, ♦ A-8, ♣ 9-4, and my partner opened one diamond, which was doubled on my right. I redoubled to show 10 HCP, thinking that I could bid my suits later on, but my LHO jumped to three clubs, meaning it as pre-emptive. I could still bid my spades, but we never got hearts into play. What are your thoughts on our bidding?
Quick Fix, Syracuse, N.Y.
It is a good rule to bid out a one-suiter after a double, regardless of strength. Only redouble when you can handle all likely actions by your LHO in response to the double. Having said that, I do have sympathy with redoubling here, since the opponents tend to bid the majors after this start.
In a suit contract, what factors should I consider when faced with the choice of leading the top of a small doubleton or leading from four to an honor?
Just the Fax, Bay City, Mich.
I tend to be slightly more in favor than most of leading from the doubleton here, regardless of my trump holding, if I think passive defense is called for. Four to an unsupported honor is less appealing, but give me a suit headed by a two-card sequence, and I tend to go for that instead. Of course, a ruff may be counter-effective if I surrender a trump trick, or trump control, in the process.
|
I was in third seat when my partner opened one heart. The next hand bid two hearts to show spades and a minor, and I had ♠ K-5-4, ♥ A-K-10-9-2, ♦ 8-5, ♣ 10-8-3. What were my bidding options?
Rocking Rooster, Phoenix, Ariz.
The logic here is that a bid of three hearts is competitive, not a limit raise. This means that you have to use the cue-bid of two spades to show a good hand with hearts. Double by you shows a good hand, typically without real fit, but that wouldn’t be suitable in this case. The real issue is whether you will stay out of game if partner signs off over your cue-bid. I’m on the fence!
My partner explained to me that all jump bids by opener at his second turn are forcing to game. If the bid is a jump-shift, then I can understand it being forcing to game; but if the jump is in a bid suit, I don’t believe that rule applies. Do you? Also, is the jump shift in a new suit forcing for one round or game forcing?
Truly Scrumptious, Shreveport, La.
A jump-shift shows a game force. But as opener, it is important to distinguish such a thing from jump rebids either in your own suit or in support of partner’s suit, neither of which is forcing. Once responder has shown limit-plus values, perhaps by something like a two-level response, these auctions do become forcing. One further caveat: In response to a negative double, jumps in a new suit show extras, but are not forcing. A cue-bid sets up the game force.
|
|
West should double one diamond rather than overcall one heart, despite his five-card major. North has more than enough to redouble, after which East should pass if he plays that as neutral, or (as here) bid one no-trump if a pass would be played as for penalties.
South can now raise a red flag by bidding two diamonds, suggesting extra length and a minimum hand. Over West’s sporting two-heart call, North’s values look suitable for offense, so he can compete to three diamonds. Even if he passes, South would surely bid on to three diamonds by virtue of his seven-card suit. East may expect to defeat the contract, but it would be unwise to double here since the location of the diamond 10 may be critical to the defense.
West leads and continues clubs, not wanting to open up either major. Declarer ruffs the third round and plays the trump ace, discovering the bad news. It seems at first sight that he must lose three more tricks, but careful timing enables him to force East to trump a loser.
South cashes both top diamonds, enters dummy with the spade king, and ruffs the fourth club as East discards a spade. Then he takes the spade ace and ruffs a spade in hand. He leads a heart to the ace and plays the last spade, retaining two diamonds and a heart in his hand. If East ruffs, declarer discards his losing heart; if not, declarer ruffs and concedes the last two tricks.
Should East ruff a club or spade loser earlier in the hand, the heart loser can be discarded in the same way.